|
||
Articles |






National Public Health Institute, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland; and the
Centre for Biotechnology, BioCity, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: vascular adhesion protein 1 adhesion molecule monoamine oxidase sialoglycoprotein endothelial
Abbreviations used: BSAO, bovine serum amine oxidase; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DAO, diamine oxidase; GCG, Genetics Computer Group; HEV, high endothelial venule(s); MAO, monoamine oxidase; PLN, peripheral lymph node(s); PNAd, PLN addressin; SSAO, semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase; VAP-1, vascular adhesion protein 1.
Continuous recirculation of lymphocytes between blood and tissue is critical for the functioning of the immune system. The adhesive interactions between multiple receptors on the circulating lymphocytes and their ligands expressed on the surface of endothelial cells in postcapillary venules provide both the means for the emigration process and a way to selectively control it. Although considerable progress has been made recently in describing the cascade of events required for a circulating leukocyte to pass into the tissue from freely flowing blood, much in this process remains to be discovered.
Present hypotheses suggest a multistep model of leukocyte adhesion to endothelium that relies on a cascade of sequential but overlapping molecular interactions between several receptor–ligand pairs (1–3). The initial transient and tethering interactions between a leukocyte in the blood stream and the vessel wall are performed principally by the selectins and their glycoprotein ligands (4–6). Integrins and other molecules may also have a role in this phase (7). This rolling and sampling step can, in the presence of the appropriate signals, be followed by firm adhesion mediated by the binding of activated integrins to their Ig superfamily ligands (4). Locally elevated levels of chemokines and other chemoattractants might be involved in initiating this activation, which is mediated by the appropriate receptors and subsequent transduction of signals within the cell (8–10). The final stage involves the transmigration of the bound cell through the endothelial lining into the tissue by mechanisms that are poorly understood. Tissue-specific recirculatory pathways, such as those of the gut and skin, rely on the regulated expression of particular adhesion molecule receptor–ligand pairs in the appropriate location (3).
We have described previously a murine mAb, 1B2, recognizing vascular adhesion protein 1 (VAP-1),1 a novel human cell adhesion molecule prominently expressed in high endothelial venules (HEV) of peripheral lymph nodes (PLN), through which much lymphocyte recirculation takes place. mAb 1B2 can block lymphocyte binding to tonsillar, synovial, and PLN HEV in a frozen section assay as well as to purified tonsillar VAP-1 (11–13). VAP-1 expression is upregulated on the endothelial cell surface under inflammatory conditions in nonlymphoid tissue such as the skin and synovium, suggesting that the molecule can also mediate the increased lymphocyte emigration found in inflamed tissue (12–14).
Two species of VAP-1 of differing molecular mass can be detected by mAb 1B2 immunoprecipitation of tonsil tissue, one of 90 and the other of 170–180 kD. However, after immunoblotting and detection with mAb 1B2 under nonreducing conditions, only the 170–180 kD species is detected (15). Immunoreactive VAP-1, with slightly different molecular masses, can also be found in other locations, particularly in the smooth muscle cells of the vasculature as well as in other smooth muscle–containing tissues (reference 12, and our unpublished observations). Studies of tonsillar VAP-1 using digestion with specific glycosidases have shown that VAP-1 is a sialoglycoprotein, probably containing both N- and O-linked sugars with abundant sialic acid residues of both the
VAP-1 Purification and Sequencing.
Molecular Biology Techniques.
Amine Oxidase Assays.
Cell Culture and Expression of VAP-1 cDNAs in Mammalian Cells.
Immunomagnetic Selections.
FACS® Analyses.
Adhesion Assays.
VAP-1 peptide sequences were used to design partially degenerate oligonucleotide primers for reverse transcription PCR experiments on mRNA prepared from human gut smooth muscle. A single cDNA fragment of
2,3- and
2,6-linked type. It has also been shown that VAP-1 mediates lymphocyte binding to HEV in lymphatic tissues under nonstatic conditions and in a sialic acid–dependent manner, as the desialylated molecule can no longer support lymphocyte binding in the frozen section assay (15). In vivo, VAP-1 mediates the initial interactions between lymphocytes and inflamed vessels when analyzed by intravital microscopy (16). VAP-1 is distinct from the PLN addressin (PNAd) defined by the mAb MECA-79, though both VAP-1 and PNAd can mediate lymphocyte binding to PLN under shear conditions. However, in contrast to PNAd, VAP-1 can operate in an L-selectin– independent manner and support the binding of both L-selectin–negative and –positive lymphocytes (15, 16). Therefore, VAP-1 is a molecule with an adhesive function in an alternative pathway operating independently of L-selectin, and is likely to mediate early interactions in lymphocyte binding to PLN-type HEV and vessels in inflammatory foci. To analyze this protein at the molecular level, we have isolated a cDNA clone encoding it and show that VAP-1 defines a functional new adhesion molecule possessing a monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Abs and Reagents.
Mouse mAb 1B2 against VAP-1 and negative control mAb 3G6 and 7C7 against chicken antigens have been described previously (11, 17). mAb TK8-14 against VAP-1 was produced by immunizing Balb/c mice with immunoaffinity-purified VAP-1 (17a). TK8-14 detects both the monomeric and dimeric forms of VAP-1, stains tissues in an identical manner to mAb 1B2, and blocks lymphocyte adhesion to PLN HEV in the Stamper-Woodruff frozen section assay. Its specificity was confirmed by a positive reaction with VAP-1 cDNA transfectants. The mAb M2 recognizing the FLAG peptide was obtained from KEBO Lab Oy (Espoo, Finland). Chemical reagents were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Normal gut samples obtained from abdominal surgery were dissected free from the lamina propria, minced into small pieces, and lysed in a lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-base, pH 7.2, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1% NP-40, 1% aprotinin, and 1 mM PMSF) overnight. After clarification, the lysate supernatant was applied sequentially to immunoaffinity columns containing 5 ml of CnBr-activated Sepharose beads armed with normal rat serum, nonbinding mAbs, and an anti–VAP-1 mAb (3 mg/ml beads). After washing with lysis buffer, the VAP-1 antigens were eluted with 50 mM triethylamine, frozen, and subsequently lyophilized. The sample was then dissolved in nonreducing Laemmli's sample buffer and separated on a 5–12.5% SDS-PAGE gel. After transfer to polyvinylidine difluoride membrane (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA) by electroblotting, the membrane was stained with Coomassie blue, and the 90- and 170–180-kD bands were excised. The whole of the 170–180-kD band and a portion of the 90-kD material were subjected to NH2-terminal and tryptic peptide sequencing (477A; Applied Biosystems, Inc.) as described previously (18). Matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry (Lasermat; Finnigan Corp., San Jose, CA) was used to confirm the predicted mass of some of the peptides.
DNA cloning and manipulation were performed according to standard techniques (19) or by using commercially available kits following instructions supplied by the manufacturer. Plasmid DNA was sequenced using a Sequenase version 2.0 kit (US Biologicals, Cleveland, OH) or in the DNA sequencing facility of the University of Turku, Department of Medical Genetics. Sequence assembly and analysis were performed using the Wisconsin Package version 8.1 UNIX of the Genetics Computer Group (GCG, Madison, WI), and database comparisons were made using the BLAST server of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/). Oligonucleotide primers for sequencing and PCR were obtained from KEBO Lab Oy. The primers used for amplifying VAP-1 cDNA fragment from smooth muscle mRNA by reverse transcription PCR were N2 (gctgtgatcacmatyttygc), designed from the VAP-1 NH2-terminal protein sequence AVITIFA (residues 13–19 of the complete protein), and T4 (ccggccctgrtagaasac), designed from the tryptic peptide sequence VFYQGR (residues 264–269). Amplification conditions with these primers were 94°C, 1 min; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C, 2 min for 30 cycles. Human multiple tissue Northern blots were obtained from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA) and hybridized with 32P-labeled probes as recommended by the manufacturer. The human cDNA library panel and lung (HL3004a) and heart (HL3026a) cDNA libraries were from Clontech.
Confluent Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) or Ax cells stably expressing VAP-1 (10–15 x 106 per flask) were detached with trypsin-EDTA, washed in culture medium, and resuspended in 1.5 ml of lysis buffer. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation and used directly in enzyme assays (10– 50 µl per assay). Total protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method using bovine gammaglobulin as a standard and a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Amine oxidase activities were measured using a spectrophotometric method exactly as described by Holt et al. (20) in a volume of 200 µl in 96-well plates, and the absorbance change was monitored in a Victor multilabel plate counter at 490 nm (Wallac, Turku, Finland). Substrate concentrations were 1 mM, and samples were preincubated with amine oxidase inhibitors for 30 min before assay if required. All enzyme assays were performed in the presence of blanks containing boiled (5 min, 100°C) or mock sample in duplicate or triplicate. Tonsillar VAP-1 was purified using a Sepharose CNBr anti–VAP-1 mAb immunoaffinity column, as described above, but was assayed directly without elution from the beads. Controls of crude porcine kidney diamine oxidase (DAO) and bovine plasma MAO were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Detection of the quinone cofactor in purified VAP-1 was performed by the redox cycling method of Paz et al. (21).
COS-7 (monkey fibroblasts) and CHO cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and Ax (rat HEV–derived) cells originating in the laboratory of M. Miyasaka (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; reference 22) and obtained with his permission from R. Renkonen, University of Helsinki (Helsinki, Finland), were used as hosts for transfection and expression of VAP-1. COS-7 and CHO cells were grown according to standard procedures. Ax cells were cultured as described (22). Expression plasmids consisting of the VAP-1 cDNA in pcDNA3 (Invitrogen Corp., San Diego, CA) were used for transient COS-7 cell transfections and generation of stably transfected CHO and Ax cell lines. Expression plasmids (20 µg) were used to transfect cells by electroporation (0.3 kV, 960 µF, 0.4-cm cuvette in RPMI plus 1 mM Na-pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, without serum) or by the Lipofectamine method (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) using 2 µg of DNA. Transiently transfected cells were assayed 3 d after transfection. Stably transfected cells were selected by culturing in the presence of 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin (GIBCO BRL) for 4 wk.
Stably transfected Ax and CHO cells were selected for uniformly brightly positive cells using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS®; Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA). In brief, confluent monolayers of transfected cells were detached by a brief trypsin-EDTA treatment. Thereafter, the cells were incubated with a saturating concentration of anti– VAP-1 mAb. After washing, the cells were incubated with anti– mouse IgM–specific superparamagnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec Inc.) and subjected to positive selection in an AS type MACS® column according to the manufacturer's instructions. Positively selected cells eluted from the column were stained for immunofluorescence using an FITC-labeled anti–VAP-1 mAb, TK8-14, which detects a different epitope on VAP-1 than mAb 1B2. Most positive cell lines were chosen for further culture, and the selection was repeated periodically to maintain high expression levels of the transfectants.
Stably or transiently transfected cells were detached from the culture flasks by a short trypsin-EDTA treatment (identical results were obtained using EDTA only, which indicates that brief trypsinization does not destroy VAP-1). After washings, normal surface staining was done as described (15). For detection of intracellular antigens, the cells were permeabilized by a 2-min incubation in –20°C acetone. The cells were then diluted immediately in an excess of the culturing medium and washed twice. After blocking nonspecific binding by a 20-min incubation on ice with an FCS-containing medium, the cells were stained normally using indirect immunofluorescence staining. The cells were finally fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and 104 cells were analyzed using FACScan® and Lysys II software (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). In all stainings, isotype-matched nonreactive negative control mAbs were used to set the level of nonspecific background staining.
Ax cells in which VAP-1 was stably expressed or mock control transfectants were plated within wax-pen circles drawn on gelatin-precoated microscope slides (2 x 104 cells per 2-cm-diameter circle). The cells were allowed to grow to confluence, and after two washings, 100 µl of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS and 10 mM Hepes (the assay medium) was added within each wax-pen circle to evenly cover the adherent cell monolayer. Meanwhile, PBL were isolated from freshly drawn blood using Ficoll centrifugation and adjusted to a concentration of 40 x 106 cells/ml in the assay medium. Thereafter, the slides were transferred to an orbital shaker operating at 60 rpm at 7°C, and 50 µl of the PBL suspension was applied onto each wax-pen circle. The assay was continued for 30 min with constant rotation. The slides were carefully decanted and dipped once in cold RPMI to remove nonadherent cells. Adherent cells were fixed to the sections by incubating the slides vertically in ice-cold PBS containing 1% glutaraldehyde overnight. The number of adherent cells was counted using an ocular grid (magnification x200). The grid covers an area of 0.25 mm2. Nine predefined areas of 0.25 mm2 at the center of the circle where the transfectants formed a confluent monolayer were counted on each slide. Two slides per sample (total area, 4.5 mm2) were counted in each of five independent experiments. In certain experiments, the adhesion assay was performed in the presence of function-blocking mAbs against VAP-1 (a combination of 1B2 and TK8-14, both at 50 µg/ml diluted in the assay medium) or class-matched negative control mAbs (a combination of 3G6 and 7C7, both at 50 µg/ml). The mAbs were preincubated with the transfectant monolayer on the slides for 30 min at 7°C before the labeled lymphocytes were added. The number of adherent cells was counted in five independent experiments as described above.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Isolation of a VAP-1 cDNA.
Human gut smooth muscle, in which VAP-1 is strongly expressed, was obtained from material removed in surgical procedures. Using an mAb immunoaffinity column, the 90- and 170–180-kD forms of VAP-1 were purified from detergent lysates of the tissue in sufficient quantities to obtain internal peptide sequence after digestion with trypsin and V8 protease. In addition, a portion of the 90-kD VAP-1 was subjected to NH2-terminal sequencing directly. The peptide elution profile from the HPLC column used to purify the peptides from both forms of VAP-1 was identical, as were the peptide sequences of the corresponding peaks, indicating that the protein is a homodimer composed of two 90-kD subunits. It should be noted that the NH2-terminal protein sequence is different from that reported previously for VAP-1 (11), which was later shown to be from an unrelated mouse protein of identical size to VAP-1 that coprecipitated with the mouse mAb used in the immunopurification (23).
700 bp was amplified. The partial cDNA sequence contained a continuous open reading frame that encoded a protein containing some of the sequences of the tryptic and V8 peptides of the immunopurified VAP-1 material, thereby confirming that the correct cDNA fragments had been amplified. A panel of 10 human cDNA libraries was analyzed by PCR in order to identify those containing VAP-1 cDNAs, and those giving the strongest signal were screened with the PCR-generated VAP-1 cDNA fragment. In this manner, a number of overlapping cDNA clones were isolated from human lung and heart cDNA libraries. Two overlapping lung cDNAs were sequenced completely on both strands. The resulting combined cDNA was 2,501 bp in length and contained a continuous open reading frame of 2,292 bp starting at an ATG methionine codon. This methionine was followed by the peptide sequence found at the NH2-terminal of the purified 90-kD VAP-1 protein, and the contiguous open reading frame encoded all of the VAP-1 tryptic and V8 peptides identified by protein sequencing (Fig. 1). A 5' untranslated region of 80 bp and a 3' untranslated region of 129 bp following the TAG stop codon were present in the clone. Neither a polyadenylation signal nor a poly A sequence was found at the 3' end of the cDNA, suggesting that the native VAP-1 mRNA may be longer than indicated by the cDNA isolated here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using protein sequence information obtained from VAP-1 purified from gut smooth muscle, we isolated a cDNA encoding this adhesion molecule. Our evidence for this is based on the following. First, protein sequence obtained from immunopurified VAP-1 was found in the predicted protein sequence of the VAP-1 cDNA clone subsequently isolated. Second, transfected cells expressing the VAP-1 cDNA could be stained on their surface with the mAb 1B2 used originally to define VAP-1 (11), and VAP-1 immunoprecipitated from these cells had a similar molecular mass, 170–180 kD, to that found in vivo (15). Third, VAP-1 cDNA–transfected Ax cells could support the adherence of PBL, and this binding could be partially inhibited by anti–VAP-1 mAb, showing that the cDNA encodes a functional adhesion molecule. There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that there are forms of VAP-1 encoded by variant mRNAs. Thus, it seems likely that we have isolated a cDNA encoding the predominant form of VAP-1 protein studied previously by immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation.
After the completion of this work, a human MAO cDNA with an identical sequence to the VAP-1 cDNA was described recently (29). However, no functional data on the protein, its enzyme activity, or expression were presented by the authors, who concluded erroneously that the cDNA sequence encodes a secreted rather than a transmembrane protein. Thus, the VAP-1 cDNA isolated here is the first shown to encode a human membrane–bound protein of the copper-containing amine oxidase family.
VAP-1 is a large, dimeric, type II transmembrane protein having a membrane-spanning domain located at the NH2-terminal end of the molecule. The intracellular domain is particularly small, only four amino acids in length, leaving a large glycosylated extracellular domain of some 163 kD per dimer. All the potential glycosylation sites, 12 N-linked and 6 putative O-linked per dimer, are located in the extracellular domain. Although it is not currently known if all of these are used, previous data suggest that VAP-1 contains both N- and O-linked sugars and numerous sialic acid residues which are thought to play an important part in the adhesive function of VAP-1 protein (15). The correct posttranslational processing of VAP-1 may be critical for its adhesive function, as VAP-1 expressed in nonendothelial-derived cell lines such as CHO and COS cells was unable to support lymphocyte binding (results not shown). It may be that only endothelial cells, such as the Ax host cells used, contain the necessary precursors and express the essential glycosyltransferases for the correct oligosaccharide modifications required for VAP-1 adhesive function. The critical role of proper oligosaccharide modification for adhesion has been documented with other adhesion molecules such as E-selectin ligand 1 and P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (30, 31).
The adhesion assays performed on VAP-1–expressing Ax cells indicated that the cDNA encodes a functional VAP-1 that can support interactions with its ligand on PBL and lead to stable binding of the PBL to the Ax cells. However, complete inhibition of this increased adhesion with anti– VAP-1 mAbs 1B2 and TK8-14 was not observed, suggesting that the VAP-1 molecule in rat-derived Ax cells is not functioning exactly as it does in its native environment. It may be that the carbohydrate modifications of the protein in Ax cells, the local membrane environment, or VAP-1 conformation are sufficiently different from that in human HEV such that the mAb can no longer block all VAP-1 interactions with its ligand. It is also possible that a subpopulation of VAP-1 molecules may exist on transfectants in a form lacking one or other of the epitopes recognized by mAbs 1B2 and TK8-14. Finally, we are left with the possibility that long-term overexpression of VAP-1 in stable transfectants alters the expression of other adhesion molecule(s) on the Ax cell surface. Of course, the function of this other putative adhesion molecule would not be inhibitable by anti–VAP-1 mAb. In HEV binding assays, VAP-1 has been shown to function independently of lymphocyte L-selectin, and it mediates the binding of CD8+ PBL much better than CD4+ PBL (16). Ax VAP-1 cDNA transfectants reproduce these observations, since analysis of immunomagnetically purified L-selectin–negative cells and CD8+ and CD4+ cells showed that L-selectin was not necessary for efficient binding to Ax transfectants, and that the CD8+ subset of PBL adhered severalfold better to VAP-1 transfectants than CD4+ cells (data not shown).
The intriguing finding that VAP-1 possesses an MAO activity suggests that the protein may have multiple physiological roles. In previous studies, we have clearly shown that VAP-1 is an inducible adhesion molecule mediating lymphocyte binding to PLN HEV as well as vessels in inflamed areas found in several inflammatory diseases (11, 12, 14–16). The expression of VAP-1 at these sites can help mediate and regulate lymphocyte extravasation, and this activity may be independent of the enzyme activity. In other tissues where VAP-1 is expressed, such as smooth muscle, its MAO activity may be its primary function. Whether the two activities are linked is unclear at present, but one can envisage that regulating amine levels could be of importance in inflamed tissue, where there may be accumulations of potentially toxic cellular amine metabolites liberated from cells damaged as a result of the inflammatory response. Another alternative is that the MAO activity may be involved in regulating the levels of a bioactive amine with a role in lymphocyte homing or inflammation.
We have shown that VAP-1 belongs to the widely distributed copper-containing amine oxidase family (28, 32) and that the extracellular domain of VAP-1 contains this activity. Thus VAP-1 is an ectoenzyme. A particular characteristic of these enzymes is the presence of an unusual carbonyl-containing topaquinone cofactor (33). In several mammalian species, including humans, a copper-containing MAO found both in the cell membrane and in a soluble form in serum has been identified (34–36). This activity is sensitive to inhibition by carbonyl-reactive agents such as semicarbazide and hydroxylamine, and the enzyme responsible is commonly referred to as an SSAO (28). We have shown that VAP-1 contains a covalently bound quinone, and these results, as well as the sensitivity of VAP-1 enzyme activity to the carbonyl-reactive agents semicarbazide and hydroxylamine, show that VAP-1 is a membrane-bound SSAO. It seems plausible that it is the same as the human membrane-bound SSAO described previously by biochemical studies and which has been reported to be expressed extensively in the vasculature, particularly in smooth muscle, although it has also been found in other cell types, including endothelial cells (28, 37). The physiological roles of SSAOs have been difficult to define, since little is known of their in vivo substrates, and since their substrate specificities vary considerably between species. We have shown that VAP-1 can use endogenously occurring methylamine as substrate but not several other endogenous amines such as tyramine, tryptamine, β-phenylethylamine, histamine, or putrescine. Identification of other substrates used by VAP-1 may provide a useful insight into the role of the amine oxidase activity.
VAP-1 would appear to belong to a growing family of adhesion molecules that have an intrinsic enzymic or other activity in addition to their adhesive ability. Such proteins include lymphocyte CD38 (38), CD73 (18), the E-selectin ligand ESL-1 (31), and heparanase (39).
The nature of the VAP-1 ligand is unknown at present. However, the previously reported finding that sialic acids are important for the adhesive ability of VAP-1 in sialidase-treated tonsil sections suggests that a ligand–carbohydrate interaction is important, at least for part of the adhesive mechanism. As this does not involve any of the known selectins, it is possible that another lectin-like molecule may well be a VAP-1 ligand. The isolation of a VAP-1 cDNA will facilitate studies to isolate the ligand and define further the role that this unusual and multifunctional new adhesion molecule plays in lymphocyte trafficking.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 18 September 1997
Revised: 5 March 1998
T. Leu's current address is Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Turku, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Butcher EC. Leukocyte-endothelial cell recognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity, Cell, 1991, 67, 1033–1036.[Medline]
2 Springer TA. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm, Cell, 1994, 76, 301–314.[Medline]
3 Butcher EG & Picker LJ. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis, Science, 1996, 272, 60–66.[Abstract]
4 Bargatze RF, Jutila MA & Butcher EC. Distinct roles of L-selectin and integrins alpha 4 beta 7 and LFA-1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer's patch-HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined, Immunity, 1995, 3, 99–108.[Medline]
5 Lasky LA. Selectin-carbohydrate interactions and the initiation of the inflammatory response, Annu Rev Biochem, 1995, 64, 113–139.[Medline]
6 Ley K & Tedder TF. Leukocyte interactions with vascular endothelium. New insights into selectin-mediated attachment and rolling, J Immunol, 1995, 155, 525–528.[Abstract]
7 Berlin C, Bargatze RF, Campbell JJ, von Andrian UH, Szabo MC, Hasslen SR, Nelson RD, Berg EL, Erlandsen SL & Butcher EC.
4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow, Cell, 1995, 80, 413–422.[Medline]
8 Schall TJ & Bacon KB. Chemokines, leukocyte trafficking, and inflammation, Curr Opin Immunol, 1994, 6, 865–873.[Medline]
9 Premack BA & Schall TJ. Chemokine receptors: gateways to inflammation and infection, Nat Med, 1996, 2, 1174–1178.[Medline]
10 Förster R, Mattis AE, Kremmer E, Wolf E, Brem G & Lipp M. A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen, Cell, 1996, 87, 1037–1047.[Medline]
11 Salmi M & Jalkanen S. A 90-kilodalton endothelial cell molecule mediating lymphocyte binding in humans, Science, 1992, 257, 1407–1409.
12 Salmi M, Kalimo K & Jalkanen S. Induction and function of vascular adhesion protein-1 at sites of inflammation, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 2255–2260.
13 Salmi M, Rajala P & Jalkanen S. Homing of mucosal leukocytes to joints. Distinct endothelial ligands in synovium mediate leukocyte-subtype specific adhesion, J Clin Invest, 1997, 99, 2165–2172.[Medline]
14 Arvilommi A-M, Salmi M, Kalimo K & Jalkanen S. Lymphocyte binding to vascular endothelium in inflamed skin revisited: a central role for vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), Eur J Immunol, 1996, 26, 825–833.[Medline]
15 Salmi M & Jalkanen S. Human vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is a unique sialoglycoprotein that mediates carbohydrate-dependent binding of lymphocytes to endothelial cells, J Exp Med, 1996, 183, 569–579.
16 Salmi M, Tohka S, Berg EL, Butcher EC & Jalkanen S. Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) mediates lymphocyte subtype–specific, selectin-independent recognition of vascular endothelium in human lymph nodes, J Exp Med, 1997, 186, 589–600.
17 Wuorela M, Jalkanen S, Pelliniemi LJ & Toivanen P. Nurse cells of the bursa of Fabricius: do they exist? , Eur J Immunol, 1990, 20, 913–917.[Medline]
17 Kurkijärvi, R., D.H. Adams, R. Leino, T. Möttönen, S. Jalkanen, and M. Salmi. 1998. Circulating form of human vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1). Increased serum levels in inflammatory liver diseases. J. Immunol. In press.
18 Airas L, Hellman J, Salmi M, Bono P, Puurunen T, Smith DJ & Jalkanen S. CD73 is involved in lymphocyte binding to the endothelium: characterization of lymphocyte–vascular adhesion protein 2 identifies it as CD73, J Exp Med, 1995, 182, 1603–1608.
19 Sambrook, J.F., T. Maniatis, and E.F. Fritsch. 1989. Molecular Cloning: Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
20 Holt A, Sharman DF, Baker GB & Palcic MM. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for monoamine oxidase and related enzymes in tissue homogenates, Anal Biochem, 1997, 244, 384–392.[Medline]
21 Paz MA, Flückiger R, Boak A, Kagan HM & Gallop PM. Specific detection of quinoproteins by redox-cycling staining, J Biol Chem, 1991, 266, 689–692.
22 Ise Y, Yamaguchi K, Sato K, Yamamura Y, Kitamura F, Tamatani T & Miyasaka M. Molecular mechanisms underlying lymphocyte recirculation. I. Functional, phenotypical and morphological characterization of high endothelial cells cultured in vitro. , Eur J Immunol, 1988, 18, 1235–1244.[Medline]
23 Salmi M, Smith DJ, Bono P, Leu T, Hellman J, Matikainen M-T & Jalkanen S. A mouse molecular mimic of human vascular adhesion protein-1, Mol Immunol, 1998, 34, 1227–1236.
24 Morris NJ, Ducret A, Aebersold R, Ross SA, Keller SR & Lienhard GE. Membrane amine oxidase cloning and identification as a major protein in the adipocyte plasma membrane, J Biol Chem, 1997, 272, 9388–9392.
25 Hansen JE, Lund O, Engelbrecht J, Bohr H, Nielsen JO, Hansen J-ES & Brunak S. Prediction of O-glycosylation of mammalian proteins: specificity patterns of UDP-GaINAc: polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase, Biochem J, 1995, 308, 801–813.[Medline]
26 von Heijne G. A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites, Nucleic Acids Res, 1986, 14, 4683–4690.
27 Hartmann E, Rapoport TA & Lodish HF. Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1989, 86, 5786–5790.
28 Lyles GA. Mammalian plasma and tissue-bound semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidases: biochemical, pharmacological and toxicological aspects, Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 1996, 28, 259–274.[Medline]
29 Zhang X & McIntire WS. Cloning and sequencing of a copper-containing, topa quinone-containing monoamine oxidase from human placenta, Gene (Amst), 1996, 179, 279–286.[Medline]
30 Sako D, Chang X-J, Barone KM, Vachino G, White HM, Shaw G, Veldman GM, Bean KM, Ahern TJ, Furie B et al.. Expression cloning of a functional glycoprotein ligand for P-selectin, Cell, 1993, 75, 1179–1186.[Medline]
31 Steegmaier M, Levinovitz A, Isenmann S, Borges E, Lenter M, Kocher HP, Kleuser B & Vestweber D. The E-selectin-ligand ESL-1 is a variant of a receptor for fibroblast growth factor, Nature, 1995, 373, 615–620.[Medline]
32 Klinman JP & Mu D. Quinoenzymes in biology, Annu Rev Biochem, 1994, 63, 299–344.[Medline]
33 Janes SM, Palcic MM, Scaman CH, Smith AJ, Brown DE, Dooley DM, Mure M & Klinman JP. Identification of topaquinone and its consensus sequence in copper amine oxidases, Biochemistry, 1992, 31, 12147–12154.[Medline]
34 Suzuki O & Matsumoto T. Some properties of benzylamine oxidase in human aorta, Biog Amines, 1984, 1, 249–257.
35 Yu PH, Zuo D-M & Davis BA. Characterization of human serum and umbilical artery semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO). Species heterogeneity and stereoisomeric specificity, Biochem Pharmacol, 1994, 47, 1055–1059.[Medline]
36 Lyles GA, Holt A & Marshall CMS. Further studies on the metabolism of methylamine by semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase activities in human plasma, umbilical artery and rat aorta, J Pharm Pharmacol, 1990, 42, 332–338.[Medline]
37 Nakos G & Gossrau R. Light microscopic visualization of semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (benzylamine oxidase) using a cerium method, Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 1994, 32, 3–10.[Medline]
38 Dianzani U, Funaro A, DiFranco D, Garbarino G, Bragardo M, Redoglia V, Buonfiglio D, De Monte LB, Pileri A & Malavasi F. Interaction between endothelium and CD4+CD45RA+ lymphocytes. Role of the human CD38 molecule, J Immunol, 1994, 153, 952–959.[Abstract]
39 Gilat D, Hershkoviz R, Goldkorn I, Cahalon L, Korner G, Vlodavsky I & Lider O. Molecular behavior adapts to context: heparanase functions as an extracellular matrix-degrading enzyme or as a T cell adhesion molecule, depending on the local pH, J Exp Med, 1995, 181, 1929–1934.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|