The Journal of Experimental Medicine
VeriKine-HS Human IFN-Beta
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 20 June 2005. doi:10.1084/jem20112iti3
Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1007 $8.00
JEM, Volume 201, Number 12, 1867-1867
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 792K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, H. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

IN THIS ISSUE

Indecisive interleukin-4?
A study on page 1899 may explain the seemingly fickle ways of the cytokine interleukin (IL)-4. Yao and colleagues show how this quintessential T helper (Th) 2 cytokine can sometimes promote the opposite Th1 response.


The prototypic Th2 cytokine IL-4 inhibits IL-10 production by DCs, thereby increasing the production of the Th1-promoting cytokine IL-12.

IL-4 is known as the key cytokine for polarizing naive T cells toward a Th2 phenotype, which is important for antibody production and protection against parasitic infections. Under some conditions, however, IL-4 has been shown to instead induce a Th1 response. Indeed, a recent study showed that mice treated with IL-4 during initial infection with Leishmania major had increased Th1 responses and were protected. If given later, IL-4 increased Th2 responses and exacerbated disease.

Yao et al. now suggest that the regulation of another cytokine—IL-10—may explain these perplexing observations. They show that dendritic cells (DCs) stimulated in the presence of IL-4 made less IL-10 than those stimulated without IL-4. As a result, the IL-4–treated DCs produced more of the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12—known to be inhibited by IL-10—and polarized naive T cells toward a Th1 phenotype more effectively. IL-10 was critical for the increased Th1 response, as IL-4 did not increase IL-12 production or T cell polarization by IL-10–deficient DCs.

IL-4 had the opposite effect on B cells, provoking increased IL-10 production. The authors suggest that the differential effect of IL-4 at different times during infection may reflect a switch from DCs to B cells as the predominant cell type that is presenting antigen.{JEMiti_end}



Heather L. Van Epps

hvanepps{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Interleukin (IL)-4 inhibits IL-10 to promote IL-12 production by dendritic cells
Yongxue Yao, Wei Li, Mark H. Kaplan, and Cheong-Hee Chang
J. Exp. Med. 2005 201: 1899-1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 792K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Epps, H. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS