The Journal of Experimental Medicine
ELISpot, FluoroSpot and ELISA kits from Mabtech
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online
doi:10.1084/jem.2059iti2
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 205, No. 9, 1944-
The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1007 $30.00
© Bashyam
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1060K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bashyam, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bashyam, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

IN THIS ISSUE

Ticks' evasion cocktail


Figure 1
Ticks secrete several different evasins, each of which blocks a different chemokine.

On page 2019, Déruaz et al. find that ticks might prefer to take on immune cells one at a time rather than brave the whole lot at once.

Some worms and viruses fend off immune cells by neutralizing the chemokines that attract them. These species make one chemokine-blocking protein that covers all the bases. But ticks don't use this one-for-all strategy, the authors now find. Instead, they made at least three single-chemokine blockers, which probably prevent host immune cells from swarming into the bite site and clogging up the ticks' food pipeline. These anti-chemokines, called evasins, each had a unique shape that might contribute to their selectivity.

Ticks might have evolved this selectivity to counter the host's step-wise immune response to the Lyme disease parasite they carry. In parasite-infected hosts, neutrophils usually arrive first to the bite site, followed by eosinophils and monocytes, and finally other immune cells. Tick saliva has different anti-chemokine activity at different times during feeding, suggesting that having several evasins might somehow better counter this staggered cell influx. Viruses, on the other hand, do not have the luxury of combating one cell type at a time and might therefore depend on a single multi-purpose protein.



Hema Bashyam

hbashyam{at}rockefeller.edu



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1060K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bashyam, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bashyam, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS