|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Articles |
Department of Microbiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Key Words: V(D)J rearrangement • immunoglobulin transgenic mice • B cell differentiation • allelic exclusion
Abbreviations used: BCR, B cell receptor; DSB, double strand break; HSA, heat stable antigen; LM-PCR, ligation-mediated PCR; RAG, recombinase activation gene; tg, transgene.
In antibody-producing cells, only one of two immunoglobulin (Ig)1 heavy (H) chain alleles is normally expressed; the other allele is excluded (1, 2). Several models have been proposed to explain allelic exclusion in Ig-producing cells (3–6). The two models of particular interest here are the stochastic and regulatory models. According to the stochastic model (3), allelic exclusion reflects the imprecision of V(D)J rearrangement, the process responsible for rearranging V, D, and J elements to form contiguous VDJ or VJ coding segments for Ig variable regions (reviewed in 7). As this process is error prone, the chance is low that a cell will make in-frame (productive) rearrangements at both alleles of a given locus. Thus, in this model, each allele rearranges independently and has an equal but low chance of being rearranged productively. The regulatory model (4, 5) adds a regulatory rider to the stochastic model and states that rearrangement at one allele may affect rearrangement at the other allele. An example of apparent nonindependent rearrangement of allelic elements is seen at the H chain locus. B cell plasmacytomas with an incomplete (DJH) rearrangement at one allele generally show a productive, in-frame VDJH (VDJH+) rearrangement at the other allele (8). This implies that the product of a VDJH+ allele is able to prevent further VH–DJH rearrangement (8). In support of this idea, VH–DJH rearrangement is suppressed in µ H chain transgenic mice (9–11 and reviewed in 12).
It is still uncertain how the µ chain product of a VDJH+ allele serves to prevent further VH–DJH rearrangement. What is clear is that expression of a µ chain, in the form of a pre–B cell receptor (pre-BCR), results in progression of pro-B cells to the pre-B stage and the cessation of VH–DJH rearrangement (reviewed in 13, 14). It is not clear, however, to what extent cessation of VH–DJH rearrangement may reflect (a) rapid differentiation of pro-B cells to a stage (pre-B) at which such rearrangement can no longer occur, or (b) an ability of the pre-BCR to signal direct inhibition of VH–DJH rearrangement in addition to the progression of pro-B to pre-B cells. Similarly, it is not clear to what extent cessation of H and L chain rearrangement after possible premature expression of a BCR may reflect rapid differentiation to the recombinase-inactive B cell stage or direct feedback inhibition. To gain further insight into these issues, we looked at initiation of VDJH rearrangement in scid and scid/+ mice bearing a µ transgene (tg) or both a µ and
Here we report that tg-induced suppression of VH–DJH rearrangement may primarily reflect accelerated B cell differentiation rather than direct feedback inhibition. In µ-tg scid mice, initiation of DH–JH rearrangement was observed to occur predominantly at the late pre-B stage rather than at the pro-B stage, and in µ/
Cells.
Flow Cytometric Analysis.
Analysis of Genomic DNA.
Ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR) (31–33) was used to assay DNA samples for double strand breaks (DSBs) resulting from the initiation of H chain gene rearrangement. Initiation of V(D)J rearrangement results in site-specific DSBs at the recombination signal/coding borders of V, D, and J elements: two kinds of broken DNA molecules are generated; covalently closed (hairpin) coding ends and blunt signal ends (34, 35). We assayed for broken molecules with signal ends; specifically, those with JH signal ends and those with 5' or 3' DHfl16.1 (DHfl) signal ends. We also assayed for signal joints (by inverse PCR), completed DH-to-JH rearrangements and unrearranged JH loci as scored by the retention of germline sequence immediately upstream of JH1.
Assays were performed as follows. A double strand linker was ligated to DNA (equivalent to
DNA was amplified in a 50-µl reaction volume containing each primer at a concentration of 0.5 µM, 200 µM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.3 at 25°C, 50 mM KCL, 0.001% gelatin, 200 µM (each) dTTP, dGTP, dATP, and dCTP (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology), and 1 U Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus Corp.). The PCR reaction was carried out for 26 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 45 s (or 70°C for 45 s for amplification of JH signal ends), and 72°C for 90 s, followed by a 5-min extension at 72°C. Ligation and PCR amplification with different primers were performed at the same time to minimize experimental variation. Each assay included positive controls and was done several times with independent preparations of DNA. Amplification of PCR products was approximately proportional to the input DNA at several different dilutions. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis and analyzed by Southern blot analysis.
Probes.
tg (µ/-tg mice). Scid mice are homozygous for a mutation (scid) that severely impairs rearrangement of V, D, and J elements (15). Thus, B cell differentiation in scid mice is arrested at the pro-B cell stage (16), the stage at which H chain gene rearrangement is initiated (17, 18). In µ-tg scid mice, however, B cell differentiation proceeds to the late pre-B cell stage before being arrested (19), and in µ/-tg scid mice, differentiation can proceed to the B cell stage (20). -tg scid mice, initiation of DH–JH rearrangement was significantly reduced compared with non–tg scid mice. Similar results were obtained with µ-tg and µ/-tg scid/+ mice (heterozygous for the scid mutation). We interpret these findings to reflect accelerated development of tg-expressing B lineage cells such that there is insufficient time to initiate or complete DH–JH rearrangement at both alleles in developing pro-B cells. The idea that a µ tg might accelerate B cell development has been proposed previously (21). In support of this notion, and consistent with our earlier studies (22), we show that developing pro-B cells in µ-tg scid mice appear to bypass the late pro-B stage and progress directly into large (early) pre-B cells, which are known to be deficient in recombinase activation gene (RAG) expression (23). Similarly, in µ/-tg scid mice, we present evidence that developing B lineage cells may transit the pro- and pre-B stages very rapidly during their progression to the RAG-inactive B cell stage. We suggest that the effect of endogenously coded Ig chains may be analogous; i.e., when a cell expresses a µ chain, it rapidly progresses to a developmental stage that precludes further rearrangement of VH elements.
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Mice.
Ig transgenic lines of C.B-17 scid mice hemizygous for the H chain tgs, M54 (24), 3H9 (25), or the kappa L chain tg, V8 (26), have been described previously (20). M54/V8 and 3H9/V8 scid mice were obtained by crossing individual tg lines and typing offspring for the presence of the respective tgs. Ig transgenic control mice, heterozygous for the scid mutation (denoted as scid/+ or s/+ mice), were obtained by crossing the above transgenic scid lines with C.B-17 wild-type mice. Mice used in this study were between 8 and 12 wk of age.
Bone marrow cells were flushed from femurs with staining medium using a syringe and 22 gauge needle. The cells were then dispersed by gentle pipetting, treated with 0.165 M NH4CL, washed, and resuspended in staining medium and passed through a sterile nylon screen. B cell hybridomas were obtained by fusing unstimulated splenic cells from adult M54/V8 (or 3H9/V8) scid and scid/+ mice in a manner previously described (27) using Ag8.563 (28) as the cell fusion partner.
Bone marrow cell suspensions were analyzed for the presence of B lineage cells representing different stages of development (17). In brief, cell suspensions were stained with Cy5 (Biological Detection Systems, Inc.) or allophycocyanin (APC; PharMingen) conjugated anti–CD45(B220), FITC-conjugated anti–CD43, or biotinylated anti–IgM. Binding of biotinylated antibodies was revealed by Texas red conjugated Streptavidin (Southern Biotechnology). B220+CD43+IgM–, B220+CD43–IgM–, and B220+CD43–IgM+ cells were enumerated or sorted by multiparameter flow cytometry using a dual laser FACStar Plus® (Becton Dickinson & Co.). Forward and light-angle scatter gates were set to include lymphoid cells only. Dead cells were identified by propidium iodide staining and excluded from analysis. To distinguish early B lineage subsets, B220+ CD43+-gated cells were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti–BP1 (29) and biotinylated anti–heat stable antigen (HSA) (17) (both reagents were provided by R. Hardy, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA).
Genomic DNA was prepared from sorted cell subsets (0.5–1.0 x 106 cells) as described previously (30) and dissolved in water at a concentration corresponding to 105 cell genome equivalents/µl. 
4 x 105 cell genomes). The linker was constructed according to Roth et al. (32) by annealing two oligonucleotides, DR19 (5'-CACGATTCCC-3') and DR20 (5'-GCTATGTACTACCCGGGAATTCGTG-3'). After ligation, different dilutions of the ligation reaction (input DNA) were used to perform PCR amplifications of one or more of the following: (a) linkered JH signal ends using DR20 and an oligonucleotide (MB221) complementary to a sequence immediately 5' of JH1 (5'-TCTCTTGTCACAGGTCTCACTATGC-3'); (b) linkered 5' DHfl signal ends using DR20 and an oligonucleotide (MB222) complementary to a sequence 5' of DHfl (5'-GCCTTCCACAAGAGGAGAAG-3'); (c) linkered 3' DHfl signal ends using DR20 and an oligonucleotide (MB241) complementary to a sequence 3' of DHfl (5'-TGGGTCAGTGGTCAAGACTCG-3'); (d) signal joints resulting from the joining of JH1, JH2, or JH3 signals to the 3' DHfl signal using MB221 and MB241; (e) DJH coding joints using a DHfl/DHsp primer MB109 (5'-CCGAATTCGTCCTCCAGAAACAGACC-3') and a primer (MB 92) complementary to a JH4 sequence (5'-GCCGGATCCCTTGACCCCAGTAGTCC-3'); (f) retained sequence immediately upstream of JH1 using MB221 and MB92; and (g) 
actin sequence using actin-specific primers (17). The level of amplified actin product served as a control for the amount of input DNA.
Blots were hybridized with: (a) pJH6.3 (36) to reveal H chain gene rearrangements, DJH coding and signal joints, and unrearranged JH alleles; (b) a genomic fragment corresponding to DHfl and its surrounding region (amplified by PCR using MB222 and MB 241) to reveal LM-PCR–amplified 3' and 5' DHfl signal ends; and (c) pActin (17) to reveal PCR-amplified actin. Probes were labeled with -[32P]dCTP using a Prime-It II kit (Stratagene Inc.).
Results
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Model for B Cell Development in Ig tg scid Mice.
Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of the effects of µ and µ/ tgs on scid B cell development. The different stages of B cell development are designated with the letter code of Hardy et al. (17); the alternative nomenclature of Rolink and Melchers (37) is shown for comparison. As indicated, B cell development in scid bone marrow is blocked at stage C, shortly after B lineage cells initiate H chain gene rearrangement. Relief from this block can be achieved by introduction of a µ tg into the scid genome. In µ-tg scid mice (22), developing pro-B cells appear to bypass stage C and develop directly into early pre-B cells, denoted as C'. Most cells in subset C' are in cycle (17) and show downregulated RAG expression (23). Cells of subset C' give rise to the D subset. At this late stage of pre-B cell differentiation, RAG expression is again upregulated (23) and L chain gene rearrangement is initiated (17, 18, 38). Differentiation does not proceed beyond stage D in µ-tg scid mice, presumably because scid pre-B cells are unable to repair DNA DSBs resulting from the initiation of gene rearrangement (22, 30). Complete relief from the scid block can be achieved in double tg scid mice, bearing both a µ and tg (20). In µ/-tg scid bone marrow, B cell development proceeds to stage E and appears to do so very rapidly, as evidenced by the near-normal percentage of B cells and virtual absence of pro- and pre-B cells.
|
chain tgs on scid B cell development is shown in Fig. 3. As indicated, scid mice bearing M54 (or 3H9) and the L chain tg, V8 (26), have near-normal percentages of B (B220+IgM+) cells in their bone marrow, but are severely deficient in early B lineage (B220+CD43+ and B220+CD43–) cells comprising subsets B–D.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 4 and Table I, JH signal ends resulting from the initiation of DH–JH rearrangement in M54 scid mice were much more abundant in the late pre-B (CD43–) cell fraction than in the CD43+ fraction containing pro-B and early pre-B cells. In M54 scid/+ mice as well, JH signal ends were more abundant in the CD43– than CD43+ cell fraction (Fig. 4 and Table I). We conclude that initiation of DH–JH rearrangement in M54 mice occurs predominantly at the late pre–B cell stage. Despite the relatively low abundance of JH signal ends in the CD43+ cell fraction of M54 scid/+ mice, alleles with (completed) DH–JH rearrangements were readily detectable in this cell fraction (Fig. 4). This is not surprising as DH–JH rearrangements would be expected to result in DJH complexes that have a much longer half-life than JH signal ends, especially in µ-tg–expressing pro-B cells that fail to rearrange their VH elements (20).
|
|
Initiation of VH–DJH Rearrangement Is Not Detectable in Late Pre-B Cells of µ-tg Mice, Despite Ongoing DH–JH Rearrangement.
To test for ongoing DH–JH and VH–DJH rearrangement in the CD43+ and CD43– cell fractions of scid, scid/+, and M54 scid/+ mice, we assayed for DSBs at both the 3' and 5' signals of the DHfl16.1 (DHfl) element. DHfl is the most upstream DH element (40) and is used in 
50% of DH–JH rearrangements (41–44). Broken DNA molecules with 3' DHfl signal ends signify initiation of DH–JH rearrangement, whereas 5' DHfl signal ends can be taken to reflect initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement (33).
Scid and scid/+ mice showed striking differences in their levels of 3' and 5' DHfl signal ends (Fig. 5). In the CD43+ cell fraction of scid mice, 3' but not 5' DHfl signal ends were abundant, whereas, in the corresponding cell fraction of scid/+ mice, 5' but not 3' DHfl ends were abundant. Thus, in the CD43+ cell fraction of scid mice, initiation of DH–JH rearrangement predominates over that of VH–DJH rearrangement, whereas the reverse is true in the CD43+ cell fraction of scid/+ mice. In the late pre-B (CD43–) cell fraction of scid/+ mice, neither 3' nor 5' DHfl signal ends were detectable, indicating that H chain gene rearrangement is normally completed before this stage, which is in agreement with the results of Fig. 4. In contrast, in the CD43– cell fraction of M54 scid/+ mice, DH–JH rearrangement was ongoing, as indicated by the abundance of 3' DHfl signal ends (Fig. 5). Note that 5' DHfl signal ends were not detectable in the CD43– (or CD43+) cell fraction of M54 scid/+ mice. Therefore, even though DH–JH rearrangement is ongoing in late pre-B cells of M54 scid/+ mice, initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement does not evidently occur in these cells. This apparent inability of the V(D)J recombinase system to target VH elements in late pre-B cells of µ-tg mice is consistent with the early findings of Yancoupolus and Alt (45). These investigators found that VH558 transcripts are detectable in µ– but not µ+ lines of transformed pre-B cells and concluded that VH elements in µ+-transformed pre-B cells are not accessible to the V(D)J recombinase system.
|
-tg Mice than in non-tg Mice.-tg mice, we sorted B220+IgM– bone marrow cells from scid, 3H9/V8 scid, and 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice, and then assayed for the level of JH signal ends. The B220+ IgM– cell population would include B lineage subsets (B–D) before the immature B cell stage (E). We also assayed for circular DNA molecules with signal joints resulting from the joining of the JH1, JH2, or JH3 signals with the 3' DHfl signal (see Materials and Methods). Signal joint formation, in contrast to coding joint formation, is not impaired in scid mice (46, 47). Also, we would expect circular DNA molecules to have a longer half-life than broken molecules with JH signal ends, thus making signal joint formation a sensitive assay for attempted DH–JH rearrangement in scid mice.
As shown in Fig. 6, JH signal ends were more abundant in the B220+IgM– cell fraction of non-tg scid mice than in the corresponding cell fraction of 3H9/V8 scid and 3H9/ V8 scid/+ mice. Thus, the initiation of DH–JH rearrangement is clearly reduced in the presence of these tgs. This is also apparent from the reduced level of signal joints in 3H9/V8 mice compared with control non-tg scid mice (Fig. 6). The level of JH2 signal joints in 3H9/V8 scid and 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice was estimated to be 10 and 60%, respectively, the level in non-tg scid mice (see Fig. 6, legend). We suggest later that the lower level of signal joints in 3H9/V8 scid than 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice may be attributable to premature death of developing scid B cells resulting from persisting DSBs at DH and JH coding elements.
|
-tg scid Mice Do Not Initiate DH–JH Rearrangement.-tg scid mice would be those in which DH–JH rearrangement is not attempted. To test this prediction, we generated and cloned B cell hybridomas from the spleen of M54/V8 and 3H9/V8 scid mice, and then examined these hybridomas for the status of their H chain alleles. Control hybridomas were obtained from M54/V8 and 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice. Representative results are illustrated in Fig. 7 for 9 3H9/ V8 scid/+ hybridomas and 10 3H9/V8 scid hybridomas. Note that one or two H chain gene rearrangements were clearly evident in all but one of the scid/+ hybridomas. In contrast, none of the scid hybridomas showed a rearranged allele.
|
-tg mice were analyzed and the results are summarized in Table II. 10 scid/+ hybridomas showed one allele to be rearranged with the other allele in germline configuration; 11 (10 of which came from 3H9/ V8 scid/+ mice) showed both alleles to be rearranged and 5 showed a single rearrangement with the other allele missing or undetectable. Two scid/+ hybridomas showed germline H chain alleles only. As normal B cells and their precursors show H chain rearrangements at both alleles (3, 8, 50), the retention of at least one germline H chain allele in 40% of the scid/+ hybridomas demonstrates significant transgene-mediated reduction of DH–JH rearrangement. These results are in agreement with the results of Fig. 6 and with previous reports showing that the frequency of endogenous H chain rearrangement is reduced in B lineage cells of M54 (10, 51) and 3H9/V8 (25) wild-type mice. In contrast to the scid/+ results, all M54/V8 and 3H9/ V8 scid hybridomas showed germline H chain alleles only (Table II). The absence of detectable H chain gene rearrangement in the scid hybridomas indicates that cells that succeed in becoming B cells in µ/-tg scid mice do not attempt DH–JH rearrangement.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
-tg scid mice compared with non-tg scid and scid/+ control mice. Specifically, late pro-B cells (subset C) appear to be missing in µ-tg scid mice and DH–JH rearrangement occurs predominantly at stage D, the late pre–B cell stage. In µ/-tg scid mice, early B lineage subsets (B–D) are grossly under represented and initiation of DH–JH rearrangement is less frequent than in non-tg control mice. Further, pro-B cells that succeed in reaching the B cell stage in µ/-tg scid mice do not attempt DH–JH rearrangement. Interestingly, in non-tg control mice, we found initiation of DH–JH rearrangement to be greater or more sustained in scid mice than in scid/+ mice. The implications of these findings are discussed below.
Extended Period of Initiation of DH–JH Rearrangement in µ-tg Mice.
In µ-tg mice initiation of DH–JH rearrangement was found to occur most frequently at the late pre-B cell stage (stage D). As DH–JH rearrangement is normally completed before this stage (17, 18), initiation of H chain gene rearrangement appears to be somewhat delayed in µ-tg mice. To explain this result, we suggest the following model: µ-tg- and RAG-expressing pro-B cells (subsets B and B') rapidly differentiate into recombinase-deficient early pre-B cells (subset C'), such that many cells do not have time to initiate or complete DH–JH rearrangement at both alleles until the late pre-B stage (subset D) when RAG expression is again upregulated.2 Rapid progression of pro-B cells to the C' stage would presumably result from premature expression of a pre-BCR containing a tg-encoded µ chain, surrogate light (SL) chain and the signal transducing chains, Ig and Igβ (reviewed in 13, 52–54). Consistent with this model is the known early expression of µ tgs (30) and the genes for SL chain (55–57), the apparent absence of subset C in µ-tg scid mice (see Fig. 2), the shortened duration of the pro-B stage in µ-tg mice (57a), and the finding that the majority of cells corresponding to subset C in non-tg mice contain nonproductive VDJH (VDJH–) rearrangements (58). The latter finding has been interpreted to suggest that pro-B cells containing a VDJH+ rearrangement quickly exit the subset C compartment (58).
Applying the above model to non-tg mice, we suggest that pro-B cells that make a VDJH+ rearrangement on the first attempt may exclude VH–DJH rearrangement at the other allele by rapidly progressing to the RAG-deficient C' stage, and then to stage D, at which rearrangement of VH elements is no longer permissible. For allelic exclusion to occur in this model, a pre-BCR need only signal developmental progression. This notion is consistent with previous reports showing that exclusion of VH–DJH rearrangement is tightly linked with progression of pro-B cells to the pre-B stage (14, 59–61). Such linkage is even observed in µ-tg mice that express a truncated µ chain, which results in a pre-BCR complex lacking (specificity) a µ variable region and surrogate light chain (62, 63). However, pro- to pre-B progression and VH–DJH rearrangement are both blocked in µ-tg mice that express a mutated µ chain that precludes assembly of a pre-BCR complex with the signal transducing Ig /β chains (64–67). Interestingly, the few B lineage cells that reportedly escape the above developmental block show allelic exclusion (67), consistent with our proposed model.
Ongoing initiation of DH–JH (Fig. 4) and V–J rearrangement (30) in late pre-B cells of M54 scid mice could help explain why these mice uniformly lack B cells (20) and appear no more leaky than non-tg scid mice (68). If attempted rearrangement of DH and JH elements in developing M54 scid pre-B cells is initiated before that of V and J elements, some cells might be expected to succeed in making a DH–JH rearrangement. Indeed, DH–JH rearrangements were recovered from late pre-B cells of M54 scid mice (see Fig. 4). However, the chance of a scid cell surviving attempted rearrangements at both H and L chain loci would seem unlikely, consistent with the absence of detectable VJ coding joints in late pre-B cells of M54 scid mice (22, 30).
Reduced Frequency of DH–JH Rearrangement in µ/-tg Mice.
In µ/-tg mice, we found initiation of DH–JH rearrangement was less frequent than in non-tg scid mice. Signal joints resulting from the initiation of DHfl to JH rearrangement in 3H9/V8 scid and 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice were estimated to be present at 10 and 60%, respectively, the level observed in non-tg scid mice. Based on the difference in level of recovered signal joints in 3H9/V8 scid/+ and non-tg scid mice, we estimate that initiation of DH–JH is 40% less frequent in µ/-tg than non-tg mice. This estimate agrees favorably with the observed frequency of germline H chain alleles in B cell hybridomas from 3H9/V8 (6/35 alleles) and M54/V8 (6/14 alleles) scid/+ mice (Table II). The much lower level of signal joints in 3H9/V8 scid than 3H9/V8 scid/+ mice is taken to reflect loss (death) of scid cells that attempt DH–JH rearrangement. This could account for the absence of rearranged H chain alleles in B cell hybridomas recovered from µ/-tg scid mice (Table II).
To explain the reduced level of DH–JH rearrangement in µ/-tg mice, we suggest that expression of a tg-coded BCR in early pro-B cells promotes very rapid progression of these cells to the B cell stage, such that there is little time to initiate DH–JH rearrangement. Consistent with this notion, (a) µ and V8 tgs are known to be expressed early in B cell development (30), (b) µ/-tg scid/+ mice contain near-normal percentages of B cells in bone marrow but markedly reduced percentages of pro- and pre-B cells (20), and (c) µ/-tg scid mice show near-normal percentages of B cells in bone marrow but sharply reduced percentages of pro-B cells compared with non-tg scid controls and virtually no pre-B cells (
1%; Fig. 3).
Basis for the Difference in Level of JH Signal Ends in scid and scid/+ Mice.
In non-tg control mice, we found that early B lineage cells in the CD43+ cell fraction from scid mice showed a much higher level of JH signal ends than the corresponding cell fraction from scid/+ mice. As scid does not impair the joining of signal ends (46, 47), one cannot attribute the relatively high level of JH signal ends in scid mice to a blockage in signal joint formation. What scid does impair, however, is the processing of coding ends before their being joined (33, 35). Thus, developing B lineage cells in scid mice do not often succeed in joining DH and JH coding ends (48, 49) and would not be expected to initiate the second step of H chain gene rearrangement (VH–DJH rearrangement). Indeed, 5' DHfl signal ends, signifying the initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement, were not detectable in CD43+ scid cells (Fig. 5). We suggest that in the absence of VH–DJH rearrangement, initiation of DH–JH rearrangement continues unabated in CD43+ cells, resulting in a high level of JH signal ends. On the other hand, in the CD43+ cell fraction of scid/+ mice, initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement was prominent and that of DH–JH rearrangement barely evident (Fig. 5). This implies that initiation of DH–JH rearrangement in scid/+ mice may be limited to the earliest stage of pro-B cell development, consistent with the idea discussed below, that onset of VH–DJH rearrangement may preclude further DH–JH rearrangement.
In wild-type or scid/+ cells, a DH–JH rearrangement may be followed by rearrangement of a VH element to the resulting DJH complex or the complex may be replaced by the joining of an upstream DH element to a downstream JH element (41). The latter event, DJH replacement would seem counterproductive to efficient assembly of VH, DH, and JH elements. Thus, it makes sense, as originally postulated by Alt et al. (69), that after DH–JH rearrangement VH rather than DH elements are preferentially rearranged. How might this happen? Recent evidence suggests that initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement is associated with a shift in the targeting of the V(D)J recombinase activity from the 3' to the 5' side of DH elements (70). Targeting of the recombinase to signals on the 5' side of DH elements would minimize DJH replacement and limit the duration of DH–JH rearrangement to the earliest stage of pro-B cell development. Although DJH complexes can be readily detected in late pro-B cells (subset C) (17, 18, 38), this does not necessarily reflect ongoing DH–JH rearrangement at this stage; the observed DJH complexes could have been formed earlier in cells of subset B.
In sum, DH–JH rearrangement in non-tg mice is normally initiated and completed at the early pro-B stage. In µ-tg mice, DH–JH rearrangement may begin at the pro-B stage, but it appears to continue and occur most frequently at the late pre-B stage. Based on the altered representation of pro-B subsets in µ-tg scid mice, we suggest that the extended period of DH–JH rearrangement in these mice primarily reflects rapid progression of µ-tg–expressing pro-B cells to the recombinase-deficient early pre-B cell stage. Thus, many cells may not have time to initiate DH–JH rearrangement until the late pre-B stage when RAG expression is again upregulated. In addition, ongoing DH–JH rearrangement (including DJH replacement) at the late pre-B stage would not be limited by initiation of VH–DJH rearrangement, as the latter does not apparently occur in late pre-B cells of µ-tg mice. Finally, rapid progression of µ/-tg–expressing pro-B cells to the recombinase-inactive B cell stage could explain why in µ/-tg mice we find a reduced initiation of DH–JH rearrangement compared with non-tg mice and a striking deficiency of pro- and pre-B cells despite near-normal numbers of B cells.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (CA06927 and CA04946) and an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Submitted: 11 December 1998
2 The extent to which RAG expression is upregulated earlier in subsets B and B' of µ-tg mice is not known. If RAG expression is not fully upregulated in these subsets, this could also contribute to the observed lower level of DH–JH rearrangement in the pro-B (B220+CD43+) versus the late pre-B (B220+CD43–) cell fraction of µ-tg mice (see Fig. 4).
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1 Weiler E. Differential activity of allelic 
-globulin genes in antibody-producing cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1965, 54, 1765–1772.
2 Pernis BG, Chiappino A, Kelus S & Gell PGH. Cellular localization of immunoglobulin with different allotype specificities in rabbit lymphoid tissues, J Exp Med, 1965, 122, 853–875.[Abstract]
3 Coleclough CR, Perry RP, Karjalainen K & Weigert M. Aberrant rearrangements contribute significantly to the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin gene expression, Nature, 1981, 290, 372–377.[Medline]
4 Alt FW, Rosenberg N, Lewis S, Thomas E & Baltimore D. Organization and reorganization of immunoglobulin genes in A-MuLV–transformed cells: rearrangement of heavy but not light chain genes, Cell, 1981, 27, 381–390.[Medline]
5 Alt FW, Rosenberg N, Enea V, Siden E & Baltimore D. Multiple immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene transcripts in Abelson murine leukemia virus-transformed cell lines, Mol Cell Biol, 1982, 2, 386–400.
6 Wabl M & Steinberg C. A theory of allelic and isotypic exclusion for immunoglobulin genes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1982, 79, 6976–6978.
7 Lewis SM. The mechanism of V(D)J joining: lessons from molecular, immunological, and comparative analyses, Adv Immunol, 1994, 56, 27–150.[Medline]
8 Alt FW, Yancopoulos GD, Blackwell TK, Wood C, Thomas E, Boss M, Coffman R, Rosenberg N, Tonegawa S & Baltimore D. Ordered rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region segments, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1984, 3, 1209–1219.[Medline]
9 Rusconi S & Kohler G. Transmission and expression of a specific pair of rearranged immunoglobulin µ and genes in a transgenic mouse line, Nature, 1985, 314, 330–334.[Medline]
10 Weaver D, Constantini F, Imanishi-Kari T & Baltimore D. A transgenic immunoglobulin mu gene prevents rearrangement of endogenous genes, Cell, 1985, 42, 117–127.[Medline]
11 Nussenzweig MC, Shaw AC, Sinn E, Danner DB, Holmes KL, Morse HC & Leder P. Allelic exclusion in transgenic mice that express the membrane form of immunoglobulin µ, Science, 1987, 236, 816–819.
12 Storb U. Transgenic mice with immunoglobulin genes, Annu Rev Immunol, 1987, 5, 151–174.[Medline]
13 Melchers F, Rolink A, Grawunder U, Winkler TH, Karasuyama H, Ghia P & Andersson J. Positive and negative selection events during B lymphopoiesis, Curr Opin Immunol, 1995, 7, 214–227.[Medline]
14 Rajewsky K. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system, Nature, 1996, 381, 751–758.[Medline]
15 Schuler W, Weiler IJ, Schuler A, Phillips RA, Rosenberg N, Mak TW, Kearney JF, Perry RP & Bosma MJ. Rearrangement of antigen receptor genes is defective in mice with severe combined immune deficiency, Cell, 1986, 46, 963–972.[Medline]
16 Bosma MJ & Carroll AC. The scid mouse mutant: definition, characterization and potential uses, Annu Rev Immunol, 1991, 9, 323–350.[Medline]
17 Hardy RR, Carmack CE, Shinton SA, Kemp JD & Hayakawa K. Resolution and characterization of pro-B and pre–pro-B cell stages in normal mouse bone marrow, J Exp Med, 1991, 173, 1213–1225.
18 Ehlich A, Schaal S, Gu H, Kitamura D, Muller W & Rajewsky K. Immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes rearrange independently at early stages of B cell development, Cell, 1993, 72, 695–704.[Medline]
19 Reichman-Fried M, Hardy RR & Bosma MJ. Development of B-lineage cells in the bone marrow of scid/ scid mice following the introduction of functionally rearranged transgenes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1990, 87, 2730–2734.
20 Chang Y, Bosma GC & Bosma MJ. Development of B cells in scid mice with immunoglobulin transgenes: implications for the control of V(D)J recombination, Immunity, 1995, 2, 607–616.[Medline]
21 Nussenzweig MC, Schmidt EV, Shaw AC, Sinn E, Campos-Torres J, Mathey-Prevot B, Pattengale PK & Leder P. A human immunoglobulin gene reduces the incidence of lymphomas in c-Myc–bearing transgenic mice, Nature, 1988, 336, 446–450.[Medline]
22 Reichman-Fried M, Bosma MJ & Hardy RR. B-lineage cells in µ-transgenic scid mice proliferate in response to IL-7 but fail to show evidence of immunoglobulin light chain gene rearrangement, Int Immunol, 1993, 5, 303–310.
23 Grawunder U, Leu TM, Schatz DG, Werner AG, Rolink AG, Melchers F & Winkler TH. Down-regulation of RAG1 and RAG2 gene expression in preB cells after functional immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangement, Immunity, 1995, 3, 601–608.[Medline]
24 Grosschedl R, Weaver D, Baltimore D & Costantini F. Introduction of a µ immunoglobulin gene into the mouse germ line: specific expression in lymphoid cells and synthesis of functional antibody, Cell, 1984, 38, 647–658.[Medline]
25 Erikson J, Radic MZ, Camper SA, Hardy RR, Carmack C & Weigert M. Expression of anti–DNA immunoglobulin transgenes in non-autoimmune mice, Nature, 1991, 349, 331–334.[Medline]
26 Carmack CE, Camper SA, Mackle JJ, Gerhard WU & Weigert MG. Influence of a V8 L chain transgene on endogenous rearrangements and the immune response to the HA(SB) determinant on influenza virus, J Immunol, 1991, 147, 2024–2033.[Abstract]
27 Kotloff DB, Bosma MJ & Ruetsch NR. Scid mouse pre-B cells with intracellular µ chains: analysis of recombinase activity and IgH gene rearrangements, Int Immunol, 1993, 5, 383–391.
28 Kearney JF, Radbruch A, Liesegang B & Rajewsky K. A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody-secreting hybrid cell lines, J Immunol, 1979, 123, 1548–1550.
29 Cooper MD, Mulvaney D, Coutinho A & Cazenave PA. A novel cell surface molecule on early B-lineage cells, Nature, 1986, 321, 616–618.[Medline]
30 Chang Y & Bosma MJ. Effect of different immunoglobulin transgenes on B cell differentiation in scid mice, Int Immunol, 1996, 9, 373–380.[Medline]
31 Mueller PR & Wold B. In vivo footprinting of a muscle specific enhancer by ligation mediated PCR, Science, 1989, 246, 780–786.
32 Roth DB, Zhu C & Gellert M. Characterization of broken DNA molecules associated with V(D)J recombination, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90, 10788–10792.
33 Schlissel M, Constantinescu A, Morrow T, Baxter M & Peng A. Double-strand signal sequence breaks in V(D)J recombination are blunt, 5'-phosphorylated, RAG-dependent, and cell cycle regulated, Genes Dev, 1993, 7, 2520–2532.
34 Roth DB, Nakajima PB, Menetski JP, Bosma MJ & Gellert M. V(D)J recombination in mouse thymocytes: double-strand breaks near T cell receptor 
rearrangement signals, Cell, 1992, 69, 41–53.[Medline]
35 Roth DB, Menetski JP, Nakajima PB, Bosma MJ & Gellert M. V(D)J recombination: broken DNA molecules with covalently sealed (hairpin) coding ends in scid mouse thymocytes, Cell, 1992, 70, 983–991.[Medline]
36 Sakano H, Kurosawa Y, Weigert M & Tonegawa S. Identification and nucleotide sequence of a diversity DNA segment (D) of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes, Nature, 1981, 290, 562–565.[Medline]
37 Rolink A & Melchers F. Molecular and cellular origins of B lymphocyte diversity, Cell, 1991, 66, 1081–1094.[Medline]
38 Li Y-S, Hayakawa K & Hardy RR. The regulated expression of B lineage associated genes during B cell differentiation in bone marrow and fetal liver, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 951–960.
39 Li Y-S, Wasserman R, Hayakawa K & Hardy RR. Identification of the earliest B lineage stage in mouse bone marrow, Immunity, 1996, 5, 527–535.[Medline]
40 Kurosawa Y & Tonegawa S. Organization, structure, and assembly of immunoglobulin heavy chain diversity DNA segments, J Exp Med, 1982, 155, 201–218.
41 Reth MG, Jackson S & Alt FW. VHDJH formation and DJH replacement during pre-B differentiation: non-random usage of gene segments, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1986, 5, 2131–2138.[Medline]
42 Ichihara Y, Hayashida H, Miyazawa S & Kurosawa Y. Only Dfl16, Dsp2, and Dq52 gene families exist in mouse immunoglobulin heavy chain diversity gene loci, of which Dfl16 and Dsp2 originate from the same primordial DH gene, Eur J Immunol, 1989, 19, 1849–1854.[Medline]
43 Feeney AJ. Lack of N regions in fetal and neonatal mouse immunoglobulin V-D-J junctional sequences, J Exp Med, 1990, 172, 1377–1390.
44 Chang Y, Paige CJ & Wu GE. Enumeration and characterization of DJH structures in mouse fetal liver, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1992, 11, 1891–1899.[Medline]
45 Yancopoulos GD & Alt FW. Developmentally controlled and tissue-specific expression of unrearranged VH gene segments, Cell, 1985, 40, 271–281.[Medline]
46 Lieber MR, Hessie JE, Lewis S, Bosma GC, Mizuuchi K, Bosma MJ & Gellert M. The defect in murine severe combined immune deficiency: joining of signal segments but not coding segments in V(D)J recombination, Cell, 1988, 55, 7–16.[Medline]
47 Blackwell TK, Malynn BA, Pollock RR, Ferrier P, Covey LR, Fulop GM, Phillips RA, Yancopoulos GD & Alt FW. Isolation of scidpre-B cells that rearrange kappa light chain genes: formation of normal signal and abnormal coding joins, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1989, 8, 735–742.[Medline]
48 Pennycook JL, Chang Y, Celler J, Phillips RA & Wu GE. High frequency of normal DJH joints in B cell progenitors in severe combined immunodeficiency mice, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 1007–1016.
49 Araki R, Itoh M, Hamatani K & Abe M. Normal D-JH rearranged products of the Ig H gene in SCID mouse bone marrow, Int Immunol, 1996, 8, 1045–1053.
50 Nottenburg C & Weissman I. Cµ gene rearrangement of mouse immunoglobulin genes in normal B cells occurs on both the expressed and nonexpressed chromosomes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1981, 78, 484–488.
51 Iacomini J, Yannoutsos N, Bandyopadhay S & Imanishi-Kari T. Endogenous immunoglobulin expression in mu transgenic mice, Int Immunol, 1991, 3, 185–196.
52 Melchers F, Haasner D, Grawunder U, Kalberer C, Karasuyama H, Winkler T & Rolink AR. Roles of IgH and L chains and of surrogate H and L chains in the development of cells of the B lymphocyte lineage, Annu Rev Immunol, 1994, 12, 209–225.[Medline]
53 Reth M. Antigen receptors on B lymphocytes, Annu Rev Immunol, 1992, 10, 97–121.[Medline]
54 Cambier JC, Pleiman CM & Clark MR. Signal transduction by the B cell antigen receptor and its coreceptors, Annu Rev Immunol, 1994, 12, 457–486.[Medline]
55 Sakaguchi N & Melchers F. 
5, a new light-chain–related locus selectively expressed in pre-B lymphocytes, Nature, 1988, 324, 579–582.[Medline]
56 Kudo A & Melchers F. A second gene, VpreB in the 5 locus of the mouse, which appears to be selectively expressed in pre-B lymphocytes, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1987, 6, 2267–2272.[Medline]
57 Pillai S & Baltimore D. Formation of disulphide-linked µ2
2 tetramers in pre-B cells by the 18K -immunoglobulin light chain, Nature, 1987, 329, 172–174.[Medline]
57 Arakawa H & Takeda S. Early expression of Ig µ chain from a transgene significantly reduces the duration of the pro-B stage but does not affect the small pre-B stage, Int Immunol, 1996, 8, 1319–1328.
58 Ehlich A, Martin V, Muller W & Rajewsky K. Analysis of the B cell progenitor compartment at the level of single cells, Curr Biol, 1994, 4, 573–583.[Medline]
59 Loffert D, Ehlich A, Muller W & Rajewsky K. Surrogate light chain expression is required to establish immunoglobulin heavy chain allelic exclusion during early B cell development, Immunity, 1996, 4, 133–144.[Medline]
60 Gong S & Nussenzweig MC. Regulation of an early developmental checkpoint in the B cell pathway by Igβ, Science, 1996, 272, 411–414.[Abstract]
61 Torres RM, Flaswinkel H, Reth M & Rajewsky K. Aberrant B cell development and immune response in mice with a compromised BCR complex, Science, 1996, 272, 1804–1808.[Abstract]
62 Corcos D, Dunda O, Butor C, Cesbron J-Y, Lores P, Bucchini D & Jami J. Pre–B-cell development in the absence of 5 in transgenic mice expressing a heavy-chain disease protein, Curr Biol, 1995, 5, 1140–1148.[Medline]
63 Shaffer AL & Schlissel MS. A truncated heavy chain protein relieves the requirement for surrogate light chains in early B cell development, J Immunol, 1997, 159, 1265–1275.[Abstract]
64 Papavasiliou F, Misulovin Z, Suh H & Nussenzweig MC. The role of Igβ in precursor B cell transition and allelic exclusion, Science, 1995, 268, 408–411.
65 Papavasiliou F, Jankovic M, Suh H & Nussenzweig MC. The cytoplasmic domains of immunoglobulin (Ig) and Igβ can independently induce the precursor B cell transition and allelic exclusion, J Exp Med, 1995, 182, 1389–1394.
66 Papavasiliou F, Jankovic M & Nussenzweig M. Surrogate or conventional light chains are required for membrane immunoglobulin mu to activate the precursor B cell transition, J Exp Med, 1996, 184, 2025–2030.
67 Cronin FE, Jiang M, Abbas AK & Grupp SA. Role of µ heavy chain in B cell development. I. Blocked B cell maturation but complete allelic exclusion in the absence of Ig/β, J Immunol, 1998, 161, 252–259.
68 Fried M, Hardy RR & Bosma MJ. Transgenic scid mice with a functionally rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 1989, 152, 107–114.[Medline]
69 Alt FW, Blackwell TK & Yancopoulos GD. Development of the primary antibody repertoire, Science, 1987, 238, 1079–1088.
70 Van Dyk LF, Wise TW, Moore BB & Meek K. Immunoglobulin DH recombination signal sequence targeting, J Immunol, 1996, 157, 4005–4015.[Abstract]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
