|
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BRIEF DEFINITIVE REPORT |
CORRESPONDENCE Cosima T. Baldari: baldari{at}unisi.it
|
|
|---|
Although manifestations of advanced disease are believed to be caused by anthrax toxin, hostpathogen interactions occurring in the lymph node are as yet largely elusive. LT blunts the release of proinflammatory mediators by macrophages and dendritic cells and promotes their apoptosis, thereby preventing phagocyte recruitment and bacterial clearance (10, 11). Furthermore, LT impairs dendritic cell function and interferes with initiation of adaptive immune responses (12). To date, the outcome of B. anthracis infection on T lymphocytes, the central regulators of adaptive immunity, has not been addressed, although these cells can be exposed to the toxin in the lymph node, and several steps in the signaling cascade initiated by the TCR may be potentially disrupted by the activities of LF and EF (1315). Here, we have investigated the outcome of T lymphocyte exposure to anthrax toxins.
| Results AND Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-2, IL-5, and TNF
in the culture supernatants of cells treated as described before and incubated for 30 h. As shown in Fig. 1 E, both LF and EF profoundly inhibited cytokine expression, further underlining the suppressive effect of anthrax toxins on T cell activation.
|
|
800 Da fragment. ET had no effect, and the shift in apparent MW was inhibited by EGCG, which blocks the proteolytic cleavage of MEKs by LF (17), but not by adefovir dipivoxil (Fig. 3 A and not depicted). In agreement with these results, immunoblot analysis of the stripped filters with an antibody that specifically recognizes the NH2 terminus of MEK2 showed that the MEK2-specific immunoreactivity was significantly reduced in LT-treated PBLs, but not in PBLs treated with LT in the presence of EGCG, nor in ET-treated PBLs (not depicted). Probing the same lysates with antibodies against phosphorylated, active MEK1/2 showed that MEK1/2 phosphorylation was not impaired by LT (Fig. 3, A and G), consistent with the fact that MAPKK cleavage does not affect the site of interaction with Raf, its upstream kinase, nor its phosphorylation sites (22). Furthermore, Ras activation was not affected, as shown by pulldown assays using a GST-Raf fusion, which interacts with GTP-bound, active Ras (Fig. 3 B). Alternatively, activation of Erk, the MAPK downstream of MEK, was profoundly inhibited by LT. This effect was selectively reversed by EGCG, but not by adefovir dipivoxil (Fig. 3, C and G, and not depicted). Furthermore, in agreement with the capacity of LF to cleave a wide panel of MAPKKs (8), activation of the stress-kinases JNK and p38, which is mediated by MKK4/7 and MKK3/6, respectively (19), was also blocked by LT (Fig. 3, D, E, and G).
|
MAP kinases link triggering of surface receptors to gene transcription (13, 19). The transcription factor NFAT plays a crucial role in the transcriptional regulation of several cytokine-encoding genes, including the genes for IL-2 and IL-2R (24). NFAT is composed of a nuclear subunit, AP-1, which is activated by MAPKs, and a cytosolic subunit, which translocates into the nucleus to assemble with AP-1 after dephosphorylation by the phosphatase calcineurin. The latter is activated by the elevation in intracellular [Ca2+]i triggered by TCR engagement (24). The effect of anthrax toxins on TCR-dependent NFAT activation was determined using a reporter Jurkat T cell line stably transfected with a construct encoding luciferase under the control of a trimer of the NFAT binding site on the IL-2 gene promoter. Consistent with the requirement for MAP and stress kinases in NFAT activation (24, 25), LT inhibited NFATdriven luciferase expression in a dose-dependent fashion, and this effect was prevented by EGCG (Fig. 4 A). Inhibition of NFAT activation by LT resulted, at least in part, from AP-1 inhibition by the toxin, as shown in transient transfection experiments using an AP1/luciferase reporter (Fig. 4 A). However, LT did not affect the Ca2+calcineurin pathway. Indeed, LT had no effect on TCR-dependent NFAT translocation to the nucleus, as determined by confocal microscopy of Jurkat cells transiently transfected with a NFATGFP fusion (Fig. 4 B). Furthermore, LT did not affect [Ca2+]i flux triggered by TCR/CD3 ligation in PBLs (not depicted).
|
The present results identify T lymphocytes as a novel cellular target of anthrax toxins and show that the intracellular activities of both LT and ET converge in these cells on the signaling cascade initiated by the TCR, resulting in suppression of cell activation and proliferation. Although the causal role of the anthrax toxic complex in the advanced phase of infection has been largely elucidated, the failure of the host to mount an effective immune response is as yet elusive. Adaptive immunity is initiated in the lymph node, where vegetative bacteria are released from infected macrophages and can be taken up by dendritic cells, processed, and presented to T cells. LT has been shown recently to interfere with MAPK signaling in dendritic cells, thereby suppressing their maturation and capacity to prime adaptive responses (12). The data reported here highlight T lymphocytes as direct cellular targets of both LT and ET. The two toxins cooperatively inhibit T cell activation at very low concentrations, similar to those expected in the early stages of infection. By suppressing the activation of both dendritic cells and T cells, which together are responsible for initiating adaptive immune responses, B. anthracis has evolved a highly effective strategy of immune evasion.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activations, in vitro binding assays, immunoblots, luciferase assays, and cytokine and cAMP measurements
For immunoblot and in vitro binding experiments, activations by TCR/CD3 ligation were performed by incubating cells with anti-CD3 mAb and secondary antibodies for 5 min at 37°C as described previously (29). For analysis of CD69/CD25 and luciferase expression, cells were activated by CD3 cross-linking on secondary antibody-coated plates (29) and processed for flow cytometry 1624 h after activation. NFAT/luciferase reporter Jurkat cells were collected 16 h after activation and processed for luciferase assays (29). In vitro binding assays and immunoblots were performed as described previously (30) and quantitated by laser densitometry (Kodak Digital Science Electrophoresis Documentation and Analysis System 120). Intracellular cAMP was quantitated by enzyme-linked immunoassay (Biotrak EIA; Amersham Biosciences). Cytokines were measured using the Human Cytokine ELISA kit obtained from Bender MedSystems.
Transfections, confocal microscopy, and flow cytometry
Jurkat cells were transiently transfected with the plasmid pEGFP/NFAT-1D (31) or an AP-1/luciferase reporter using a modification of the DEAE/dextran procedure as described previously (29). Confocal microscopy was performed on a confocal microscope (Microsystems; Leica). CD3, CD69, and CD25 surface expression was quantitated by flow cytometry using fluorochrome-labeled mAb. Samples were processed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). T cell proliferation was measured by flow cytometric analysis of CFSE-labeled cells, counterstained with anti-CD3 mAb as described previously (30). Cells were analyzed 24172 h after stimulation. Intracellular flux of calcium ions was measured as described previously (29) using FF-fluo-4 (Molecular Probes).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from AIRC, MIUR (FIRB), EU (Epipepvac to C.T. Baldari and the Anthrax Euronet to C. Montecucco), and the National Institutes of Health (to W.-J. Tang).
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 4 August 2004 Accepted: 8 November 2004
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Dixon, T.C., M. Meselson, J. Guillemin, and P.C. Hanna. 1999. Anthrax. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:815826.
2 Ascenzi, P. P. Visca, G. Ippolito, A. Spallarossa, M. Bolognesi, and C. Montecucco. 2002. Anthrax toxin: a tripartite lethal combination. FEBS Lett. 531:384388.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 Mock, M., and T. Mignot. 2003. Anthrax toxins and the host: a story of intimacy. Cell. Microbiol. 5:1523.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 Collier, R.J., and J.A. Young. 2003. Anthrax toxin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19:4570.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 Abrami, L., C. Liu, P. Cosson, S.H. Leppla, and F.G. van der Goot. 2003. Anthrax toxin triggers endocytosis of its receptor via a lipid raft-mediated clathrin-dependent process. J. Cell Biol. 160:321328.
6 Duesbery, N.S., C.P. Webb, S.H. Leppla, V.M. Gordon, K.R. Klimpel, T.D. Copeland, N.G. Ahn, M.K. Oskarsson, K. Fukasawa, K.D. Paull, and G.F. Vande Woude. 1998. Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor. Science. 280:734737.
7 Vitale, G., R. Pellizzari, C. Recchi, G. Napolitani, M. Mock, and C. Montecucco. 1998. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves the N-terminus of MAPKKs and induces tyrosine/threonine phosphorylation of MAPKs in cultured macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248:706711.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 Vitale, G., L. Bernardi, G. Napolitani, M. Mock, and C. Montecucco. 2000. Susceptibility of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase family members to proteolysis by anthrax lethal factor. Biochem. J. 352:739745.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 Drum, C.L., S.-Z. Yan, J. Bard, Y.-D. Shen, D. Lu, S. Soelaiman, Z. Grabarek, A. Bohm, and W.-J. Tang. 2002. Structural basis for the activation of anthrax adenylate cyclase exotoxin by calmodulin. Nature. 415:396402.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 Pellizzari, R., C. Guidi-Rontani, G. Vitale, M. Mock, and C. Montecucco. 1999. Anthrax lethal factor cleaves MKK3 in macrophages and inhibits the LPS/IFNgamma-induced release of NO and TNFalpha. FEBS Lett. 462:199204.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 Park, J.M., F.R. Greten, Z.W. Li, and M. Karin. 2002. Macrophage apoptosis by anthrax lethal factor through p38 MAP kinase inhibition. Science. 297:20482051.
12 Agrawal, A., J. Lingappa, S.H. Leppla, S. Agrawal, A. Jabbar, C. Quinn, and B. Pulendran. 2003. Impairment of dendritic cells and adaptive immunity by anthrax lethal toxin. Nature. 424:329334.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 Dong, C., R.J. Davis, and R.A. Flavell. 2002. MAP kinases in the immune response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20:5572.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 Appleman, L.J., D. Tzachanis, T. Grader-Beck, A.A. van Puijenbroek, and V.A. Boussiotis. 2001. Helper T cell anergy: from biochemistry to cancer pathophysiology and therapeutics. J. Mol. Med. 78:673683.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 Torgersen, K.M., T. Vang, H. Abrahamsen, S. Yaqub, and K. Tasken. 2002. Molecular mechanisms for protein kinase A-mediated modulation of immune function. Cell. Signal. 14:19.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 Cantrell, D. 1996. T cell antigen receptor signal transduction pathways. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:259274.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 Dell'Aica, I., M. Dona, F. Tonello, A. Piris, M. Mock, C. Montecucco, and S. Garbisa. 2004. Potent inhibitors of anthrax lethal factor from green tea. EMBO Rep. 5:418422.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 Shen, Y., N.L. Zhukovskaya, M.I. Zimmer, S. Soelaiman, P. Bergson, C.R. Wang, C.S. Gibbs, and W.J. Tang. 2004. Selective inhibition of anthrax edema factor by adefovir, a drug for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:32423247.
19 Chang, L., and M. Karin. 2001. Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature. 410:3740.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 Fukuda, M., Y. Gotoh, and E. Nishida. 1997. Interaction of MAP kinase with MAP kinase kinase: its possible role in the control of nucleocytoplasmic transport of MAP kinase. EMBO J. 16:901908.
21 Xia, Y., Z. Wu, B. Su, B. Murray, and M. Karin. 1998. JNKK1 organizes a MAP kinase module through specific and sequential interactions with upstream and downstream components mediated by its amino-terminal extension. Genes Dev. 12:33693381.
22 Catling, A.D., H.J. Schaeffer, C.W. Reuter, G.R. Reddy, and M.J. Weber. 1995. A proline-rich sequence unique to MEK1 and MEK2 is required for raf binding and regulates MEK function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:52145225.[Abstract]
23 Dhillon, A.S., C. Pollock, H. Steen, P.E. Shaw, H. Mischak, and W. Kolch. 2002. Cyclic AMP-dependent kinase regulates Raf-1 kinase mainly by phosphorylation of serine 259. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:32373246.
24 Rao, A., C. Luo, and P.G. Hogan. 1997. Transcription factors of the NFAT family: regulation and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:707747.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 Wu, C.-C., S.-C. Hsu, H.-m. Shih, and M.-Z. Lai. 2003. Nuclear factor of activated T cells c is a target of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in T cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:64426454.
26 Baldari, C.T., M.M. Di Somma, M.B. Majolini, C. Ulivieri, E. Milia, and J.L. Telford. 1988. NF-AT-luciferase reporter T cell lines as tools to screen immunosuppressive drugs. Biologicals. 26:15.[Medline]
27 Tonello, F., L. Naletto, V. Romanello, F. Dal Molin, and C. Montecucco. 2004. Tyrosine-728 and glutamic acid-735 are essential for the metalloproteolytic activity of the lethal factor of Bacillus anthracis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313:496502.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 Cataldi, A., E. Labruyère, and M. Mock. 1990. Construction and characterization of a protective antigen-deficient Bacillus anthracis strain. Mol. Microbiol. 4:11111117.[Medline]
29 Boncristiano, M., S. Rossi Paccani, S. Barone, C. Ulivieri, L. Patrussi, D. Ilver, A. Amedei, M.M. D'Elios, J.L. Telford, and C.T. Baldari. 2003. The Helicobacter pylori vacuolating toxin inhibits T cell activation by two independent mechanisms. J. Exp. Med. 198:18871897.
30 Pacini, S., M. Pellegrini, E. Migliaccio, L. Patrussi, C. Ulivieri, A. Ventura, F. Carraro, A. Naldini, L. Lanfrancone, P.G. Pelicci, and C.T. Baldari. 2004. p66SHC promotes apoptosis and antagonizes mitogenic signaling in T cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:17471757.
31 Plyte, S., M. Boncristiano, E. Fattori, F. Galvagni, S. Rossi Paccani, M.B. Majolini, S. Oliviero, G. Ciliberto, J.L. Telford, and C.T. Baldari. 2001. Identification and characterization of a novel nuclear factor of activated T-cells-1 isoform expressed in mouse brain. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1435014358.
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|