|
||
Articles |


Sanders-Brown Research Center on Aging, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0084
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: intracellular bacteria protozoa cytoskeleton lectin
Abbreviations used: GalNAc, D(+)-Galactose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; mil, mammalian-specific infectivity; moi, multiplicity of infection; RER, rough endoplasmic reticulum.
Entry of intracellular bacteria into host cells involves interaction with the host cell receptor and manipulation of host signaling and cytoskeletal processes to induce bacterial uptake (1, 2). Invasion of epithelial cells by Shigella flexneri and Yersinia enterocolitica requires contact with the β1 integrins present on host cell surfaces (1). Integrins are heterodimeric transmembrane receptors comprising of
The Legionnaires' disease bacterium, Legionella pneumophila, is a facultative intracellular pathogen that invades and replicates within a rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER)1-surrounded phagosome in human macrophages and epithelial cells (10). In the aquatic environment, L. pneumophila is a parasite of protozoa. The bacteria are transmitted by aerosols generated in the environment. Intracellular replication within protozoa probably play major factors in bacterial amplification and transmission to humans (10–13). Interestingly, similar to the intracellular infection of macrophages, the bacteria are also targeted within protozoa into a replicative phagosome surrounded by the RER (14). Although L. pneumophila has loci that are required for survival within both macrophages and protozoa, the bacterium has mammalian-specific infectivity loci (mil) that are not required for infectivity of protozoa (15, 16).
Initial attachment of L. pneumophila to protozoa is mediated by the bacterial type IV pili, but the receptor for these pili is not known (17). Recently, we have demonstrated that attachment and invasion of L. pneumophila into its protozoan host, H. vermiformis, is mediated by bacterial attachment to a 170-kD galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Gal/ GalNAc) inhibitable lectin, a homologue of a β2 integrin– like Gal/GalNAc lectin of the human pathogen, Entamoeba histolytica (18–20). Bacterial uptake by H. vermiformis is insensitive to the inhibitory effects of cytochalasin D (21). In addition, many genes are induced upon bacterial attachment and invasion, and inhibition of protein synthesis of H. vermiformis blocks bacterial entry (22).
Attachment of L. pneumophila to the Gal/GalNAc lectin of H. vermiformis is associated with a time-dependent and reversible tyrosine dephosphorylation of several host cell proteins, including the 170-kD lectin (18). This bacteria- induced host tyrosine dephosphorylation is blocked by prior treatment of H. vermiformis with tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors, indicating a bacterial attachment-mediated induction of a tyrosine phosphatase activity (18). It is not known whether protein tyrosine dephosphorylation in H. vermiformis plays any role in modulating host cytoskeletal events upon attachment and entry of L. pneumophila into the protozoan host.
Focal adhesions have been recognized in Entamoeba histolytica and Acanthamoebae, and have been shown to be involved in attachment to surfaces, interaction with the receptor upon engagement to ligands, and locomotion of the parasite (23–28). The protozoan focal adhesions are also disrupted by cytochalasin D, similar to the mammalian focal adhesions (26). Protozoan focal adhesions are composed of cytoskeletal and regulatory proteins that are antigenically and functionally homologous to their mammalian counterparts, including actin,
In this report, we examined the events leading to cytoskeletal changes during the uptake of L. pneumophila by H. vermiformis. Attachment of L. pneumophila to H. vermiformis is associated with a time-dependent and reversible tyrosine dephosphorylation of many putative homologues of mammalian cytoskeletal proteins, including, paxillin, vinculin, and pp125FAK whereas actin was minimally affected. These alterations in host cell processes were associated with or followed by a noncoated receptor-mediated endocytic uptake of the bacteria.
H. vermiformis strain CDC-19 (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] 50237) is an established model for the study of pathogenesis of L. pneumophila, and was isolated from a water source of an outbreak of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease (14, 30). The amebae were maintained in ATCC culture medium 1034 (30).
Reagents and Antibodies.
Detection of Tyrosine-phosphorylated Proteins in H. vermiformis upon Contact with L. pneumophila.
To examine the ability of some sugars to block tyrosine dephosphorylation of amebal proteins upon contact with L. pneumophila, H. vermiformis were preincubated before the infection in the presence of different sugars. Preincubation of amebae was performed for 15 min on ice followed by coincubation with the bacteria at 37°C. At the end of the coincubation period, amebal cell lysates were prepared as described below.
Preparation of Cell Lysates.
Western Blotting and Immunoprecipitation Studies.
For immunoprecipitations, cell extracts were incubated with biotinylated anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies and immune complexes were collected using avidin-agarose beads (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). The beads were washed extensively with lysis buffer and eluted proteins were resolved under SDS-PAGE conditions. After transfer onto Immobilon-P membranes, the blots were probed with antibodies to pp125FAK, paxillin, or vinculin. Anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates were also analyzed by immunoblotting with antiactin antibody in the same experiment. This was followed by incubation with either HRP-conjugated goat anti– mouse or goat anti–rabbit antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) and proteins were visualized as described above. The relative intensities of the protein bands were quantitated using the NIH Image program (version 1.6). The results were expressed as percentages of uninfected controls. The percent tyrosine phosphorylation of each of the cytoskeletal proteins compared with uninfected controls (PY%) was calculated as a ratio of tyrosine-phosphorylated paxillin, pp125FAK or vinculin to the tyrosine-phosphorylated actin for that time point during infection in the same experiment.
Transmission Electron Microscopy.
and β subunits that serve as a link between the extracellular matrix and the actin cytoskeleton at sites of close cell–substratum contact (3). Clustering of integrins upon binding to their ligands induces tyrosine phosphorylation of integrins and recruitment of several cytoskeletal and regulatory proteins forming focal adhesions at contact sites (3–5). Protein tyrosine phosphatases are involved in the regulation of focal contacts and their stability (6–9).
-spectrin, myosin II, pp125FAK, vinculin,
-actinin, protein kinase C, and MAP kinase (25, 27, 28). Many of these protozoan proteins, similar to their mammalian homologues, have been also shown to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation upon receptor engagement (25, 27, 28). These observations indicate that many aspects of receptor-mediated signal transduction are highly conserved through evolution.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Bacterial and Protozoan Strains and Culture.
Legionella pneumophila AA100 is a virulent clinical isolate that has been described previously (29). The construction of a mini Tn10::kan transposon insertion library in L. pneumophila AA100 has been described previously (15). The mini Tn10::kan insertion mutants of L. pneumophila (GF162, GG104, GB112, GM128, GO128, GP65, GQ262, and GT251) were selected according to their defects in invasion of H. vermiformis, using gentamicin protection assays, as we described previously (18). In brief, after 1 h of infection, extracellular bacteria were killed with gentamicin, and intracellular bacteria were plated for colony enumeration. The percentage of invasion by the mutants was obtained relative to the wild-type strain. Through Southern hybridizations, these mutants have been confirmed to contain distinct insertions in their chromosomes (15). L. pneumophila was grown on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar plates at 37°C, or in the presence of 50 µg/ml of kanamycin for the mutants. For infections, bacteria grown for 48 h on agar plates were resuspended in serum-free axenic medium to a desired concentration.
Biotinylated and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated recombinant antiphosphotyrosine antibodies were purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). D(+)-Galactose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc), D(+)-mannose, and antibodies to vinculin (monoclonal mouse anti–human vinculin, IgG1, clone hVIN-1), and actin (monoclonal mouse anti–amebae actin, IgG1, clone KJ43A) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Antipaxillin (monoclonal mouse anti–chicken paxillin antibody, IgG1, clone Z035) and anti-pp125FAK (polyclonal rabbit anti–human pp125FAK antibody) antibodies were from Zymed Laboratories (San Francisco, CA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA), respectively. Methylamine was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
H. vermiformis were harvested and infected with L. pneumophila as we described previously (18). At several time intervals of coincubation at 37°C, amebal cell lysates were prepared for immunoblot and immunoprecipitation analysis as described below.
After incubation of H. vermiformis with L. pneumophila, infections were stopped using cold stop buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (18). Cells were washed three times with stop buffer and pelleted by low speed centrifugation at 735 g for 2 min. The amebae were lysed using cold 0.1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer, and the detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation, as described previously (18). Proteins from detergent-insoluble fraction (pellet) were resuspended in 50 µl of lysis buffer and sonicated for 5 s.
Proteins from detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. After transfer onto Immobilon-P (Millipore, Bedford, MA), membranes were incubated in a blocking buffer containing 1.5% BSA for 30 min. Membranes were probed with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (RC-20; Transduction Laboratories). After extensive washing, blots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (DuPont NEN, Boston, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
H. vermiformis were infected with L. pneumophila using a multiplicity of infection (moi) of 100 at 4°C to allow attachment, followed by a temperature shift to 37°C for 8 min to allow uptake. Preparation of ultrathin sections was performed as described previously (15). In brief, infected amebae were extensively washed with tissue culture medium to remove extracellular bacteria, fixed with 3.5% glutaraldehyde followed by 1% OsO4, dehydrated by ethanol, and embedded in Eponate 12 resin (Ted Pella, Redding, CA). Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate and examined by a Hitachi H-7000/STEM electron microscope (Hitachi Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 75 KV. Multiple sections of different samples were examined.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Attachment and Invasion of H. vermiformis by L. pneumophila Is Associated with Tyrosine Dephosphorylation of Several Detergent-insoluble Proteins.
Previously, we have shown that attachment and entry of L. pneumophila into its protozoan host, H. vermiformis, was associated with a time-dependent and reversible tyrosine dephosphorylation of multiple host proteins in the detergent-soluble fraction (18). To further investigate this, we examined the changes in the tyrosine phosphorylation status of proteins in the detergent-insoluble fractions, which constitute most of the cytoskeletal proteins. H. vermiformis was infected with L. pneumophila for several time intervals and detergent-insoluble fractions of H. vermiformis were subjected to antiphosphotyrosine immunoblot analysis. In contrast to uninfected H. vermiformis at time zero (Fig. 1 A, lane 1) or 30 min incubated under identical conditions of infection (Fig. 1 A, lane 6), tyrosine dephosphorylation of many proteins was seen in infected H. vermiformis (Fig. 1). Prominent tyrosine dephosphorylation of many proteins with apparent molecular mass of 170, 150, and 120–125 kD indicated by arrowheads was detectable as early as 1 min, and remained dephosphorylated during the 30-min infection period (Fig. 1 A, lanes 2–5). Although the degree of protein tyrosine dephosphorylation varied slightly between experiments, similar to our observations with the detergent-soluble proteins (18), the observations of tyrosine dephosphorylation of the 170-, 150-, and 120–125-kD was always consistent in several experiments (data not shown). Electrotransfer of the proteins >200-kD species was inconsistent but when it occurred the 200-kD species was dephosphorylated upon infection (data not shown). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the proteins of molecular masses <69 kD was variable, and their dephosphorylation upon infection was inconsistent in multiple experiments (data not shown). The molecular masses of the major tyrosine-dephosphorylated proteins corresponded to some known cytoskeletal proteins such as vinculin (120 kD) and myosin II (200 kD). This process of protein tyrosine dephosphorylation was highly reversible. When H. vermiformis was infected for 30 min with L. pneumophila and the cells were washed to remove extracellular bacteria and further incubated in medium for 15 min, the tyrosine phosphorylation pattern of proteins returned to normal levels similar to uninfected cells (Fig. 1 A, compare lane 1 with 7). Protein tyrosine dephosphorylation in H. vermiformis in response to invasion by L. pneumophila was not induced by supernatant from Legionella culture (Fig. 1 B, lane 3) or equivalent numbers of the Escherichia coli strain HB101 (lane 4).
|
-actinin, protein kinase C, and MAP kinase (25, 27, 28). In addition, some of these protozoan proteins have been also shown to be tyrosine phosphorylated, such as pp125FAK (28). Many of the protozoan cytoskeletal proteins are antigenically similar to higher eukaryotic homologues, since they are recognized by antibodies raised against the mammalian or avian homologous proteins, including pp125FAK, actin, vinculin, and
-actinin (25, 27, 28, 28). As an initial step, we sought to identify some of the cytoskeletal proteins that may be tyrosine phosphorylated in uninfected cells to monitor changes after infection. As a screening procedure, phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates of amebal cell lysates (PY/IP) were immunoblotted with appropriate antibodies that recognized cytoskeletal proteins.
Actin, paxillin, vinculin, and pp125FAK appeared as 43-, 69-, 116–120-, and 100–105-kD proteins, respectively (Fig. 2, A–D). All four proteins were basally tyrosine phosphorylated in uninfected H. vermiformis (Fig. 2, A–D, PY/IP). The anti pp125FAK, and antivinculin antibodies were generated against the respective mammalian proteins, while the antiactin was raised against protozoan actin (see Materials and Methods). Antibodies to paxillin, vinculin, and pp125FAK identified more than one protein band in Western blot analysis but the most prominent band comigrated with their mammalian homologues from murine B (Fig. 2, B–D, lane M) and T lymphocytes (data not shown). Tyrosine-phosphorylated FAK migrated with slightly higher mobility when compared with its mammalian counterpart (Fig. 2 D). Antibodies to several other cytoskeletal proteins failed to recognize H. vermiformis proteins in Western blot analysis (data not shown). These experiments identified four of the cytoskeletal proteins, actin, paxillin, vinculin, and pp125FAK as basally tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in H. vermiformis. These data are the first demonstration of the presence of cytoskeletal protein homologues in the protozoan H. vermiformis that were immunologically cross-reactive with their mammalian counterparts.
|
20% within 5 min of the infection (data not shown). Specificity of these L. pneumophila–induced host cell processes was confirmed by the observation that no loss of tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoskeletal proteins was detected when H. vermiformis was incubated for 20 min with formalin-killed L. pneumophila (Fig. 3, A and B, lane 4 and C, lane 3). Note that vinculin was the only protein (among the proteins studied) with a molecular mass that corresponded to a protein that was dramatically tyrosine dephosphorylated upon infection (Fig. 1 A). It is possible that the other two proteins comigrated with other bands that masked the detection of their tyrosine dephosphorylation, which was detectable after immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3). Alternatively, the proteins underwent minor tyrosine dephosphorylation that was undetectable in simple immunoblots that detected the major dephosphorylated proteins.
|
|
First, we used methylamine, an inhibitor of receptor-mediated endocytosis (31) that has been shown to block entry of L. pneumophila into protozoa, including H. vermiformis (15, 21, 32). H. vermiformis was pretreated with 50 mM of methylamine for 30 min and later infected with L. pneumophila. Under these conditions, methylamine caused complete inhibition of bacterial entry, as confirmed by gentamicin protection assays (18), but had no effect on the number of attached bacteria compared with untreated cells (data not shown). Phosphotyrosine analysis of H. vermiformis total proteins before and after infection showed that inhibition of bacterial entry did not block bacteria-induced tyrosine dephosphorylation of host cell proteins (Fig. 5). Incubation with methylamine did not alter the pattern of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in uninfected cells (Fig. 5, lane 2). These results indicated that entry of L. pneumophila into H. vermiformis was not required to induce tyrosine dephosphorylation of host proteins, and that bacterial attachment was sufficient to induce tyrosine dephosphorylation of H. vermiformis proteins. The increased level of bacteria-induced tyrosine dephosphorylation under these conditions (compared with Fig. 1 A) may be due to continuous attachment of the bacteria in the absence of uptake throughout the infection period.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Gal/GalNAc lectin homologue of E. histolytica is a β2-like integrin (19, 20). In general, binding of a ligand to the extracellular domain of the integrin results in tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of the β chain of the integrin, clustering of the integrin receptor, and recruitment of many regulatory and cytoskeletal proteins (3, 35). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of integrins is important for internalization and targeting of the ligands to the appropriate endosomal compartment (36, 37). Disruption of tyrosine phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of integrins blocks ligand internalization (35, 36, 38), disrupts cytoskeletal rearrangements (3, 35), or alters targeting of the internalized ligand through the endosomal pathway (37). Interestingly, invasion of mammalian cells by the intracellular bacterium, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is mediated by binding to β1 integrin and is enhanced by mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin that disrupts its association with the cytoskeleton (39). Similar substitutions of residues in the cytoplasmic tail of the low density lipoprotein receptor results in the rapid endocytosis of the receptor (40). These studies suggest that mutations that disrupt association between the receptor and cytoskeletal components favor efficient internalization of certain ligands (39).
Disassembly of focal contacts and disruption of cytoskeletal rearrangements involves activation of protein tyrosine phosphatases (6, 7). In addition, inhibitors of tyrosine kinases inhibit the formation of focal contacts (3). It is tempting to speculate that tyrosine dephosphorylation of the lectin and the putative cytoskeletal protein homologues are collectively indicative of bacterial attachment-mediated cytoskeletal disruption of the protozoan host. These predictions are supported by the observations that uptake of L. pneumophila by H. vermiformis is not blocked by cytoskeletal disruption of the protozoan host (21, 32). Similarly, uptake of the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia by epithelial cells is also not affected by disruption of the host cytoskeleton (41). In addition, invasion of mammalian cells by many viruses is associated with disruption of the cytoskeleton (42).
Transmission electron microscopy in this study showed that a small proportion of bacterial uptake occurs by coiling phagocytosis. No coated pits are observed in the coil structure. This mode of uptake is morphologically similar to the coiling phagocytosis of complement-opsonized L. pneumophila by human monocytes (33). However, most of the uptake events of L. pneumophila by H. vermiformis occur by a cup-shaped invagination of the plasma membrane through which the bacterium sinks into the host cell. In addition, there is no direct contact between the bacterium and the plasma membrane in this invagination. We think that initial contacts are made between L. pneumophila and H. vermiformis followed by signaling of the protozoan host to take up the bacteria by a trigger and not a zipper mode of uptake (43).
Based on our current data and previous studies (18, 21, 22), we propose the following model of attachment and invasion of the protozoan host H. vermiformis by the Legionnaires' disease bacterium, L. pneumophila. Attachment of L. pneumophila to the Gal/GalNAc lectin receptor of H. vermiformis is associated with induction of a tyrosine phosphatase activity that results in dephosphorylation of the lectin receptor (18) and several cytoskeletal proteins. We propose that these alterations in the protozoan host are manifested in disruption of the cytoskeleton to avoid shedding of the bacteria. These events are associated with, or followed by, a triggering mechanism of receptor-mediated endocytosis to internalize L. pneumophila. In addition, bacterial attachment and invasion is also associated with induced expression of specific protozoan genes and these induced genes may be important for entry of L. pneumophila (22). Some of the induced gene products may be the lectin receptor or its associated proteins. The internalized bacteria are targeted into a RER-surrounded phagosome that is excluded from the classical endosomal–lysosomal degradation pathway. Future studies will shed light on the intriguing ability of this intracellular bacterial pathogen to manipulate cell biological processes within two evolutionarily distant hosts, humans and protozoa.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 23 April 1998
Revised: 22 May 1998
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Finlay BB & Cossart P. Exploitation of mammalian host cell functions by bacterial pathogens, Science, 1997, 276, 718–725.
2 Menard R, Dehio C & Sansonetti PJ. Bacterial entry into epithelial cells: the paradigm of Shigella. , Trends Microbiol, 1996, 4, 220–226.[Medline]
3 Clark EA & Brugge JS. Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken, Science, 1995, 268, 233–239.
4 Heldin C-H. Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction, Cell, 1995, 80, 213–223.[Medline]
5 Miyamoto S, Teramoto H, Coso OA, Sutkind S, Burbelo PD, Akiyama SK & Yamada KM. Integrin function: molecular hierarchies of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules, J Cell Biol, 1995, 131, 791–805.
6 Duntlevy JR & Couchman JR. Controlled induction of focal adhesion disassembly and migration in primary fibroblasts, J Cell Sci, 1993, 105, 489–500.[Abstract]
7 Nakamura TY, Yamamoto I, Nishitani H, Matozaki T, Suzuki T, Wakabayashi S, Shigekawa M & Goshima K. Detachment of cultured cells from the substratum induced by the neutrophil-derived oxidant NH2Cl: synergistic role of phosphotyrosine and intracellular Ca2+concentration, J Cell Biol, 1995, 131, 509–524.
8 Defilippi P, Retta SF, Olivo C, Palmieri M, Venturino M, Silengo L & Tarone G. p125FAKtyrosine phosphorylation and focal adhesion assembly: studies with phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitors, Exp Cell Res, 1995, 221, 141–152.[Medline]
9 Serra-Pages C, Kedershal NL, Fazikas L, Medley Q, Debant A & Streuli M. The LAR transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase and a coiled-coil LAR-interacting protein co-localize at focal adhesions, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1995, 14, 2827–2838.[Medline]
10 Fields BS. The molecular ecology of legionellae, Trends Microbiol, 1996, 4, 286–290.[Medline]
11 Abu Kwaik, Y., L.-Y. Gao, O.S. Harb, and B.J. Stone. Transcriptional regulation of the macrophage-induced gene (gspA) of Legionella pneumophilaand phenotypic characterization of a null mutant, Mol Microbiol, 1997, 24, 629–642.[Medline]
12 Cirillo JD, Tompkins LS & Falkow S. Growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellaniienhances invasion, Infect Immun, 1994, 62, 3254–3261.
13 Brieland JK, Fantone JC, Remick DG, LeGendre M, McClain M & Engleberg NC. The role of Legionella pneumophila-infected Hartmannella vermiformisas an infectious particle in a murine model of Legionnaires' disease, Infect Immun, 1997, 65, 4892–4896.[Abstract]
14 Abu Kwaik, Y. The phagosome containing Legionella pneumophila within the protozoan Hartmannella vermiformisis surrounded by the rough endoplasmic reticulum, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62, 2022–2028.[Abstract]
15 Gao L-Y, Harb OS, Abu Y & Kwaik. Utilization of similar mechanisms by Legionella pneumophilato parasitize two evolutionarily distant hosts, mammalian and protozoan cells, Infect Immun, 1997, 65, 4738–4746.[Abstract]
16 Gao L-Y, Harb OS, Abu Y & Kwaik. Identification of macrophage-specific infectivity loci (mil) of Legionella pneumophilathat are not required for infectivity of protozoa, Infect Immun, 1998, 66, 883–892.
17 Stone BJ, Abu Y & Kwaik. Expression of multiple pili by Legionella pneumophila: identification and characterization of a type IV pilin gene and its role in adherence to mammalian and protozoan cells, Infect Immun, 1998, 66, 1768–1775.
18 Venkataraman C, Haack BJ, Bondada S, Abu Y & Kwaik. Identification of a Gal/GalNAc lectin in the protozoan Hartmannella vermiformis as a potential receptor for attachment and invasion by the Legionnaires' disease bacterium, Legionella pneumophila. , J Exp Med, 1997, 186, 537–547.
19 Tannich E, Ebert F & Horstmann RD. Primary structure of the 170-kD surface lectin of pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica. , Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88, 1849–1853.
20 Adams SA, Robson SC, Gathiram V, Jackson TFHG, Pillay TS, Kirsch RE & Makgoba MW. Immunological similarity between the 170 kD amoebic adherence glycoprotein and human β2 integrins, Lancet, 1993, 341, 17–19.[Medline]
21 King CH, Fields BS, Shotts EB Jr & White EH. Effects of cytochalasin D and methylamine on intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophilain amoebae and human monocyte-like cells, Infect Immun, 1991, 59, 758–763.
22 Abu Kwaik, Y., B.S. Fields, and N.C. Engleberg. Protein expression by the protozoan Hartmannella vermiformis upon contact with its bacterial parasite Legionella pneumophila. , Infect Immun, 1994, 62, 1860–1866.
23 Kwiatkowska K & Sobota A. Local accumulation of
-spectrin-related protein under plasma membrane during capping and phagocytosis in Acanthamoeba. , Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 1997, 36, 253–265.[Medline]
24 Santiago A, Carbajal ME, Benitez-King G & Meza I. Entamoeba histolytica: PKC transduction pathway activation in the trophozoite-fibronectin interaction, Exp Parasitol, 1994, 79, 436–444.[Medline]
25 Bailey GB, Shen PS, Beanan MJ & McCoomer NE. Actin associated proteins of Entamoeba histolytica. , Arch Med Res, 1992, 23, 129–132.[Medline]
26 Vazquez-Prado J & Meza I. Fibronectin "receptor" in Entamoeba histolytica: purification and association with the cytoskeleton, Arch Med Res, 1992, 23, 125–128.[Medline]
27 Vazquez J, Franco E, Reyes G & Meza I. Characterization of adhesion plates induced by the interaction of Entamoeba histolyticatrophozoites with fibronectin, Cell Motil Cytoskeleton, 1995, 32, 37–45.[Medline]
28 Pe'rez E, Munoz MDL & Ortega A. Entamoeba histolytica: Involvement of pp125FAKin collagen-induced signal transduction, Exp Parasitol, 1996, 82, 164–170.[Medline]
29 Abu Kwaik, Y., B.I. Eisenstein, and N.C. Engleberg. Phenotypic modulation by Legionella pneumophilaupon infection of macrophages, Infect Immun, 1993, 61, 1320–1329.
30 Fields BS, Nerad TA, Sawyer TK, King CH, Barbaree JM, Martin WT, Morrill WE & Sanden GN. Characterization of an axenic strain of Hartmannella vermiformisobtained from an investigation of nosocomial legionellosis, J Protozool, 1990, 37, 581–583.[Medline]
31 Davies PJA, Davies DR, Levitzki A, Maxfield FR, Milhaud P, Willingham MC & Pastan IH. Transglutaminase is essential in receptor-mediated endocytosis of
2-macroglobulin and polypeptide hormones, Nature, 1980, 283, 162–167.[Medline]
32 Harb OS, Venkataraman C, Haack BJ, Gao L-Y, Abu Y & Kwaik. Heterogeneity in the attachment and uptake mechanisms of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium, Legionella pneumophila, by protozoan hosts, Appl Environ Microbiol, 1998, 64, 126–132.
33 Horwitz MA. Phagocytosis of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila)occurs by a novel mechanism: engulfment within a pseudopod coil, Cell, 1984, 36, 27–33.[Medline]
34 Schwartz AL. Receptor cell biology: receptor-mediated endocytosis, Pediatr Res, 1995, 38, 835–843.[Medline]
35 Greenberg S, Chang P & Silverstein SC. Tyrosine phosphorylation is required for Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis in mouse macrophages, J Exp Med, 1993, 177, 529–534.
36 Fallon RJ, Danaher M, Slayors RL & Saxena A. Defective asialoglycoprotein receptor endocytosis mediated by tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Requirement for a tyrosine in the receptor internalization signal, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 11011–11017.
37 Weiser P, Muller R, Braun U & Reth M. Endosomal targeting by the cytoplamic tail of membrane immunoglobulin, Science, 1997, 276, 407–411.
38 Yokota A, Yukawa K, Yamamoto A, Sugiyama K, Suemura M, Tashiro Y, Kishimoto T & Kikutani H. Two forms of low-affinity Fc receptor for IgE differentially mediate endocytosis and phagocytosis: identification of the critical cytoplasmic domains, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89, 5030–5034.
39 Nhieu GTV, Krukonis ES, Reszka AA, Horwitz AF & Isberg RR. Mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin β1 chain indicate a role for endocytosis factors in bacterial internalization, J Biol Chem, 1996, 271, 7665–7672.
40 Davis CG, van Driel IR, Russel DW, Brown MS & Goldstein JL. The low density lipoprotein receptor. Identification of amino acids in cytoplasmic domain required for rapid endocytosis, J Biol Chem, 1987, 262, 4075–4082.
41 Reynolds DJ & Pearce JH. Characterization of cytochalasin D-resistant (pinocytic) mechanisms of endocytosis utilized by chlamydiae, Infect Immun, 1990, 58, 3208–3216.
42 Cudmore S, Reckmann I & Way M. Viral manipulations of the actin cytoskeleton, Trends Microbiol, 1997, 5, 142–148.[Medline]
43 Swanson JA & Baer SC. Phagocytosis by zippers and triggers, Trends Cell Biol, 1995, 5, 89–93.[Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|