|
||
ARTICLE |
CORRESPONDENCE Toshinori Nakayama: tnakayama{at}faculty.chiba-u.jp
|
|
|---|
The quality of adaptive immune responses depends on the size of the antigen-specific memory T cell pool, which is regulated through specific homeostatic mechanisms controlling both cell survival and proliferation. Upon antigen recognition, naive CD4 T cells undergo a rapid clonal expansion, followed by the differentiation into functionally distinct Th cell subsets, such as effector Th1 and Th2 cells (1–3). These effector T cells undergo a dramatic contraction in numbers after antigen clearance, with 90–95% succumbing to apoptosis within weeks (4–6). However, some of the effector T cells are maintained as memory T cells for long periods in vivo (7, 8).
In contrast to CD8 memory T cells, CD4 memory T cells may not require the signals through common cytokine receptor
Several properties that distinguish memory T cells from naive T cells have been described, such as increased longevity and enhanced capacity for recall response to cognate antigen (17). Memory T cells have several features associated with stem cells (18), and the similarity of the gene expression pattern between memory T/B cells and long-term hematopoietic stem cells was reported (19). Similar to hematopoietic stem cells, memory T cells appear to possess the ability to proliferate in response to homeostatic signals. The homeostatic signals may drive self-renewal, whereas antigenic signals drive effector cell differentiation and function.
The polycomb group (PcG) gene Bmi1 has recently been implicated in the maintenance of hematopoietic (20, 21), neural (22), and cancer stem cells (23). PcG gene products form multimeric complexes and maintain the early determined gene expression patterns of key developmental regulators, such as homeobox genes both in invertebrates and vertebrates (24, 25). Bmi1, Mel-18, M33, Pc2, Rae-28/Mph1, Mph2, and Ring1A/B are constituents of a multimeric protein complex similar to the polycomb repressive complex (PRC)1 identified in Drosophila. Another PcG complex, which contains Eed, Suz12, Ezh1, and Ezh2, is PRC2. PRC2 possesses an intrinsic histone H3-K27 methyltransferase activity (26–29), which implicates a likely mechanism for PcG-mediated gene silencing. Lack of individual components of PRC1 results in apoptosis and the loss of proliferative responses of immature lymphoid cells (30, 31). In mature lymphocytes, PcG gene products play several roles in differentiation and cell fate. Mel-18 controls Th2 cell differentiation through the regulation of GATA3 expression (32), and Bmi1 controls the stability of GTAT3 protein in developing Th2 cells (33). EzH2 is involved in B cell development and controls IgH V(D)J rearrangement (34).
We herein investigated the role of Bmi1 in the generation and maintenance of memory CD4+ Th1/Th2 cells. In the absence of Bmi1, the generation of both Th1 and Th2 memory cells was impaired as a consequence of increased Noxa expression. Because our previous study indicated that the expression of Bmi1 is higher in Th2 cells than Th1 cells, we sought to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the Bmi1/Noxa-mediated regulation of memory T cell generation by focusing primarily on memory Th2 cells. Our results indicate that Bmi1 controls memory CD4 T cell survival and function through the direct repression of the Noxa gene.
To investigate the role of Bmi1 in the generation and maintenance of memory Th1/Th2 cells, we used a "memory Th1/Th2 mouse" system (35, 36) in which OVA-specific
chain (9, 10). However, critical regulatory roles of IL-7 in the generation and survival of memory CD4 T cells were reported recently (11, 12). In addition, the homeostasis of memory CD4 T cells is dependent on the signals through the TCR as well as the IL-7 receptor (13). Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 are reported to be the downstream targets of the IL-7 receptor and promote T cell survival (14–16).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
ABSTRACT
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
REFERENCES
Generation of memory Th1/Th2 cells was impaired in the absence of Bmi1
In Bmi1–/– mice, although a reduction of cell numbers in the lymphoid organs was seen, substantial numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells developed with normal expression of developmental cell surface antigens (not depicted). After in vitro antigenic stimulation, Bmi1–/– CD4 T cells were shown to proliferate well (Fig. S1 A, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20072000/DC1) and differentiate normally into IL-4–producing effector Th2 cells under Th2 conditions or IFN-
–producing effector Th1 cells under Th1 conditions (33). Under IL-4–limiting conditions, Th2 cell differentiation was impaired significantly in the absence of Bmi1, and the Bmi1-mediated regulation of the stability of GATA3 protein was demonstrated (33).
βTCR transgenic (Tg) CD4 T cells from Bmi1+/+, Bmi1+/–, or Bmi1–/– mice were stimulated with antigenic OVA peptide and wild-type antigen-presenting cells under Th2 or Th1 culture conditions in vitro for 6 d, and these effector Th cells were then adoptively transferred into syngeneic BALB/c nu/nu mice (memory Th1/Th2 mice). 5 wk after cell transfer, the numbers of donor-derived KJ1+ memory Th1/Th2 cells were assessed in various organs. As shown in Fig. 1 A, a Bmi1 gene dose-dependent affect on the numbers of memory Th2 cells was observed in all tissues tested (spleen, liver, lung, and PBMCs).
It is worth noting that even heterozygous Bmi1+/– groups showed marked effects. Although the expression levels of IL-7R
and IL-2Rβ were slightly lower on Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells as compared with wild-type cells, other surface marker antigens were expressed normally (Fig. S1 B). Next, KJ1+ effector Th1 cells were transferred into BALB/c nu/nu mice. The memory Th1 cell generation from Bmi1–/– effector Th1 cells was also impaired in all tissues tested (Fig. 1 B). The reduction in the Bmi+/– group was not obvious. A similar loss of memory Th cell generation was observed in both Th2 (Fig. 1 C) and Th1 cells (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20072000/DC1) when Bmi1–/– effector cells were transferred into nonlymphopenic normal BALB/c mice. These results indicate that the generation of memory Th1/Th2 cells was impaired in the absence of Bmi1.
|
The homeostatic proliferation as measured by BrdU incorporation in vivo was decreased slightly in Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells as compared with wild type (14.3 ± 0.4% vs. 9.1 ± 1.5%) (Fig. 1 E). Next, we assessed the extent of ongoing apoptotic cell death in vivo by a TUNEL assay. In Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells, ongoing apoptosis was enhanced dramatically as compared with wild type (8.2 vs. 57.1%) (Fig. 1 F). In addition, increased annexin V+PI+ cells were detected in Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells after restimulation in vitro, indicating that these memory cells are highly prone to cell death (Fig. S1 C).
Deletion of p16ink4a and p19arf genes failed to restore the decreased memory Th2 cell generation in the absence of Bmi1
Bmi1 has been reported to promote cell proliferation, cell survival, and stem cell self-renewal by repressing the Ink4a/Arf locus (37). This locus codes for two proteins, p16ink4a and p19arf (Ink4a and Arf), through the use of alternative reading frames. Ink4a is a cyclin D–dependent kinase inhibitor that promotes cell cycle arrest after Rb activation. Arf induces p53 activation and p53-mediated cell death (38). In the Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells, we confirmed the increased expression of the Ink4a/Arf gene after anti-TCR stimulation (Fig. 2 A).
An increased mRNA expression of both Ink4a and Arf was confirmed (not depicted). In addition, various proapoptotic genes, which are known to be targets for p53, such as Bax, Puma, Noxa, Bim, Bad, Fas, and Fas ligand, were increased in Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells (Fig. 2 A). In Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells, increased expression of mRNA was observed in the Ink4a/Arf, Bax, Puma, Noxa, Bad, and Fas genes, whereas expression of antiapoptotic genes Bcl2, BclxL, and Mcl1 was unchanged (Fig. 2 B). To examine whether the increased expression of Ink4a/Arf in Bmi1–/– Th2 cells plays a role in the Bmi1-mediated maintenance of memory Th2 cells, Bmi1–/–mice were crossed with Ink4a–/–/Arf–/– mice, and effector Th2 cells generated from Bmi1–/–Ink4a–/–Arf–/– with Ly5.2 background were transferred into Ly5.1 mice. 5 wk later, the number of Ly5.2+ memory Th2 cells was assessed. Depletion of Ink4a and Arf genes itself had no effect on the generation of memory T cells (Fig. 2 C, panels 1 and 3) and failed to restore memory Th2 cell generation in Bmi1–/– background (Fig. 2 C, panels 2 and 4). Furthermore, the deletion of the p53 gene failed to rescue the Bmi1+/– memory Th2 cell numbers (Fig. S6, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20072000/DC1). These results suggest that the Ink4/Arf and p53-dependent pathways are not key pathways responsible for the reduced memory Th2 cell generation in Bmi1–/– memory mice. To identify any possible proapoptotic genes whose expression is regulated by Bmi1 but not regulated by the Ink4/Arf and p53-dependent pathways, the expression levels of these proapoptotic genes were assessed in the Bmi1–/–/Ink4a–/–/Arf–/– Th2 cells. Among these proapoptotic genes, the level of Noxa mRNA increased in Bmi1–/– Th2 cells and remained high in Bmi1–/–/Ink4a–/–/Arf–/– background, whereas other targets such as Bax, Puma, Bim, Bad, Fas, and Fas ligand were at the normal expression levels (Fig. 2 D). Increased expression of Noxa mRNA was observed also in effector Th1, Tc1, and Tc2 cells in the absence of Bmi1 (Fig. S7). These results indicate that the expression of Noxa is suppressed by the expression of Bmi1, but it is independent from the control of the Ink4/Arf and p53 pathways. The results thus far obtained suggest that Bmi1 controls the generation of both Th1 and Th2 memory cells accompanied with an increased expression of Noxa. Our previous study indicated that the expression of Bmi1 is higher in Th2 cells than Th1 cells, and Bmi1 controls the generation of Th2 cells more profoundly as compared with Th1 cells (33). Therefore, to better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the Bmi1/Noxa-mediated regulation of memory CD4 T cell generation, we focused much of our studies on memory Th2 cells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Noxa is a member of a BH3-only protein family that initiates programmed cell death in various cells, including lymphocytes (39–41). Noxa is known to regulate selectively the pro-survival activity of Mcl1 and A1/Bfl-1 (42), and an important role of Mcl1 in the survival of lymphocytes was reported (43). The mRNA expression of antiapoptotic genes Mcl1, Bclx, and BclxL was not changed in Bmi1–/– memory (Fig. 2 B) and induced normally in effector Th2 cells by the IL-7 treatment (unpublished data). Enforced expression of Noxa in effector Th2 cells resulted in the decreased generation of memory Th2 cells (Fig. 3 B), suggesting that the overproduction of Noxa prevents memory Th2 cell generation even in the presence of normal abundance of antiapoptotic proteins. Thus, it is likely that Bmi1 attenuates Noxa-mediated inhibition of Mcl1 pro-survival activity and promotes memory T cell generation.
Noxa was originally identified as a downstream target of p53 (44). Arf/Mdm2-mediated stabilization of p53 protein and the resulting mRNA expression of the p53 target genes were reported (45, 46). Therefore, it was likely that the enhancement of cell death observed in Bmi1–/– Th2 cells is p53 dependent. However, the deletion of the p53 gene failed to rescue the decreased generation of memory Th2 cells in the absence of Bmi1 (Fig. S6). Thus, an increased apoptotic cell death observed in Bmi1–/– memory Th2 cells appears to be p53 independent.
The Bmi1-mediated repression of the Ink4a/Arf gene observed in the hematopoietic and neural stem cells (45, 46) appears to operate in Th2 cells (Fig. 2, A and B). It is known that Arf induces p53 activation (38), resulting in the induction of p53-dependent genes, including Puma and Bim. An important role of Puma and Bim in the cell death of activated T cells was reported (47, 48), and the expression of these genes was up-regulated in Bmi1–/– effector and memory Th2 cells (Fig. 2, A and B). However, Bmi1–/–/Ink4a–/–/Arf–/– Th2 cells, in which the levels of Puma and Bim expression were not increased (Fig. 2 D), failed to generate normal numbers of memory Th2 cells (Fig. 2 C). Although the expression of Puma and Bim mRNA was up-regulated, the levels were considerably low compared with Noxa in Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells (Fig. 2 A). This might explain the predominant effect of Noxa in the cell death of Bmi1–/– Th2 cells. However, the current experimental data do not allow us to make any conclusions to be drawn in regards to the relative contribution of each of the factors in the survival of CD4 T cells. Thus, although Puma and Bim may play a role in the survival of memory Th2 cells, Noxa appears to be a critical target for the Bmi1-mediated regulation of memory Th2 cell survival.
Semi-acute survival of transferred Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells was substantially impaired (Fig. 1 D and Figs. S3–S5). On the other hand, high numbers of apoptotic cells were detected in the spleen even 5 wk after effector Bmi1–/– Th2 cell transfer (Fig. 1 F). The extent of the defect in homeostatic proliferation was modest (Fig. 1 E). The low number of Bmi1–/– memory CD4 T cells persisted for at least 2 mo (unpublished data). These results suggest that the long-term survival of memory Th2 cells is also dependent on the expression of Bmi1. Collectively, we conclude that Bmi1 controls both semi-acute survival of effector Th2 cells and long-term survival of memory Th2 cells.
The PRC2 was reported to possess an intrinsic histone H3-K27 methyltransferase activity (26–29). The PRC1, including Bmi1 and Ring1, was shown to possess an activity of histone H2A ubiquitination (49–51), whereas there has been no report indicating that the PRC1 possess an intrinsic histone H3-K27 methyltransferase activity. Accumulating evidence supports a sequential binding model (52), in which PRC2-mediated H3-K27 methylation serves as a binding site for the recruitment of PRC1 complex through the specific recognition of the H3-K27 methyl mark by the chromo domain of the polycomb protein, such as M33 (53, 54). In our study, however, the levels of tri-methylation of histone H3-K27 were substantially decreased in Bmi1–/– Th1 and Th2 cells (Fig. S10 and Fig. 4, D and E). In addition, the levels of binding of Suz12, a component of PRC2, at the Noxa gene locus were decreased in Bmi1–/– Th2 cells (Fig. 4 F). Thus, in Th2 cells, Bmi1 may play an important role for the recruitment of PRC2 and subsequent histone H3-K27 methylation at the Noxa gene locus. Alternatively, the Bmi1-containing PcG complex in Th2 cells may associate with a unique molecule possessing an intrinsic histone H3-K27 methyltransferase activity. In any event, tri-methylation of histone H3-K27 at the Noxa gene locus is strictly regulated by the expression of Bmi1.
The expression of Bmi1 is required for the DNA CpG methylation of the Noxa gene (Fig. 5 A). The binding of Dnmt1 at the CpG island was Bmi1 dependent (Fig. 5 B and Fig. S11). The treatment with a 5-Aza resulted in the dissociation of Bmi1, Ring1B, and Suz12 from the CpG island (Fig. 5 D) and the up-regulation of Noxa mRNA (Fig. 5 C and Fig. S13 A). Increased expression of Noxa mRNA and reduced binding of Bmi1 were confirmed in Dnmt1 knockdown T cells (Fig. 5, E and F). Recently, the PcG complex was reported to be associated with DNA methyltransferases, including Dnmt1 (55, 56). Thus, a DNA methyltransferase, such as Dnmt1, may play a critical role in the recruitment and the repressive function of the PcG complex at the Noxa gene.
In this study, we demonstrate that the generation and maintenance of memory Th1/Th2 cells (Fig. 1) and the memory Th2 cell–dependent airway inflammation are controlled by the expression of Bmi1 (Figs. 6 and 7). Our preliminary experiments demonstrate that at least Mel-18, Mph1/Rae28, and M33 appear to be involved in the regulation of memory Th2 cell generation (unpublished data), suggesting that the survival of memory Th2 cells is regulated by an epigenetic mechanism involving the Bmi1-containing PcG complex. We have recently reported that Bmi1 stabilizes GATA3 protein through the direct interaction with GATA3 (33). Mel-18 is involved in the induction of GATA3 expression in developing Th2 cells (32). Collectively, PcG gene products appear to control the development of effector and memory Th2 cells at multiple steps in a distinct manner and govern the Th2-type immune responses and inflammation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
β (DO11.10) Tg mice were provided by D. Loh (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) (57). All mice were used at 4–8 wk old. BALB/c and BALB/c nu/nu mice were purchased from Clea Inc. Ly5.1 mice were purchased from Sankyo Laboratory. All mice used in this study were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All experiments using mice received approval from the Chiba University Administrative Panel for Animal Care. Animal care was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Chiba University.
Reagents.
The reagents used in this study are as follows: FITC- or APC-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb (GK1.5), FITC-conjugated anti-Ly5.2 mAb (104), and PE-conjugated KJ1 (anti-clonotypic mAb for DO11.10 TCR) were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-FcR
II and III mAb (2.4G2) and unconjugated anti–IL-4 mAb (11B11), anti–IL-12 mAb (C17.8), and anti–IFN-
(R4-6A2) were used as culture supernatants. Recombinant mouse IL-4 was from TOYOBO. The OVA peptide (residues 323–339; ISQAVHAAHAEINEAGR) was synthesized by BEX Corporation.
The generation of effector and memory Th1/Th2 cells.
Effector and memory Th1/Th2 cells were generated as described previously (35, 36). In brief, splenic KJ1+CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 OVA-specific TCR Tg mice were stimulated with 1 µM of an OVA peptide (Loh15) plus APC (irradiated splenocytes) under the Th1 or Th2 culture conditions for 6 d in vitro. Th1 condition: 25 U/ml IL-2, 10 U/ml IL-12, and anti–IL-4 mAb. Th2 condition: 25 U/ml IL-2, 10 U/ml IL-4, anti–IL-12 mAb, and anti–IFN-
mAb. In some experiments, splenic CD4 T cells were stimulated with 3 µg/ml of immobilized anti–TCR-β mAb plus 1 µg/ml anti-CD28 mAb. These effector Th1/Th2 cells (3 x 107) were transferred intravenously into BALB/c nu/nu, BALB/c, or Ly5.1 C57BL/6 recipient mice. 5 wk after cell transfer, the generation of memory Th2 cells was assessed using donor cell–specific mAbs (KJ1 and anti-Ly5.2).
TUNEL assay.
TUNEL assay was performed with In Situ Cell Detection kit (Roche).
Measurement of BrdU incorporation in vivo.
The memory Th2 mice were treated twice with 1 mg BrdU on days 0 and 2. BrdU incorporation in splenic KJ1+ memory Th2 cells was assessed on day 4 using the BrdU Flow kit (BD Biosciences).
5-Aza treatment.
Developing Th2 cells were treated with 10 µM 5-Aza (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 d, and then total RNA was prepared.
ELISA.
Serum OVA–specific Ig concentrations were determined by ELISA as described previously (36).
Quantitative RT-PCR.
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using oligo (dT) primer and Superscript II RT (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed as described previously using ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (36). The primers for TaqMan probes for the detection were purchased from Applied Biosystems. The expression was normalized using the HPRT signal.
Retrovirus infection.
Retrovirus vector, pMXs-IRES-GFP, was provided by T. Kitamura (The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan). The method for the generation of virus supernatant and the infection was described previously (32). Infected cells were collected 4 d after infection and transferred into recipient mice.
Lentivirus infection.
Lentivirus vectors, pLKO.1 (SHC002) and pLKO.1 mouse Dnmt1 (TRCN39024), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. pCAG-HIVgp and pCMV-VSV-G-RSV-Rev vectors were provided by H. Miyoshi (RIKEN Bioresource Center, Ibaraki Japan). Recombinant lentiviruses were generated using a three-plasmid system as described previously (58). In brief, 293 T cells were transfected with self-inactivating lentiviral vector, pCAG-HIVgp vector, and pCMV-VSV-G-RSV-Rev vector. Virus containing culture supernatant was collected 48 h after transfection and used for infection. T cell line TG40 (2.5 x 105/well) was infected and selected using puromycin.
ChIP assay.
ChIP assay was performed as described previously (59). The antibodies using ChIP assay are as follows; anti-trimethyl histone H3-K4 (ab8580; Abcam), anti-trimethyl histone H3-K9 (Abcam), anti-trimethyl histone H3-K27 (Millipore), anti-Bmi1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-Dnmt1 (sc-20701; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-Suz12 (Abcam), and normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). An mAb specific for mouse Ring1b was provided by H. Koseki (Riken Research for Allergy and Immunology, Yokohama, Japan). The specific primers used in ChIP assay are shown in Table S1, which is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20072000/DC1.
MeDIP.
MeDIP was performed using a METHYL kit (Diagenode). In brief, genomic DNA was purified from effector Th2 cells and sheared by sonication to reduce DNA lengths to between 200 and 1,000 bp. The sheared DNA was diluted and incubated with antiserum specific for the 5-methyl cytidine. Next, immune complexes were precipitated with protein A agarose. The precipitated DNA was purified using QIAquick PCR Purification kit (QIAGEN).
Assessment of memory Th2 cell function in vivo.
OVA-specific wild-type and Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells (107 cells) were intravenously transferred into BALB/c nu/nu mice. 5 wk after cell transfer, the mice were challenged four times by inhalation with OVA on days 0, 2, 8, and 10. The serum Ig levels, lung histology, mRNA expression in the lung, and airway hyperresponsiveness were then assessed on day 11 as described previously (36, 60). BAL fluid was collected on day 12.
Statistical analysis.
Student's t test was used.
Online supplemental material.
Fig. S1 shows the phenotypic and functional characterization of Bmi1–/– Th2 cells. Fig. S2 shows the impaired generation of memory Th1 cells from Bmi1–/– effector Th1 cells. Fig. S3 depicts the kinetic analysis of the number of Th2 cells after adoptive transfer of effector Th2 cells, and Fig. S4 displays the competitive analysis for memory Th2 cell generation from Bmi1+/+ and Bmi1+/– effector Th2 cells under nonlymphopenic conditions. Fig. S5 shows a competitive analysis for memory Th2 cell generation from Bmi1+/+ and Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells under lymphopenic conditions. Fig. S6 shows that deletion of the p53 gene failed to restore the generation of Bmi1+/– memory Th2 cells. In Fig. S7, mRNA expression of Noxa in Bmi1+/+ and Bmi1–/– effector Th1, Th2, Tc1, and Tc2 cells is shown. Fig. S8 displays mRNA expression of the Ink4a/Arf and Noxa in Bmi1+/+, Bmi1+/–, and Bmi1–/– effector Th2 cells. In Fig. S9, binding of Bmi1 at the Noxa gene locus in effector Th1 and Th2 cells is shown. Fig. S10 depicts histone modifications at the Noxa gene locus in Bmi1+/+and Bmi1+/– effector Th1 cells. Fig. S11 shows binding of Dnmt1 at the Noxa gene locus in Bmi1+/+and Bmi1+/– effector Th1 cells, and Fig. S12 shows histone modifications at the Noxa gene locus after 5-Aza treatment. Fig. S12 displays Noxa mRNA expression and the binding of Bmi1 at the Noxa gene locus in effector Th1 cells after 5-Aza treatment. In Fig. S14, mRNA expression of Noxa in Th2 cells treated with RG108, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor is shown. Table S1 lists the primer pairs used for the ChIP assay. The online supplemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20072000/DC1.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Japan) (Grants-in-Aid: for Scientific Research on Priority Areas no. 17016010; Scientific Research [B] no. 17390139, Scientific Research [C] nos. 18590466, 19590491, and 19591609, Exploratory Research no. 19659121, Young Scientists [Start-up] no. 18890046, and Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology), and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Japan), Kanae Foundation, Uehara Memorial Foundation, Mochida Foundation, Yasuda Medical Foundation, Astellas Foundation, and Sagawa Foundation.
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 17 September 2007
Accepted: 26 March 2008
© 2008 Yamashita et al. This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.jem.org/misc/terms.shtml). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Mosmann, T.R., H. Cherwinski, M.W. Bond, M.A. Giedlin, and R.L. Coffman. 1986. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J. Immunol. 136:2348–2357.[Abstract]
2 Seder, R.A., and W.E. Paul. 1994. Acquisition of lymphokine-producing phenotype by CD4+ T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:635–673.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 Reiner, S.L., and R.M. Locksley. 1995. The regulation of immunity to Leishmania major. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:151–177.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 Kaech, S.M., E.J. Wherry, and R. Ahmed. 2002. Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:251–262.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 Schluns, K.S., and L. Lefrancois. 2003. Cytokine control of memory T-cell development and survival. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:269–279.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 Lanzavecchia, A., and F. Sallusto. 2002. Progressive differentiation and selection of the fittest in the immune response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:982–987.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 Dutton, R.W., L.M. Bradley, and S.L. Swain. 1998. T cell memory. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:201–223.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 Sprent, J., and C.D. Surh. 2002. T cell memory. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20:551–579.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 Lantz, O., I. Grandjean, P. Matzinger, and J.P. Di Santo. 2000.
chain required for naive CD4+ T cell survival but not for antigen proliferation. Nat. Immunol. 1:54–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 Tan, J.T., B. Ernst, W.C. Kieper, E. LeRoy, J. Sprent, and C.D. Surh. 2002. Interleukin (IL)-15 and IL-7 jointly regulate homeostatic proliferation of memory phenotype CD8+ cells but are not required for memory phenotype CD4+ cells. J. Exp. Med. 195:1523–1532.
11 Kondrack, R.M., J. Harbertson, J.T. Tan, M.E. McBreen, C.D. Surh, and L.M. Bradley. 2003. Interleukin 7 regulates the survival and generation of memory CD4 cells. J. Exp. Med. 198:1797–1806.
12 Li, J., G. Huston, and S.L. Swain. 2003. IL-7 promotes the transition of CD4 effectors to persistent memory cells. J. Exp. Med. 198:1807–1815.
13 Seddon, B., P. Tomlinson, and R. Zamoyska. 2003. Interleukin 7 and T cell receptor signals regulate homeostasis of CD4 memory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4:680–686.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 Kaech, S.M., J.T. Tan, E.J. Wherry, B.T. Konieczny, C.D. Surh, and R. Ahmed. 2003. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4:1191–1198.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 Maraskovsky, E., L.A. O'Reilly, M. Teepe, L.M. Corcoran, J.J. Peschon, and A. Strasser. 1997. Bcl-2 can rescue T lymphocyte development in interleukin-7 receptor-deficient mice but not in mutant rag-1–/– mice. Cell. 89:1011–1019.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 Opferman, J.T., H. Iwasaki, C.C. Ong, H. Suh, S. Mizuno, K. Akashi, and S.J. Korsmeyer. 2005. Obligate role of anti-apoptotic MCL-1 in the survival of hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 307:1101–1104.
17 Masopust, D., S.M. Kaech, E.J. Wherry, and R. Ahmed. 2004. The role of programming in memory T-cell development. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16:217–225.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 Fearon, D.T., P. Manders, and S.D. Wagner. 2001. Arrested differentiation, the self-renewing memory lymphocyte, and vaccination. Science. 293:248–250.
19 Luckey, C.J., D. Bhattacharya, A.W. Goldrath, I.L. Weissman, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis. 2006. Memory T and memory B cells share a transcriptional program of self-renewal with long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:3304–3309.
20 Park, I.K., D. Qian, M. Kiel, M.W. Becker, M. Pihalja, I.L. Weissman, S.J. Morrison, and M.F. Clarke. 2003. Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult self-renewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 423:302–305.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 Iwama, A., H. Oguro, M. Negishi, Y. Kato, Y. Morita, H. Tsukui, H. Ema, T. Kamijo, Y. Katoh-Fukui, H. Koseki, et al. 2004. Enhanced self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells mediated by the polycomb gene product Bmi-1. Immunity. 21:843–851.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 Molofsky, A.V., R. Pardal, T. Iwashita, I.K. Park, M.F. Clarke, and S.J. Morrison. 2003. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 425:962–967.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 Lessard, J., and G. Sauvageau. 2003. Bmi-1 determines the proliferative capacity of normal and leukaemic stem cells. Nature. 423:255–260.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 Satijn, D.P., and A.P. Otte. 1999. Polycomb group protein complexes: do different complexes regulate distinct target genes? Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1447:1–16.[Medline]
25 van Lohuizen, M. 1999. The trithorax-group and polycomb-group chromatin modifiers: implications for disease. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:355–361.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 Cao, R., L. Wang, H. Wang, L. Xia, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, R.S. Jones, and Y. Zhang. 2002. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science. 298:1039–1043.
27 Kuzmichev, A., K. Nishioka, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg. 2002. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 16:2893–2905.
28 Czermin, B., R. Melfi, D. McCabe, V. Seitz, A. Imhof, and V. Pirrotta. 2002. Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell. 111:185–196.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 Muller, J., C.M. Hart, N.J. Francis, M.L. Vargas, A. Sengupta, B. Wild, E.L. Miller, M.B. O'Connor, R.E. Kingston, and J.A. Simon. 2002. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell. 111:197–208.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 van der Lugt, N.M., J. Domen, K. Linders, M. van Roon, E. Robanus-Maandag, H. te Riele, M. van der Valk, J. Deschamps, M. Sofroniew, M. van Lohuizen, et al. 1994. Posterior transformation, neurological abnormalities, and severe hematopoietic defects in mice with a targeted deletion of the bmi-1 proto-oncogene. Genes Dev. 8:757–769.
31 Akasaka, T., K. Tsuji, H. Kawahira, M. Kanno, K. Harigaya, L. Hu, Y. Ebihara, T. Nakahata, O. Tetsu, M. Taniguchi, and H. Koseki. 1997. The role of mel-18, a mammalian Polycomb group gene, during IL-7-dependent proliferation of lymphocyte precursors. Immunity. 7:135–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
32 Kimura, M., Y. Koseki, M. Yamashita, N. Watanabe, C. Shimizu, T. Katsumoto, T. Kitamura, M. Taniguchi, H. Koseki, and T. Nakayama. 2001. Regulation of Th2 cell differentiation by mel-18, a mammalian polycomb group gene. Immunity. 15:275–287.[CrossRef][Medline]
33 Hosokawa, H., M.Y. Kimura, R. Shinnakasu, A. Suzuki, T. Miki, H. Koseki, M. van Lohuizen, M. Yamashita, and T. Nakayama. 2006. Regulation of Th2 cell development by Polycomb group gene bmi-1 through the stabilization of GATA3. J. Immunol. 177:7656–7664.
34 Su, I.H., A. Basavaraj, A.N. Krutchinsky, O. Hobert, A. Ullrich, B.T. Chait, and A. Tarakhovsky. 2003. Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement. Nat. Immunol. 4:124–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 Yamashita, M., R. Shinnakasu, Y. Nigo, M. Kimura, A. Hasegawa, M. Taniguchi, and T. Nakayama. 2004. Interleukin (IL)-4-independent maintenance of histone modification of the IL-4 gene loci in memory Th2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279:39454–39464.
36 Yamashita, M., K. Hirahara, R. Shinnakasu, H. Hosokawa, S. Norikane, M.Y. Kimura, A. Hasegawa, and T. Nakayama. 2006. Crucial role of MLL for the maintenance of memory T helper type 2 cell responses. Immunity. 24:611–622.[CrossRef][Medline]
37 Jacobs, J.J., K. Kieboom, S. Marino, R.A. DePinho, and M. van Lohuizen. 1999. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature. 397:164–168.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 Lowe, S.W., and C.J. Sherr. 2003. Tumor suppression by Ink4a-Arf: progress and puzzles. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13:77–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
39 Strasser, A. 2005. The role of BH3-only proteins in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:189–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
40 Alves, N.L., I.A. Derks, E. Berk, R. Spijker, R.A. van Lier, and E. Eldering. 2006. The Noxa/Mcl-1 axis regulates susceptibility to apoptosis under glucose limitation in dividing T cells. Immunity. 24:703–716.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 Marrack, P., and J. Kappler. 2004. Control of T cell viability. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22:765–787.[CrossRef][Medline]
42 Willis, S.N., and J.M. Adams. 2005. Life in the balance: how BH3-only proteins induce apoptosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17:617–625.[CrossRef][Medline]
43 Opferman, J.T., A. Letai, C. Beard, M.D. Sorcinelli, C.C. Ong, and S.J. Korsmeyer. 2003. Development and maintenance of B and T lymphocytes requires antiapoptotic MCL-1. Nature. 426:671–676.[CrossRef][Medline]
44 Oda, E., R. Ohki, H. Murasawa, J. Nemoto, T. Shibue, T. Yamashita, T. Tokino, T. Taniguchi, and N. Tanaka. 2000. Noxa, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family and candidate mediator of p53-induced apoptosis. Science. 288:1053–1058.
45 Bruggeman, S.W., M.E. Valk-Lingbeek, P.P. van der Stoop, J.J. Jacobs, K. Kieboom, E. Tanger, D. Hulsman, C. Leung, Y. Arsenijevic, S. Marino, and M. van Lohuizen. 2005. Ink4a and Arf differentially affect cell proliferation and neural stem cell self-renewal in Bmi1-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 19:1438–1443.
46 Molofsky, A.V., S. He, M. Bydon, S.J. Morrison, and R. Pardal. 2005. Bmi-1 promotes neural stem cell self-renewal and neural development but not mouse growth and survival by repressing the p16Ink4a and p19Arf senescence pathways. Genes Dev. 19:1432–1437.
47 Bauer, A., A. Villunger, V. Labi, S.F. Fischer, A. Strasser, H. Wagner, R.M. Schmid, and G. Hacker. 2006. The NF-
B regulator Bcl-3 and the BH3-only proteins Bim and Puma control the death of activated T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:10979–10984.
48 You, H., M. Pellegrini, K. Tsuchihara, K. Yamamoto, G. Hacker, M. Erlacher, A. Villunger, and T.W. Mak. 2006. FOXO3a-dependent regulation of Puma in response to cytokine/growth factor withdrawal. J. Exp. Med. 203:1657–1663.
49 de Napoles, M., J.E. Mermoud, R. Wakao, Y.A. Tang, M. Endoh, R. Appanah, T.B. Nesterova, J. Silva, A.P. Otte, M. Vidal, et al. 2004. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev. Cell. 7:663–676.[CrossRef][Medline]
50 Wang, H., L. Wang, H. Erdjument-Bromage, M. Vidal, P. Tempst, R.S. Jones, and Y. Zhang. 2004. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature. 431:873–878.[CrossRef][Medline]
51 Cao, R., Y. Tsukada, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A ubiquitylation and Hox gene silencing. Mol. Cell. 20:845–854.[CrossRef][Medline]
52 Wang, L., J.L. Brown, R. Cao, Y. Zhang, J.A. Kassis, and R.S. Jones. 2004. Hierarchical recruitment of polycomb group silencing complexes. Mol. Cell. 14:637–646.[CrossRef][Medline]
53 Fischle, W., Y. Wang, S.A. Jacobs, Y. Kim, C.D. Allis, and S. Khorasanizadeh. 2003. Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 17:1870–1881.
54 Min, J., Y. Zhang, and R.M. Xu. 2003. Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27. Genes Dev. 17:1823–1828.
55 Vire, E., C. Brenner, R. Deplus, L. Blanchon, M. Fraga, C. Didelot, L. Morey, A. Van Eynde, D. Bernard, J.M. Vanderwinden, et al. 2006. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 439:871–874.[CrossRef][Medline]
56 Negishi, M., A. Saraya, S. Miyagi, K. Nagao, Y. Inagaki, M. Nishikawa, S. Tajima, H. Koseki, H. Tsuda, Y. Takasaki, et al. 2007. Bmi1 cooperates with Dnmt1-associated protein 1 in gene silencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 353:992–998.[CrossRef][Medline]
57 Murphy, K.M., A.B. Heimberger, and D.Y. Loh. 1990. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science. 250:1720–1723.
58 Miyoshi, H., U. Blomer, M. Takahashi, F.H. Gage, and I.M. Verma. 1998. Development of a self-inactivating lentivirus vector. J. Virol. 72:8150–8157.
59 Yamashita, M., M. Ukai-Tadenuma, M. Kimura, M. Omori, M. Inami, M. Taniguchi, and T. Nakayama. 2002. Identification of a conserved GATA3 response element upstream proximal from the interleukin-13 gene locus. J. Biol. Chem. 277:42399–42408.
60 Kamata, T., M. Yamashita, M. Kimura, K. Murata, M. Inami, C. Shimizu, K. Sugaya, C.R. Wang, M. Taniguchi, and T. Nakayama. 2003. src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 controls the development of allergic airway inflammation. J. Clin. Invest. 111:109–119.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|