|
||
ARTICLE |
CORRESPONDENCE Habib Zaghouani: zaghouanih{at}health.missouri.edu
|
|
|---|
1 (IL-13R
1), which heterodimerizes with IL-4R
. During secondary antigen challenge, Th2-produced IL-4 triggers the apoptosis of Th1 cells via IL-4R
/IL-13R
1, thus explaining the Th2 bias in neonates. We show that neonates acquire the ability to overcome the Th2 bias and generate Th1 responses starting 6 d after birth. This transition was caused by the developmental maturation of CD8
+CD4– dendritic cells (DCs), which were minimal in number during the first few days of birth and produced low levels of IL-12. This lack of IL-12 sustained the expression of IL-13R
1 on Th1 cells. By day 6 after birth, however, a significant number of CD8
+CD4– DCs accumulated in the spleen and produced IL-12, which triggered the down-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression on Th1 cells, thus protecting them against IL-4–driven apoptosis. Secondary exposure to antigen (Ag) in neonates usually leads to a lack of Th1 cells and a bias toward Th2 immunity (1–4). This unbalanced response may explain the susceptibility of neonates to microbial infections and allergic reactions (5). Strategies aimed at balancing neonatal Th1 and Th2 responses may thus facilitate the development of effective vaccines against infections (6) and treatments for allergies (7). Recently, we and others have discovered that both Th1 and Th2 cells develop during the primary response to Ag in neonates (8, 9). However, a second encounter with Ag gives rise to a strong Th2 response and a weak Th1 response.
Using OVA-specific TCR transgenic (Tg) DO11.10 T cells (10), we developed a neonate-to-neonate transfer system that allows us to track the fate of primary Th1 cells upon exposure to Ag (11). In this system, neonatal splenic T cells from 1-d-old DO11.10/scid mice are transferred into newborn (1-d-old) BALB/c mice, which are then challenged with Ag i.p. 2 wk later, primary T cell responses are evaluated in the spleen. Secondary responses are examined in this model by rechallenging the mice with Ag in CFA at 7 wk of age and analyzing T cell responses 10 d later. Using this model, we have shown that the lack of secondary Th1 responses stems from the apoptosis of Th1 cells driven by IL-4 produced by their Th2 counterparts (9). In this system, IL-4 does not signal through the conventional type I IL-4 receptor (IL-4R
/
c) on Th1 cells (12). Rather, primary exposure to Ag induces the up-regulation of the IL-13R
1 chain, which associates with IL-4R
, giving rise to an IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor, or type II receptor, through which both IL-4 and IL-13 can signal (13, 14). During in vitro recall or in vivo rechallenge with Ag, IL-4 from the Th2 cells utilizes the IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor to drive apoptosis of Th1 cells, thus biasing the secondary immune response toward Th2 cells (9).
In this study, we investigated the mechanism underlying the up-regulation of IL-13R
1 in neonatal Th1 cells. Our data indicate that the delayed developmental maturation of a subset of DCs leads to a shortage in IL-12 production, allowing for up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression and its association with the IL-4R
chain. Indeed, we show that the CD8
+CD4– DCs accumulate to a significant level by day 6 after birth, a time point at which expression of IL-13R
1 decreases, leading to diminished Th1 cell apoptosis and the restoration of IFN-
production by Th1 cells upon secondary Ag challenge. Neutralization of endogenous IL-12 on day 6 restored IL-13R
1 expression and apoptosis of neonatal Th1 cells, thus inhibiting secondary IFN-
responses, and supplying exogenous IL-12 during exposure to Ag at birth decreased IL-13R
1 expression and inhibited apoptosis of primary Th1 cells, allowing the generation of secondary Th1 responses. Consistent with this, the transfer of wild-type adult DCs into newborn mice that had previously received neonatal DO11.10 T cells inhibited the expression of IL-13R
1, leading to the survival of primary Th1 cells and the production of IFN-
during secondary Ag challenge. In contrast, the transfer of IL-12–deficient DCs led to sustained IL-13R
1 expression, Th1 cell apoptosis, and, thus, a lack of IFN-
production during the secondary response. Finally, transfer of IL-12+/+, but not IL-12–deficient, adult CD8
+CD4– DCs also inhibited IL-13R
1 expression and Th1 cell apoptosis, and restored secondary IFN-
production by Th1 cells. The effect of transferring IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DCs was reversed if IL-12 was neutralized at the time of Ag exposure.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and the development of neonatal Th1 immunity
receptors (Fc
Rs) (16). As indicated in Fig. 1, neonatal DO11.10 T cells transferred to 1-d-old BALB/c mice and exposed to Ig-OVA do not produce IFN-
upon rechallenge with OVA peptide in CFA at adult stage (Fig. 1 A). When the transfer used 8-wk-old adult instead of neonatal T cells, secondary IFN-
responses developed. The lack of a secondary IFN-
response is because of the fact that neonatal Th1 cells undergo apoptosis upon reencounter with OVA peptide, as indicated by the substantial Annexin V staining relative to adult T cells (Fig. 1 B). However, if neonatal exposure to Ig-OVA occurs around day 6 after birth, the cells acquire the ability to develop secondary IFN-
responses both in the spleen and lymph node upon rechallenge with OVA/CFA at the age of 7 wk (Fig. 1, C and D). Overall, neonates acquire the ability to develop Th1 secondary responses when the initial exposure to Ag occurs on or beyond day 6 after birth.
|
1 on Th1 cells and that such a chain associates with IL-4R
to form an IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor (9) through which both IL-4 and IL-13 can signal (13, 14). Also, neonatal exposure to Ig-OVA induces both Th1 and Th2 cells in the primary response, and upon rechallenge with OVA peptide the Th2 cells produce IL-4 that uses the IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor on Th1 cells to signal for their death (9). Because restoration of secondary IFN-
responses could occur when the primary exposure to Ig-OVA takes place around day 6 after birth, we sought to test whether at that point in time exposure to Ig-OVA no longer sustains up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression. Accordingly, 1-d-old BALB/c mice that had received neonatal DO11.10 T cells were given Ig-OVA on day 1, 2, 4, 6, or 10 after T cell transfer, and 2 wk later their splenic Th1 cells were isolated on the basis of IFN-
secretion and tested for IL-13R
1 mRNA expression. As shown in Fig. 2 A, IL-13R
1 mRNA was up-regulated when exposure to Ig-OVA took place on day 1, 2, or 4 after birth. However, a significant decrease occurred when the Ig-OVA was given on day 6 or 10 after birth. Densitometry analysis indicated that IL-13R
1 mRNA went down from 260% of GADPH mRNA on day 2 to 10% on days 6 and 10, indicating an inability of the Th1 cells to up-regulate IL-13R
1 mRNA (Fig. 2 B). The decrease in IL-13R
1 mRNA on day 6 after birth translates into reduction of cell-surface IL-13R
1 protein. Indeed, IL-13R
1 protein expression went down by 50% (from 91 to 41%) when exposure to Ag was performed on day 6 instead of day 1 after birth (Fig. 2 C). Furthermore, Western blot analysis of Th1 T cell lysates indicated similar results, as Il-13R
1 decreased by half upon Ag exposure on day 6 instead of day 1 after birth (Fig. 2 D). The control 1C5 CTLL-2 cells transfected with the IL-13R
1 gene (17) expressed IL-13R
1 protein, whereas the untransfected wild-type CTLL cells did not, indicating that the rabbit anti–IL-13R
1 antiserum is specific for IL-13R
1 protein. Overall, IL-13R
1 mRNA and protein expression decreased significantly when exposure to Ag was made on day 6 after birth.
|
1 mRNA expression from these Th1 cells during neonatal exposure to Ig-OVA was superimposed upon IFN-
production in the secondary response, an inverse correlation between IL-13R
1 mRNA and the secondary IFN-
response was observed (Fig. 2 C). Indeed, when neonatal exposure to Ig-OVA was performed on day 6, the mice began to develop secondary IFN-
responses when challenged with OVA peptide 2 mo later. Such IFN-
responses were even higher when the neonatal exposure to Ig-OVA took place on day 10 after birth. Overall, day 6 represents a time point at which exposure to Ag no longer up-regulates IL-13R
1, leading to the survival of IFN-
–producing cells and the development of neonatal Th1 immunity.
Exogenous IL-12 given during exposure to Ag on the day of birth reduces up-regulation of IL-13R
1 on primary neonatal Th1 cells and restores IFN-
secondary responses
Previously, it has been shown that neonates demonstrate a poor ability to produce IL-12 (18), which justifies the lack of neonatal Th1 immunity because IL-12 is a key differentiation factor for Th1 cells. However, the primary response does indeed raise Th1 cells (8, 9), suggesting that the lack of neonatal secondary Th1 immunity is not due solely to defective differentiation. Given that IL-12 was shown to restore neonatal secondary splenic Th1 responses (4, 11), we thought that it may accomplish this effect by interfering with the up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression. To test this premise, newborn BALB/c mice were given neonatal DO11.10 T cells and were administered Ig-OVA together with rIL-12. 7 wk later, the animals were challenged with OVA peptide in CFA and their splenic secondary responses were analyzed. As seen in Fig. 3 A, the mice given IL-12 developed IFN-
responses, whereas control animals not given IL-12 had no measurable IFN-
responses. In line with these results is the observation that the apoptosis of Th1 cells from IL-12–recipient mice was significantly reduced relative to control animals not given IL-12 (Fig. 3 B). When the animals were evaluated for IL-13R
1 expression 2 wk after exposure to Ig-OVA/IL-12 but before any rechallenge with OVA/CFA, the primary Th1 cells had significantly reduced IL-13R
1 mRNA relative to mice given Ig-OVA but no IL-12, as measured by spot blot (Fig. 3 C) and real-time PCR (Fig. 3 D). Again, when the cells were analyzed for IL-13R
1 protein, the supply of exogenous IL-12 together with Ig-OVA reduced IL-13R
1 protein expression from 84 to 41% when compared with cells from mice that did not receive IL-12. (Fig. 3, E and F). Overall, exogenous IL-12 was capable of down-regulating IL-13R
1 on primary Th1 cells, which inhibited their apoptosis during rechallenge with OVA peptide and restored the secondary IFN-
responses.
|
1 and sustains the survival of IFN-
–producing T cells
1 expression and rescue neonatal primary Th1 cells similar to Ag exposure on day 6, we postulated that the newborn acquires the ability to produce significant IL-12 on day 6, which results in IL-13R
1 down-regulation and rescue of Th1 immunity. To test this premise, mice were given Ig-OVA and anti–IL-12 antibody on day 6 after birth, challenged with OVA peptide in CFA 2 mo later, and tested for IFN-
production as well as Th1 apoptosis. Fig. 4 A shows that neutralization of IL-12 during exposure to Ig-OVA on day 6 reduces IFN-
production to minimal levels comparable to those observed with day 1 exposure to Ag, whereas rat IgG–injected mice sustain significant IFN-
responses. Also, apoptosis of Th1 cells was more substantial in the mice given anti–IL-12 antibody versus recipients of rat IgG (Fig. 4 B). These results indicate that the restoration of secondary Th1 responses upon delay of Ag exposure to day 6 after birth operates through the production of endogenous IL-12. Interestingly, IL-13R
1 mRNA expression analyzed 2 wk after day 6 Ag exposure was significantly up-regulated in the mice given anti–IL-12 antibody versus those recipients of rat IgG instead (Fig. 4, C and D). Similar results were observed when the cells were analyzed for IL-13R
1 protein expression (Fig. 4, E and F). Indeed, neutralization of IL-12 with ant–IL-12 antibody during day 6 exposure to Ig-OVA reduced IL-13R
1 protein expression from 72 to 43% relative to cells from mice that received the control rat IgG instead of anti–IL-12 antibody. Overall, the findings suggest that the newborn mice acquire the ability to produce significant IL-12 by day 6 after birth that is sufficient for down-regulation of IL-13R
1, survival of Th1 cells, and restoration of secondary IFN-
responses.
|
1 up-regulation on primary neonatal Th1 cells and restores secondary IFN-
responses
responses. As can be seen in Fig. 5, binding of Annexin V to neonatal Th1 DO11.10 T cells decreased from 87% in the mice that did not receive DCs (Nil) to 12% in those that received DCs from IL-12–sufficient (IL-12+/+) mice (IL-12+/+ DCs; Fig. 5, A and B). Transfer of DCs from IL-12–deficient (IL-12–/–) (20) instead of IL-12+/+ mice did not reduce Th1 cell death, as binding of Annexin V was observed on 86% of the Th1 cells in comparison to 87% in the mice with no DC transfer (compare Fig. 5 C with Fig. 5 A). The primary Th1 cells from the IL-12+/+ DC–enriched mice had reduced expression of IL-13R
1 mRNA relative to T cells of mice that were transferred with IL-12–/– DCs or animals that did not receive DC transfer (Fig. 5 D). Furthermore, when the mice were challenged with OVA/CFA at 7 wk of age, those recipients of IL-12+/+ DCs developed secondary IFN-
responses, whereas animals that were not given DCs or received IL-12–/– DCs had minimal IFN-
responses (Fig. 5 E). The conclusion to be drawn from these experiments is that enrichment with IL-12+/+ DCs is similar to treatment with exogenous IL-12, which reduces IL-13R
1 expression by Th1 cells, leading to the inhibition of apoptosis and restoration of secondary IFN-
responses.
|
+CD4– subset of DCs in the neonates leads to minimal IL-12 production, significant up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression, death of primary Th1 cells, and lack of secondary IFN-
responses
1 expression, inhibit apoptosis of primary Th1 cells, and restore secondary IFN-
responses, we sought to determine whether delayed developmental accumulation of a specific subset of DCs is responsible for the up-regulation of IL-13R
1 by virtue of minimal IL-12 production leading to the death of primary Th1 cells and a lack of secondary IFN-
responses. The splenic CD11c+ DCs comprise both CD8
+ and CD8
– DCs (21). Also, some of the CD8
– DCs can express CD4, and as such are further divided into CD8
–CD4+ and CD8
–CD4– DCs. Initially, we determined the kinetics of accumulation of various subsets of DCs in the splenic neonate between the day of birth and day 10 of age. As indicated in Fig. 6, most splenic CD11c+ DCs were negative for CD8
and CD4. However, by day 4 the number of CD8
–CD4+ DCs rose to 11.2% among the total CD11c+ DCs, whereas CD8
+CD4– DCs made up 3.3% of total CD11c+ cells. By day 6, both subsets reached a number that was more or less similar to days 8 and 10, which ranged between 13 and 16% for CD8
–CD4+ and between 3.8 and 4.3% for CD8
+CD4– DCs (Fig. 6). These numbers are much lower than those observed in adult mice (40.4% for CD8
–CD4+ and 16% for CD8
+CD4– DCs), indicating that developmental accumulation is not complete by day 10. In fact, CD8
+CD4+ DCs, which make up a very small fraction of total adult CD11c+ DCs, remain insignificant at day 10 of age. Because day 6 was a turning point for the development of Th1 secondary immunity and the CD8
–CD4+ and CD8
+CD4– DC subsets have undergone a significant increase in number between birth and day 6, we tested both populations for reduction of IL-13R
1 up-regulation, inhibition of apoptosis of Th1 cells, and restoration of secondary IFN-
responses. Accordingly, newborn BALB/c mice were transferred with 1-d-old DO11.10 T cells with the CD8
–CD4+ or CD8
+CD4– adult DC subset from either IL-12+/+ or IL-12–/– mice and were exposed to Ig-OVA. 2 wk later, Th1 cells were isolated and IL-13R
1 mRNA expression on primary neonatal Th1 cells was evaluated by spot blot. Fig. 7 A shows that up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression occurred when the mice received no DC transfer or transfer with IL-12+/+ CD8
–CD4+ DCs. However, up-regulation of IL-13R
1 expression was minimal when the animals were transferred with IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DCs (Fig. 7 A). Transfer of IL-12–/– CD8
+CD4– DCs did not reduce IL-13R
1 mRNA expression on Th1 cells (Fig. 7 A). Moreover, apoptosis of Th1 cells was reduced significantly with the transfer of IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DCs relative to IL-12+/+ CD8
–CD4+ or no DC transfer (Fig. 7, C–E). Indeed, 83 and 87% of primary Th1 cells bind Annexin V when the transfer used no DCs or IL-12+/+ CD8
–CD4+ DCs, respectively (Fig. 7, C and D). Only 45% of primary Th1 cells bound Annexin V when the transfer was made with IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DCs (Fig. 7 E). Inhibition of T cell death by CD8+CD4– DC transfer is dependent on IL-12. This statement emanates from the observation that IL-12–/– CD8+CD4– DC transfer does not inhibit the apoptosis of Th1 cells (Fig. 7 F), but a supply of exogenous IL-12 together with the IL-12–/– CD8+CD4– DC transfer restores the reduction of Annexin V binding to Th1 cells (Fig. 7 H). Finally, secondary IFN-
responses did occur with the IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DCs, but not with the IL-12–/– CD8
+CD4– or even the IL-12+/+ CD8
–CD4+ DC transfer (Fig. 7 B). Supply of exogenous IL-12 with the IL-12–/– CD8
+CD4– DCs restored IFN-
secondary responses. Furthermore, neutralization of IL-12 during IL-12+/+ CD8
+CD4– DC transfer by injection of anti–IL-12 antibody restored apoptosis of primary Th1 cells (Fig. 7 B). These results indicate that CD8
+CD4– DCs provide sufficient IL-12 needed for down-regulation of IL-13R
1, inhibition of apoptosis, and restoration of secondary Th1 responses.
|
|
+CD4– DCs or by an inability of these APCs to produce IL-12, we isolated neonatal CD11c+ DCs at different time points after birth, stimulated the cells with the DC stimulator CpG dinucleotide, and tested for IL-12 production. As indicated in Fig. 8, neonatal DCs gain the ability to produce IL-12 progressively over time and reach a maximum at adult age (Fig. 8 A). However, these results do not distinguish between an increase in the number of CD8
+CD4– DCs or the gain of ability to produce IL-12 cytokine. Given that isolation of the DC subsets at early neonatal age is not feasible because of low frequency, we opted to purify total CD11c+ DCs, stimulate them with CpG, and test for intracellular IL-12 on gated DC subsets. Fig. 8 B shows that on day 1 after birth most of the splenic DCs are CD8
–CD4–, with almost no CD8
+CD4– or CD8–CD4+ DC subsets. By day 6, however, both CD8
+CD4– and CD8–CD4+ DC subsets reached significant frequency, as was shown in Fig. 6. When tested for intracellular IL-12, 26% of the CD8
–CD4– double-negative and most frequent subset produced IL-12 on day 1 after birth, and 6 d later 84% of the cells displayed IL-12 expression (Fig. 8 C). This points to a developmental influence on these DCs to produce IL-12 cytokine. As for the CD8
+CD4– DCs, like the CD8
–CD4+ DCs, there was no detectable IL-12 on day 1 but the majority of the cells available on day 6 produced IL-12 (84 and 97%, respectively; Fig. 8, D and E). These results indicate that the limited availability of IL-12 on the day of birth is caused by delayed accumulation of the DC subsets in the spleen, together with a progressive ability to produce IL-12 cytokine.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 chain during neonatal exposure to Ag (9). Indeed, it was shown that the IL-13R
1 chain associates with IL-4R
to form an IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor through which both IL-4 and IL-13 cytokines can signal (13, 14). During rechallenge with Ag, IL-4 from the Th2 cells utilizes the IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor and induces the death of Th1 cells (9). In this paper, we show that day 6 after birth is a turning point at which exposure to Ag no longer results in secondary responses that are biased toward Th2 and secondary Th1 IFN-
responses emerge (Fig. 1). These observations bode well with findings indicating that exposure to Ag at day 7 but not at day 3 become effective in inducing Th1 responses (22). Interestingly, day 6 after birth also represents a turning point for the expression of IL-13R
1, as exposure to Ag at this age no longer up-regulates IL-13R
1 mRNA or protein expression on Th1 cells (Fig. 2). We then set up experiments and investigated the mechanism underlying the restoration of neonatal Th1 secondary responses by day 6 Ag exposure. We have previously shown that IL-12 can rescue splenic Th1 cells and restore IFN-
production (4, 11). Given that the neonate displays an inability to produce significant IL-12 (19, 23), we thought that exposure to Ag within an environment where IL-12 is limited may be responsible for up-regulation of IL-13R
1 and the consequent death of Th1 cells. This assumption proved correct, as exogenous IL-12 given during Ag exposure on day 1 reduced IL-13R
1 mRNA and protein expression on primary Th1 cells, inhibited their apoptosis, and restored secondary IFN-
responses (Fig. 3). Moreover, it was shown that the administration of anti–IL-12 antibody during Ag exposure on day 6 after birth nullifies restoration of secondary IFN-
responses, and this operates through the restitution of IL-13R
1 up-regulation and apoptosis of Th1 cells (Fig. 4).
Given that DCs are the main producers of IL-12 and that the neonatal environment is composed of lower numbers of DCs relative to other APCs (11), it is possible that the inability of the neonatal environment to provide significant IL-12 is related to the minimal number of Ag-presenting DCs available at day 1 after birth. In fact, when newborn mice were enriched with adult IL-12+/+ splenic DCs, up-regulation of IL-13R
1 on primary Th1 cells was minimal, apoptosis was significantly reduced, and secondary Th1 IFN-
responses were restored (Fig. 5). IL-12–/– DCs could not inhibit IL-13R
1 up-regulation or restore Th1 IFN-
responses. These observations, together with the day 6–acquired neonatal transition to secondary Th1 responses, suggest that developmental accumulation of DCs could be responsible for the bias of neonatal immunity toward Th2. Given that distinct subsets of DCs can perform different functions (24–27), delayed developmental accumulation of a specific subset of CD8
+/–CD4+/– DCs over time could orchestrate the Th2 bias of neonatal immunity. Analysis of DC ontogeny in the neonate mouse indicated that although CD11c+ CD8
–CD4– DCs were present at a significant number on the day of birth, the CD8
+CD4– and CD8
–CD4+ subsets began to accumulate in the spleen by day 4 and reached a significant percentage by day 6 (Fig. 6). A small population of CD8
+CD4+ DCs that is present in adult mice was not detected by day 10 after birth. Thus, these observations suggested that it is the CD8
+CD4– and/or the CD8
–CD4+ subset that might be responsible for the acquired ability of the neonate to develop secondary Th1 responses when exposure to Ag is performed on day 6 after birth. In fact, when the CD8
+CD4–, but not the CD8
–CD4+, subset was transferred to newborns on the day of birth during exposure to Ag, the primary Th1 cells displayed significantly reduced IL-13R
1 expression, resisted apoptosis, and developed secondary IFN-
responses when the animals were rechallenged with OVA as adults (Fig. 7). Transfer of IL-12–/– CD8
+CD4– DCs was not able to overturn IL-13R
1 up-regulation or restore IFN-
secondary Th1 responses, indicating that the subset presents Ag and produces the IL-12 needed to counter IL-13R
1 up-regulation. Moreover, investigation of the frequency of the DC subsets indicated that a minimal number of the presenting CD8
+CD4– DC subset is present in the spleen on the day of birth. At best, these cells could produce IL-12 at a limited rate, like the CD8
–CD4– double-negative DC subset (Fig. 8), but this would be insufficient to counter IL-13R
1 up-regulation. By day 6, the frequency of the CD8
+CD4– DC subset increased because of significant accumulation of this subset (Fig. 8). In addition, most of the cells produced IL-12, leading to inhibition of IL-13R
1 up-regulation, diminished apoptosis of primary Th1 cells, and development of secondary Th1 responses.
Collectively, these observations indicate that delayed developmental maturation of a subset of DCs operates the Th2 bias of neonatal immunity. In particular, our data suggest that minimal production of IL-12 in early neonatal life because of delayed accumulation of the CD8
+CD4– DC subset leads to up-regulation of IL-13R
1 on primary Th1 cells. This chain associates with IL-4R
and forms an IL-4R
/IL-13R
1 heteroreceptor (13, 14). IL-4 from the Th2 cells used this receptor to drive apoptosis of Th1 cells, leading to a lack of secondary Th1 immunity, and hence the bias to Th2 cells (9). These observations agree with previous papers showing a delayed developmental accumulation of DCs (28, 29). What this study adds is that a specific subset is responsible for Ag presentation and IL-12 production, and it ties the regulation of IL-13R
1 to such IL-12 and the developmental maturation of the CD8
+CD4– DC subset during the neonatal period. Also, we demonstrate that sufficient accumulation of the CD8
+CD4– DC subset by day 6 after birth represents a turning point to down-regulate IL-13R
1 and sustain the transition for Th1 responses. These previously unrecognized findings highlight the mechanism underlying the bias of neonatal immunity toward Th2 cells and provide useful information for the development of pediatric vaccines and reagents against allergies in infants and children (30).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ag's
OVA peptide (SQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) encompasses aa residues 323–339 of OVA and is immunogenic in BALB/c (H-2d) mice. Ig-W, a BALB/c IgG2b Ig molecule generated by transfection of the 91A3 antiarsonate antibody heavy and light chains into the non–Ig-secreting myeloma B cell line SP2/0, was previously described (4). Ig-OVA, expressing OVA peptide within the heavy chain variable region of Ig-W, was also previously described (11). ODN1826 or CpG oligonucleotide was purchased from InvivoGen.
Generation of rabbit anti–IL-13R
1 antibodies
Expression and purification of IL-13R
1 protein.
The plasmid pQE30–IL-13R
1 (31), a gift from A. Gessner (Institut für Klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Erlangen, Germany), was digested with SphI and XhoI to liberate a cDNA that encodes the extracellular domain of IL-13R
1 (aa 27–339) with an N-terminal His tag. This fragment was ligated into pFastBac plasmid (Invitrogen) to generate pFastBac–IL-13R
1, which was then used to generate baculovirus and to express rmIL-13R
1 in Sf9 cells, according to the manufacturer's instructions. IL-13R
1 protein was purified using Ni-NTA agarose beads from QIAGEN, as previously described (32).
Rabbit immunization with IL-13R
1 protein.
A New Zealand white rabbit was immunized with 50 µg rIL-13R
1 in CFA/PBS, as previously described (33). A subsequent immunization with 50 µg rIL-13R
1 in IFA/PBS was given monthly for 3 mo.
Adoptive T cell transfer
Splenic cells from 1-day-old DO11.10/scid mice containing the equivalent of 30 x 103 DO11.10 T cells were transferred into 1-day-old BALB/c mice by i.v. injection through the facial vein using a 30-gauge needle. To obtain four experimental newborn BALB/c hosts, 12 DO11.10/scid neonatal mice were used. For the transfer of adult T cells into newborn mice, DO11.10 T cells were purified from the spleens of adult DO11.10/scid mice with anti-CD4 antibody–coupled magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec) before injection into the host. In this case, two to three adult DO11.10/scid mice are needed to generate four neonatal BALB/c hosts. When the analysis requires separation of Th1 from Th2 cells, the transfer used 300 x 103 purified rather unseparated neonatal DO11.10/scid T cells. In this case, 60 newborn DO11.10/scid mice are needed to generate four BALB/c hosts. This 10-fold increase in T cell transfer was required for the isolation of sufficient numbers of T cells for RNA extraction and spot blot and real-time PCR analysis.
Detection of apoptosis by staining with Annexin V
For cell-surface staining, the splenic cells from BALB/c hosts that received neonatal DO11.10/scid T cells and Ig-OVA were incubated for 20 min at 4°C with 5 µg/ml 2.4G2 mAb to block Fc
Rs on the cell surface before staining. The cells were then stained with the anti-TCR OVA clonotypic mAb KJ1-26 (mouse IgG2a) and FITC–Annexin V (BD Biosciences). Cytokine secretion was blocked by the addition of 10 µg/ml Brefeldin A (BFA; Epicentre), and the cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 2% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS buffer for 10 min at room temperature, and incubated with PE–anti–mouse IFN-
. Isotype-matched controls were included in all experiments. All data were collected using a flow cytometer (FACScan; Becton Dickinson) and were analyzed with CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson) and Flowjo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
Separation of Th1 cells
The separation of neonatal Th1 from Th2 cells requires an increased frequency of primary T lymphocytes. To overcome this technical difficulty, the transfer was performed with purified neonatal DO11.10/scid T lymphocytes instead of total splenic cells, and the number of transferred cells was increased from 30 to 300 x 103 cells per newborn BALB/c host. Consequently, each T cell subset isolation experiment used four neonatal BALB/c hosts that required cells from 60 newborn DO11.10/scid mice. Accordingly, each BALB/c newborn was given 300 x 103 CD4+-DO11.10 T cells purified from the spleens of neonatal (1-day-old) DO11.10/scid mice, and the hosts were injected i.p. with a saline solution containing 100 µg Ig-OVA. 2 wk later, the splenic T cells were stimulated for 10 h with 10 µM OVA peptide, and Th1 cells were separated on the basis of cytokine secretion (IFN-
), as previously described (34), using separation kits (Miltenyi Biotec). In brief, after peptide stimulation the spleen cells were incubated with mouse IFN-
catch reagent for 45 min, and the cell surface–captured cytokine was used to attach PE-conjugated anticytokine mAb by incubation with PE–anti–IFN-
for 10 min on ice. Anti-PE–coupled microbeads were added, and the cells were incubated for 15 min at 4°C. Subsequently, IFN-
–producing cells were separated by MACS (Miltenyi Biotec). Usually, 108 splenic cells are used to obtain from 0.5 to 106 Th1 cells.
Detection of a subset of DCs
For cell-surface staining, the splenic cells (106 cells/ml) from different ages (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 d old) of BALB/c neonates were incubated for 20 min at 4°C with 5 µg/ml 2.4G2 mAb to block Fc
Rs on the cell surface and were stained with anti-CD11c for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD8
and PE-labeled anti-CD4 (BD Biosciences), and fixed with 2% formaldehyde.
Isolation of DCs
For the isolation of bulk splenic DCs, spleens from adult BALB/c or IL-12–/– mice were collected and purified according to the standard collagenase/differential adherence method (35). In brief, the spleen was disrupted in a collagenase solution, and isolated DCs were floated on a dense BSA gradient. Subsequently, the cells were allowed to adhere to Petri dishes for 90 min at 37°C, washed, and incubated overnight at 37°C and 7% CO2. The next day, floating DCs were harvested and used for transfer experiments. In some experiments, adult DCs were purified using anti-CD11c mAb–coupled microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Isolation of splenic DCs from neonates used 45 newborns for each time point and was performed using anti-CD11c mAb coupled to microbeads, as described.
For the isolation of DC subsets, the bulk DCs were incubated with anti-CD8
mAb–coupled microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and were separated into CD8
+ and CD8
– populations by MACS. For preparation of CD8
+CD4– and CD8
–CD4+DC subsets, the CD8
– fraction was labeled with anti-CD4 mAb–coupled microbeads and separated by MACS. Each fraction was assessed for purity, and no population was used if contamination was >5%.
Treatment with rIL-12 and anti–IL-12 antibodies
In vivo injection of rIL-12 (PeproTech) used 50 ng of cytokine in PBS injected i.p., together with Ig-OVA, within 24 h after T cell transfer. The mice were given two more injections (50 ng in PBS) 48 and 72 h later. Control groups were injected with PBS without cytokine. For neutralization of IL-12, we used C17.8 anti–IL-12 mAb (BD Biosciences), which was injected i.p. Rat IgG was used as a control.
Cytokine ELISA and ELISPOT
Measurement of cytokines by ELISA.
Splenic cells containing both T cells and APCs were incubated with Ag in 96-well round-bottom plates for 24 h. IFN-
production was measured by ELISA using anticytokine antibodies according to BD Bioscience's instructions.
Measurement of IFN-
by ELISPOT.
Detection of IFN-
by ELISPOT was performed as previously described (4, 9). In brief, HA-Multiscreen plates (Millipore) were coated with capture antibody, and free sites were saturated with DMEM culture media containing 10% fetal calf serum. Subsequently, 106 splenic cells were added and the culture was stimulated with OVA peptide with or without blocking antibody. 1 µg/ml of biotinylated anti–IFN-
antibody was added, and bound antibody was revealed with avidin-peroxidase. Spots were counted using Immunospot software (Cellular Technology Ltd.).
Spot blot for detection of IL-13R
1 expression
Because of the small number of isolated Th1 cells, RNA purification yields small amounts insufficient to perform Northern blot analysis. We developed a spot-blot technology to overcome these limitations and performed IL-13R
1 analysis by both spot blot and real-time PCR. Accordingly, a 1-kb IL-13R
1 DNA fragment was digested from pCEP4IL-13R
1 plasmid with BamH1 and purified by electroelution from a 1% agarose gel. 1 µl Tris buffer containing 5 ng IL-13R
1, pUC19 or GAPDH DNA was deposited within marked circular spots on a nylon transfer membrane (Magnacharge; Osmonics). Duplicate spots were made for each sample. The membrane was dried for 30 min at 60°C, and the DNA was denatured in 0.5 N NaOH and neutralized with 0.5 M Tris buffer. The membrane was then used for detection of IL-13R
1 mRNA. Total RNA was extracted from 0.5–1 x 106 purified Th1 cells using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies). 5 µg RNA was used in an RT reaction together with
-[32P]dCTP (GE Healthcare) to generate labeled cDNA probes by using the Ampolabeling-LRP kit (SuperArray Inc.). The specific primers for the amplification of target genes were purchased from SuperArray Inc. Subsequently, the labeled cDNA probes were hybridized to the membrane in a 0.75-ml hybridization buffer for 24 h at 60°C. The intensity of radioactive spots was analyzed on a Molecular Imager FX (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using Quantity One software. Results were expressed as arbitrary units estimated as follows: (mean spot density of sample – mean spot density of background)/(mean spot density of GAPDH – mean spot density of background). The background represents the mean radioactive intensity obtained from pUC19 DNA spots included in the membrane.
Real-time PCR
RT and DNA amplification were performed according to a one-step protocol using 200 ng of total RNA and an Absolute MAX QRT-PCR SYBR Mix (ABgene), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Expression of IL-13R
1 chain mRNA was assessed in neonatal Th1 cells. β-actin was included to serve as a normalizer. The oligonucleotides used as specific primers were as follows: sense, (IL-13R
1) 5'-GCACAGAGTATAGGTAAGGAGCAA-3' and (β-actin) 5'-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3'; and antisense, (IL-13R
1) 5'-ACAAAGACTGGAATGGTGAGTAAC-3' and (β-actin) 5'-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT-3'. Real-time PCR was performed on a Smart Cycler (Cepheid), and the results were analyzed by the comparative CT method described by the Smart Cycler software.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 5 July 2007
Accepted: 1 August 2008
R, Fc
receptor; Tg, transgenic. H.-H. Lee and C.M. Hoeman contributed equally to this paper.
H.-H. Lee's present address is Division of Immunology, Karp Laboratories, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
© 2008 Lee et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.jem.org/misc/terms.shtml). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Singh, R.R., B.H. Hahn, and E.E. Sercarz. 1996. Neonatal peptide exposure can prime T cells and, upon subsequent immunization, induce their immune deviation: implications for antibody vs. T cell-mediated autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 183:1613–1621.
2 Chen, N., and E.H. Field. 1995. Enhanced type 2 and diminished type 1 cytokines in neonatal tolerance. Transplantation. 59:933–941.[Medline]
3 Forsthuber, T., H.C. Yip, and P.V. Lehmann. 1996. Induction of TH1 and TH2 immunity in neonatal mice. Science. 271:1728–1730.[Abstract]
4 Min, B., K.L. Legge, C. Pack, and H. Zaghouani. 1998. Neonatal exposure to a self-peptide–immunoglobulin chimera circumvents the use of adjuvant and confers resistance to autoimmune disease by a novel mechanism involving interleukin 4 lymph node deviation and interferon
–mediated splenic anergy. J. Exp. Med. 188:2007–2017.
5 Adkins, B., C. Leclerc, and S. Marshall-Clarke. 2004. Neonatal adaptive immunity comes of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:553–564.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 Siegrist, C.A. 2001. Neonatal and early life vaccinology. Vaccine. 19:3331–3346.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 Andersson, A.C., U. Seppala, and A. Rudin. 2004. Activation of human neonatal monocyte-derived dendritic cells by lipopolysaccharide down-regulates birch allergen-induced Th2 differentiation. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:3516–3524.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 Adkins, B., and R.Q. Du. 1998. Newborn mice develop balanced Th1/Th2 primary effector responses in vivo but are biased to Th2 secondary responses. J. Immunol. 160:4217–4224.
9 Li, L., H.H. Lee, J.J. Bell, R.K. Gregg, J.S. Ellis, A. Gessner, and H. Zaghouani. 2004. IL-4 utilizes an alternative receptor to drive apoptosis of Th1 cells and skews neonatal immunity toward Th2. Immunity. 20:429–440.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 Murphy, K.M., A.B. Heimberger, and D.Y. Loh. 1990. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science. 250:1720–1723.
11 Li, L., K.L. Legge, B. Min, J.J. Bell, R. Gregg, J. Caprio, and H. Zaghouani. 2001. Neonatal immunity develops in a transgenic TCR transfer model and reveals a requirement for elevated cell input to achieve organ-specific responses. J. Immunol. 167:2585–2594.
12 Huang, H., and W.E. Paul. 1998. Impaired interleukin 4 signaling in T helper type 1 cells. J. Exp. Med. 187:1305–1313.
13 McKenzie, G.J., P.G. Fallon, C.L. Emson, R.K. Grencis, and A.N.J. McKenzie. 1999. Simultaneous disruption of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 defines individual roles in T helper cell type 2-mediated responses. J. Exp. Med. 189:1565–1572.
14 Murata, T., S.R. Husain, H. Mohri, and R.K. Puri. 1998. Two different IL-13 receptor chains are expressed in normal human skin fibroblasts, and IL-4 and IL-13 mediate signal transduction through a common pathway. Int. Immunol. 10:1103–1110.
15 Haskins, K., R. Kubo, J. White, M. Pigeon, J. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1983. The major histocompatibility complex–restricted antigen receptor on T cells. I. Isolation with a monoclonal antibody. J. Exp. Med. 157:1149–1169.
16 Brumeanu, T.D., W.J. Swiggard, R.M. Steinman, C.A. Bona, and H. Zaghouani. 1993. Efficient loading of identical viral peptide onto class II molecules by antigenized immunoglobulin and influenza virus. J. Exp. Med. 178:1795–1799.
17 Hilton, D.J., J.G. Zhang, D. Metcalf, W.S. Alexander, N.A. Nicola, and T.A. Willson. 1996. Cloning and characterization of a binding subunit of the interleukin 13 receptor that is also a component of the interleukin 4 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:497–501.
18 Goriely, S., C. Van Lint, R. Dadkhah, M. Libin, D. De Wit, D. Demonte, F. Willems, and M. Goldman. 2004. A defect in nucleosome remodeling prevents IL-12(p35) gene transcription in neonatal dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 199:1011–1016.
19 Macatonia, S.E., N.A. Hosken, M. Litton, P. Vieira, C.S. Hsieh, J.A. Culpepper, M. Wysocka, G. Trinchieri, K.M. Murphy, and A. O'Garra. 1995. Dendritic cells produce IL-12 and direct the development of Th1 cells from naive CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 154:5071–5079.[Abstract]
20 Mattner, F., J. Magram, J. Ferrante, P. Launois, K. Di Padova, R. Behin, M.K. Gately, J.A. Louis, and G. Alber. 1996. Genetically resistant mice lacking interleukin-12 are susceptible to infection with Leishmania major and mount a polarized Th2 cell response. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1553–1559.[Medline]
21 Shortman, K. 2000. Burnet oration: dendritic cells: multiple subtypes, multiple origins, multiple functions. Immunol. Cell Biol. 78:161–165.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 Ichino, M., G. Mor, J. Conover, W.R. Weiss, M. Takeno, K.J. Ishii, and D.M. Klinman. 1999. Factors associated with the development of neonatal tolerance after the administration of a plasmid DNA vaccine. J. Immunol. 162:3814–3818.
23 Sun, C.M., E. Deriaud, C. Leclerc, and R. Lo-Man. 2005. Upon TLR9 signaling, CD5+ B cells control the IL-12-dependent Th1-priming capacity of neonatal DCs. Immunity. 22:467–477.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 Dudziak, D., A.O. Kamphorst, G.F. Heidkamp, V.R. Buchholz, C. Trumpfheller, S. Yamazaki, C. Cheong, K. Liu, H.W. Lee, C.G. Park, et al. 2007. Differential antigen processing by dendritic cell subsets in vivo. Science. 315:107–111.
25 Maldonado-Lopez, R., T. De Smedt, P. Michel, J. Godfroid, B. Pajak, C. Heirman, K. Thielemans, O. Leo, J. Urbain, and M. Moser. 1999. CD8
+ and CD8
– subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 189:587–592.
26 Steinman, R.M., D. Hawiger, and M.C. Nussenzweig. 2003. Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:685–711.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 Legge, K.L., R.K. Gregg, R. Maldonado-Lopez, L. Li, J.C. Caprio, M. Moser, and H. Zaghouani. 2002. On the role of dendritic cells in peripheral T cell tolerance and modulation of autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 196:217–227.
28 Sun, C.M., L. Fiette, M. Tanguy, C. Leclerc, and R. Lo-Man. 2003. Ontogeny and innate properties of neonatal dendritic cells. Blood. 102:585–591.
29 Dakic, A., Q.X. Shao, A. D'Amico, M. O'Keeffe, W.F. Chen, K. Shortman, and L. Wu. 2004. Development of the dendritic cell system during mouse ontogeny. J. Immunol. 172:1018–1027.
30 Bona, C. 2005. Neonatal Immunity. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 389 pp.
31 Schnare, M., H. Blum, S. Juttner, M. Rollinghoff, and A. Gessner. 1998. Specific antagonism of type I IL-4 receptor with a mutated form of murine IL-4. J. Immunol. 161:3484–3492.
32 Poudrier, J., P. Graber, S. Herren, C. Berney, D. Gretener, M.H. Kosco-Vilbois, and J.-F. Gauchat. 2000. A novel monoclonal antibody, C41, reveals IL-13R
1 expression by murine germinal center B cells and follicular dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:3157–3164.[CrossRef][Medline]
33 Legge, K.L., B. Min, N.T. Potter, and H. Zaghouani. 1997. Presentation of a T cell receptor antagonist peptide by immunoglobulins ablates activation of T cells by a synthetic peptide or proteins requiring endocytic processing. J. Exp. Med. 185:1043–1053.
34 Ouyang, W., M. Lohning, Z. Gao, M. Assenmacher, S. Ranganath, A. Radbruch, and K.M. Murphy. 2000. Stat6-independent GATA-3 autoactivation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment. Immunity. 12:27–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 Romani, N., D. Reider, M. Heuer, S. Ebner, E. Kampgen, B. Eibl, D. Niederwieser, and G. Schuler. 1996. Generation of mature dendritic cells from human blood. An improved method with special regard to clinical applicability. J. Immunol. Methods. 196:137–151.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related In this Issue article
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |