Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 14K) Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JEM Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Correction

Centurion-Lara et al. Vol. 189, No. 4, February 15, 1999. Pages 647–656.

The authors regret that while revising their original submission to conform to the terminology that had recently been published for the T. pallidum genome they neglected to make two changes. The incorrect data appear on p. 649, left column, lines 9–12, and in the labeling of the lanes in Fig. 3. The corrected text appears below.

[p. 649] In careful experiments using limited dilutions of Nichols strain DNA, we showed that the efficiency of the primer sets was the following: tpr B, J > F, E, H > G, C/D, A, K, I > L.

[Fig. 3] G, F, E, C/D, B, A, L, K, J, I, H, +

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 14K) Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JEM Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?