|
||
ARTICLE |
CORRESPONDENCE Tatiana V. Byzova: byzovat{at}ccf.org
|
|
|---|
The process of angiogenesis involves coordinated endothelial cell (EC) proliferation, invasion, migration, and tube formation. This process is induced by vascular growth factors in coordination with extracellular matrixinteracting molecules such as integrins (1). Among integrins,
vß3 heterodimer is known to be up-regulated on proliferating endothelial cells during angiogenesis and vascular remodeling. The disruption of
vß3 integrin ligation by either blocking antibodies or cyclic peptide antagonists prevented blood vessel formation in mouse retina, rabbit cornea, chick chorioallantoic membrane, and human skin transplanted onto athymic mice (26). Histological examination of tumor tissue from mice treated with the
vß3 blockers revealed reduction in the tumor cell viability and in the vascular density (7). These findings suggested that integrin
vß3 provides cellular signals that facilitate EC proliferation and migration during angiogenesis.
However, studies using ß3- and ß5-null mice demonstrated enhanced tumor growth, tumor angiogenesis, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Ainduced vascular permeability caused by elevated levels of VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-2 on ECs (8, 9). Therefore, it has been concluded that
vß3 and
vß5 integrins function as negative regulators of angiogenesis by restricting the VEGFR-2 expression (10). Surprisingly, neither
vß3 blocking antibody nor cyclic peptide antagonists induced VEGFR-2 expression in any of the model systems described in previous studies. This raises the possibility that an enhanced expression of VEGFR-2 in integrin ß3/ß5deficient mice could be a result of over-compensation because both integrins are pivotal for early embryonic vasculogenesis and angiogenesis (11). Another hypothesis suggested by authors of previous studies is that unligated integrins can act as negative regulators of cell survival by initiating a process referred to as "integrin-mediated cell death." Therefore, a genetic ablation of a proapoptotic stimulus (i.e., unligated
vß3/
vß5) would lead to increased endothelial cell survival in vivo, contributing to increased blood vessel density (12). Overall, because of the great deal of controversy, the precise role of
vß3 integrin in endothelial cell biology and angiogenesis remains unclear.
One of the characteristic features of integrins is the ability to transduce signals through the cellular membrane in both directions. Outside-in signaling informs the cell about the extracellular matrix environment. Inside-out signaling, known as integrin activation, is the process stimulated by agonist (i.e., thrombin or adenosine diphosphate for platelets and growth factor for EC) and results in changes in integrin functional activity (13). The cytoplasmic domains of integrins play a vital role in these bidirectional signaling processes. The cytoplasmic domain of the ß3 subunit of the vitronectin receptor (
vß3) undergoes phosphorylation in response to cell adhesion to an immobilized ligand (14). Phosphorylated ß3 can recruit signaling intermediates, Shc and GRB2, suggesting that the phosphorylation of the ß3 cytoplasmic domain may induce Ras activation in several cell types (15).
To elucidate the role of ß3 integrin and its complexes, we characterized mice that express a mutant form of ß3 integrin, but not the WT form (knock-in mice). In the mutant, the two tyrosine residues known to be involved in integrin signaling, Tyr747 and Tyr759, were substituted to phenylalanines. The mutant is unable to undergo phosphorylation of cytoplasmic domain, resulting in deficient integrin signaling. In these mice, named DiYF, the mutant ß3 integrin is physically present on all cell types, which should prevent any developmental compensatory changes. Recent studies using DiYF mice demonstrated that mutation of both cytoplasmic tyrosine residues of the ß3 cytoplasmic domain leads to the defective function of
IIbß3 on platelets, unstable platelet aggregation, and clot retraction in vitro and to an enhanced tendency to rebleed in vivo (16, 17). Thus, although it is clear that ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs play an important role in integrin signaling in platelets, its function in endothelial and other specialized cells remains unknown.
In the specialized cells, integrins form functional complexes with other receptors on the cell surface. Most often, integrins are associated with tyrosine kinase receptors and these two types of receptors influence each others activity (18, 19). On ECs,
vß3 integrin is intimately linked with the VEGFR-2, because VEGF is able to induce
vß3 integrin expression and activation (20). At the same time,
vß3 is able to enhance the phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 in response to VEGF and subsequent activation of SAPK2/p38 and FAK.
We sought to directly establish the role of ß3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation and integrin signaling in VEGF-stimulated responses of EC and in pathological angiogenesis in vivo. To this end, we combined in vivo and ex vivo angiogenesis assays with an extensive characterization of ECs derived from both WT and DiYF mice to perform a complete analysis of the role of integrin ß3 and its signaling in functional responses to VEGF.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vß3 such as vitronectin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, and gelatin strongly stimulated Tyr759 and Tyr747 phosphorylation of WT ECs. Laminin and collagen, which are recognized primarily by integrins other than
vß3, induced lower levels of tyrosine phosphorylation. Sodium pervanadate, known to block phosphatase activity, was used as a positive control in this experiment. As anticipated, no tyrosine phosphorylation of ß3 integrin was observed in DiYF EC under any conditions.
|
Pathological angiogenesis is impaired in DiYF mice
We next evaluated whether ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs are crucial for a complete angiogenic response to VEGF in vivo. We implanted VEGF-Acontaining Matrigel subcutaneously into WT and DiYF mice and assessed the angiogenic response based on the amount of hemoglobin extracted from Matrigel. As shown in Fig. 2 A, the hemoglobin concentration was at least fivefold lower in Matrigel plugs isolated from DiYF mice compared with WT counterparts. The vascular density in Matrigel implants was assessed by von Willebrand factor (vWF) staining. Only 50% of Matrigel plugs from DiYF mice had a distinguishable vasculature and exhibited staining for vWF (Fig. 2 B, top).
The vascular density was 4.2-fold lower in DiYF mice than in WT controls (P = 0.01) (Fig. 2 B, bottom). Thus, VEGF-induced angiogenesis was significantly impaired in DiYF mice.
|
Knowing that monocytes/macrophages use ß3 integrin for their arrest and extravasation at sites of inflammation, we assessed whether DiYF mutation affects macrophage recruitment into tumors using anti-F4/80 antibody staining. As shown in Fig. 2 G, considerable amounts of macrophages were found to be present in tumors implanted in both WT and DiYF mice. No substantial reductions in macrophage recruitment were found in DiYF mice. Similar results were observed in Matrigel model of VEGF-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 2 H). Thus, DiYF mutations within ß3 integrin do not impair the process of macrophage recruitment in tumors.
Normal embryogenesis and adult vasculature development in DiYF mice
Homozygous WT and DiYF mice were bred to obtain homozygous littermates. The average number of embryos per litter was the same. Size and weight of pups were not substantially different between WT and DiYF mice. In contrast to ß3 integrin knockout mice, no embryonic mortality caused by placental defects was observed in DiYF mice. DiYF mutation did not affected survival of embryos at early stages of development. DiYF embryos did not exhibit any broad vascular defects (Fig. 3 A).
Prenatal DiYF mutant mothers did not suffer from intrauterine hemorrhage and placental defects (Fig. 3 B) as observed in ß3 integrin knockout mice. To examine the survival of DiYF mutant mice after birth, the numbers of pups per litter from homozygous crosses were monitored. Even after 7 d of postpartum there was no significant difference in mortality of pups between these two groups. The DiYF mutant embryos (P = 12) or pups did not show any vasculature defects and hemorrhage in skin or in gastrointestinal tract as observed in ß3 integrin knockout mice (Fig. 3 C). Development of large blood vessels exemplified by aorta also appeared to be normal because no significant differences (P = 0.445) in thickness and general histological structures of aorta were observed in DiYF mice compared with WT counterparts (Fig. 3 D).
|
DiYF mutations within the ß3 integrin cytoplasmic domain impair angiogenic properties of ECs
Previous studies demonstrated that
vß3 integrin controls migration, invasive potential, and angiogenic phenotype of ECs (20). Therefore, we assessed whether impaired ß3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation affected EC capillary and tube formation ex vivo. WT but not DiYF ECs were able to form well-assembled and complete capillary cord-like structures in the presence of VEGF-A (Fig. 4 A).
In contrast, DiYF ECs remained randomly scattered without any signs of organization (Fig. 4 A). The number of cords formed by WT EC was 5.4-fold higher compared with DiYF cells (Fig. 4 B).
|
ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs controls ex vivo angiogenesis in response to VEGF
We next assessed whether DiYF mutations affected an outgrowth of vascular sprouts from aortic segments isolated from mice. First, an ex vivo angiogenic assay was performed in Matrigel enriched with growth factors. The aortic rings from WT mice produced an extensive network of vascular sprouts, whereas DiYF aortic rings failed to do so (Fig. 4 E). To elucidate the role of ß3 integrin in VEGF-induced responses, the aortic ring assay was performed in the presence or absence of VEGF using growth factorreduced Matrigel. Under these conditions, aortic rings from WT mice produced a significantly higher number of vascular sprouts both in the absence and presence of VEGF than did aortic rings from DiYF mice (Fig. 4 F). Quantification of the number of aortic ring sprouts indicated that DiYF cells formed fourfold fewer vascular sprouts ex vivo, regardless of stimulation, than did WT aortic rings (Fig. 4 G). VEGF produced a small increase in capillary formation of DiYF rings; however, the number of sprouts was only 2025% of that observed in WT aortic rings (Fig. 4 G).
To further analyze the capillary growth from aortic rings, a detailed kinetic study was undertaken. The time curves of vascular growth are presented in Fig. 4 H. In the absence of stimulation, very few microvessels were detected in either WT or DiYF implants even after a prolonged incubation, whereas serum-induced neovascularization was considerably higher in WT implants than in DiYF implants (Fig. 4 H). The peak values of capillary growth were observed 8 d after implantation and were 10 and 45 microvessels per ring for DiYF and WT, respectively. VEGF with endothelial growth supplement was a stronger stimulus than endothelial growth supplement alone, but both produced extensive formation of capillaries in WT but not in DiYF aortic rings (Fig. 4 H). Collectively, these results indicate that the impaired pathological angiogenesis in DiYF mice was caused by the defective functional responses of endothelial cells.
ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs regulates EC adhesion, spreading, and migration
To further define the nature of the angiogenic defect observed in DiYF mice, we compared angiogenesis-relevant functions of ECs isolated from WT and DiYF mice. We first assessed whether the mutation in ß3 integrin cytoplasmic domain had any effect on EC adhesion and subsequent cell spreading on extracellular matrix substrates. WT and DiYF ECs were plated on various integrin ligands and numbers of attached and spread cells per field were counted. WT and DiYF ECs adhered and spread equally well on fibronectin, laminin-1, and collagen-coated plates (Fig. 5, A and B).
In contrast, a significant difference (P < 0.001) in the behavior of WT and DiYF ECs was found using the
vß3 ligands vitronectin and entactin. On these substrates, DiYF ECs showed a twofold reduction in adhesion and a fourfold decrease in the number of spread cells on vitronectin and threefolds on entactin (Fig. 5, A and B). To further examine the role of ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs in regulation of receptor ligand-binding strength, we examined cell adhesion under conditions of shear stress. WT and excessive DiYF endothelial cells were plated on vitronectin-coated glass coverslips to achieve equal number of adherent cells. Then, adherent cells were subjected to perfusion with shear rates of 530 dyn/cm2 for 1 min. As shown in Fig. 5 C, shear stress revealed a dramatic difference in strength of adhesion between WT and DiYF endothelial cells. Shear stress of 10 to 15 dyne/cm2 almost completely abolishes DiYF endothelial cell adhesion to vitronectin, whereas >60% of WT endothelial cells remained tightly adhered to the matrix. Shear rate sufficient to wash away 50% of adherent cells was 23 and 8 dyne/cm2 for WT and DiYF endothelial cells, respectively (Fig. 5 C). This finding demonstrates that ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs regulates ligand-binding strength.
|
We then compared the VEGF-induced migratory activity of WT and DiYF ECs. Stimulation of WT ECs with VEGF at 5, 10, and 20 ng/ml induced 1.5-, 2.5-, and 2.9-fold increases of migration compared with untreated ECs (Fig. 5 E). DiYF ECs also responded to VEGF stimulation; however, the rate of migration was substantially reduced when compared with WT cells (Fig. 5 E). Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation of
vß3 integrin appears to play an important role in VEGF-induced EC migration to extracellular matrix. To further confirm these results, we used an alternative and more physiologically relevant method to assess EC migration. WT and DiYF ECs were plated on various integrin ligands and were allowed to form a confluent monolayer. Then, a wound in the monolayer was created and the healing process was monitored at different time points. The quantitative aspects of wound recovery and representative images of ECs are presented in Fig. 5, F and G, respectively. Whereas WT and DiYF EC migrated equally well on fibronectin, laminin, and collagen, a threefold reduction in migration on vitronectin was observed in DiYF ECs compared with WT (Fig. 5 F). The DiYF mutation impairs
vß3 integrin-dependent and VEGF-stimulated responses of ECs, underscoring the role of phosphorylation of tyrosines in the cytoplasmic domain in the regulation of a cross-talk between
vß3 and VEGFRs.
ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs are required for sustained activation of VEGFR-2
Next, we sought to identify a molecular mechanism responsible for abnormalities observed in DiYF ECs. Previous studies using ß3-null mice demonstrated that the absence of ß3 leads to up-regulation of VEGFR-2 and consequently to augmentation of angiogenic responses of ECs (8). However, no differences in VEGFR-2 levels were observed between DiYF and WT ECs from lung or aortic origin (unpublished data). It was previously shown that integrin ß3 forms a complex with VEGFR-2 immediately upon stimulation with VEGF, and this association was proposed to be necessary for the activation of angiogenic program in ECs (23). Therefore, we sought to determine whether the DiYF mutations impaired the interaction of ß3 integrin with VEGFR-2. Low levels of ß3VEGFR-2 interaction were observed in unstimulated WT ECs in suspension or upon adhesion to extracellular matrix. VEGF stimulated a dramatic increase in formation of the complex between ß3 and VEGFR-2 in WT ECs plated on vitronectin, but not in suspension or on laminin, demonstrating the ligand specificity of this phenomenon (Fig. 6 A).
In contrast, no interaction between ß3 and VEGR-2 was observed in DiYF ECs under any conditions (Fig. 6 B). Thus, ß3 tyrosine phosphorylation was essential for an interaction between VEGFR-2 and
vß3 integrin.
|
ß3 integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motifs are critical for VEGF-induced
vß3 integrin activation
An intrinsic property of integrin is an increase in soluble ligand binding in response to stimulation, a process referred to as integrin activation. We and others previously reported that VEGF activates
vß3 integrin on ECs in response to VEGF (24). We sought to determine whether impaired activation of VEGFR-2 in DiYF ECs resulted in defective
vß3 activation by VEGF. VEGF induced a sixfold increase of fibrinogen binding to WT ECs, but only a threefold increase in binding to DiYF ECs (Fig. 7 A).
MnCl2, an agonist known to activate integrins and stimulate ß3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation (25), produced at least a 12-fold increase in fibrinogen binding to WT ECs compared with a 5-fold increase observed in DiYF ECs (Fig. 7 B). The specificity of ligand binding was confirmed by addition of 10-fold excess of unlabeled fibrinogen. Similar results were observed when integrin activation was monitored using a monovalent activation-dependent ligand WOW-1 Fab. VEGF and MnCl2 stimulated 9- and 11-fold increases, respectively, in WOW-1 binding to WT ECs and 3.5- and 4-fold increases, respectively, to DiYF ECs (Fig. 7 C and Fig. 6 D). Thus, it is apparent that the mutations within the cytoplasmic domain of ß3 integrin in the DiYF mice significantly impair the process of integrin activation, resulting in defective cell adhesion and migration.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vß3 function in primary endothelial cells as opposed to model cell lines lacking appropriate receptors and signaling intermediates. The ex vivo and in vitro results from this model provided novel information that is different from the previously published results from in vitro studies and ß3 knockout mice experiments (8). A unique aspect of our experimental system is that compensatory or over-compensatory responses were not observed; these responses often occur in knockout models when a protein of interest is absent during development (26). Using DiYF knock-in mice, we assessed pathological neovascularization in vivo and performed an extensive analysis of the underlying mechanisms of angiogenesis using ex vivo models. The major findings of this paper are the following. (a) Phosphorylation of ß3 integrin in WT ECs occurred in response to integrin ligation and VEGF stimulation. (b) Lack of ß3 integrin phosphorylation in DiYF knock-in mice resulted in impaired angiogenic response in three distinct in vivo models. As a result of reduced vascularization, tumor growth was significantly inhibited in DiYF mice compared with WT. (c) At the same time, DiYF mutation did not affect embryogenesis, organogenesis, and overall vascular development. In contrast to the phenotype of ß3 integrin knockout mice, DiYF pups were broadly normal and did not show any hemorrhage in any organ. Vascular density and maturation in adult DiYF animal was also normal, indicating that integrin phosphorylation is crucial for pathological but not normal vascularization. (d) In ECs from DiYF mice, VEGF-induced functional responses (cell adhesion, spreading, migration, and capillary tube formation) were defective compared with WT. (e) Lack of ß3 integrin phosphorylation in DiYF ECs lead to disruption of the VEGFR-2ß3 integrin complex and lack of VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in response to VEGF. (f) VEGF-induced integrin activation (inside-out signaling) was suppressed in DiYF ECs compared with WT ECs.
Our data show that, in WT ECs, phosphorylation of ß3 integrin occurs in response to integrin ligation and VEGF stimulation. The finding that ß3 phosphorylation occurs not only in response to adhesion to extracellular matrix (i.e., as a result of outside-in integrin signaling), but also upon treatment with VEGF, indicates that ß3 might play an important regulatory role in outside-in integrin signaling, also known as integrin activation. In DiYF ECs, ß3 cannot be phosphorylated, and integrin activation, as measured by soluble ligand binding to
Vß3, was considerably reduced compared with WT. Previous studies demonstrated that ligation or the treatment with the agonist Mn2+ induces ß3 integrin phosphorylation in cells other than ECs (25). At the molecular level, it was also shown that ß3 integrin phosphorylation controls the strength of receptorligand interaction (27), and might contribute to the overall functional activity of the integrin.
In three distinct models, one that measured capillary formation in Matrigel and two others for vascularity of implanted tumors, we observed that pathological angiogenesis was severely impaired in DiYF mice. Our findings are consistent with the results of studies using
Vß3 blocking antibodies and demonstrate a key role for
Vß3 integrin in angiogenesis, suggesting that ß3 integrin is a positive regulator of angiogenesis and its phosphorylation is a critical step in EC responses during VEGF-induced neovascularization. Further, our findings provide an additional argument that increased angiogenesis observed in ß3 knockout mice (8) is a result of molecular compensation via VEGR-2; this emphasizes the physiological importance of VEGR-2
Vß3 cross-regulation in ECs, but does not reflect the true function of
Vß3 integrin in angiogenesis in an organism expressing normal amounts of this receptor. Since our experimental approach does not involve a complete deletion of ß3 integrin from the cell surface, it does not trigger compensatory responses (i.e., up-regulation of VEGR-2). The phenomenon of molecular compensationin many cases, over-compensationin knockout mice has been described in numerous reports and represents a major drawback of the knockout approach. Frequently, the loss of a particular protein results in increased expression of other members of the same family, revealing the functional redundancy (28). It has been shown, for example, that
Vß5 integrin can compensate for the loss of
5ß1 integrin (26). Analysis of the substitute molecule, which is structurally and functionally distinct from the targeted protein (29, 30), might reveal new connections within the molecular network. It is intriguing that VEGR-2, a tyrosine kinase receptor, can compensate for the loss of a member of integrin family of cell adhesion molecules, as VEGR-2 is distinct in regard to ligand repertoire and other functional aspects.
In the present study, impaired angiogenesis in DiYF knock-in mice resulted from the decreased adhesion, spreading, and migration of ECs in response to VEGF. Interestingly, impaired cell adhesion and migration was observed only on vitronectin as a substrate, but not on fibronectin or collagen. Nevertheless, ex vivo angiogenesis in Matrigel, and in vivo angiogenesis, was defective, emphasizing a role for
Vß3 in this process. At the molecular level, this study demonstrated that impaired tyrosine phosphorylation of ß3 integrin in DiYF ECs abrogated
Vß3VEGFR-2 complex formation and resulted in dramatically reduced phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 upon VEGF stimulation. Since VEGF (via VEGFR-2 as its major functional receptor on ECs) induces phosphorylation of
Vß3 and phosphorylation of
Vß3, in turn, is required for complete and sustained phosphorylation of VEGFR-2, it can be concluded that these two receptors are able to cross-activate each other in ECs, therefore forming a functional partnership that is essential for successful angiogenesis.
Collectively, our findings demonstrate that
Vß3 and its inside-out and outside-in signaling is essential for pathological angiogenesis and undoubtedly represents a promising target for pharmaceutical approaches. However, when developing new inhibitors for angiogenesis, one should take into consideration the complexity of
Vß3 regulation, its interactions with other receptors, and possible compensatory changes resulting from its suppression.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vivo Matrigel plug assay.
WT and DiYF animals received an abdominal subcutaneous injection of 500 µl Matrigel mixed with VEGF (60 ng/ml) and heparin (60 units/ml). After 7 d, the animals were killed and dissected. Matrigel plugs were removed and digested using 5 ml Drabkin reagent, and quantification of neovascularization was assessed using a hemoglobin assay as per the manufacturer's protocol.
Tumor angiogenesis.
WT and DiYF mice were subcutaneously injected with freshly harvested 106 B16F10 mouse melanoma or RM-1 mouse prostate cancer cells. Tumors were collected 10 d after injection and tumor weights were measured. Tumors were also photographed and processed for immunohistochemical staining.
Immunohistochemistry and image analysis.
Immunohistochemistry and image analysis was performed as described previously (21). Matrigel plugs or tumor tissues sections were stained with polyclonal rabbit anti-vWF antibody (Abcam, Inc.) or rat anti-F4/80 (Serotec, Inc). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. WT and DiYF skin, liver, and kidney tissue samples were processed and stained for vWF or laminin. B16F10 tumor sections were stained with polyclonal anti-CD31 (Fitzgerald Industries Intl.) and anti-laminin (Sigma-Aldrich) antibody.
Aortic ring assay and isolation of endothelial cells.
The mouse aortic ring assay was performed as described previously (21). WT and DiYF mouse lungs were excised, minced, and digested using collagenase-dispase reagent (3 mg/ml). Digests were strained and the resulting cell suspension was plated on flasks coated with 1 mg/ml fibronectin. Endothelial cells were isolated and characterized as described previously (31).
Cell adhesion and cell spreading assay.
The cell adhesion assay was performed as described previously (32). Mouse lung endothelial cell suspensions were added to ligand-coated wells and placed in humidified incubator for 45 min. The wells were gently washed three times with DMEM and photographs were taken. The numbers of attached and spread cells per field were counted. Adhesion assay under shear stress conditions was performed as described previously using flow chamber (33). Prior to the beginning of the experiment WT and 2.25-fold excess DiYF endothelial cells were added on vitronectin-coated coverslips to achieve approximately equal number of adherent cell population and allowed to interact with the matrix for 15 min. These coverslips were gently washed and introduced into the bottom of the flow chamber. Shear stress of 530 dyne/cm2 was applied using syringe pump for 1 min. Number of WT endothelial cells adhered to vitronectin under static condition per field was assigned the value of 100% and relative adhesion was calculated.
Endothelial cell migration and wound healing assay.
Endothelial cell migration assay was performed as described previously (24). WT and DiYF mouse lung endothelial cells were grown to confluence in 12-well plates precoated with various integrin ligands. Cells were serum starved and then a wound was created. Images were recorded immediately after wounding (time zero) and 12 h later. Cell migration was quantified using image analysis of five randomly selected fields of denuded area. The mean wound area is expressed as percent of recovery (% R) from three identically treated plates using the equation % R = [1 (Tt/T0)] x 100, where T0 is the wounded area at 0 h and Tt is the wounded area after 12 h.
WOW-1 and fibrinogen binding assay.
WOW-1 Fab binding assay was performed as described previously (34). To assess fibrinogen binding, WT and DiYF mouse lung endothelial cells were serum starved for 4 h and further induced with 20 ng/ml VEGF-165 or 1 mm MnCl2. FITC-labeled fibrinogen was added at a final concentration of 200 nM for 45 min. Cells were fixed and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. FACS was performed using a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson), and data were analyzed using CellQuest software program.
Endothelial tube and precapillary cord formation assay.
The formation of vascular tube-like structures by WT and DiYF mouse lung endothelial cells were assessed on the basement membrane matrix preparation. WT and DiYF mouse lung endothelial cells were seeded on Matrigel-coated plates. Medium with or without 20 ng/ml VEGF was added, and cells were further incubated at 37°C for 8 h. The tube formation was observed using an inverted phasecontrast microscope, and photographs were taken from each well. Using ImagePro software, the degree of tube formation was quantified by measuring the length of tubes in random fields. The precapillary cord formation assay was performed as described previously (22).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis.
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (23). To analyze the ß3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation of WT and DiYF mouse lung microvascular endothelial cells, ECs were added to various integrin ligand-coated plates and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. Cell lysates containing equal amount of proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using rabbit antiintegrin ß3 [pY747] and [pY759] antibody (Biosource International, Inc). Cell lysates were also analyzed for ß3 integrin expression as a loading control. Serum-starved WT and DiYF ECs were also treated with 20 ng/ml VEGF for 060 min. Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot using antiintegrin ß3 [pY747], antiintegrin ß3 [pY759], antiERK-1/2 and antip-ERK-1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies.
Statistical analysis.
Values were expressed as mean ± SDs. p values were based on the paired t test. Results were considered statically significant with P < 0.05.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 17 April 2006
Accepted: 14 September 2006
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Eliceiri, B.P. 2001. Integrin and growth factor receptor crosstalk. Circ. Res. 89:11041110.
2 Friedlander, M., P.C. Brooks, R.W. Shaffer, C.M. Kincaid, J.A. Varner, and D.A. Cheresh. 1995. Definition of two angiogenic pathways by distinct alpha v integrins. Science. 270:15001502.
3 Brooks, P.C., R.A. Clark, and D.A. Cheresh. 1994. Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science. 264:569571.
4 Brooks, P.C., S. Stromblad, R. Klemke, D. Visscher, F.H. Sarkar, and D.A. Cheresh. 1995. Antiintegrin alpha v beta 3 blocks human breast cancer growth and angiogenesis in human skin. J. Clin. Invest. 96:18151822.[Medline]
5 Drake, C.J., D.A. Cheresh, and C.D. Little. 1995. An antagonist of integrin alpha v beta 3 prevents maturation of blood vessels during embryonic neovascularization. J. Cell Sci. 108(Pt 7):26552661.[Abstract]
6 Hammes, H.P., M. Brownlee, A. Jonczyk, A. Sutter, and K.T. Preissner. 1996. Subcutaneous injection of a cyclic peptide antagonist of vitronectin receptor-type integrins inhibits retinal neovascularization. Nat. Med. 2:529533.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 Brooks, P.C., A.M. Montgomery, M. Rosenfeld, R.A. Reisfeld, T. Hu, G. Klier, and D.A. Cheresh. 1994. Integrin alpha v beta 3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels. Cell. 79:11571164.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 Reynolds, L.E., L. Wyder, J.C. Lively, D. Taverna, S.D. Robinson, X. Huang, D. Sheppard, R.O. Hynes, and K.M. Hodivala-Dilke. 2002. Enhanced pathological angiogenesis in mice lacking beta3 integrin or beta3 and beta5 integrins. Nat. Med. 8:2734.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 Robinson, S.D., L.E. Reynolds, L. Wyder, D.J. Hicklin, and K.M. Hodivala-Dilke. 2004. Beta3-integrin regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-A-dependent permeability. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24:21082114.
10 Hodivala-Dilke, K.M., A.R. Reynolds, and L.E. Reynolds. 2003. Integrins in angiogenesis: multitalented molecules in a balancing act. Cell Tissue Res. 314:131144.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 Sheppard, D. 2002. Endothelial integrins and angiogenesis: not so simple anymore. J. Clin. Invest. 110:913914.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 Cheresh, D.A., and D.G. Stupack. 2002. Integrin-mediated death: an explanation of the integrin-knockout phenotype? Nat. Med. 8:193194.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 Hynes, R.O. 2002. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 110:673687.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 Chandhoke, S.K., M. Williams, E. Schaefer, L. Zorn, and S.D. Blystone. 2004. Beta 3 integrin phosphorylation is essential for Arp3 organization into leukocyte alpha V beta 3-vitronectin adhesion contacts. J. Cell Sci. 117:14311441.
15 Butler, B., M.P. Williams, and S.D. Blystone. 2003. Ligand-dependent activation of integrin alpha vbeta 3. J. Biol. Chem. 278:52645270.
16 Law, D.A., F.R. DeGuzman, P. Heiser, K. Ministri-Madrid, N. Killeen, and D.R. Phillips. 1999. Integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motif is required for outside-in alphaIIbbeta3 signalling and platelet function. Nature. 401:808811.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 Prasad, K.S., P. Andre, M. He, M. Bao, J. Manganello, and D.R. Phillips. 2003. Soluble CD40 ligand induces beta3 integrin tyrosine phosphorylation and triggers platelet activation by outside-in signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:1236712371.
18 Das, R., G.H. Mahabeleshwar, and G.C. Kundu. 2004. Osteopontin induces AP-1-mediated secretion of urokinase-type plasminogen activator through c-Src-dependent epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation in breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279:1105111064.
19 Sundberg, C., and K. Rubin. 1996. Stimulation of beta1 integrins on fibroblasts induces PDGF independent tyrosine phosphorylation of PDGF beta-receptors. J. Cell Biol. 132:741752.
20 Eliceiri, B.P., and D.A. Cheresh. 1999. The role of alphav integrins during angiogenesis: insights into potential mechanisms of action and clinical development. J. Clin. Invest. 103:12271230.[Medline]
21 Chen, J., P.R. Somanath, O. Razorenova, W.S. Chen, N. Hay, P. Bornstein, and T.V. Byzova. 2005. Akt1 regulates pathological angiogenesis, vascular maturation and permeability in vivo. Nat. Med. 11:11881196.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 Hoang, M.V., M.C. Whelan, and D.R. Senger. 2004. Rho activity critically and selectively regulates endothelial cell organization during angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:18741879.
23 Soldi, R., S. Mitola, M. Strasly, P. Defilippi, G. Tarone, and F. Bussolino. 1999. Role of alphavbeta3 integrin in the activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. EMBO J. 18:882892.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 Byzova, T.V., C.K. Goldman, N. Pampori, K.A. Thomas, A. Bett, S.J. Shattil, and E.F. Plow. 2000. A mechanism for modulation of cellular responses to VEGF: activation of the integrins. Mol. Cell. 6:851860.[Medline]
25 Blystone, S.D., M.P. Williams, S.E. Slater, and E.J. Brown. 1997. Requirement of integrin beta3 tyrosine 747 for beta3 tyrosine phosphorylation and regulation of alphavbeta3 avidity. J. Biol. Chem. 272:2875728761.
26 Yang, J.T., and R.O. Hynes. 1996. Fibronectin receptor functions in embryonic cells deficient in alpha 5 beta 1 integrin can be replaced by alpha V integrins. Mol. Biol. Cell. 7:17371748.[Abstract]
27 Boettiger, D., F. Huber, L. Lynch, and S. Blystone. 2001. Activation of alpha(v)beta3-vitronectin binding is a multistage process in which increases in bond strength are dependent on Y747 and Y759 in the cytoplasmic domain of beta3. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:12271237.
28 Tedford, K., L. Nitschke, I. Girkontaite, A. Charlesworth, G. Chan, V. Sakk, M. Barbacid, and K.D. Fischer. 2001. Compensation between Vav-1 and Vav-2 in B cell development and antigen receptor signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2:548555.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 Allikian, M.J., A.A. Hack, S. Mewborn, U. Mayer, and E.M. McNally. 2004. Genetic compensation for sarcoglycan loss by integrin alpha7beta1 in muscle. J. Cell Sci. 117:38213830.
30 Stromblad, S., A. Fotedar, H. Brickner, C. Theesfeld, d.D. Aguilar, M. Friedlander, and D.A. Cheresh. 2002. Loss of p53 compensates for alpha v-integrin function in retinal neovascularization. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1337113374.
31 Fan, J., R.S. Frey, A. Rahman, and A.B. Malik. 2002. Role of neutrophil NADPH oxidase in the mechanism of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced NF-kappa B activation and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:34043411.
32 Byzova, T.V., and E.F. Plow. 1998. Activation of alphaVbeta3 on vascular cells controls recognition of prothrombin. J. Cell Biol. 143:20812092.
33 Ahrens, I.G., N. Moran, K. Aylward, G. Meade, M. Moser, D. Assefa, D.J. Fitzgerald, C. Bode, and K. Peter. 2006. Evidence for a differential functional regulation of the two beta(3)-integrins alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(IIb)beta(3). Exp. Cell Res. 312:925937.[CrossRef][Medline]
34 Pampori, N., T. Hato, D.G. Stupack, S. Aidoudi, D.A. Cheresh, G.R. Nemerow, and S.J. Shattil. 1999. Mechanisms and consequences of affinity modulation of integrin alpha(V)beta(3) detected with a novel patch-engineered monovalent ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 274:2160921616.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|