|
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Article |
mbukrinsky{at}picower.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: CCR5 signal transduction Gi protein receptor capping receptor desensitization
Infection of the target cells by HIV-1 is initiated by interaction between the viral envelope protein, gp120, and a specific set of cell surface receptors. In addition to CD4, which has long been recognized as an essential component of the receptor for HIV and SIV 1, several chemokine receptors have been shown recently to function as coreceptors (for review see reference 2). Despite a wide variety of chemokine receptors, all primary M-tropic strains of HIV-1 described to date have been shown to be capable of using CC chemokine receptor (CCR)51 345678, a receptor for CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1
Chemokine receptors belong to a group of seven-transmembrane receptors that transduce signals via coupling to G proteins. Both CCR5 and CXCR4 are believed to be coupled to Gi-like proteins, based on their sensitivity to pertussis toxin (PTX) 13. Binding of a ligand (a chemokine or HIV-1) to these receptors induces a characteristic Ca2+ flux and tyrosine phosphorylation 131415, which can be blocked by pretreatment of the cells with PTX. However, this signaling appears to be unimportant for the function of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for HIV-1, at least in immortalized cells overexpressing chemokine receptors 1617181920. Indeed, transfection into CCR5-negative cells of mutant receptors unable to couple to G proteins and transduce signals makes such cells fully susceptible to infection with R5 HIV-1 strains. In contrast, HIV-1 infection of primary CD4+ T cells appears to require actin-mediated rearrangement of receptors 21, implying a signal-mediated process.
PTX is the major virulence factor of Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough. PTX is a 105-kD noncovalently linked heterohexameric protein, which can be functionally divided into an enzymatically active A-protomer and a B (binding)-oligomer. The A-protomer consists of a single peptide subunit (S1) with ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, which specifically ribosylates and inactivates the
One such activity of PTX and B-oligomer is described in this report. We demonstrate that treatment of primary T cells with PTX or B-oligomer induces a specific desensitization of CCR5. As a result, such cells do not respond to stimulation with a CCR5 ligand, MIP-1β, and do not support entry of CCR5-dependent HIV-1 strains.
Primary Lymphocyte Cultures.
Infection with HIV-1.
Immunofluorescent Microscopy.
Binding Studies.
Calcium Mobilization Assay.
, MIP-1β, and RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted). The major coreceptor for T cell line–adapted HIV-1 strains is CXCR4 9, a receptor for a CXC chemokine, stroma-derived factor (SDF)-1
. CXCR4 can be used also by syncytium–inducing primary strains that appear at the late stages of AIDS progression 8101112.
-subunit of Gi proteins, thus leading to uncoupling of corresponding signal transduction events 2223. The B-oligomer is a pentameric protein complex composed of two dimers (S2-S4 and S3-S4) joined together by the S5 subunit, and is responsible for target cell binding (for review see reference 24). The preferential binding sites for PTX are carbohydrate moieties 25, but cell surface molecules bearing these carbohydrate determinants have not yet been unequivocally identified. In lymphocytes, a 70-kD protein (p70) exhibiting features of the PTX receptor has been described 262728; however, p70 may be only one part of a complex receptor, as PTX was shown to interact also with smaller cell surface proteins of 43 and 50 kD 2729. Treatment of T lymphocytes with PTX or purified B-oligomer induced a signaling response typical of ligand–receptor interaction, characterized by an increase of diacylglycerol levels and protein kinase C (PKC) activity, and by Ca2+ flux 303132. Thus, it is not surprising that a number of biological effects of PTX are mediated by its B-oligomer, independently of Gi protein inactivation (for review see reference 24).
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
Reagents.
PTX was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. and B-oligomer was from Calbiochem. The purity of B-oligomer was verified by gel electrophoresis analysis, which revealed complete lack of contamination with A-protomer. MIP-1β, RANTES, and SDF-1
were from PeproTech, and Fura-2/AM, Ro-31-8220, and Gö 6979 were from Calbiochem.
T cell–enriched, monocyte-depleted cultures were established from PBMCs from HIV-1–negative donors by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation and two rounds of adherence to plastic. Nonadherent cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, and stimulated with phytohemagglutinin (5 µg/ml) for 3 d. Cells were then washed and cultured for another 7 d in medium supplemented with 20 U/ml of recombinant IL-2. By that time,
84% of the cells were CD3+,
40% were CD4+,
30% were CCR5+,
95% were CXCR4+,
10% were CCR5+CD4+, and
35% were CXCR4+CD4+, as determined by flow cytometry.
Five HIV-1 strains were used in this study: three R5 viruses (92US660, 92US657, and ADA) and two X4 strains (92UG21, a primary isolate, and LAI, a T cell line–adapted virus). Before infection, viral stocks were treated with 200 U/ml of RNase-free DNase for 1 h at room temperature to eliminate DNA contamination. Viral inoculae were adjusted according to reverse transcriptase activity to 6 x 104 cpm per 106 cells. After a 2-h adsorption, cells were washed and cultured in IL-2–supplemented medium.
Cells were treated with B-oligomer (1 nM) for 10 min and then inoculated with heat-inactivated HIV-1 (2 x 106 cpm/ml of reverse transcriptase activity) or with 5 µg/ml of recombinant gp120JR-FL (Progenics Pharmaceuticals) or gp120LAI (Intracel). After 60 min at 37°C, cells were washed and fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde. After washing, cells were incubated for 20 min in 1% FCS/PBS at room temperature, and 2 x 105 cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in 0.1 ml of 1% FCS/PBS with anti-CCR5 or anti-CXCR4 mAb (2D7 and 12G5, respectively, obtained from PharMingen; both antibodies neutralize HIV-1 infection), followed by a 30-min incubation with a secondary rhodamine-labeled anti–mouse IgG. After washing, cells were incubated with FITC-labeled anti-CD4 mAb (13B8.2, Immunotech; this antibody does not compete with gp120 for CD4 binding), then washed, spotted on slides, dried, and analyzed on an immunofluorescent imaging system using a dedicated software (MetaMorph; Universal Imaging Corporation).
For each binding reaction, 106 cells resuspended in binding buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% BSA) were mixed with B-oligomer (1 nM), incubated for 10 min at 37°C, and then transferred to ice. 550 pM of 125I-labeled MIP-1β (specific activity 2,200 Ci/mmol) was added to cells in the presence or absence of a 1,000-fold molar excess of unlabeled MIP-1β, or 0.5 µg/ml of gp120, and reactions were incubated at 4°C for 4 h on a horizontal shaker. After washing with binding buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, cell-bound radioactivity was counted in a gamma-counter.
The assay was performed as previously described 33. In brief, 0.6 ml of Fura-2–loaded cells (5 x 106 cells/ml) was transferred to an acrylic cuvette and stimulated with B-oligomer (500 ng/sample), SDF-1
(100 ng/sample), or MIP-1β (500 ng/sample). Fluorescence emission at 340 and 380 nm was measured on a Perkin-Elmer Luminescence Spectrometer LS50B.
![]()
Results and Discussion
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
Several previously published reports 1617181920 demonstrated that activity of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for HIV-1 does not involve signaling via coupled Gi proteins. A somewhat conflicting result has been reported recently 21, demonstrating that entry of X4 HIV-1 strains into primary T cells correlated with actin-dependent cocapping of CD4 and CXCR4 receptors, thus implicating signaling in the process of HIV-1 entry. To better define the role of signaling from chemokine receptors in HIV-1 entry into primary T cells, we used PTX to specifically inactivate Gi-like proteins that transduce signals from both CCR5 and CXCR4 13, and measured HIV-1 entry by PCR, using primers LTR R/U5 specific for early products of reverse transcription 34. The fragment of HIV-1 cDNA amplified by these primers is produced either within the virion or very early after virus–cell fusion, and thus reflects the efficiency of virus entry. Surprisingly, PTX inhibited entry of R5 HIV-1 strains 92US660 (Fig. 1 A) and ADA (not shown), but not of X4 strains LAI (Fig. 1 A) and 92UG21 (not shown). PTX is a complex protein composed of an active (A) and a binding (B) subunit, and certain T cell activities have been shown to be initiated by the B-oligomer of PTX independently of inactivation of Gi-like proteins by the A-protomer 35. We therefore tested whether activity of B-oligomer could account for the observed inhibitory effect of PTX on entry of R5 HIV-1. Similar to results observed with PTX, B-oligomer inhibited entry of R5 HIV-1 strains in a dose-dependent fashion, but not of X4 HIV-1 strains (Fig. 1 B). Analysis of the B-oligomer preparation by SDS-PAGE confirmed the lack of A-protomer (not shown), and Gi-mediated signaling was not impaired in B-oligomer–treated cells (see Fig. 4, right). We thus conclude that PTX blocks entry of R5 HIV-1 strains by a mechanism that is independent of Gi protein inhibition. Interestingly, no inhibitory activity of PTX or B-oligomer was observed on entry of R5 HIV-1 into PM1 cells (not shown), consistent with recently reported results 36. This result underscores the differences between the primary cells and T cell lines.
|
|
|
|
, respectively, after pretreatment of the cells with B-oligomer. Treatment of the cells with B-oligomer blocked Ca2+ flux initiated by MIP-1β (Fig. 4 A) and RANTES (not shown), but not by SDF-1
(Fig. 4 B). Although pretreatment of the cells with MIP-1β desensitized response to B-oligomer (Fig. 4 C), pretreatment with SDF-1
induced only partial desensitization (Fig. 4 D). Of note, B-oligomer at the suboptimal concentration used in these experiments (2 nM) did not desensitize its own receptor (not shown). The use of higher concentrations of B-oligomer for desensitization studies was confounded by a very slow return of the Ca2+ response to the baseline (>30 min), thus precluding analysis by Fura-2–based technique due to leaking of the dye from the cells. The pattern of Ca2+ response to sequential treatment of cells with B-oligomer and MIP-1β is best described by the phenomenon of heterologous desensitization. Potentially, this desensitization is attributable to signaling from a B-oligomer receptor, similar to the heterologous desensitization of CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptors by signaling from opiate receptors 40. Although we can not formally rule out the possibility that B-oligomer binds to CCR5, several considerations make this scenario unlikely. First, B-oligomer did not compete with MIP-1β or gp120 for binding to CCR5 (Fig. 3). Second, B-oligomer did not induce downregulation of CCR5, as evidenced by flow cytometric analysis (not shown). Third, B-oligomer did not induce Ca2+ flux (not shown) and did not affect HIV-1 replication (Fig. 2) in PM1 cells, supporting the notion that B-oligomer signals through its own receptor and this signaling is required for its anti-HIV activity.
Treatment of T lymphocytes with PTX or B-oligomer has been reported to rapidly increase PKC activity 30. To determine whether PKC was involved in the observed effects of B-oligomer on CCR5 function, we used two selective PKC inhibitors, Ro-31-8220 and Gö 6979. As shown in Fig. 5, Ro-31-8220 reversed the inhibitory effect of B-oligomer on entry of R5 HIV-1 (Fig. 5 A, panel a) and on Ca2+ flux induced by RANTES, another ligand for CCR5 (Fig. 5 B, panel a). On its own, Ro-31-8220 did not significantly alter either of those activities of CCR5 (Fig. 5A and Fig. B, panel b). It also did not act upon entry of X4 HIV-1 (Fig. 5 A, panel b) or signaling by SDF-1
(Fig. 5 B, panels c and d), which are mediated by CXCR4 and are not affected by B-oligomer. A similar result was observed with a different PKC inhibitor, Gö 6979 (not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that PKC is involved in signal transduction from B-oligomer (and PTX) receptor to CCR5.
|
|
|
and MIP-1β. This analysis was confounded by rapid downregulation of CXCR4 or CCR5 after stimulation with SDF-1
or MIP-1β, respectively. Nevertheless, results presented in Table demonstrate that B-oligomer blocked capping induced by MIP-1β, but not by SDF-1
. Similar to HIV-1– or gp120-induced polarization, the capping involved not only the ligand-specific receptor, but also other molecules, including CD4. This result suggests that signaling from chemokine receptors induces a major actin-dependent rearrangement of cellular membrane. Taken together, the results presented in this report suggest that the inhibitory effect of PTX and its B-oligomer on HIV-1 infection of primary cells is mediated through desensitization of CCR5. Exposure to B-oligomer causes T cells to lose signaling activity associated with binding of the natural CCR5 ligand, MIP-1β, and to fail to cap after binding of R5 HIV-1; however, ligand-binding activity is preserved. The role of receptor capping in HIV-1 infection of primary cells, and the nature of signals involved in the regulation of capping are now under investigation in our laboratory. It is clear that receptor capping is not required for binding of the virus, but it might be necessary for fusion with primary cells. In addition to the potential value of the B-oligomer as an anti-HIV agent, these studies may define new targets in the search for novel therapeutic approaches against HIV infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants to M. Bukrinsky and by funding from The Picower Institute for Medical Research.
Submitted: 22 January 1999
Revised: 1 July 1999
Accepted: 6 July 1999
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Maddon P.J., Dalgleish A.G., McDougal J.S., Clapham P.R., Weiss R.A. & Axel R.. The T4 gene encodes the AIDS virus receptor and is expressed in the immune system and the brain, Cell, 47, 1986, 333–348.[Medline]
Bieniasz P.D. & Cullen B.R.. Chemokine receptors and human immunodeficiency virus infection, Front. Biosci. (Online)., 3, 1998, D44–D58.
Alkhatib G., Combadiere C., Broder C.C., Feng Y., Kennedy P.E., Murphy P.M. & Berger E.A.. CC CKR5a RANTES, MIP-1
, MIP-1β receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1, Science., 272, 1996, 1955–1958.[Abstract]
Choe H., Farzan M., Sun Y., Sullivan N., Rollins B., Ponath P.D., Wu L., Mackay C.R., LaRosa G. & Newman W.. The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates, Cell., 85, 1996, 1135–1148.[Medline]
Deng H., Liu R., Ellmeier W., Choe S., Unutmaz D., Burkhart M., Di Marzio P., Marmon S., Sutton R.E. & Hill C.M.. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1, Nature., 381, 1996, 661–666.[Medline]
Doranz B.J., Rucker J., Yi Y., Smyth R.J., Samson M., Peiper S.C., Parmentier M., Collman R.G. & Doms R.W.. A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses fusin and the beta-chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors, Cell., 85, 1996, 1149–1158.[Medline]
Dragic T., Litwin V., Allaway G.P., Martin S.R., Huang Y., Nagashima K.A., Cayanan C., Maddon P.J., Koup R.A., Moore J.P. & Paxton W.A.. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5, Nature., 381, 1996, 667–673.[Medline]
Zhang L., Huang Y., He T., Cao Y. & Ho D.D.. HIV-1 subtype and second-receptor use, Nature., 383, 1996, 768, .[Medline]
Feng Y., Broder C.C., Kennedy P.E. & Berger E.A.. HIV-1 entry cofactorfunctional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor, Science., 272, 1996, 872–877.[Abstract]
Simmons G., Wilkinson D., Reeves J.D., Dittmar M.T., Beddows S., Weber J., Carnegie G., Desselberger U., Gray P.W., Weiss R.A. & Clapham P.R.. Primary, syncytium-inducing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates are dual-tropic and most can use either Lestr or CCR5 as coreceptors for virus entry, J. Virol., 70, 1996, 8355–8360.[Abstract]
Bjorndal A., Deng H., Jansson M., Fiore J.R., Colognesi C., Karlsson A., Albert J., Scarlatti G., Littman D.R. & Fenyo E.M.. Coreceptor usage of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates varies according to biological phenotype, J. Virol., 71, 1997, 7478–7487.[Abstract]
Connor R.I., Sheridan K.E., Ceradini D., Choe S. & Landau N.R.. Change in coreceptor use correlates with disease progression in HIV-1–infected individuals, J. Exp. Med., 185, 1997, 621–628.
Davis C.B., Dikic I., Unutmaz D., Hill C.M., Arthos J., Siani M.A., Thompson D.A., Schlessinger J. & Littman D.R.. Signal transduction due to HIV-1 envelope interactions with chemokine receptors CXCR4 or CCR5, J. Exp. Med., 186, 1997, 1793–1798.
Weissman D., Rabin R.L., Arthos J., Rubbert A., Dybul M., Swofford R., Venkatesan S., Farber J.M. & Fauci A.S.. Macrophage-tropic HIV and SIV envelope proteins induce a signal through the CCR5 chemokine receptor, Nature., 389, 1997, 981–985.[Medline]
Ganju R.K., Dutt P., Wu L., Newman W., Avraham H., Avraham S. & Groopman J.E.. Beta-chemokine receptor CCR5 signals via the novel tyrosine kinase RAFTK, Blood., 91, 1998, 791–797.
Gosling J., Monteclaro F.S., Atchison R.E., Arai H., Tsou C.L., Goldsmith M.A. & Charo I.F.. Molecular uncoupling of C-C chemokine receptor 5-induced chemotaxis and signal transduction from HIV-1 coreceptor activity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 94, 1997, 5061–5066.
Farzan M., Choe H., Martin K.A., Sun Y., Sidelko M., Mackay C.R., Gerard N.P., Sodroski J. & Gerard C.. HIV-1 entry and macrophage inflammatory protein-1β-mediated signaling are independent functions of the chemokine receptor CCR5, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 1997, 6854–6857.
Aramori I., Zhang J., Ferguson S.S., Bieniasz P.D., Cullen B.R. & Caron M.G.. Molecular mechanism of desensitization of the chemokine receptor CCR-5receptor signaling and internalization are dissociable from its role as an HIV-1 co-receptor, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Org.) J., 16, 1997, 4606–4616.[Medline]
Alkhatib G., Locati M., Kennedy P.E., Murphy P.M. & Berger E.A.. HIV-1 coreceptor activity of CCR5 and its inhibition by chemokinesindependence from G protein signaling and importance of coreceptor downmodulation, Virology., 234, 1997, 340–348.[Medline]
Lu Z., Berson J.F., Chen Y., Turner J.D., Zhang T., Sharron M., Jenks M.H., Wang Z., Kim J. & Rucker J.. Evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor usage through interactions with distinct CCR5 and CXCR4 domains, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 94, 1997, 6426–6431.
Iyengar S., Hildreth J.E. & Schwartz D.H.. Actin-dependent receptor colocalization required for human immunodeficiency virus entry into host cells, J. Virol., 72, 1998, 5251–5255.
Hepler J.R. & Gilman A.G.. G proteins, Trends Biochem. Sci., 17, 1992, 383–387.[Medline]
Kaslow H.R. & Burns D.L.. Pertussis toxin and target eukaryotic cellsbinding, entry, and activation, FASEB (Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol.) J., 6, 1992, 2684–2690.[Abstract]
Wong W.S. & Rosoff P.M.. Pharmacology of pertussis toxin B-oligomer, Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 74, 1996, 559–564.[Medline]
Saukkonen K., Burnette W.N., Mar V.L., Masure H.R. & Tuomanen E.I.. Pertussis toxin has eukaryotic-like carbohydrate recognition domains, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 1992, 118–122.
Clark C.G. & Armstrong G.D.. Lymphocyte receptors for pertussis toxin, Infect. Immun., 58, 1990, 3840–3846.
Armstrong G.D., Clark C.G. & Heerze L.D.. The 70-kilodalton pertussis toxin-binding protein in Jurkat cells, Infect. Immun., 62, 1994, 2236–2243.
Lei M.G. & Morrison D.C.. Evidence that lipopolysaccharide and pertussis toxin bind to different domains on the same p73 receptor on murine splenocytes, Infect. Immun., 61, 1993, 1359–1364.
Rogers T.S., Corey S.J. & Rosoff P.M.. Identification of a 43-kilodalton human T lymphocyte membrane protein as a receptor for pertussis toxin, J. Immunol., 145, 1990, 678–683.[Abstract]
Thom R.E. & Casnellie J.E.. Pertussis toxin activates protein kinase C and a tyrosine protein kinase in the human T cell line Jurkat, FEBS Lett., 244, 1989, 181–184.[Medline]
Stewart S.J., Prpic V., Johns J.A., Powers F.S., Graber S.E., Forbes J.T. & Exton J.H.. Bacterial toxins affect early events of T lymphocyte activation, J. Clin. Invest., 83, 1989, 234–242.[Medline]
Rosoff P.M., Walker R. & Winberry L.. Pertussis toxin triggers rapid second messenger production in human T lymphocytes, J. Immunol., 139, 1987, 2419–2423.[Abstract]
Sherry B., Zybarth G., Alfano M., Dubrovsky L., Mitchell R., Rich D., Ulrich P., Bucala R., Cerami A. & Bukrinsky M.. Role of cyclophilin A in the uptake of HIV-1 by macrophages and T lymphocytes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95, 1998, 1758–1763.
Schmidtmayerova H., Alfano M., Nuovo G. & Bukrinsky M.. HIV-1 T-lymphotropic strains enter macrophages via CD4 and CXCR4-mediated pathwayreplication is restricted at a post-entry level, J. Virol., 72, 1998, 4633–4642.
Gray L.S., Huber K.S., Gray M.C., Hewlett E.L. & Engelhard V.H.. Pertussis toxin effects on T lymphocytes are mediated through CD3 and not by pertussis toxin catalyzed modification of a G protein, J. Immunol., 142, 1989, 1631–1638.[Abstract]
Cocchi F., DeVico A.L., Garzino-Demo A., Cara A., Gallo R.C. & Lusso P.. The V3 domain of the HIV-1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein is critical for chemokine-mediated blockade of infection, Nature Med., 2, 1996, 1244–1247.[Medline]
Guntermann C., Murphy B.J., Zheng R., Qureshi A., Eagles P.A. & Nye K.E.. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection requires pertussis toxin sensitive G-protein-coupled signalling and mediates cAMP downregulation, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 256, 1999, 429–435.[Medline]
Bukrinsky M.I., Stanwick T.L., Dempsey M.P. & Stevenson M.. Quiescent T lymphocytes as an inducible virus reservoir in HIV-1 infection, Science., 254, 1991, 423–427.
Pauza C.D., Hinds P.W., Yin C., McKechnie T.S., Hinds S.B. & Salvato M.S.. The lymphocytosis-promoting agent pertussis toxin affects virus burden and lymphocyte distribution in the SIV-infected rhesus macaque, AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses., 13, 1997, 87–95.[Medline]
Grimm M.C., Ben-Baruch A., Taub D.D., Howard O.M., Resau J.H., Wang J.M., Ali H., Richardson R., Snyderman R. & Oppenheim J.J.. Opiates transdeactivate chemokine receptors
and µ opiate receptor-mediated heterologous desensitization, J. Exp. Med., 188, 1998, 317–325.
Dianzani U., Bragardo M., Buonfiglio D., Redoglia V., Funaro A., Portoles P., Rojo J., Malavasi F. & Pileri A.. Modulation of CD4 lateral interaction with lymphocyte surface molecules induced by HIV-1 gp120, Eur. J. Immunol., 25, 1995, 1306–1311.[Medline]
Feito M.J., Bragardo M., Buonfiglio D., Bonissoni S., Bottarel F., Malavasi F. & Dianzani U.. gp120s derived from four syncytium-inducing HIV-1 strains induce different patterns of CD4 association with lymphocyte surface molecules, Int. Immunol., 9, 1997, 1141–1147.
Kinter A., Catanzaro A., Monaco J., Ruiz M., Justement J., Moir S., Arthos J., Oliva A., Ehler L. & Mizell S.. CC-chemokines enhance the replication of T-tropic strains of HIV-1 in CD4+ T cellsrole of signal transduction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95, 1998, 11880–11885.
Nieto M., Frade J.M., Sancho D., Mellado M., Martinez-A C. & Sanchez-Madrid F.. Polarization of chemokine receptors to the leading edge during lymphocyte chemotaxis, J. Exp. Med., 186, 1997, 153–158.
Folks T.M., Powell D., Lightfoote M., Koenig S., Fauci A.S., Benn S., Rabson A., Daugherty D., Gendelman H.E. & Hoggan M.D.. Biological and biochemical characterization of a cloned Leu-3– cell surviving infection with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome retrovirus, J. Exp. Med., 164, 1986, 280–290.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|