|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Original Article |
emg002{at}jefferson.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Key Words: alcoholism • disulfiram • ALDH2-2 • acetaldehyde • treatment
Disulfiram (Anatabuse®), a nonspecific drug that inhibits the activity of ALDH2 by reacting with sulfhydryl groups in the enzyme 13, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of alcoholism 14. However, a major problem with disulfiram is the lack of patient compliance which is mainly due to its side effects including sensory and motor neuropathies, optic neuritis, orthostatic hypotension, and hypersensitivity reactions 15161819. Hence, a new approach to specifically inhibit ALDH2 without the undesirable side effects of disulfiram would be a welcomed development in the treatment of alcoholism.
With the advent of gene pharmacology, new approaches now exist by which the expression of a single gene can be inhibited. Antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides (ASOs) with a sequence complementary to the primary RNA transcripts or to mRNA can inhibit gene expression in a specific manner 20. The clinical applications of antisense are becoming accepted. An ASO (VitraveneTM) designed to inhibit human cytomegalovirus replication was approved for commercialization by the FDA. In addition, over 20 other ASOs are undergoing clinical trials (www.recap.com).
In 1997, a consensus conference on the design of antisense concluded that a large number of ASOs (>30) had to be designed and tested empirically to find one effective antisense molecule 21. However, recent work in our laboratory led to the finding that about one half of the most active antisense deoxyoligonucleotides reported in the literature contain a 5'-TCCC-3' motif in the molecule 22. Antisense deoxyoligonucleotides containing the TCCC motif and designed prospectively were shown to act by greatly reducing mRNA levels 22. This is in line with recent postulates that the RNA moiety of DNA-RNA hybrids is hydrolyzed by RNase H 23.
Here, we report studies on a phosphorothioate-modified deoxyoligonucleotide containing the 5'-TCCC-3' motif directed against ALDH2 mRNA, which was shown to be most effective in: (a) reducing ALDH2 mRNA levels and mitochondrial ALDH2 activity in rat hepatoma cells in vitro, (b) reducing liver ALDH2 mRNA and mitochondrial ALDH2 activity in rats in vivo, (c) increasing fourfold the plasma acetaldehyde levels after an oral dose of ethanol, and (d) eliciting a marked reduction in ethanol consumption. Overall, we present studies in which an antisense molecule designed to anneal to ALDH2 mRNA in the rat results in a phenotype that mimics the elevated plasma acetaldehyde levels observed in Asians who have a low ALDH2 activity (ALDH2–2) and consume ethanol. Such an antisense molecule led to a marked reduction in voluntary ethanol consumption in animals.
ASOs
Cell Culture
In Vitro Oligonucleotide Delivery
Mitochondria Isolation
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Research on the genetics of alcoholism indicates that there are (a) predisposing and (b) protective factors in the development of alcoholism. The heritability of predisposing factors has been estimated to be 40–60% 1, while the protective genetic influence can approach 100% 2. The protective genetic influence is associated with a low activity of liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2), an enzyme that plays a major role in the detoxification of acetaldehyde generated in the metabolism of ethanol. In some Asian populations, a dominant mutation in the gene that codes for this enzyme (ALDH2–2) renders the enzyme largely inactive 34. Individuals carrying the ALDH2–2 allele who consume small amounts of alcohol display elevated blood acetaldehyde levels and dysphoric effects that include dizziness, nausea, hypotension, and palpitations 5. It has been postulated that many of the intoxicating effects of ethanol are accentuated in subjects carrying the ALDH2–2 allele 67. Overall, the protective effect of the ALDH2–2 allele against alcohol abuse and alcoholism ranges from 66 and 90% for heterozygotes to 100% for homozygotes 289101112.
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Chemicals
All chemicals used were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, except for sucrose, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium phosphate, magnesium chloride, perchloric acid, hydrochloric acid, acetonitrile, and isooctane, which were purchased from Fisher Scientific.
Phosphorothioate oligonucleotides with specific base sequences used for in vitro studies were manufactured by Genset Corp. Purified ASO-9 for in vivo work and for the last two in vitro studies was purchased from Hybridon. For the in vivo study, HPLC-purified ASO-9 was dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. A large stock solution was prepared a day ahead of the initiation of the in vivo study and aliquoted into separate tubes to prevent any freeze-thaw cycles, which were stored at –70°C until it was needed for dosing.
Rat hepatoma cell line H4-II-E-C3 (H4) (American Type Culture Collection CRL-1600) was purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 4.5 g/liter of L-glutamine (Cellgro®; Mediatech), 20% horse serum, and 5% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies) in 10% CO2 at 37°C. All delivery of oligonucleotides and incubations were conducted in the presence of 10% CO2 at 37°C.
H4 cells were seeded 18–24 h before the delivery of phosphorothioate oligonucleotides at a density of 2.5 x 106 cells/100-mm culture dish. Oligonucleotides were prepared using cationic liposomes, Lipofectamine PlusTM (Life Technologies). For each 100-mm culture dish to be treated, varying amounts of oligo in 2.5 to 10 µl (800 µM stock) were added to 360 µl serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 4.5 g/liter of L-glutamine (DMEM) which were mixed with 27 µl PLUS reagent® in a microcentrifuge tube, while in another microcentrifuge tube, 40 µl of Lipofectamine (2 mg/ml) was added to 360 µl DMEM. The microcentrifuge tubes were incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then the contents of the microcentrifuge tube containing the oligo and PLUS reagent was added dropwise to the microcentrifuge tube containing lipofectamine and DMEM. The combined mixture was then incubated for an additional 15 min at room temperature to form the Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex. The final Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex (800 µl) was added to 7.2 ml of serum-free DMEM at 37°C. The 8.0-ml mixture constituted the complete culture medium in a 100-mm culture dish (final concentrations of ASO-9 ranged from 0.25 to 1.0 µM). Prior to the addition of the Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex, the medium with serum was removed from the cells and the final 8 ml of prepared Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex was added to the culture dish and incubated for 6 h in the absence of serum. 30 min before the end of the 6-h delivery, serum was added back to the cells for overnight culture. As the oligo concentration was reduced by addition of serum, a second addition of Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex (280 µl) was prepared to maintain the desired concentration. A second addition was prepared using oligo, 9.45 µl PLUS reagent, and 14 µl lipofectamine. The final Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex was added to the culture dish at 6 h with a mixture of 20% horse (2.2 ml) and 5% fetal bovine serum (0.6 ml) and incubated for an additional 18 h.
Upon completion of incubations, H4 cells were collected by removing the culture medium containing the Lipofectamine Plus-oligo complex and washing once with 5 ml ice-cold mitochondrial isolation buffer comprised of 0.25 mM sucrose in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Cells were collected and transferred to an ice-cold conical tube for centrifugation at 152 g for 5 min at 4°C to pellet the cells which were then resuspended in 200 µl of the isolation buffer. The concentrated cellular suspension was homogenized and fractionated as described previously 24. The final purified mitochondrial pellet was resuspended in 250 µl of 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate, pH 9.0, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70°C until the time of analysis. Prior to analysis, the mitochondria were thawed on ice, solubilized by adding 1% Triton X-100, and incubated for 15 min on ice. In some studies (see study III, Table and Table ), the Triton X–treated mitochondria were transferred to an ultracentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 4°C for 30 min at 69,500 g to remove insoluble particulates.
|
|
Determination of ALDH and Glutamate Dehydrogenase Activity
The low-Km ALDH activity in the isolated mitochondria was assayed as described previously 25 with minor modifications. The assay was initiated by the addition of propionaldehyde to a final concentration of 14 µM, 80 µM NAD, and 2.5 mM MgCl2 26. The reaction was linear with time, and ALDH activity was expressed as nmoles NADH/min/mg protein. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) was assayed as described with minor modifications 27. The assay was performed at 37°C in a 400-µl reaction mixture containing 25 µg of soluble mitochondrial protein. The reaction was linear with time, and GDH activity was expressed as the oxidation of NADH to NAD+ in µmoles NAD/min/mg protein.
Determination of ALDH2 Half-Life by Cycloheximide
Initial studies were conducted to determine the optimal concentration of cycloheximide (CHX) required to maximally inhibit protein synthesis in the H4 cells. Cells were seeded at a density of 16 x 106 cells/T75 flask 24 h before the treatment with CHX to ensure that they were in a stationary phase. The incubation medium containing serum was removed from the cells and the cells were washed twice with 5 ml of methionine-free DMEM (L-glutamine was added; Life Technologies). Cells were then cultured for 1 h in 8 ml of methionine-free DMEM containing 1, 3, 5, 7, or 10 µg/ml CHX, after which a 15-min pulse of [35S]methionine (1.5 µCi, SA = 1 CI/µM) was added to the flask. After the pulse, [35S]methionine was removed from the flask and the cells were washed twice with 5 ml PBS. Cells were then lysed in 10 ml of 0.15 M KCl containing 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) and processed for radioactivity determination essentially as described earlier 28. The total cellular protein content of cells treated with or without CHX was determined as described above.
The half-life of ALDH2 (time to reduce the activity by 50%) in the H4 cells was determined in the presence of 5 µg/ml CHX. H4 cells (3 replicates/time per point) were treated for 1, 5, 7, 12, or 24 h with CHX in DMEM without serum present. The mitochondrial ALDH2 activity remaining at the different times of incubation with CHX was then determined.
Sequencing of H4-II-E-C3 ALDH2–1 cDNA by Reverse Transcriptase PCR
The published cDNA sequence of the mitochondrial ALDH2 in the Sprague-Dawley rat 29 was used to design PCR primers to amplify the cDNA obtained from the mRNA isolated from the H4 cell line. Total cellular RNA was isolated using Tri-Reagent® (Molecular Research Center, Inc.) and the first strand cDNA was made using a First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit using random hexamer primers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Three sets of PCR primers were designed to amplify three fragments of 476, 753, and 598 bp which combined constituted 96% of the published Sprague-Dawley rat sequence. The PCR primers were as follows: (476 bp, forward 5'-CACgCCTgAgCCgCCTg-3', reverse 5'-gCTgAAgAAgTCgCCATCg-3'), (753 bp, forward 5'-CgATggCgACTTCTTCAgC-3', reverse 5'-CTTggCgATggTCATgCCA-3'), (598 bp, forward 5'-TggCATgACCATCgCCAAg-3': reverse 5'-gAACCAgCATCCAgCACAg-3'). The primers were synthesized by the Nucleic Acid Facility at Thomas Jefferson University. All fragments were gel purified from 1% agarose gels using QIAGEN's gel purification kit (QIAGEN) and the forward primers of each fragment were used in the sequencing reactions performed by Thomas Jefferson University-Nucleic Acid Facility.
Determination of mRNA Expression by Competitive Reverse Transcriptase PCR
Competitive reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR for ALDH2 mRNA was developed by first designing PCR primers to amplify a 584-bp fragment from the Sprague-Dawley rat cDNA, donated by Dr. Henry Weiner of Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN). The primers (specific to mitochondrial ALDH) used to generate the 584-bp fragment (referred to as a parent fragment) were as follows: forward (F) 5'-ACgTggTggTgATgAAAgTg-3' and reverse (R1) 5'-gATgAAgTAACCACggTCTg-3'. The parent fragment was amplified from the cDNA template under the following conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 63°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1.2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min, and the resulting band was purified from a 1% agarose gel. An internal standard, which served as a competitor for primers of the parent fragment during reverse transcription (as recombinant RNA, rcRNA) and PCR (as first strand cDNA) reactions, was constructed using a similar technique to that described previously 30. The same forward primer mentioned above and a new reverse primer (NRP), comprised of the previous reverse primer sequence (R1, 5'-gATgAAgTAACCACggTCTg) and an added reverse primer sequence (R2, 5'-ACACTgCgTTCCACgAATTC-3'), was used to amplify a smaller internal standard fragment of 429 bp. The 40-mer NRP sequence (5'-gATgAAgTAACCACggTCTgACACTgCgTTCCACgAATTC-3') allowed the parent fragment primers (F and R1) to also amplify the shorter artificial 429 bp internal standard that was spiked into experimental RNA samples at varying amounts for competition with the mRNA of the parent fragment.
The pGEM®-T Easy Vector (Promega) containing the 429-bp recombinant DNA fragment (rcDNA) was transformed into DH5
competent Escherichia coli cells according to the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies). The plasmid DNA was linearized using NotI restriction enzyme and then purified before use as template in the in vitro transcription reaction. The in vitro transcription reaction for generating RNA to be used as competitor in the RT-PCR reaction was performed using the RiboProbe® In Vitro Transcription System (Promega). The in vitro transcription and RNA purification was performed as recommended in the Promega technical manual.
A streamlined procedure similar to that reported by Vanden Heuvel et al. 31 for design of a recombinant RNA (rcRNA) was used to make the GDH internal standard which eliminated any subcloning and relied only on PCR to obtain the rcDNA template for in vitro transcription. The cDNA template obtained for GDH was obtained by reverse transcription using random hexamers (pd(N)6 20 ng/20 µl RT reaction; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and Omniscript RT (QIAGEN) from RNA isolated from H4 cells. Primers were designed to amplify a 782-bp fragment with a forward (F1) 5'-TCCTgggAggTCATCgAAg-3' and a reverse (R) primer 5'-AACTgCTTCTCgCTggCTg-3') by PCR using similar conditions to those described above for ALDH using 55°C for primer annealing. The PCR product was run on a 1% agarose gel and the 782-bp parent fragment was purified from the gel. The purified fragment was then amplified with a newly designed forward primer (NFP) and the same reverse primer (R) as mentioned above. The new forward primer was constructed using a T7 promoter sequence (5'-TgTAATACgACTCACTATAgggCgAAT) plus the previous forward primer sequence (F1) (5'-TCCTgggAggTCATCgAAg-3'), and a new forward primer sequence (F2) (5'-CgTgAgTgTggATgAggTg-3') comprising a 65-mer: 5'-TgTAATACgACTCACTATAgggCgAATTCCTgggAggTCATCgAAgCgTgAgTgTggATgAggTg-3', which amplified a shorter fragment (718 bp), which was subsequently used to prepare the GDH-mRNA internal standard. For this purpose, the smaller artificial fragment (718 bp) containing the T7 promoter sequence was then used as the DNA template for in vitro transcription to make RNA which served as the GDH internal standard for competitive RT-PCR reactions with sample RNA.
Sample analysis for ALDH or GDH mRNA expression was performed using 2 µg of total RNA spiked with a range of internal standard RNA (ALDH 0–100 pg and GDH 0–32 ng) depending on the anticipated gene expression. Omniscript RT was used for all the reverse transcription reactions according to the QIAGEN protocol using random hexamers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to prime first strand cDNA synthesis. The parent fragment and internal standard bands were analyzed on a Kodak Digital Science Image Station 440CF (Eastman Kodak Co.) by analyzing the net intensity of the UV/fluorescence emitted by the ethidium bromide in the bands. The actual amount of internal standard that was needed to compete for amplification with the parent fragment was determined by plotting the amount of internal standard against its corresponding net intensity ratio (internal standard band/parent fragment band). Using a linear relationship, the exact amount of internal standard needed to equally compete with the amount of sample mRNA present was determined from the linear regression equation when y = 1.
Animals and Treatment
Intravenous Administration of ASO-9.
Male Lewis rats (Harlan) weighing 200–300 g were used. Prior to femoral vein catheterization, all rats were acclimated for at least 3 d to their cages. All animals were maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle and had free access to laboratory rodent diet 5001 (PMI Feeds, Inc.) and tap water. Once animals were acclimated, surgery was performed to insert a femoral venous catheter comprised of a flexible Tygon plastic tubing (0.015 internal diameter [I.D.] x 0.03 outer diameter [O.D.]). Patency of catheters was maintained by using a lock solution containing heparin (444 U/ml), dextrose (22%), and streptokinase (16,667 U/ml), and a small piece of monofilament which was inserted at the exposed end of the cannula to retain the lock solution. Animals were treated for 4 d at 15 mg ASO-9/kg/day via intravenous catheters. An oral ethanol challenge (1 g/kg) was administered on day 5 and animals were killed 1 h later for determination of plasma acetaldehyde, ALDH, and GDH activity and mRNA expression.
Intraperitoneal Administration of ASO-9.
Male Lewis rats as described above were surgically implanted with 2-ml osmotic pumps (Alzet Minipump 2 M1–1®) containing a solution of 25 mg/ml ASO-9 in PBS or PBS (controls) in the interperitoneal cavity. A priming dose of 20 mg/kg was administered intraperitoneally after implantation of the pumps. The pumps delivered ASO-9 at 24 mg/kg/day. 3 d after pump implantation, animals were deprived of water overnight while rat chow remained accessible. After the overnight fluid deprivation, on day 4 animals were offered 6% vol/vol ethanol as the only fluid and consumption was measured at hourly intervals for 5 h. Rehydration is a prime physiological drive and animals will initially consume the fluid offered. After the initial bout, rejection to continue consuming the fluid freely available indicates an aversion to the fluid offered. The general protocol follows that recently described 25. Animals were videotaped to capture their behavior after ethanol presentation (see Garver et al. in http://arc.tju.edu/egarver).
Acetaldehyde Determination by HPLC.
Plasma acetaldehyde was determined as described previously 25.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed for the datasets in Microsoft Excel 1997. Significant inhibitions of treated versus control groups were calculated using a two-sample t test assuming unequal variances. Statistical significance was demonstrated at a 95% confidence level with P values < 0.05. Where applicable, mean values for groups were calculated, as well as the SEM.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Reduction in ALDH2–1 Activity of H4 Cells Incubated in the Presence of ASO-9
Half-Life.
When using an antisense molecule to inhibit specific protein synthesis, the half-life of the preformed protein must be considered. To determine the half-life of the mature mitochondrial ALDH2 we used CHX to arrest the synthesis of all cellular proteins, which allowed us to measure the decay of the existing ALDH2 enzyme. We first determined the minimal concentration of CHX required for maximal inhibition of protein synthesis in the H4 cell, measured by the rate of incorporation of [35S]methionine into total proteins. CHX at a concentration of 5 µg/ml produced the maximal inhibition of 35S incorporation. At this concentration of CHX methionine-derived 35S incorporation was inhibited by 85% over 24 h. The residual incorporation could be due to posttranslational incorporation of [35S]sulfate, and it was not further reduced by increasing the concentrations of CHX. Cell viability under these conditions exceeded 90%. Under these conditions, ALDH2 activity in the H4 cells was reduced by 56% from control values in 24 h. The calculated half-life of the mature ALDH2 in the mitochondria was 22 h. Such a half-life is in line with a half-life of 22 h also reported for Hela cells transduced with human ALDH2–1 34.
Effect of ASO-9.
We present here the results of antisense phosphorothioate deoxyoligonucleotide no. 9 (ASO-9), the most effective of nine antisense molecules containing the TCCC motif studied. Data in Table show that after a 24-h incubation of H4 cells with ASO-9, mitochondrial ALDH2 activity was reduced by 54.9 ± 10.7% (mean ± SEM). Lipofectamine alone or lipofectamine plus control oligonucleotide(s) showed no reductions in ALDH2 activity. Given a half-life of 22 h, it was determined that the de novo synthesis of ALDH2–1 was inhibited by >95% after the 24 h of exposure to ASO-9 (Table ). Although ASO-9 proved to be very effective in inhibiting the synthesis of ALDH2, the exact mechanism by which this molecule elicited its effects was unknown. Thus, studies were conducted to determine whether ASO-9 reduced ALDH2–1 mRNA levels.
Reduction in ALDH2 mRNA Levels Induced by ASO-9 on H4 Cells
The steady-state level of ALDH2 mRNA was determined by quantitative competitive RT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods. Table shows that after a 24-h treatment with ASO-9, ALDH2 mRNA in the H4 cells was reduced by 84.8 ± 4.7%. This result suggests that the mechanism of action for ASO-9 is likely mediated by RNA hydrolysis by RNase H.
|
mRNA Levels.
The specificity of ASO-9 was also demonstrated by determining mRNA levels of ALDH2 and of GDH, another mitochondrial enzyme, in the same cells. Fig. 1 shows the reduction in mRNA ALDH2 afforded by ASO-9 (see Fig. 1aFig. 1) and its ineffectiveness on GDH mRNA levels (Fig. 1, B1).
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Present knowledge indicates that there are two major mechanisms of antisense action: (a) occupancy of mRNA and (b) occupancy-activated RNase H hydrolysis of the RNA targets 20. Our earlier studies on the mechanisms of action of ASOs which incorporate the TCCC motif in the molecule led to the finding that steady-state mRNA levels are significantly reduced by these ASOs. As RNase H only exists in the nucleus and the most effective ASOs had targets mainly in intron and 3'-untranslated regions, it was postulated that the TCCC-mediated mechanism of antisense action was localized in the nucleus 22.
In the studies presented here, nine ASOs were designed which incorporated the TCCC motif 22 targeting exons (a message also present in the nucleus), as only the cDNA sequence of the Sprague-Dawley rat ALDH2 was known at the time of starting these studies 29. We found that two of the nine antisense molecules (two ASO's in 3'-untranslated region [UTR], and seven ASOs in open reading frame including ASO-9) had inhibitory effects on the ALDH2 enzyme activity, with ASO-9 being the most effective. As ASO-9 targeted exon 2, it was possible that the antisense mechanism of ASO-9 might have been due to occupancy-mediated inhibition of translation rather than to RNase H–mediated hydrolysis. To determine if the mechanism of action followed translation arrest or a reduction in mRNA transcript levels, we determined the steady-state levels of mRNA and whether any reduction in mRNA levels correlated with the loss of ALDH2 activity. Analysis of ALDH2 steady-state mRNA by competitive RT-PCR demonstrated that ASO-9 indeed reduced the levels of mRNA by 85%, which paralleled the calculated 95% inhibition of enzyme synthesis. These data suggest that the mechanism of action of ASO-9 is likely one involving mRNA hydrolysis by RNase H, although some additional transcriptional arrest by occupation cannot be ruled out.
A true antisense mechanism was demonstrated by the fact that as the number of mismatches from the original ASO-9 molecule were increased from 2- to 3- and 4 bases, the oligonucleotide's ability to inhibit ALDH mRNA levels was reduced. An oligonucleotide with 4 base mismatches from ASO-9 was essentially inactive. Furthermore, ASO-9 was specific for its ALDH2 target, as ALDH2 mRNA levels were reduced whereas the mRNA levels for GDH, another mitochondrial enzyme, remained constant.
Despite the variation in basal mRNA levels in the H4 cells, the inhibition afforded by ASO-9 over six experiments was quite constant and averaged 85%. During in vitro studies it was noted that basal ALDH2 mRNA levels varied between experiments. In each of these experiments, serum was added at 6 h and the serum lots varied from one experiment to another. Previously, it has been shown that hormones such as insulin, progesterone, and dihydrotestosterone, found at different levels in serum lots, can increase or reduce the expression of ALDH2 by as much as 50% 35. In addition, H4 cells at various passages were used over the course of the experiments and we found that the ALDH2 activity could be reduced by as much as 50% after many (>5) passages.
When "naked" (without liposomal conjugation) ASO-9 was administered intravenously for 4 d and animals were killed 24 h after the last dose of the oligonucleotide, hepatic ALDH2 mRNA was reduced by 50% and ALDH2 activity was reduced by 40%. Administration of ethanol to animals pretreated with ASO-9 elicited a fourfold increase in plasma acetaldehyde levels versus that in control (PBS) animals. In the same animals, ASO-9 did not modify the activity of mitochondrial GDH, thus again indicating the specificity of action of this antisense oligonucleotide seen in cell cultures.
We further determined if treatment of ASO-9 would establish an aversion to ethanol consumption in rats. We have previously reported the development of a rat model to measure a drug-induced aversion to ethanol using disulfiram as the aversive test drug 25. Animals treated with ASO-9 showed a 61% reduction in alcohol consumption after experiencing the ASO-ethanol reaction compared with control animals. Overall, ASO-9 showed an effectiveness in the same order as that reported previously for large doses of disulfiram.
Theoretically, an ASO of 17–21 bases with a sequence complementary to the primary RNA transcripts or the mRNA sequence can inhibit gene expression through Watson-Crick DNA-RNA hybridization in a specific manner because a sequence of this length is unlikely to repeat more than once in the human genome. Here, we demonstrated that ASO-9 did not affect GDH activity or mRNA levels, which strongly suggested that its effects were not due to nonantisense effects on another protein. In addition to specificity of antisense oligonucleotides for their target, antisense oligonucleotides have been shown to have minimal side effects over a wide range of doses 36. Both the specificity and lack of serious side effects of an antisense oligonucleotide would be advantageous when compared with disulfiram.
Disulfiram displays a large number of side effects, is nonspecific for its target, and requires daily administration, which has markedly reduced its clinical use 1516. The half-life of phosphorothioate oligonucleotides is 48 h in rodents 373839 while in humans, antisense molecules have been reported to have a half-life of 6 to 14 d 40. The protracted half-life in humans would make it possible to reduce the frequency of administration, maintaining the desired efficacy and improving compliance. Disulfiram is the only drug that inhibits ALDH2 which is approved in the U.S. for the treatment of alcoholism. Controlled studies show that daily administration of disulfiram is indeed effective in the treatment of alcoholism 4142, although disulfiram has been criticized for not lengthening the time elapsed until full abstinence is broken 43. However, as patients must experience the effects of the disulfiram-ethanol reaction before the aversive effects take place, the time to break the abstinence is not expected to be affected by the drug. The main problem with disulfiram relates to the lack of compliance by patients with medication taking, mainly due to sensory and motor neuropathies, optic neuritis, orthostatic hypotension, and hypersensitivity reactions 15161819. In a number of studies in which disulfiram was administered under supervision its effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption was clearly seen 14. However, due to its side effects, doses that are fully therapeutic are rarely achieved. At the doses normally employed (250–300 mg daily), less than 50% of patients display the disulfiram-ethanol reaction 4445. Thus, there is the obvious need to develop alternatives to disulfiram to mimic the strong protective effects of a low ALDH2 activity seen in Asians carrying the ALDH2–2 allele.
Studies presented in this communication provide a strong proof of principle that inhibition of ALDH2 gene expression can mimic the ALDH2–2 Asian phenotype, resulting in (a) low liver mitochondrial ALDH2–1 activity, (b) elevated plasma acetaldehyde levels after the administration of ethanol, and (c) an aversion to ethanol, shown as a reduction in alcohol consumption.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the support of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R50AA107186, T32 AA 0763 and R37 AA 10630) and Fondecyt and Millennium Institute, Chile.
Submitted: 5 March 2001
Revised: 22 June 2001
Accepted: 17 July 2001
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Schuckit M.A.. Genetics of the risk for alcoholism, Am. J. Addict., 9, 2000, 103–112.[Medline]
Higuchi S.. Polymorphisms of ethanol metabolizing enzyme genes and alcoholism, Alcohol Alcohol., 2Suppl.1994, 29–34.
Yoshida A., Ikawa M., Hsu L.C. & Tani K.. Molecular abnormality and cDNA cloning of human aldehyde dehydrogenases, Alcohol., 2, 1985, 103–106.[Medline]
Yoshida A. & Dave V.. Enzymatic activity of atypical Oriental types of aldehyde dehydrogenases, Biochem. Genet., 23, 1985, 585–590.[Medline]
Mizoi Y., Tatsuno Y., Adachi J., Kogame M., Fukunaga T., Fujiwara S., Hishida S. & Ijiri I.. Alcohol sensitivity related to polymorphism of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes in Japanese, Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 18, 1983, 127–133.[Medline]
Wall T.L. & Ehlers C.L.. Acute effects of alcohol on P300 in Asians with different ALDH2 genotypes, Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res., 19, 1995, 617–622.[Medline]
Wall T.L., Johnson M.L., Horn S.M., Carr L.G., Smith T.L. & Schuckit M.A.. Evaluation of the self-rating of the effects of alcohol form in Asian Americans with aldehyde dehydrogenase polymorphisms, J. Stud. Alcohol., 60, 1999, 784–789.[Medline]
Hempel J. & Lindahl R.. Class III aldehyde dehydrogenase from rat liversuper-family relationship to classes I and II and functional interpretations, Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 290, 1989, 3–17.[Medline]
Harada S., Agarwal D.P., Goedde H.W., Tagaki S. & Ishikawa B.. Possible protective role against alcoholism for aldehyde dehydrogenase isozyme deficiency in Japan, Lancet., 2, 1982, 827, .[Medline]
Goedde H.W., Agarwal D.P. & Harada S.. The role of alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase isozymes in alcohol metabolism, alcohol sensitivity, and alcoholism, Isozymes, Curr.Top. Biol. Med. Res. 81983, 175–193.
Thomasson H.R., Edenberg H.J., Crabb D.W., Mai X.L., Jerome R.E., Li T.K., Wang S.P., Lin Y.T., Lu R.B. & Yin S.J.. Alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genotypes and alcoholism in Chinese men, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 48, 1991, 677–681.[Medline]
Tu G.C. & Israel Y.. Alcohol consumption by orientals in North America is predicted largely by a single gene, Behav. Genet., 25, 1995, 59–65.[Medline]
Weiner H.. Aldehyde dehydrogenasemechanism of action and possible physiological roles, Majchrowicz E. & Noble E.P., Biochemistry and Pharmacology of Ethanol. Vol. I, 1979, 107–122, Plenum Press, NY.
Brewer C., Meyers R.J. & Johnsen J.. Does disulfiram help to prevent relapse in alcohol abuse?, CNS Drugs., 14, 2000, 329–341.
Dupuy O., Flocard F., Vial C., Rode G., Charles N., Boisson D. & Flechaire A.. [Disulfiram (Esperal) toxicity. Apropos of 3 original cases, Rev. Med. Interne., 16, 1995, 67–72.[Medline]
Peachey J.E. & Annis H.. Effectiveness of aversion therapy using disulfiram and related compounds, Crow K.E. & Batt R.B., Human Metabolism of Alcohol. Vol. 1, 1989, 158–167, CRC Press, Boca-Raton, FL.
17. Gallant, D.M. 1987. The use of psychopharmacologic medications in alcoholism. In Alcoholism: A Guide to Diagnosis, Intervention, and Treatment. W.W. Norton & Company, New York. 170–173.
Hugues F.C., Munera Y. & Le Jeunne C.. Drug induced orthostatic hypotension, Rev. Med. Interne., 13, 1992, 465–470.[Medline]
Chick J.. Safety issues concerning the use of disulfiram in treating alcohol dependence, Drug Saf., 20, 1999, 427–435.[Medline]
Crooke S.T.. Molecular mechanisms of action of antisense drugs, Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 1489, 1999, 31–44.[Medline]
Stein C.A.. How to design an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide experimenta consensus approach, Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev., 8, 1998, 129–132.[Medline]
Tu G.C., Cao Q.N., Zhou F. & Israel Y.. Tetranucleotide GGGA motif in primary RNA transcripts. Novel target site for antisense design, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 1998, 25125–25131.
Crooke S.T.. Evaluating the mechanism of action of antiproliferative antisense drugs, Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev, 10, 2000, 123–126.[Medline]
Tank A.W., Weiner H. & Thurman J.A.. Enzymology and subcellular localization of aldehyde oxidation in rat liver. Oxidation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde derived from dopamine to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, Biochem. Pharmacol., 30, 1981, 3265–3275.[Medline]
Garver E., Ross A.D., Tu G., Cao Q., Zhou F. & Israel Y.. Paradigm to test a drug-induced aversion to ethanol, Alcohol Alcohol., 35, 2000, 435–438.
Takahashi K. & Weiner H.. Magnesium stimulation of catalytic activity of horse liver aldehyde dehydrogenase. Changes in molecular weight and catalytic sites, J. Biol. Chem., 255, 1980, 8206–8209.
Schmidt E.. Glutamate dehydrogenase UV-assay, Bergmeyer H.U.. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Vol. III, 1983, 650–656, Verlag Chemie, Deerfield Beach, FL.
Reel J.R. & Kenney F.T.. "Superinduction" of tyrosine transaminase in hepatoma cell culturesdifferential inhibition of synthesis and turnover by actionomycin D, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 61, 1968, 200–206.
Farres J., Guan K.L. & Weiner H.. Primary structures of rat and bovine liver mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases deduced from cDNA sequences, Eur. J. Biochem., 180, 1989, 67–74.[Medline]
Wang A.M., Doyle M.V. & Mark D.F.. Quantitation of mRNA by the polymerase chain reaction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 86, 1989, 9717–9721[published erratum at 87:2865].
Vanden Heuvel J.P., Tyson F.L. & Bell D.A.. Construction of recombinant RNA templates for use as internal standards in quantitative RT- PCR, Biotechniques., 14, 1993, 395–398.[Medline]
Huang M. & Lindahl R.. Aldehyde dehydrogenase heterogeneity in rat hepatic cells, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 277, 1990, 296–300.[Medline]
Klyosov A.A., Rashkovetsky L.G., Tahir M.K. & Keung W.M.. Possible role of liver cytosolic and mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases in acetaldehyde metabolism, Biochemistry., 35, 1996, 4445–4456.[Medline]
Crabb D. & Xiao Q.. Studies on the enzymology of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 in genetically modified HeLa cells, Alcohol, Clin.Exp. Res. 221998, 780–781.
Crabb D.W., Stewart M.J. & Xiao Q.. Hormonal and chemical influences on the expression of class 2 aldehyde dehydrogenases in rat H4IIEC3 and human HuH7 hepatoma cells, Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res, 19, 1995, 1414–1419.[Medline]
Schechter P.J. & Martin R.R.. Safety and tolerance of phosphorothioates in humans, Crooke S.T.. Antisense Research and Application. Vol. 131, 1998, 233–239, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Agrawal S., Temsamani J. & Tang J.Y.. Pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and stability of oligodeoxynucleotide phosphorothioates in mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 88, 1991, 7595–7599.
Cossum P.A., Sasmor H., Dellinger D., Truong L., Cummins L., Owens S.R., Markham P.M., Shea J.P. & Crooke S.. Disposition of the 14C-labeled phosphorothioate oligonucleotide ISIS 2105 after intravenous administration to rats, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 267, 1993, 1181–1190.
Zhang R., Iyer R.P., Yu D., Tan W., Zhang X., Lu Z., Zhao H. & Agrawal S.. Pharmacokinetics and tissue disposition of a chimeric oligodeoxynucleoside phosphorothioate in rats after intravenous administration, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 278, 1996, 971–979.
Bayever E., Iversen P.L., Bishop M.R., Sharp J.G., Tewary H.K., Arneson M.A., Pirruccello S.J., Ruddon R.W., Kessinger A. & Zon G.. Systemic administration of a phosphorothioate oligonucleotide with a sequence complementary to p53 for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromeinitial results of a phase I trial, Antisense Res. Dev, 3, 1993, 383–390.[Medline]
Chick J., Gough K., Falkowski W., Kershaw P., Hore B., Mehta B., Ritson B., Ropner R. & Torley D.. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism, Br. J. Psychiatry., 161, 1992, 84–89.
Fuller R.K., Branchey L., Brightwell D.R., Derman R.M., Emrick C.D., Iber F.L., James K.E., Lacoursiere R.B., Lee K.K. & Lowenstam I.. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism. A Veterans Administration cooperative study, JAMA., 256, 1986, 1449–1455.
Swift R.M.. Medications and alcohol craving, Alcohol Res. Health., 23, 1999, 207–213.[Medline]
Brewer C.. How effective is the standard dose of disulfiram? A review of the alcohol-disulfiram reaction in practice, Br. J. Psychiatry., 144, 1984, 200–202.
Christensen J.K., Moller I.W., Ronsted P., Angelo H.R. & Johansson B.. Dose-effect relationship of disulfiram in human volunteers. Iclinical studies, Pharmacol. Toxicol., 68, 1991, 163–165.[Medline]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
