|
||
ARTICLE |
CORRESPONDENCE Antonella Viola: antonella.viola{at}unipd.it
|
|
|---|
Human tumors express antigens recognized by T and B lymphocytes, a recent discovery that has paved the way for the development of novel immunotherapeutic strategies targeting the immune effectors toward cancer-associated antigens (1, 2). Unfortunately, the many attempts to create a therapeutic cancer vaccine for human tumors have been unsuccessful. Although vaccination often succeeds in expanding circulating T lymphocytes recognizing the autologous tumor, only a limited number of clinically objective responses have been reported so far (3). T lymphocytes activated by vaccination acquire an antigen-experienced memory phenotype, and they are virtually competent to attack neoplastic cells (4, 5). Thus, inefficacy of active immunotherapy probably depends either on the inability of sufficient lymphocyte numbers to reach the site of cancer growth or on the countermeasures orchestrated by tumor cells. Tumor escape mechanisms are quite diversified; they include loss of antigen, HLA molecules, or key proteins of the antigen-processing machinery; local production of immunosuppressive molecules; recruitment and activation of suppressive myeloid cells; and loss of costimulatory molecules (6).
Among cancer patients undergoing active immunotherapy, those showing mixed responses are particularly intriguing (7). In clinical trials, in fact, some tumor nodules regress or disappear, whereas in the same patient others progress. The reasons for this heterogeneous response are not clear, but it was proposed that tumor nodules might have different permissive states toward the activity of anti-tumor lymphocytes (7). The interactions between lymphocytes, tumors, and tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells can create a number of functional events that range from full activation of specific immune responses to the induction of tolerance in tumor-specific T lymphocytes (8, 9). However, in general, the tumor microenvironment does not seem to be suitable for T lymphocyte functions, and, indeed, a number of reports indicate that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are impaired in both signal transduction and effector systems (10). These findings have been obtained mostly in nonvaccinated tumor-bearing hosts, but it is reasonable to assume that the same constrains might apply to lymphocytes activated by active immunotherapy once they reach the tumor site.
The control of amino acid metabolism is emerging as a relevant immunoregulatory tool shared by different cell types of the immune system, which can also underlie the immune dysfunctions induced by tumors. The activation of the tryptophan-degrading enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in dendritic cells, originally associated with peripheral tolerance and maternal tolerance toward the fetus, was recently shown to be involved in tumor immune evasion. In two different tumor models, systemic administration of a specific indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor resulted in partial reversion of the tumor-induced immunosuppression (11, 12).
Tryptophan is not the only amino acid whose metabolism is increased in a tumor-conditioned microenvironment, and numerous reports suggest also a role for the activation of L-arginine (L-Arg) metabolizing enzymes during tumor growth and development. In tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells, L-Arg is metabolized by arginase I (ARG1), arginase II (ARG2), and by the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase (NOS2). Cytoplasmic ARG1 and mitochondrial ARG2 hydrolize L-Arg to urea and ornithine, the latter being converted to polyamines by ornithine decarboxylase (13). NOS2 oxidizes L-Arg to citrulline and nitric oxide (NO), a pleiotropic molecule important for ischemia, inflammation, angiogenesis, immune response, and cell growth and differentiation (14).
Increased ARG activity has long been detected in patients with colon, breast, lung, and prostate cancer (15), and it was proposed that this enzymatic activity sustained the high demand of polyamines necessary to tumor growth (16). However, ARG activity in macrophages infiltrating a mouse tumor was recently shown to impair antigen-specific T cell responses and the expression of the CD3
chain (17). Increased production of NO within various human cancers may contribute to tumor development by favoring neoangiogenesis, tumor metastasis, and tumor-related immune suppression (18). It is commonly believed that ARG and NOS are competitively regulated by Th1 and Th2 cytokines and complex intracellular biochemical pathways, including negative feed-back loops and competition for the same substrate (13). However, simultaneous activation of ARG and NOS in myeloid cells licensed by the tumor can generate powerful inhibitory signals, eventually leading to apoptotic death of antigen-specific T lymphocytes (19, 20).
Evidence has been accumulating that ARG and NOS are overexpressed in prostate cancers as compared with hyperplasic prostate (2123), with the intriguing observation that the tumor cells, rather than myeloid infiltrating cells, could be the main source of the enzymes. We investigated whether the alteration of L-Arg metabolism in tumor explants could be responsible for the induction of TIL dysfunctions. When small tumor samples are cultured in medium containing a combination of ARG- and NOS-specific inhibitors, TIL recover their functions, suggesting the presence of a predominant immunosuppressive mechanism based on the altered L-Arg metabolism in prostate cancer.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arginine and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors restore local tumor recognition by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Frey and collaborators have shown that murine CD8+ TIL do contain cytolytic granules, but these granules are diffused in the cytoplasm and do not polarize in response to T cell stimulation (33). Moreover, they showed that recovery of lytic function, after isolation and culture of TIL, correlated with the capacity of TIL to mobilize and polarize cytotoxic granules. We decided to analyze the subcellular localization of cytolytic granules in CTL infiltrating PCa samples untreated or incubated for 4 d with ARG and NOS inhibitors. A cytotoxic granuleassociated protein, TIA-1, was used as a specific granule marker (34, 35). Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analysis revealed that lytic granules were evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of CD8+ T cells present in PCa samples, suggesting that CTL do not engage productive contacts or are unable to organize a mature immunological synapse inside the tumor (Fig. 7, A and B). However, when PCa samples were precultured with l-NMMA and NOHA, the subcellular distribution of CTL lytic granules seemed to be polarized in a restricted region of the cytoplasm, suggesting that functional immunological synapses between CTL and target cells were organized (Fig. 7, A and B). TIA-1+ cells present in PCa samples, treated or untreated with ARG and NOS inhibitors, from three different patients were counted. We found that tumor tissues preincubated or not with l-NMMA and NOHA had comparable numbers of TIA-1+ cells. However, polarized granules were expressed by less than 10% of the positive cells in untreated tumors, whereas more than 90% of TIA-1+ cells displayed a polarized phenotype in tumors incubated with ARG and NOS inhibitors.
|
To clarify the identity of the apoptotic cells and the role of cytotoxic T cells in mediating the observed apoptosis in tumor samples treated with NOS and ARG inhibitors, we performed a double staining for TIA-1 and apoptosis (Fig. 7 D). The results indicate that apoptotic cells are not lymphocytes but are surrounded by TIA-1+ cells, thus strengthening evidence for the role of CTL in mediating apoptosis inside the tumor.
Taken together, these data indicate that CTL infiltrating human prostate cancer are potentially able to kill tumor cells and that their in situ lytic function can be restored by inhibiting ARG2 and NOS2.
Arginine and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors restore antitumor activity in prostate carcinoma cultures of transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate mice
We were not able to recover enough human T lymphocytes from PCa organ cultures to perform functional studies. We therefore decided to use a mouse model very close to the human pathology: the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) mouse. These mice are transgenic for the SV40 large-antigen (Tag) oncogene under the control of the rat probasin regulatory element and express Tag at puberty. In the following weeks, TRAMP mice progressively develop spontaneous prostatic hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma, and lymph node and lung metastases, closely mimicking progression of human PCa (36). Another interesting analogy with human tumors directly concerns the scope of our studies: the invading, but not the normal, epithelium overexpresses both ARG and NOS (unpublished data). At 2224 wk of age, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and well-differentiated carcinoma comprised the majority of the pathology in TRAMP mice, but the tumor appearance was variable, ranging from microscopic tumors evidenced only histologically to macroscopically visible nodules in the pelvis where the individual mouse prostate lobes were indistinguishable (36). The first type of tumors was infiltrated by a sizeable number of CD8+ T lymphocytes (12.66 ± 1.09% of the gated, live cells recovered after tumor dissociation) with the phenotype of memory/effector cells, as assessed by the expression of CD62L, CD44, and CD25 (Fig. 8 A). In large tumors, the percentage of CD8+ T lymphocytes declined dramatically (0.15 ± 0.01% of gated cells), and these lymphocytes had almost completely lost the expression of CD25, the
chain of the IL-2 receptor (Fig. 8 A). Large tumors were then enzymatically dissociated, pooled, and cultured in the presence of high doses of IL-2 to expand TIL. Equivalent numbers of the same cellular preparation were cultured in the presence of the ARG and NOS inhibitors used in previous experiments, low doses of IL-2, or a combination of inhibitors and low IL-2 concentration. After 3 wk, TIL were recovered and tested for their ability to recognize different targets by releasing IFN-
(Fig. 8 B). No TIL were recovered in cultures incubated only with the inhibitors (unpublished data), an expected result in the absence of IL-2 driving the expansion of the activated T lymphocytes. High-dose IL-2 allowed the highest cell recovery (3.48 x 106; 464-fold expansion), but TIL had a very high background IFN-
release, which did not allow discriminating any tumor-specific recognition. Low-dose IL-2 combined with the ARG and NOS inhibitors allowed recovery of an intermediate number of TIL (2.56 x 106; 341-fold expansion) that recognized the autologous tumor, the syngeneic prostate cancer cell line TRAMP C1, and the SV40-infected fibroblast but not normal splenocytes or tumors of different histology (MBL-2 and B16 tumors), suggesting the expansion of tumor-specific and possibly SV40-restricted effectors. Low-dose IL-2 alone supported a lower expansion (138-fold; 1.24 x 106 total cells) of TIL that only partially recognized the autologous tumor and SV40+ fibroblasts but not TRAMP C1 cells (Fig. 8 B). These data confirm the relevance of ARG and NOS in restraining tumor-specific lymphocytes in PCa and suggest that the lymphocyte repertoire generated by altering the local L-Arg metabolism in the presence of IL-2 might be different from that obtained by the simple IL-2driven activation.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many of these studies, however, suffer from the limitation that T lymphocytes are activated after repeated in vitro stimulations in a disrupted tumor environment. Within the tumor site, tumor-specific lymphocytes are sensitive to any changes in the microenvironment, and these changes can condition their function and activation state. Most solid tumors are characterized by lymphocyte infiltration, but TIL frequently are unable to kill autologous tumor cells, indicating that they are in an anergic/tolerant state (26, 27, 42, 43). The data presented here provide new insight into the biology of T lymphocytes infiltrating human PCa. TIL within PCa are mainly CD8+ T lymphocytes with an antigen-experienced, terminally differentiated phenotype. However, they remain in a dormant state that is not altered by cytokines affecting T lymphocyte proliferation such as IL-2. Unlike normally responsive lymphocytes in tumor-free prostates and peripheral blood, TIL are not activated locally by powerful signals acting either on TCR or downstream signaling pathways. The steady-state regulation of the dormant state is dependent on the enhanced intratumoral metabolism of the amino acid L-Arg, because the simple addition of ARG- and NOS-specific inhibitors was sufficient to rouse these CTL, activate them, and start a number of events leading to cytolytic granule polarization and killing of cognate targets. These data were confirmed and extended in TRAMP mice, allowing us to evaluate the tumor-specific reactivity of TIL rescued from the dormant state by the ARG and NOS inhibitor and expanded by low doses of IL-2.
Our findings suggest that the L-Argmetabolizing enzymes are up-regulated in prostate cancer cells rather than in tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells such as macrophages, although we cannot rule out the contribution of these latter cells. In line with our results, it is known that several tumor cell lines express high levels of ARG and that inhibition of arginase activity often abolishes in vitro cell growth (15). Our data, together with the recent literature, suggest that intratumoral arginase induction might be beneficial for the tumor through different pathways, i.e., supporting tumor growth and development by providing polyamines and suppressing antitumor immune response by negatively affecting TIL.
NOS activity has been detected in many human tumors, including prostate cancer, although its function is unclear (18, 23). NO stimulates angiogenesis, thus enhancing tumor growth and invasiveness (44). Moreover, NO induced an enhanced expression of the DNA-dependent protein-kinase catalytic subunit, DNA-PKcs, that should protect tumor cells from the damaging activity of NO and other DNA-damaging agents, such as X-ray radiation, Adriamycin, bleomycin, and cisplatin (45).
Depletion of cytosolic L-Arg content by ARG might trigger the generation of superoxide (O2-) from the NOS2 reductase domain (46, 47). The reductase domain of NOS2 generates O2 that reacts immediately with NO generated by the oxygenase domain. The chemical byproducts of this reaction are ONOO, highly reactive oxidizing agents that nitrate protein-associate tyrosines and damage different biological targets (48). Cell membranes offer no significant barrier to diffusion of peroxynitrites from different compartments, within or between cells, at a rate that is faster than the known decomposition pathways of these moieties (49). This lack of a barrier indicates that, whenever O2 and NO are generated from the same or different cells in a microenvironment, they will immediately associate, and the resulting ONOO will diffuse freely through cell membranes.
A number of lines of evidence indicate that peroxynitrites are quite toxic for lymphocytes: they can prime T lymphocytes to undergo apoptotic cell death through different pathways involving inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphorylation via nitration of tyrosine residues (29, 30) or by nitration of the protein voltage-dependent anion channel, a component of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (50). Nitrotyrosine, a marker of peroxynitrite activity in tissues, is found in thymic extracts and thymic sections colocalized with apoptotic cells, suggesting that peroxynitrites are also involved in thymic apoptosis in vivo (29). Staining for nitrotyrosine in PCa tissue sections gave a diffuse pattern with some hot spots in the TIL. Whether T lymphocytes are more prone to the effect of ONOO and their decomposition by-products or instead activate additional intracellular pathways for nitrotyrosine generation is not known. Indeed, recent data suggest that protein nitration can be considered a cellular signaling mechanism, because it is specific and reversible (5153). Although the biochemical pathway responsible for tyrosine denitration is not known, our results indicate that CTL posses a mechanism capable of eliminating nitrotyrosines and rescuing T cell functions.
As in previous mouse studies, inhibition of both ARG and NOS was crucial to rescue T cell functions. We are currently investigating the mechanism for such synergy. However, in addition to having a synergistic activity in peroxynitrite generation, ARG and NOS can exert independent inhibitory activities on T lymphocytes, as shown in different tumor models. ARG depletes L-Arg in local microenvironments, leading to loss of the CD3
chain in T lymphocytes and their functional paralysis after antigen recognition (17), whereas NO blocks the signaling through the IL-2 receptors of T lymphocytes by impeding phosphorylation of the intracellular signaling proteins STAT5, Akt, and Erk (20).
A number of studies have proposed that cancers induce immunosuppression by inhibiting CD3
chain expression in T lymphocytes (for review see reference 54). We analyzed the expression of CD3
chain in both PBL and TIL from PCa patients, but we were unable to demonstrate its down-regulation (unpublished data). Moreover, PBL from PCa patients responded normally to all the stimuli we provided, indicating that no evident signaling defects were present. In contrast, TIL from PCa patients were unresponsive even when stimulated with PMA plus ionomycin, stimuli that by-pass TCR signaling. Altogether, these data indicate that in PCa the ARG2 activity does not induce immunosuppression through CD3
down-regulation.
Although it seems that the number of TIL in the tumor might correlate with prognosis (37, 38, 55), it is suggested that TIL are functionally deficient and that this deficiency is transient and attributable to the tumor environment because, on purification from tumor cells, tumor-specific killing can be detected (33, 56, 57). CTL kill their target cell by polarized secretion of their lytic granules at the immunological synapse (58, 59). Polarization and secretion of lytic granules are triggered by recognition of MHC class Ipeptide complexes on the target cell through the T cell receptor (60). Therefore, our results showing that inhibition of ARG and NOS activities in the tumor results in spontaneous polarization of cytotoxic granules in TIL indicate that CD8+ T cells infiltrating prostate cancer are terminally differentiated cytotoxic T cells that are in contact with the target cell but are unable to kill because they are narcotized by the tumor environment. However, even inside the tumor, CTL activity can be restored pharmaceutically.
Based on our findings, drugs controlling ARG and NOS might be useful in aiding immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of cancer by creating a favorable tumor environment for the T lymphocyte effector program. Molecules are being developed to create novel isozyme-specific inhibitors for both NO synthases and arginases (61, 62), but more must be done to enhance selectivity. ARG1 is found at highest concentrations in the mammalian liver where it carries out the final cytosolic step of the urea cycle, a process that allows the disposal of nitrogenous waste. Arginase inhibitors might thus cause hyperammonemia and interfere with hepatic urea cycle. Moreover, some activities of inhibitors are not predictable. For example, the effect of N
-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, considered a selective NOS2 antagonist, requires reconsideration, because it can also inhibit arginase both in vivo and in vitro (63). Thus, the identification of the specific biochemical pathways responsible for immunosuppression, such as the protein nitration described here, may allow the development of more specific and less toxic immunoprotective molecules.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostate cancer specimens from 79 patients (aged 5276 yr) who had undergone radical prostatectomy were obtained from the Department of Urology, Hospital of the University of Padova. None of these patients had received preoperative antitumor therapy. Benign prostates were obtained from patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy for bladder cancer (n = 18). Immediately after the surgery, the prostate specimens were divided and sent to the laboratory. Diagnosis was performed by a team of surgical pathologists at the Hospital.
Isolation of T cells from peripheral blood and tumor.
After removing necrotic areas and fat, 100120-mm3 tumor specimens were washed in PBS and minced into small pieces using bistouries. From this tumor material 104105 TIL were obtained after 2-h digestion at 37°C using a mixture of enzymes dissolved in RPMI 1640 medium (collagenase type IV, 1 mg/ml; deoxyribonuclease, 30 U/ml; and hyaluronidase, 0.1 mg/ml; all from Sigma-Aldrich). The resulting cell suspension was passed over a 30-µm filter, washed in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO BRL), and prepared for immunocytometric analysis.
PBL from both healthy donors and patients were isolated from heparinized blood by centrifugation on Ficoll gradient (Ficoll-Paque PLUS, Amersham Biosciences). PBL were cultured (37°C, 5% CO2) in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all obtained from GIBCO BRL).
Prostate organ cultures.
Immediately after surgery, 100120-mm3 tumor sections were brought to the laboratory. After removal of necrotic tissues, prostate samples were cut in 23-mm3 pieces and placed on presoaked collagen sponges (Johnson & Johnson) in complete RPMI 1640 medium (RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% nonessential amino acids, and 1% sodium pyruvate).
Cultures were placed in six-well plates, and 3 ml of medium was added to each well to reach the upper part of the gel without submerging the prostate samples. Cultures were incubated at 37°C, in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.
In some experiments, phytohemagglutinin (1 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) or phorbol myristate-acetate (50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) plus ionomycin (0.5 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), with or without IL-2 (100 IU/ml; Chiron Corp.), were added to the cultures. In other experiments, N-hydroxy-l-arginine (0.5 mM; Cayman Chemical) and l-NMMA (0.5 mM; Cayman Chemical) were added to the cultures.
Monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry.
The following panel of commercially available directly conjugated mAbs was included in this study: CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, CD8, CD25, CD26, CD28, CD45RA, CD45RO, CD56, CD62L, CCR4, CXCR4, CCR5, CCR6, NKAT, NKB1, CD94, and antiperforin obtained from BD Biosciences; CD27 and CD31 obtained from Caltag Laboratories; CXCR3 and CCR7 obtained from R&D Systems; CD137 obtained from Ancell Corporation; NKp30, NKp44, NKp46, p50.3, p58.1, p58.2, NKG2A, and CD161 obtained from Immunotech; and mAb antinitrotyrosine obtained from Upstate Biotechnology. Intracellular markers (nitrotyrosine and perforin) were stained in cells previously fixed and permeabilized with a Fix and Perm kit (Caltag Laboratories) according to the manufacturer's manual.
The expression of these antigens on TIL and PBL was assessed by flow cytometry analysis (FACS-Calibur or FACS Canto; Becton Dickinson) using direct or indirect immunofluorescence assay combining up to six fluorescences (FITC, PE, PE-Cy5, PE-Cy7, APC, and APC-Cy7). A gate on CD8+ cells was defined for each sample, and dead cells were gated out based on their scatter properties and propidium iodide (25 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) incorporation. For the staining of mouse TIL, the following antibodies were used: rat antimouse CD8-Tri-color (0.1 µg/106 cells; clone CTCD8
, Caltag Laboratories); hamster antimouse CD3-FITC (1 µg/106 cells; clone 145-2C11, Caltag Laboratories); FITC- or BIOTIN-labeled rat antimouse CD62L, CD25, CD44 (BD Biosciences); and isotype-matched controls (Caltag Laboratories). Data were processed using CELLQUEST (Becton Dickinson) or FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.).
Cell lines.
B16, a melanoma cell line of C57BL/6 (H-2b) provided by N. Restifo (Surgery Branch, National Institutes of Health), MBL2 (H-2b) a Moloney virus-induced lymphoma, and C57SV fibroblasts (H-2b SV40-transformed fibroblasts) provided by P.L. Lollini (Istituto di Cancerologia, Bologna, Italy) were maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM Hepes, 20 µM 2-ME, 150 U/ml streptomycin, 200 U/ml penicillin, and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Invitrogen). TRAMP-C1, a cell line established from a primary tumor in the prostate of a PB-Tag C57BL/6 (TRAMP) mouse, was provided by N.M. Greenberg (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas). This cell line was maintained in DMEM high glucose (Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM Hepes, 20 µM 2-ME, 150 U/ml streptomycin, 200 U/ml penicillin, 108 DHT (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5% heat-inactivated FCS (Invitrogen).
Mice.
68-wk-old male C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. TRAMP mice, a gift from N.M. Greenberg, were bred in our facility and used for experiment at age 2224 wk. Procedures involving animals and their care were in conformity with institutional guidelines that comply with national and international laws and policies.
Mouse tumor-infiltrating leukocyte generation.
Tumor prostates were surgically removed from TRAMP mice. Enzyme medium (DNase, 300 U/ml, + hyaluronidase, 0.1%, + collagenase, 1%) was used for the dissociation of tumor biopsies to single-cell suspensions. After Ficoll centrifugation, these suspensions were cultured for TIL outgrowth. In brief, 0.5 x 106 cells were cultured in 24-well plates in 2 ml of DMEM/10% FCS with IL-2 and/or enzyme inhibitors, as specified in Results. Cultures were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2, and 1 ml of exhausted medium was replaced every 4 d. When used as target cells, normal splenocytes were derived from the spleen of C57BL/6 mice.
ELISA.
Mouse TIL (105 cells) from 3-wk cultures were coincubated for 24 h with an equal number of target cells. The supernatant was then harvested and tested for released IFN-
in a sandwich ELISA assay (Endogen), following the manufacture's instructions. Data were derived from triplicate wells.
Immunohistochemistry.
4-µm tissue sections were cut from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. After deparaffination, antigen retrieval was performed by microwave heating according to the manufacturer's instructions. For TIA-1 staining, tissue sections were heated in 10 mM buffered citrate, pH 6.0 (UCS Diagnostics), 750 W for 15 min. Slides were cooled at room temperature for 30 min. Sections were incubated with the primary antibodies (anti-CD4, clone 1F6, 1:40 dilution, Novo Castra; anti-CD8, clone C/144B, dilution 1:50, DakoCytomation; anti-iNOS1, dilution 1:50, Lab Vision Corporation; anti-ARG2, clone H-64, dilution 1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Inc.; anti-TIA1, clone 2G9, dilution 1:100, Immunotech; antinitrotyrosine, dilution 1:200, Upstate Biotechnology) at 37°C for 1 h. Binding antibodies were detected using biotinylated secondary antibody and avidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Ultra-tek HRP antipolyvalent SCY, TECK Laboratories). Peroxidase activity was visualized with diaminobenzidine as a chromogen. Counterstaining with light hematoxylin for 1 min was performed to visualize nuclei. Substitution of the primary antibody with PBS served as negative control.
TUNEL assay.
DNA fragmentation associated with apoptosis was detected in 4-µm prostate sections by TUNEL staining, using the ApopTag kit (S7110-kit, Oncor International) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Sections were counterstained with methyl green 0.1%.
Immunofluorescence.
4-µm paraffin sections were cut and mounted on xilane-coated slides and heated in a microwave 750 W for 20 min in acetate buffer. Tissue sections were incubated with anti-TIA1 (1:250; Immunotech) for 1 h at room temperature, then washed with PBS and incubated with a Texas redconjugated antimouse IgG1 (1:1,000; Calbiochem).
After washing in PBS, slides were mounted in 2.5% 1,4-diazobicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO, Fluka), 90% glycerol, 10% PBS and were examined using a confocal microscope (Bio-Rad Laboratories) with 60-magnification objective lenses (Nikon). In the case of double staining, after PBS washing sections were stained for DNA fragmentation, according to manufacturer's guidelines (Oncogene Research Products Fluorescein-FragEL DNA Fragmentation detection kit). The negative control was generated substituting PBS for anti-TIA-1 and TdT enzyme. Confocal microscope was performed with a PerkinElmer Ultra View. Images were analyzed using the Photoshop 7.0 program (Adobe Systems, Inc.)
Statistical analysis.
Results are expressed as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test (Microsoft Office software; Microsoft Corporation). P
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work has been supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca finalizzata), Unindustria Treviso, U.S. Army (contract no. DAMD17-03-1-0032), and Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) to A. Viola and from FIRB-MIUR (contract no. RBAU01935A), MIUR-CNR Progetto Strategico Oncologia, and the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca finalizzata) to V. Bronte.
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 30 September 2004
Accepted: 2 March 2005
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Finn, O.J. 2003. Cancer vaccines: between the idea and the reality. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:630641.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 Van Der Bruggen, P., Y. Zhang, P. Chaux, V. Stroobant, C. Panichelli, E.S. Schultz, J. Chapiro, B.J. Van Den Eynde, F. Brasseur, and T. Boon. 2002. Tumor-specific shared antigenic peptides recognized by human T cells. Immunol. Rev. 188:5164.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 Rosenberg, S.A., J.C. Yang, and N.P. Restifo. 2004. Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines. Nat. Med. 10:909915.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 Coulie, P.G., and P. van der Bruggen. 2003. T-cell responses of vaccinated cancer patients. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15:131137.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 Parmiani, G., C. Castelli, P. Dalerba, R. Mortarini, L. Rivoltini, F.M. Marincola, and A. Anichini. 2002. Cancer immunotherapy with peptide-based vaccines: what have we achieved? Where are we going? J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 94:805818.
6 Marincola, F.M., E.M. Jaffee, D.J. Hicklin, and S. Ferrone. 2000. Escape of human solid tumors from T-cell recognition: molecular mechanisms and functional significance. Adv. Immunol. 74:181273.[Medline]
7 Wang, E., L.D. Miller, G.A. Ohnmacht, S. Mocellin, A. Perez-Diez, D. Petersen, Y. Zhao, R. Simon, J.I. Powell, E. Asaki, et al. 2002. Prospective molecular profiling of melanoma metastases suggests classifiers of immune responsiveness. Cancer Res. 62:35813586.
8 Vakkila, J., and M.T. Lotze. 2004. Inflammation and necrosis promote tumour growth. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:641648.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 Mantovani, A., S. Sozzani, M. Locati, P. Allavena, and A. Sica. 2002. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 23:549555.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 Whiteside, T.L. 1999. Signaling defects in T lymphocytes of patients with malignancy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 48:346352.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 Munn, D.H., M.D. Sharma, D. Hou, B. Baban, J.R. Lee, S.J. Antonia, J.L. Messina, P. Chandler, P.A. Koni, and A.L. Mellor. 2004. Expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase by plasmacytoid dendritic cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes. J. Clin. Invest. 114:280290.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 Uyttenhove, C., L. Pilotte, I. Theate, V. Stroobant, D. Colau, N. Parmentier, T. Boon, and B.J. Van den Eynde. 2003. Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Nat. Med. 9:12691274.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 Wu, G., and S.M. Morris Jr. 1998. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem. J. 336:117.[Medline]
14 Bogdan, C. 2001. Nitric oxide and the immune response. Nat. Immunol. 2:907916.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 Cederbaum, S.D., H. Yu, W.W. Grody, R.M. Kern, P. Yoo, and R.K. Iyer. 2004. Arginases I and II: do their functions overlap? Mol. Genet. Metab. 81:S3844.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 Chang, C.I., J.C. Liao, and L. Kuo. 2001. Macrophage arginase promotes tumor cell growth and suppresses nitric oxide-mediated tumor cytotoxicity. Cancer Res. 61:11001106.
17 Rodriguez, P.C., D.G. Quiceno, J. Zabaleta, B. Ortiz, A.H. Zea, M.B. Piazuelo, A. Delgado, P. Correa, J. Brayer, E.M. Sotomayor, et al. 2004. Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res. 64:58395849.
18 Xu, W., L.Z. Liu, M. Loizidou, M. Ahmed, and I.G. Charles. 2002. The role of nitric oxide in cancer. Cell Res. 12:311320.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 Bronte, V., P. Serafini, C. De Santo, I. Marigo, V. Tosello, A. Mazzoni, D.M. Segal, C. Staib, M. Lowel, G. Sutter, et al. 2003. IL-4-induced arginase 1 suppresses alloreactive T cells in tumor-bearing mice. J. Immunol. 170:270278.
20 Bronte, V., P. Serafini, A. Mazzoni, D.M. Segal, and P. Zanovello. 2003. L-arginine metabolism in myeloid cells controls T-lymphocyte functions. Trends Immunol. 24:302306.[Medline]
21 Keskinege, A., S. Elgun, and E. Yilmaz. 2001. Possible implications of arginase and diamine oxidase in prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Detect. Prev. 25:7679.[Medline]
22 Aaltoma, S.H., P.K. Lipponen, and V.M. Kosma. 2001. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and its prognostic value in prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 21:31013106.[Medline]
23 Wang, J., M. Torbenson, Q. Wang, J.Y. Ro, and M. Becich. 2003. Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in paired neoplastic and non-neoplastic primary prostate cell cultures and prostatectomy specimen. Urol. Oncol. 21:117122.[Medline]
24 Armstrong, A.C., D. Eaton, and J.C. Ewing. 2001. Science, medicine, and the future: cellular immunotherapy for cancer. BMJ. 323:12891293.
25 Sallusto, F., D. Lenig, R. Forster, M. Lipp, and A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 401:708712.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 Radoja, S., and A.B. Frey. 2000. Cancer-induced defective cytotoxic T lymphocyte effector function: another mechanism how antigenic tumors escape immune-mediated killing. Mol. Med. 6:465479.[Medline]
27 Gorelik, L., and R.A. Flavell. 2001. Immune-mediated eradication of tumors through the blockade of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in T cells. Nat. Med. 7:11181122.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 Varani, J., M.K. Dame, K. Wojno, L. Schuger, and K.J. Johnson. 1999. Characteristics of nonmalignant and malignant human prostate in organ culture. Lab. Invest. 79:723731.
29 Moulian, N., F. Truffault, Y.M. Gaudry-Talarmain, A. Serraf, and S. Berrih-Aknin. 2001. In vivo and in vitro apoptosis of human thymocytes are associated with nitrotyrosine formation. Blood. 97:35213530.
30 Brito, C., M. Naviliat, A.C. Tiscornia, F. Vuillier, G. Gualco, G. Dighiero, R. Radi, and A.M. Cayota. 1999. Peroxynitrite inhibits T lymphocyte activation and proliferation by promoting impairment of tyrosine phosphorylation and peroxynitrite-driven apoptotic death. J. Immunol. 162:33563366.
31 Koeck, T., X. Fu, S.L. Hazen, J.W. Crabb, D.J. Stuehr, and K.S. Aulak. 2004. Rapid and selective oxygen-regulated protein tyrosine denitration and nitration in mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 279:2725727262.
32 Aulak, K.S., T. Koeck, J.W. Crabb, and D.J. Stuehr. 2004. Dynamics of protein nitration in cells and mitochondria. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 286:H30H38.
33 Radoja, S., M. Saio, D. Schaer, M. Koneru, S. Vukmanovic, and A.B. Frey. 2001. CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating T cells are deficient in perforin-mediated cytolytic activity due to defective microtubule-organizing center mobilization and lytic granule exocytosis. J. Immunol. 167:50425051.
34 Tian, Q., M. Streuli, H. Saito, S.F. Schlossman, and P. Anderson. 1991. A polyadenylate binding protein localized to the granules of cytolytic lymphocytes induces DNA fragmentation in target cells. Cell. 67:629639.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 Meehan, S.M., R.T. McCluskey, M. Pascual, F.I. Preffer, P. Anderson, S.F. Schlossman, and R.B. Colvin. 1997. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human renal allografts: identification, distribution, and quantitation of cells with a cytotoxic granule protein GMP-17 (TIA-1) and cells with fragmented nuclear DNA. Lab. Invest. 76:639649.
36 Kaplan-Lefko, P.J., T.M. Chen, M.M. Ittmann, R.J. Barrios, G.E. Ayala, W.J. Huss, L.A. Maddison, B.A. Foster, and N.M. Greenberg. 2003. Pathobiology of autochthonous prostate cancer in a pre-clinical transgenic mouse model. Prostate. 55:219237.[CrossRef][Medline]
37 Vesalainen, S., P. Lipponen, M. Talja, and K. Syrjanen. 1994. Histological grade, perineural infiltration, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and apoptosis as determinants of long-term prognosis in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer. 30:17971803.[CrossRef]
38 Zhang, L., J.R. Conejo-Garcia, D. Katsaros, P.A. Gimotty, M. Massobrio, G. Regnani, A. Makrigiannakis, H. Gray, K. Schlienger, M.N. Liebman, et al. 2003. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:203213.
39 Dudley, M.E., and S.A. Rosenberg. 2003. Adoptive-cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 3:666675.[CrossRef][Medline]
40 Correale, P., L. Micheli, M.T. Vecchio, M. Sabatino, R. Petrioli, D. Pozzessere, S. Marsili, G. Giorgi, L. Lozzi, P. Neri, and G. Francini. 2001. A parathyroid-hormone-related-protein (PTH-rP)-specific cytotoxic T cell response induced by in vitro stimulation of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes derived from prostate cancer metastases, with epitope peptide-loaded autologous dendritic cells and low-dose IL-2. Br. J. Cancer. 85:17221730.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 Frost, P., R. Caliliw, A. Belldegrun, and B. Bonavida. 2003. Immunosensitization of resistant human tumor cells to cytotoxicity by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Int. J. Oncol. 22:431437.[Medline]
42 Whiteside, T.L. 1998. Immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Mechanisms responsible for functional and signaling defects. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 451:167171.[Medline]
43 Zippelius, A., P. Batard, V. Rubio-Godoy, G. Bioley, D. Lienard, F. Lejeune, D. Rimoldi, P. Guillaume, M. Meidenbauer, A. Mackensen, et al. 2004. Effector function of human tumor-specific CD8 T cells in melanoma lesions: a state of local functional tolerance. Cancer Res. 64:28652873.
44 Jenkins, D.C., I.G. Charles, L.L. Thomsen, D.W. Moss, L.S. Holmes, S.A. Baylis, P. Rhodes, K. Westmore, P.C. Emson, and S. Moncada. 1995. Roles of nitric oxide in tumor growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:43924396.
45 Xu, W., L. Liu, G.C. Smith, and G. Charles. 2000. Nitric oxide upregulates expression of DNA-PKcs to protect cells from DNA-damaging anti-tumour agents. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:339345.[CrossRef][Medline]
46 Xia, Y., and J.L. Zweier. 1997. Superoxide and peroxynitrite generation from inducible nitric oxide synthase in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:69546958.
47 Xia, Y., L.J. Roman, B.S. Masters, and J.L. Zweier. 1998. Inducible nitric-oxide synthase generates superoxide from the reductase domain. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2263522639.
48 Groves, J.T. 1999. Peroxynitrite: reactive, invasive and enigmatic. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 3:226235.[CrossRef][Medline]
49 Marla, S.S., J. Lee, and J.T. Groves. 1997. Peroxynitrite rapidly permeates phospholipid membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1424314248.
50 Aulak, K.S., M. Miyagi, L. Yan, K.A. West, D. Massillon, J.W. Crabb, and D.J. Stuehr. 2001. Proteomic method identifies proteins nitrated in vivo during inflammatory challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:1205612061.
51 Ischiropoulos, H. 2003. Biological selectivity and functional aspects of protein tyrosine nitration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 305:776783.[CrossRef][Medline]
52 Schopfer, F.J., P.R. Baker, and B.A. Freeman. 2003. NO-dependent protein nitration: a cell signaling event or an oxidative inflammatory response? Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:646654.[CrossRef][Medline]
53 Kuo, W.N., R.N. Kanadia, V.P. Shanbhag, and R. Toro. 1999. Denitration of peroxynitrite-treated proteins by protein nitratases from rat brain and heart. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 201:1116.[CrossRef][Medline]
54 Baniyash, M. 2004. TCR zeta-chain downregulation: curtailing an excessive inflammatory immune response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:675687.[CrossRef][Medline]
55 Kondratiev, S., E. Sabo, E. Yakirevich, O. Lavie, and M.B. Resnick. 2004. Intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocytes as a prognostic factor of survival in endometrial carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10:44504456.
56 Yannelli, J.R., C. Hyatt, S. McConnell, K. Hines, L. Jacknin, L. Parker, M. Sanders, and S.A. Rosenberg. 1996. Growth of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from human solid cancers: summary of a 5-year experience. Int. J. Cancer. 65:413421.[CrossRef][Medline]
57 Radoja, S., M. Saio, and A.B. Frey. 2001. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are primed for Fas-mediated activation-induced cell death but are not apoptotic in situ. J. Immunol. 166:60746083.
58 Lieberman, J. 2003. The ABCs of granule-mediated cytotoxicity: new weapons in the arsenal. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:361370.[CrossRef][Medline]
59 Trambas, C.M., and G.M. Griffiths. 2003. Delivering the kiss of death. Nat. Immunol. 4:399403.[CrossRef][Medline]
60 Takayama, H., and M.V. Sitkovsky. 1987. Antigen receptor-regulated exocytosis in cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 166:725743.
61 Vallance, P., and J. Leiper. 2002. Blocking NO synthesis: how, where and why? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1:939950.[CrossRef][Medline]
62 Colleluori, D.M., and D.E. Ash. 2001. Classical and slow-binding inhibitors of human type II arginase. Biochemistry. 40:93569362.[CrossRef][Medline]
63 Reisser, D., N. Onier-Cherix, and J.F. Jeannin. 2002. Arginase activity is inhibited by L-NAME, both in vitro and in vivo. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 17:267270.[CrossRef][Medline]
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|