|
||
Article |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adetailed picture now exists of the biochemical and cell biological basis of T cell antigen recognition and of the function and structure of MHC class I and class II molecules (for review see reference 1). With the extensive description of antigen processing, presentation, and recognition at the individual cell and molecular level in vitro, attention is returning to more classical immunological issues, especially the cell interactions that are involved in the evolution of T cell–dependent immune responses in vivo. Despite a large body of literature on the anatomy of lymphoid organs, leukocyte migration, and the histologic changes that accompany antigen introduction, it is only recently with the development of methods for tracking individual T and B cells of known antigen specificity that a clear view of the cellular interactions that occur after immunization has begun to emerge (2, 3).
A missing component in this emerging picture is the APC. It is clear that distinct forms of antigen and/or different routes of antigen administration to experimental animals can determine whether unresponsiveness or immunity results, as well as the quality of such an immune response. This is presumed to occur, at least in part, by favoring antigen presentation by one or another APC type (4–6). However, the study of antigen trafficking and of the role of different APCs in presenting antigen in vivo after administration by different routes has been hampered by the lack of suitable probes able to directly detect processed antigen in situ. This has made it difficult to relate APC–T cell interactions to the functional consequence of antigen exposure. As an indirect measure of ligand display, most studies of this issue to date have involved the isolation of candidate APCs from various tissues after antigen administration, followed by in vitro testing of the ability of these cells to activate T cells of the appropriate specificity (7–12). The major problem with this approach is that activation of a T cell is determined by factors other than just the number of available TCR ligands on the APC, such as the number and type of adhesion molecules expressed by the interacting cells or the presence of costimulatory molecules on the APC. All these factors may explain why discrepancies exist in the literature regarding the ability of various APCs to present antigens administered by the same route (7, 10).
To provide a means of directly assessing both the amount and distribution of specific peptide–MHC molecule ligands on various cells after in vivo antigen administration, we have developed a number of mAb with selective reactivity to defined peptide–MHC class I or class II combinations (Zhong, G., C. Reis e Sousa, and R.N. Germain, manuscript submitted for publication; 13). Despite some background on endogenous peptide–MHC molecule complexes, these new reagents are very effective in detecting the desired ligands on cell surfaces or within cells. We have described elsewhere the characteristics of mAb to complexes of the 46-61 and 116-129 segments of the model protein antigen hen egg lysozyme (HEL)1 with the mouse class II Ak molecule, and the ability of these mAb to react with surface, intracellular, and detergent solubilized forms of these complexes (Zhong, G., C. Reis e Sousa, and R.N. Germain, manuscript submitted for publication).
Here we report on the use of these new reagents in flow cytometric and immunohistologic studies of antigen presentation after i.v. injection of soluble antigen without adjuvant. This route of administration of soluble proteins has been of particular interest because it allows almost immediate access of antigen to B cells, dendritic cells (DC), and macrophages throughout the body. This is thought to mimic the presentation of self-serum antigens or microbial products accessing the vascular space or extracellular fluid, and systemic antigen administration by this and other routes has been associated with the induction of either profound immunological tolerance or immune deviation to a noninflammatory response (14–18). A major outstanding question is whether these outcomes reflect the selective presentation of processed antigen by a subset of APCs, perhaps resting B cells lacking specific surface receptors for the antigen and unable to provide cosignals or cytokines necessary for response or Th1 development of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. The data available concerning this issue are contradictory, but none support the hypothesis that such B cell presentation is the dominant mode of antigen presentation in these circumstances (7, 10). In contrast to these previous results, we now demonstrate using direct measurement of TCR ligand by mAb staining that early after antigen administration, I-Ak–HEL 46-61 complexes can be detected on virtually all B cells in lymphoid tissues, independently of their surface immunoglobulin receptor specificity. Furthermore, after i.v. antigen administration, B cells and readily extracted DC in the low density fraction of spleen (LOD) display similar levels of processed antigen in association with MHC class II on their plasma membrane relative to total class II levels. Because of their numerical advantage, presentation by the large number of TCR ligand–bearing B cells may contribute to the unresponsiveness or Th2 immune deviation normally associated with the introduction of antigen into the bloodstream.
Mice.
Antigens and Immunization.
Cells.
T Cell Hybridoma Assay.
Flow Cytometry.
Immunohistochemistry.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Medium.
RPMI-1640 medium (Biofluids, Inc., Rockville, MD) was supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 10 mM nonessential amino acids, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 10% FCS (all from Biofluids, Inc.), and 10 µM 2-ME.
CBA/J and B10.BR mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and were used between 6 and 24 wk of age. Invariant chain–deficient mice (19, 20) backcrossed to B10.BR were a gift from Dr. E.K. Bikoff (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
HEL peptide 46-61 (NTDGSTDYGILQINSR) was synthesized and purified by the Peptide Synthesis Facility of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH, Bethesda, MD). BSA and HEL proteins were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Mice were injected i.v. through the tail vein with HEL or BSA dissolved in PBS.
Splenocytes were prepared by dissociating spleens into a cell suspension. LOD were prepared as described (21). The low density fraction contained primarily B cells, macrophages, and DC. The latter represented
10–15% of LOD as assessed by staining with anti-CD11c (22). B cells were depleted from LOD using magnetic beads coated with sheep anti–mouse IgG (DYNAL Inc., Great Neck, NY). DC depletion was carried out with magnetic beads coated with sheep anti–rat IgG (DYNAL Inc.), which were preincubated with 33D1 (23), NLDC-145 (24), and N418 (22) mAbs.
3A9.1 is a T cell hybridoma specific for HEL 46-61–Ak (25). DC-depleted or B cell–depleted LOD were titrated in graded numbers in flat 96-well plates to which 5 x 104 3A9.1 cells were added. After overnight incubation, IL-2 secreted into the supernatant was measured by ELISA (26). Data are expressed as absorbance values obtained at 405 nm and are within the linear range of the assay.
Whole spleen cells or LOD were stained after isolation or after overnight incubation in medium at 37°C, in the presence or absence of the indicated concentration of HEL. Cells were stained using C4H3, a rat IgG2b mAb specific for I-Ak loaded with the 46-61 peptide of HEL (Zhong, G., C. Reis e Sousa, and R.N. Germain, manuscript submitted for publication). Staining of B cells was carried out by staining first with C4H3, followed by FITC- or biotin-conjugated mouse F(ab')2 anti–rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). This was followed by PE-streptavidin (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA; used in the case of the biotin-conjugated secondary antibody) and PE- or FITC-conjugated RA3-6B2 (anti-B220; PharMingen, San Diego, CA), added in a solution containing 25 µg/ml of rat IgG to block any free binding sites on the secondary antibody. Staining of DC was carried out by staining first with C4H3, followed by FITC-mouse F(ab')2 anti–rat IgG; N418 supernatant (ATCC HB-224; reference 22) containing 25 µg/ml rat IgG was then added, followed by biotin-conjugated goat F(ab')2 anti–hamster IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and PE- or TriColor-streptavidin (Caltag Laboratories). All staining included irrelevant, isotype-matched antibodies as negative controls and as controls for cross-reactivity. Antibody incubations ranged between 20 and 40 min on ice; washes and reagent dilutions were in cold PBS containing 1% FCS. Samples were analyzed using a FACScanTM cytometer and CellQuestTM software (Becton–Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), using propidium iodide and/or scatter gating to exclude dead cells.
Spleen fragments were frozen in embedding medium (Cryoform; International Equipment Co., Needham, MA). 6-µm frozen sections were cut, air-dried, fixed in acetone, and rehydrated in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20. After blocking endogenous peroxidase in 0.3% H2O2, sections were incubated with C4H3 supernatant or an isotype-matched control, followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated mouse F(ab')2 anti–rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). HRP localization was revealed using a metal-enhanced diaminobenzidine substrate (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). For double labeling, sections were stained as above except that, before developing HRP, sections were further stained with either FITC-H57-597 (anti–TCR-β; PharMingen) or FITC-RA3-6B2 (anti-B220; PharMingen), added in a solution containing 25 µg/ ml of rat IgG; this was followed by alkaline phosphatase–conjugated rabbit antifluorescein (BIODESIGN International, Kennebunk, ME). Alkaline phosphatase was developed first, using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (Sigma Chemical Co.), and HRP was developed last, using the same substrate as for single staining. Sections were dried and mounted in Permount (Fisher Scientific Co., Fairlawn, NJ). Stained sections were photographed on an Axiophot compound microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) using Kodachrome 25 film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY).
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Processing and Presentation of HEL by B Cells and DC after Antigen Exposure In Vitro.
In cells that have not been exposed to HEL, the C4H3 mAb stains a subset of I-Ak molecules loaded with certain self peptides (background staining), but the staining is markedly increased on HEL-pulsed cells, in proportion to the number of Ak complexes produced containing the 46-61 peptide or overlapping segments of the HEL protein (referred to throughout as HEL 46-61–Ak based on the known immunodominance of this particular segment of the HEL protein; reference 27) (Zhong, G., C. Reis e Sousa, and R.N. Germain, manuscript submitted for publication). The relative surface expression of HEL 46-61–Ak complexes by DC and B cells was assessed by using C4H3 to stain whole spleen or LOD that had been incubated overnight in vitro in the presence or absence of a subsaturating concentration of soluble HEL. As shown in Fig. 1, DC cultured in medium alone have more HEL-independent staining than B cells, due largely to the fact that they express higher absolute numbers of I-Ak molecules on the plasma membrane (Reis e Sousa, C., unpublished observations). However, most DC and B cells display substantial levels of HEL 46-61–Ak complexes on their surface after pulsing with intact antigen, reflected in increased staining with C4H3 (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the relative magnitude of this increase as a multiple of the initial background staining does not differ significantly between whole spleen (small, resting) B cells and low density (larger, activated) B cells and is not very different between B cells and DC (Fig. 1). Although careful analysis of mean fluorescence ratios reveals that the proportional increase in B cell staining is actually slightly greater than that seen with DC, the absolute level of specific ligand is somewhat higher on DC, in agreement with their higher overall level of MHC class II expression.
|
|
|
|
|
10 vs.
50%).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Alternative approaches have involved isolating cells from various tissues after antigen administration and testing them for the ability to present the antigen to T cells in vitro (7– 12). These are laborious experiments which only indirectly assess the actual ligand display of the cells, as such T cell assays depend on a host of other APC–T cell interactions to translate TCR engagement into functional responses which can be measured. Furthermore, such assays cannot differentiate between increased levels of antigenic complexes per cell versus an increased frequency of subpopulations of cells bearing antigenic complexes.
In this study, we have addressed a question explored previously by several groups using T cell assays, namely what cell population(s) bear(s) foreign peptide–MHC class II complexes after systemic administration of soluble protein antigen in the absence of adjuvant. This is a model for induction of "high-zone" tolerance (35) or immune deviation (15–18) that has been widely studied. Some investigators have argued that this route favors rapid and extensive presentation of antigen by resting B cells lacking costimulatory properties or cytokine production that overwhelms effective presentation by activating DC, resulting in clonal anergy, deletion, or deviation towards the Th2 phenotype (4–6). However, using T cell assays to detect cells bearing processed antigen, two groups failed to find evidence for antigen presentation by polyclonal B cells after injection of myoglobin or conalbumin (7), or pigeon cytochrome c or a cytochrome c-HEL conjugate (10). In both studies, the absence of processed antigen on B cells was inferred from the inability of these cells to induce proliferation of naive transgenic T cells (10), normal T cell clones, or primed lymph node T cells (7).
However, T cell proliferation is extremely dependent on costimulation for IL-2 production (36). Thus, T cell proliferation assays are naturally biased to detect antigen on APC such as DC which express CD28 ligand(s) upon in vitro culture, rather than on APCs such as resting B cells which are deficient in providing signal 2 (37, 38). The results of these T cell assays have been interpreted in one case as unequivocally indicating an absence of significant levels of processed antigen on antigen-unspecific B cells under these conditions (10), whereas in another, the lack of T cell stimulation was ascribed to either the absence of such TCR ligand (signal 1) on the surface of the B cells, or the inability of these cells, in contrast to DC from the same mice, to provide other signals to activate T cells (signal 2) (7). Very recently, in studies which involve analysis of cells from lymph nodes draining sites of inflammation induced by adjuvants, Guéry et al. (12) have reported that i.v. injection of HEL allows presentation by B cells but not DC, using for their assay transformed T cells that are less costimulation sensitive.
In contrast to these studies, we have here analyzed antigen presentation by various cell types after in vitro and in vivo soluble antigen administration using a direct assay for specific peptide–MHC class II complexes involving staining with mAb to TCR ligands. This approach obviates the problems associated with indirect T cell assays as a means of evaluating antigen presentation. Using this approach with flow cytofluorimetry or immunohistology, we report clear evidence for extensive HEL presentation by a large fraction of B cells in spleen, lymph nodes, and other lymphoid organs in noninflammatory conditions (Figs. 2–4). Essentially all B220+ B cells bear processed HEL on their surface in association with Ak as early as 1–4 h after i.v. injection of milligram quantities of HEL protein (Figs. 2, 3, and 4, and data not shown). Using invariant chain–deficient mice, we demonstrate that this polyclonal B cell presentation is due to active intracellular antigen processing (Table 1). Our results using peptide–MHC-specific antibodies are consistent with the alternative interpretation given in some earlier studies of B cell versus DC presentation after i.v. antigen exposure, which suggests that differential cosignaling, rather than differential TCR ligand display, accounts for the failure of B cells to activate the responding T cells in vitro. Consistent with that interpretation, we find evidence for polyclonal B cell presentation after i.v. immunization not only by direct staining for processed antigen but also by using B cells to stimulate a T cell hybridoma relatively insensitive to costimulation (Fig. 5).
It needs to be stressed that the high generalized level of B cell ligand display we measure here occurs only with substantial concentrations of offered HEL protein, and may not be seen at limiting antigen concentrations. Antigen-specific B cells are much more efficient at presenting low amounts of antigen in vitro than B cells not bearing surface Ig reactive with the antigen (for review see reference 28). Polyclonal B cell presentation of HEL in our current system is likely to be mimicking presentation of high-abundance serum proteins taken up through the normal pinocytic activity of B cells rather than presentation of the low concentrations of antigen available at very early or very late times during an infection, when surface Ig capture and concentration of antigen may be most important.
Our results also help resolve the controversy over whether DC in the spleen process and present intact antigens administered i.v. (7, 10). Earlier results arguing that DC were the main APC capable of stimulating T cells after systemic administration of protein antigens (7) were not reproduced in a later study by a different group (10). In contrast, the later study demonstrated that DC were the main APC isolated from peptide-injected, but not intact protein-injected, mice which were capable of stimulating T cells in vivo (10). This suggested that splenic DC could not process intact antigen, but could be easily loaded with exogenous peptides, arguing that the apparent processing of intact antigen by DC in the earlier study had been an artifact arising from the presence of peptide contaminants in the injected protein preparations (10). These results are in line with a recent report showing that, after i.v. administration of HEL, B cells in immune lymph nodes or draining sites of adjuvant administration can present that antigen whereas DC from the same lymph nodes cannot (12). In contrast, our results show that DC isolated from spleen bear substantial numbers of HEL 46-61–Ak complexes on their plasma membranes after i.v. administration (Fig. 4) in a system in which peptide-free protein solutions are used and extracellular proteolysis does not generate enough peptide to give detectable staining (Table 1 and data not shown). Moreover, flow cytometric comparison of the staining of B cells and N418+ DC fails to reveal significant differences in the TCR ligand levels relative to total I-Ak levels displayed by the two cell types (Fig. 4), suggesting that splenic B cells and splenic DC have a similar ability to process and present serum proteins under the nonactivating conditions we have used.
This does not mean that all DC and B cells have the same ability to capture and present antigen. DC isolated from spleen are thought to represent a more mature form of DC, composed of recent immigrants from nonlymphoid tissues that have downregulated the ability to capture and process intact antigens (39, 40), although they have not entirely lost this functionality (34, 41). In comparison, truly immature DC, such as Langerhans cells, are much more efficient at taking up and processing antigens (41, 42) and, in fact, immature DC have been claimed to be as good as or better than antigen-specific B cells at capturing and presenting limiting concentrations of antigen (43). In most forms of antigen administration which lead to an immune response, antigen is probably taken up in nonlymphoid tissues by immature DC that migrate to the lymph nodes or spleen (39, 40), and only a limiting amount of free antigen drains to those tissues, where it may be preferentially picked up by antigen-specific B cells, rather than polyclonal B cells or lymphoid DC.
Although our results show that the relative increment over background of specific peptide–MHC class II complexes is similar for B cells and lymphoid DC after i.v. HEL administration, DC nonetheless display more total antigenic complexes on their surface by virtue of their higher total expression of MHC class II molecules. This is clear from the greater intensity of C4H3 staining of HEL-pulsed DC relative to B cells (Figs. 1 and 4) and raises the interesting question of whether T cells simply integrate the total number of antigenic complexes on the surface of an APC, irrespective of other peptide–MHC complexes that might be present, or whether the fraction of total complexes loaded with the right peptide is a determining factor in T cell activation. In the former case, DC would clearly have an advantage over B cells at providing signal 1, even if their processing efficiency were lower. Analysis of functional antigen presentation by LOD DC versus LOD B cells showed about a fivefold advantage for DC over B cells on a per cell basis, whereas the absolute difference in specific antigen complexes was only about twofold. These data are consistent with the notion that DC have a variety of advantages beyond absolute ligand display, such as adhesion coligands and costimulatory molecules, which improve their function as APCs (39).
I.v. injections are an artificial mode of antigen introduction that may simulate the presentation of normal serum proteins and of pathogen products present in extracellular fluids. This form of antigen exposure is more often associated with induction of tolerance or deviation to Th2 responses than with inflammatory-type immunity (14–18). The observations reported here support a previously suggested mechanism by which i.v. injections can promote such immune effects (4–6). Because antigen-unspecific B cells are more abundant than DC in the spleen, if both APC present the injected antigen to a similar extent, it is likely that on the basis of numbers alone antigen-specific T cells will encounter the antigen on a B cell before seeing it on a DC, perhaps being anergized, clonally eliminated, or deviated to a Th2 differentiation pathway (5, 6). Testing of this model by directly visualizing the interactions between HEL-specific T cells and antigen-bearing APCs using mAbs specific for processed HEL is currently underway.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 6 June 1997
Revised: 14 July 1997
1 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells; HEL, hen egg lysozyme; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; LOD, low density spleen; WT, wild-type.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Germain RN. MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation: providing ligands for T lymphocyte activation, Cell, 1994, 76, 287–299.[Medline]
2 MacLennan IC. Germinal centers, Annu Rev Immunol, 1994, 12, 117–139.[Medline]
3 Mondino A, Khoruts A & Jenkins MK. The anatomy of T-cell activation and tolerance, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93, 2245–2252.
4 Eynon EE & Parker DC. Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens, J Exp Med, 1992, 175, 131–138.
5 Fuchs EJ & Matzinger P. B cells turn off virgin but not memory T cells, Science (Wash DC), 1992, 258, 1156–1159.
6 Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family, Annu Rev Immunol, 1994, 12, 991–1045.[Medline]
7 Crowley M, Inaba K & Steinman RM. Dendritic cells are the principal cells in mouse spleen bearing immunogenic fragments of foreign proteins, J Exp Med, 1990, 172, 383–386.
8 Liu LM & MacPherson GG. Lymph–borne (veiled) dendritic cells can acquire and present intestinally administered antigens, Immunology, 1991, 73, 281–286.[Medline]
9 Liu LM & MacPherson GG. Antigen acquisition by dendritic cells: intestinal dendritic cells acquire antigen administered orally and can prime naive T cells in vivo, J Exp Med, 1993, 177, 1299–1307.
10 Constant S, Schweitzer N, West J, Ranney P & Bottomly K. B lymphocytes can be competent antigen-presenting cells for priming CD4+T cells to protein antigens in vivo, J Immunol, 1995, 155, 3734–3741.[Abstract]
11 Guéry JC, Ria F & Adorini L. Dendritic cells but not B cells present antigenic complexes to class II–restricted T cells after administration of protein in adjuvant, J Exp Med, 1996, 183, 751–757.
12 Guéry JC, Ria F, Galbiati F, Smiroldo S & Adorini L. The mode of protein antigen administration determines preferential presentation of peptide–class II complexes by lymph node dendritic or B cells, Int Immunol, 1997, 9, 9–15.
13 Porgador A, Yewdell JW, Deng Y, Bennink JR & Germain RN. Intracellular localization, surface quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide–MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody, Immunity, 1997, 6, 715–726.[Medline]
14 Weigle WO. Analysis of autoimmunity through experimental models of thyroiditis and allergic encephalomyelitis, Adv Immunol, 1980, 30, 159–273.[Medline]
15 De Wit D, Van Mechelen M, Ryelandt M, Figueiredo AC, Abramowicz D, Goldman M, Bazin H, Urbain J & Leo O. The injection of deaggregated gamma globulins in adult mice induces antigen-specific unresponsiveness of T helper type 1 but not type 2 lymphocytes, J Exp Med, 1992, 175, 9–14.
16 Burstein HJ, Shea CM & Abbas AK. Aqueous antigens induce in vivo tolerance selectively in IL-2– and IFN-gamma–producing (Th1) cells, J Immunol, 1992, 148, 3687–3691.[Abstract]
17 Romball CG & Weigle WO. In vivo induction of tolerance in murine CD4+cell subsets, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 1637–1644.
18 Degermann S, Pria E & Adorini L. Soluble protein but not peptide administration diverts the immune response of a clonal CD4+T cell population to the T helper 2 cell pathway, J Immunol, 1996, 157, 3260–3269.[Abstract]
19 Bikoff EK, Huang LY, Episkopou V, van Meerwijk J, Germain RN & Robertson EJ. Defective major histocompatibility complex class II assembly, transport, peptide acquisition, and CD4+T cell selection in mice lacking invariant chain expression, J Exp Med, 1993, 177, 1699–1712.
20 Bikoff EK, Germain RN & Robertson EJ. Allelic differences affecting invariant chain dependency of MHC class II subunit assembly, Immunity, 1995, 2, 301–310.[Medline]
21 Swiggard, W., R.M. Nonacs, M.D. Witmer-Pack, and R.M. Steinman. 1991. Enrichment of dendritic cells by plastic adherence and EA rosetting. In Current Protocols in Immunology, Volume 1. J.E. Coligan, A.M. Kruisbeek, D.H. Margulies, E.M. Shevach, and W. Strober, editors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 3.7.1–3.7.11.
22 Metlay JP, Witmer-Pack MD, Agger R, Crowley MT, Lawless D & Steinman RM. The distinct leukocyte integrins of mouse spleen dendritic cells as identified with new hamster monoclonal antibodies, J Exp Med, 1990, 171, 1753–1771.
23 Nussenzweig MC, Steinman RM, Witmer MD & Gutchinov B. A monoclonal antibody specific for mouse dendritic cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1982, 79, 161–165.
24 Kraal G, Breel M, Janse M & Bruin G. Langerhans' cells, veiled cells, and interdigitating cells in the mouse recognized by a monoclonal antibody, J Exp Med, 1986, 163, 981–997.
25 Allen PM, Strydom DJ & Unanue ER. Processing of lysozyme by macrophages: identification of the determinant recognized by two T-cell hybridomas, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81, 2489–2493.
26 Reis e Sousa C & Germain RN. Major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of peptides derived from soluble exogenous antigen by a subset of cells engaged in phagocytosis, J Exp Med, 1995, 182, 841–851.
27 Nelson CA, Roof RW, McCourt DW & Unanue ER. Identification of the naturally processed form of hen egg white lysozyme bound to the murine major histocompatibility complex class II molecule I-Ak, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992, 89, 7380–7383.
28 Lanzavecchia A. Receptor-mediated antigen uptake and its effect on antigen presentation to class II-restricted T lymphocytes, Annu Rev Immunol, 1990, 8, 773–793.[Medline]
29 McHeyzer-Williams MG & Davis MM. Antigen-specific development of primary and memory T cells in vivo, Science (Wash DC), 1995, 268, 106–111.
30 Luther SA, Gulbranson-Judge A, Acha-Orbea H & MacLennan IC. Viral superantigen drives extrafollicular and follicular B cell differentiation leading to virus-specific antibody production, J Exp Med, 1997, 185, 551–562.
31 Kearney ER, Pape KA, Loh DY & Jenkins MK. Visualization of peptide-specific T cell immunity and peripheral tolerance induction in vivo, Immunity, 1994, 1, 327–339.[Medline]
32 Shokat KM & Goodnow CC. Antigen-induced B-cell death and elimination during germinal-centre immune responses, Nature (Lond), 1995, 375, 334–338.[Medline]
33 van den Eertwegh AJM, Boersma WJA & Claassen E. Immunological functions and in vivocell–cell interactions of T cells in the spleen, Crit Rev Immunol, 1992, 11, 337–380.[Medline]
34 Inaba K, Metlay JP, Crowley MT & Steinman RM. Dendritic cells pulsed with protein antigens in vitro can prime antigen-specific, MHC-restricted T cells in situ, J Exp Med, 1990, 172, 631–640.
35 Mitchison NA. Induction of immunological paralysis in two zones of dosage, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 1964, 161, 275–292.
36 Umlauf SW, Beverly B, Kang SM, Brorson K, Tran AC & Schwartz RH. Molecular regulation of the IL-2 gene: rheostatic control of the immune system, Immunol Rev, 1993, 133, 177–197.[Medline]
37 Gilbert KM & Weigle WO. Tolerogenicity of resting and activated B cells, J Exp Med, 1994, 179, 249–258.
38 Cassell DJ & Schwartz RH. A quantitative analysis of antigen-presenting cell function: activated B cells stimulate naive CD4 T cells but are inferior to dendritic cells in providing costimulation, J Exp Med, 1994, 180, 1829–1840.
39 Steinman RM. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity, Annu Rev Immunol, 1991, 9, 271–296.[Medline]
40 Austyn JM. New insights into the mobilization and phagocytic activity of dendritic cells, J Exp Med, 1996, 183, 1287–1292.
41 Reis e Sousa C, Stahl PD & Austyn JM. Phagocytosis of antigens by Langerhans cells in vitro, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 509–519.
42 Romani N, Koide S, Crowley M, Witmer PM, Livingstone AM, Fathman CG, Inaba K & Steinman RM. Presentation of exogenous protein antigens by dendritic cells to T cell clones. Intact protein is presented best by immature, epidermal Langerhans cells, J Exp Med, 1989, 169, 1169–1178.
43 Sallusto F & Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony–stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha, J Exp Med, 1994, 179, 1109–1118.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|