© The Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1007/1997/4/1517/ $5.00
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Volume 185, Number 8, April 21, 1997 1517-1522
Altered Hematopoiesis, Behavior, and Sexual Function in µ Opioid Receptor–deficient Mice
Mingting Tian*,
Hal E. Broxmeyer
,||,¶,
Yi Fan*,
Zhennan Lai*,
Shengwen Zhang*,
Susan Aronica,||,¶,
Scott Cooper,||,¶,
Robert M. Bigsby
,
Rosemary Steinmetz,
Sandra J. Engle*,
Anton Mestek*,
Jonathan D. Pollock,
Michael N. Lehman**,
Heiko T. Jansen**,
Moyin Ying**,
Peter J. Stambrook**,
Jay A. Tischfield*, and
Lei Yu*,
From the * Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, || Department of Medicine, and ¶ Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; and the ** Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The µ opioid receptor is thought to be the cellular target of opioid narcotics such as morphine and heroin, mediating their effects in both pain relief and euphoria. Its involvement is also implicated in a range of diverse biological processes. Using a mouse model in which the receptor gene was disrupted by targeted homologous recombination, we explored the involvement of this receptor in a number of physiological functions. Mice homozygous for the disrupted gene developed normally, but their motor function was altered. Drug-naive homozygotes displayed reduced locomotor activity, and morphine did not induce changes in locomotor activity observed in wild-type mice. Unexpectedly, lack of a functional receptor resulted in changes in both the host defense system and the reproductive system. We observed increased proliferation of granulocyte-macrophage, erythroid, and multipotential progenitor cells in both bone marrow and spleen, indicating a link between hematopoiesis and the opioid system, both of which are stress-responsive systems. Unexpected changes in sexual function in male homozygotes were also observed, as shown by reduced mating activity, a decrease in sperm count and motility, and smaller litter size. Taken together, these results suggest a novel role of the µ opioid receptor in hematopoiesis and reproductive physiology, in addition to its known involvement in pain relief.
Address correspondence to Lei Yu, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 975 West Walnut St., Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Opioids exert their physiological effect by interacting with membrane-bound opioid receptors. Extensive studies in the past have established that there are three major types of opioid receptors, µ, 
, and 
, with somewhat overlapping, yet distinct pharmacology (1, 2). In recent years, molecular cloning has led to the identification of the genes for these opioid receptors (3), and subsequent studies using these clones have confirmed the pharmacological classification (3, 4). The µ opioid receptor is the major cellular target for most medically relevant opioid narcotics, including naturally occurring drugs such as morphine and codeine as well as synthetic compounds such as fentanyl and methadone. In addition to these µ-selective alkaloids, the µ opioid receptor is also activated by peptide ligands such as endorphins (endogenous) and [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Glyol5]-enkephalin (synthetic).
The major clinical use of morphine and other opioids is for pain relief. Analgesic effects of opioids can be mediated by all three types of opioid receptors (2). A recent study using mice with a disrupted µ opioid receptor gene demonstrated the central role of this receptor in opioid-mediated pain relief (5). In addition to nociception, opioid receptor involvement has also been implicated in other physiological functions such as motor activity, gastrointestinal motility, and respiratory activity (6). To explore the role that the µ opioid receptor may play in diverse biological processes, we examined mice deficient in the µ opioid receptor gene. Here we report the findings of these studies.
|
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Mice.
The µ opioid receptor gene Oprm was disrupted in embryonic stem (ES) cells by replacing the coding exon 1 with a PGK-neo selection marker using the method of gene targeting as described (7, 8). Targeted ES cells were microinjected into C57/ BL6 mouse blastocysts, and the resultant chimeric mice were mated to wild-type female mice of the Swiss black strain to obtain germline transmission of the targeted gene. Genomic Southern blotting and nested PCR were used to confirm the presence of the disrupted gene in the progeny mice. Mice were housed at 72–74°F and 60% humidity with 12-h light/dark lighting cycle. Water and food were available ad libitum.
Hematopoiesis Assays.
Unseparated marrow and spleen cells were plated respectively at 5 x 104 and 5 x 105 per ml in 1.0% methylcellulose culture medium with 30% vol/vol fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Labs, Inc., Logan, UT) and 1 U/ml recombinant human erythropoietin (Amgen Biologicals, Thousand Oaks, CA), 50 ng/ml recombinant murine steel factor (Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA), 5% vol/vol pokeweed mitogen mouse spleen cell– conditioned medium, and 0.1 mM hemin (Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). Colonies deriving from hematopoietic progenitors were scored after 7 d of incubation in a humidified environment at 5% CO2 and lowered (5%) O2 as described (9–11). Absolute numbers of progenitors per organ were calculated based on the number of viable, unseparated nucleated cells per femur or spleen, and the number of colonies scored per number of cells plated. The percentage of progenitors in S-phase was estimated by the high specific activity tritiated thymidine kill technique (9–11).
Measurements of Motor Activity and Sexual Function.
Locomotor activity measurements were recorded in a quiet room under dim light by video cameras, and the tapes were analyzed off-line. Individual mice placed in a round plastic chamber were habituated for 15 min before the activity was recorded. Horizontal activity was scored as breaking either one of the two center lines (perpendicular to each other). Vertical activity was scored as the animal raised its head and/or stood up along the side wall. Morphine (in 0.9% saline) was injected intraperitoneally at a 2.3 mg/kg, the ED50 dosage of analgesia in mice (12). U62066 (dissolved in ethanol and diluted in saline) was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 3 pmol/kg.
Mating behavior was tested essentially as described (13). Sperm from the right-side epididymis was flushed out in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, and sperm number counted both by Coulter cell counter and by warmed Neubauer counting chamber (14). Sperm motility was the percentage of sperm showing forward progressing, linear motion.
Statistics.
Data of heterozygotes and homozygotes were analyzed for statistically significant differences from that of wild-type mice by Student's t test. An asterisk (*) indicates significant difference (P <0.05) from the wild type. All data are shown as mean ± SEM.
|
Results and Discussion
|
|---|
Normal Growth but Altered Motor Activity in µ Opioid Receptor–deficient Mice.
The µ opioid receptor gene Oprm, a single copy gene on mouse chromosome 10 (15), was disrupted in ES cells by gene targeting (16, 17) for generation of µ opioid receptor–deficient mice. Analysis of genomic DNA from progeny mice confirmed the presence of the disrupted gene (data not shown). Deficiency in the µ opioid receptor does not appear to cause major changes in mouse development, as mice of all three genotypes grew with comparable body weight (Fig. 1), without noticeable changes in neuroanatomy or histology (data not shown). When tested for opioid-mediated antinociception using the tail flick latency assay, we observed similar results to those reported by Matthes et al. (5), i.e., a lack of morphineinduced increase of tail flick latency in mice homozygous for the deficient receptor gene (Oprm–/–; data not shown).
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1 Normal growth of µ opioid receptor–deficient mice. Body weight after birth of wild-type (Oprm+/+, solid circles, n = 14), heterozygous (Oprm+/–, open circles, n = 23), and homozygous (Oprm–/–, open squares, n = 18) mice. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. There are no significant differences among the three genotypes (Student's t test).
| |
Morphine and other opioids are known to enhance motor activity in rodents. Locomotor activity is defined as two types of behavior: horizontal (the extent of the mouse's running around in observation cage) and vertical (the frequency of the animal's upward movement, either as rearing or standing up against the side of the cage). When observed for spontaneous horizontal activity, wild-type mice habituated over a period of time after being placed in the observation cage (Fig. 2 A). In homozygous mice (Oprm–/–) that had not been exposed to morphine, the spontaneous horizontal activity was greatly reduced compared with that of the wild type (Fig. 2 A). This suggests that even in naive animals that have not been exposed to exogenously administered opioids, the µ opioid receptor may play a role in modulating the basal tone of spontaneous locomotor activity.
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2 Locomotor activity. Locomotor activity was measured in mice of the wild-type (Oprm+/+, solid circles, n = 6), heterozygous (Oprm+/–, open circles, n = 5), and homozygous (Oprm–/–, open squares, n = 6) genotypes. Movement counts are shown both in 10-min intervals (A–D, left) and for the total 1-h testing period (A–D, right). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (*, significant difference [P <0.05, Student's t test] from the wild type.) (A) Spontaneous horizontal activity in naive mice not exposed to morphine. Homozygotes showed reduced locomotor activity. (B) Horizontal activity after injection of morphine. Wild-type mice displayed hyperactivity, while homozygotes and heterozygotes showed little change. (C) Spontaneous vertical activity in naive mice not exposed to morphine. There are no significant differences between the groups. (D) Vertical activity after injection of morphine. Wild-type mice showed dramatic reduction in activity upon morphine injection, and there was little change in either the homozygotes or the heterozygotes.
| |
When morphine was injected, wild-type mice exhibited increased locomotor activity (Fig. 2 B), a phenomenon commonly observed in mice (18). The homozygous mice, on the other hand, were not affected by morphine injection, and their spontaneous horizontal activity stayed relatively constant over the course of the test (Fig. 2 B). This difference between wild-type and homozygous mice is significant both for the 10-min segments during recording (Fig. 2 B, left), and over the entire recording time of 60 min (Fig. 2 B, right). Interestingly, heterozygous mice displayed intermediate levels of horizontal activity that did not change after morphine injection (Fig. 2 B).
When the vertical activity was examined, there was no significant difference among three genotypes of mice (Fig. 2 C). Upon morphine injection, the vertical activity in wildtype mice was greatly reduced (Fig. 2 D), in agreement with previous studies (18). In homozygous mice, morphine did not change the level of vertical activity during the test period (Fig. 2 D), indicating a lack of µ opioid receptor for mediating the morphine effect. Just as for horizontal activity, vertical activity in heterozygous mice was not affected by morphine (Fig. 2 D), suggesting that one normal allele of the µ opioid receptor gene is not sufficient to overcome the deficit of the other mutated allele in this respect.
These results are consistent with previous observations that in normal (wild-type) mice, morphine increases horizontal locomotor activity and reduces vertical locomotor activity (18). Our data demonstrate that the µ opioid receptor plays a central role in morphine modulation of locomotor activity, since in both homozygous and heterozygous mice, the morphine effects were largely abolished.
Hematopoiesis.
Animal studies support the role of opioids in modulating the host defense system (19, 20). For example, both β-endorphin and enkephalins, endogenous opioids that have high affinity for µ and opioid receptors, affect mature cells of the hematopoietic system, i.e., monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils (19). However, no studies have thus far linked the µ opioid receptor system to blood cell production, especially for progenitor cells of myeloid origin that give rise to granulocytes, monocytes/macrophages, erythrocytes, and platelets. Hematopoiesis, the production of blood cells, is regulated by cytokines, which include members of the chemokine family (21–24). Chemokine receptors, for example the interleukin-8 receptor, are members of the G protein-coupled receptor family like the µ opioid receptor, and the µ opioid receptor displays moderate levels of sequence homology to both the interleukin-8 receptor and C-C chemokine receptors (25). Given these structural parallels and implied functional interactions, it was of interest to examine the µ opioid receptor–deficient mice for potential changes in hematopoietic processes.
To explore a potential role of µ opioid receptors in hematopoiesis, myeloid blood cell production in mice was examined using bone marrow, spleen, and blood. We found that the absolute numbers of femoral bone marrow granulocytemacrophage (CFU-GM), erythoid (BFU-E), and multipotential (CFU-GEMM) progenitor cells in bone marrow were significantly higher in homozygotes (Oprm–/–) compared to wild-type mice (Table 1), whereas there were no apparent differences in nucleated cellularity in the bone marrow and spleen (Table 1) or in the leukocytes, erythrocytes, and platelet counts in the blood (data not shown). Also, although myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow and spleen were in a slowly cycling state in wild-type mice, these progenitors were in rapid cell cycle in homozygous mice as determined by the percentage of progenitors in S-phase (Table 1). The cycling status of myeloid progenitors in bone marrow and spleen of heterozygous mice (Oprm+/–) was intermediate between that of wild type (Oprm+/+) and homozygotes (Oprm–/–). Also, the absolute numbers of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-GEMM in spleen were increased in homozygotes compared to wild-type mice, although these differences were not significant.
Cells of the myeloid lineage, such as monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, are among the body's first line of defense against infections, and serve important functions such as antigen presentation, phagocytosis of foreign materials, and production/release of stimulatory and suppressing cytokines active on myeloid and lymphoid cell production and function (21–24). Endogenous opioids in circulation could potentially activate the µ opioid receptor on these cells, which may modulate hematopoiesis. Our finding of enhanced production of the myeloid progenitors in µ opioid receptor–deficient mice thus provides strong evidence of this receptor's involvement in blood cell production, most likely as a negative regulatory influence. The exact link remains to be determined, and may be directly or indirectly mediated at the level of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The enhanced proliferation status and number of myeloid progenitors in bone marrow and spleen without a subsequent increase in mature blood cell number suggests involvement of additional cell–cytokine mediated events between premature and mature blood cell regulation.
Sexual Function.
During breeding, we noticed that it took homozygous male mice (Oprm–/–) a significantly longer time to impregnate a female than wild-type male mice (Table 2), and the offspring litter size by homozygous males was smaller than that by wild type (Table 2). Two factors could contribute to such a change: a reduction in mating activity and a change in reproductive physiology. To examine whether the µ opioid receptor plays a role in the sexual behavior in mice, we measured the mating activity in male mice. When an estrous wild-type female mouse was placed in a cage with a male mouse, the wild-type male would start to investigate the female and, within a few min, initiate sexual activity by mounting the female mouse. The homozygous males (Oprm–/–), on the other hand, showed a significantly lengthened period before they initiated sexual activity with the female mouse (Table 2). Also, whereas the majority of the mounting attempts by a wild type male were appropriate (mounting from the rear of the female), the proportion of appropriate mounting by a homozygous male was much reduced (Table 2). In addition, the number of intromissions during the test session was significantly reduced in homozygous males as compared with the wild type. These results indicate that sexual activity is reduced in the homozygous male mice compared with that in the wild type. The reduction of sexual activity in homozygous mice does not appear to be caused by reduced locomotor activity, because during mating tests there was no significant difference among the wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous male mice in the total contact time, determined as the accumulative time when the male was investigating the female mouse, including mounting and sniffing of body and genital areas (Table 2).
When physiological parameters of the male reproductive system were examined, they also appeared to be altered by disruption of the µ opioid receptor gene. As shown in Table 2, even when a homozygous male initiated intromission, there was little ejaculation (a lack of seminal plugs) during the 2-h test. This is not due to a complete inability to ejaculate, as homozygous males were able to form seminal plugs when left overnight in the cage with female mice (Table 2). However, the percentage of overnight plugs was reduced compared with that of the wild-type male mice.
The male reproductive system in homozygous male mice appears to be functional, as the prostate and seminal vesicle weights were of similar values among different genotypes (Table 2). However, sperm motility and sperm counts in homozygous mice were significantly reduced compared to those in wild-type mice (Table 2). These data suggest that the development of sperm may be affected by disruption of the µ opioid receptor gene even though the gross anatomy of the male reproductive system in homozygous male mice is not. Taken together, these results indicate that the µ opioid receptor may play an important role in the sexual behavior and reproductive physiology in mice. Further studies are needed to address whether the µ opioid receptor acts directly on the reproductive organs or functions by modulating a central mechanism.
|
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Drs. Judith Strong and Michael Vasko for comments on the manuscript, and Tom Hendrickson, Andrea Caperell-Grant, and Paula Stevenson for technical assistance.
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants DA09116 and DA09444 to L. Yu; HL56416, HL54037, and a project in P01 HL53586 to H.E. Broxmeyer; and DK38185 to J.A. Tischfield. L. Yu is the recipient of a Research Career Development Award (NS01557) from the NIH. S. Aronica was supported by the NIH training program T32DK07519 to H.E. Broxmeyer. S.J. Engle and A. Mestek were supported by the NIH training grant T32HD07373 to the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics.
Submitted: 10 February 1997
|
References
|
|---|
1 Goldstein A. Binding selectivity profiles for ligands of multiple receptor types: focus on opioid receptors, Trends Pharmacol Sci, 1987, 8, 456–459.
2 Pasternak GW. Pharmacological mechanisms of opioid analgesics, Clin Neuropharmacol, 1993, 16, 1–18.[Medline]
3 Kieffer BL. Recent advances in molecular recognition and signal transduction of active peptides: receptors for opioid peptides, Cell Mol Neurobiol, 1995, 15, 615–635.[Medline]
4 Raynor K, Kong H, Yasuda K, Chen Y, Yu L, Bell GI & Reisine T. Pharmacological characterization of the cloned -, -, and µ-opioid receptors, Mol Pharmacol, 1994, 45, 330–334.[Abstract]
5 Matthes HWD, Maldonado R, Simonin F, Valverde O, Slowe S, Kitchen I, Befort K, Dierich A, Le Meur M, Dolle P et al.. Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the µ-opioidreceptor gene, Nature (Lond), 1996, 383, 819–823.[Medline]
6 The Opiate Receptors. 1988. G.W. Pasternak, editor. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. 520 pp.
7 Engle SJ, Stockelman MG, Chen J, Boivin G, Yum M-N, Davies PM, Ying MY, Sahota A, Simmonds HA, Stambrook PJ & Tischfield JA. Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficient mice develop 2,8-dihydroxyadenine nephrolithiasis, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93, 5307–5312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 Pollock JD, Williams DA, Gifford MA, Li LL, Du X, Fisherman J, Orkin SH, Doerschuk CM & Dinauer MC. Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production, Nat Genet, 1995, 9, 202–209.[Medline]
9 Broxmeyer HE, Williams DE, Hangoc G, Cooper S, Gillis S, Shadduck RK & Bicknell DC. Synergistic myelopoietic actions in vivo after administration to mice of combinations of purified natural murine colony-stimulating factor 1, recombinant murine interleukin 3, and recombinant murine granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987, 84, 3871–3875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 Cooper, S., C. Mantel, and H.E. Broxmeyer. 1994. Myelosuppressive effects in vivo with very low dosages of monomeric recombinant murine macrophage inflammatory protein-1
. Exp. Hematol. (Charlottesv.). 22:186–193.
11 Cooper, S., and H.E. Broxmeyer. 1997. Measurement of interleukin-3 and other hematopoietic growth factors, such as GM-CSF, G-CSF, M-CSF, erythropoietin and the potent co-stimulating cytokines steel factor and Flt-3 ligand. In Current Protocols in Immunology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. In press.
12 Drug Dosage in Laboratory Animals: A Handbook. R.E. Borchard, C.D. Barnes, and L.G. Eltherington, editors. 1990. Telford Press, Inc., Caldwell, NJ. 692 pp.
13 Baum MJ, Brown JJG, Kica E, Rubin BS, Johnson RS & Papaioannou V E. Effect of a null mutation of the c-fos proto-oncogene on sexual behavior of male mice, Biol Reprod, 1994, 50, 1040–1048.[Abstract]
14 Vawda AI & Davies AG. Effects of cisplatin on the mouse testis, Acta Endocrinol, 1986, 112, 436–441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 Kozak CA, Filie J, Adamson MC, Chen Y & Yu L. Murine chromosomal location of the µ and opioid receptor genes, Genomics, 1994, 21, 659–661.[Medline]
16 Capecchi MR. Altering the genome by homologous recombination, Science (Wash DC), 1989, 244, 1288–1292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 Doetschman, T. 1994. Gene transfer in embryonic stem cells. In Transgenic Animal Technology: A Laboratory Handbook. O. Smithies, editor. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 115–146.
18 Michael-Titus A, Dourmap N & Costentin J. Mu and delta opioid receptors control differently the horizontal and vertical components of locomotor activity in mice, Neuropeptides, 1989, 13, 235–242.[Medline]
19 Bryant, H.U., and J.W. Holaday. 1993. Opioids in immunologic processes. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology: Opioids II. A. Herz, editor. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 361–392.
20 Stefano GB, Scharrer B, Smith EM, Hughes TKJ, Magazine HI, Bilfinger TV, Hartman AR, Fricchione GL, Liu Y & Makman MH. Opioid and opiate immunoregulatory processes, Crit Rev Immunol, 1996, 16, 109–144.[Medline]
21 Broxmeyer, H.E. 1992. Update: biomolecule–cell interactions and the regulation of myelopoiesis. In Concise Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Hematology. M.J.J. Murphy, editor. Alpha Medical Press, Dayton, OH. 119–149.
22 Broxmeyer, H.E. 1993. Role of cytokines in hematopoiesis. In Clinical Aspects of Cytokines: Role in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy. J.J. Oppenheim, J.L. Rossio, and A.J.H. Gearing, editors. Oxford University Press, New York. 201–206.
23 Broxmeyer HE. Is interleukin 17, an inducible cytokine that stimulates production of other cytokines, merely a redundant player in a sea of other biomolecules? , J Exp Med, 1996, 183, 2411–2415.[Free Full Text]
24 Broxmeyer, H.E. 1996. Myelosuppressive cytokines and peptides. In Blood Cell Biochemistry: Hematopoietic Growth Factors and Their Receptors. A.D. Whetton and J. Gordon, editors. Plenum, London. 121–150.
25 Chen Y, Mestek A, Liu J, Hurley JA & Yu L. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a µ-opioid receptor from rat brain, Mol Pharmacol, 1993, 44, 8–12.[Abstract]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Koyama, T., Mayahara, T., Wakamatsu, T., Sora, I., Fukuda, K.
(2009). Deletion of {micro}-opioid receptor in mice does not affect the minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anaesthetics and nitrous oxide-induced analgesia. Br J Anaesth
103: 744-749
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schwindinger, W. F., Borrell, B. M., Waldman, L. C., Robishaw, J. D.
(2009). Mice lacking the G protein {gamma}3-subunit show resistance to opioids and diet induced obesity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.
297: R1494-R1502
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Benamar, K., Yondorf, M., Barreto, V. T., Geller, E. B., Adler, M. W.
(2007). Deletion of {micro}-Opioid Receptor in Mice Alters the Development of Acute Neuroinflammation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
323: 990-994
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Broxmeyer, H. E., Sehra, S., Cooper, S., Toney, L. M., Kusam, S., Aloor, J. J., Marchal, C. C., Dinauer, M. C., Dent, A. L.
(2007). Aberrant Regulation of Hematopoiesis by T Cells in BAZF-Deficient Mice. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 5275-5285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nagai, J., Kurokawa, M., Takeshima, H., Kieffer, B. L., Ueda, H.
(2007). Circadian-Dependent Learning and Memory Enhancement in Nociceptin Receptor-Deficient Mice with a Novel KUROBOX Apparatus Using Stress-Free Positive Cue Task. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
321: 195-201
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, P.-W., Wu, S., Lee, Y.-M.
(2004). Differential Expression of {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene in CXBK and B6 Mice by Sp1. Mol. Pharmacol.
66: 1580-1584
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tegeder, I., Geisslinger, G.
(2004). Opioids As Modulators of Cell Death and Survival--Unraveling Mechanisms and Revealing New Indications. Pharmacol. Rev.
56: 351-369
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Steidl, U., Bork, S., Schaub, S., Selbach, O., Seres, J., Aivado, M., Schroeder, T., Rohr, U.-P., Fenk, R., Kliszewski, S., Maercker, C., Neubert, P., Bornstein, S. R., Haas, H. L., Kobbe, G., Tenen, D. G., Haas, R., Kronenwett, R.
(2004). Primary human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells express functionally active receptors of neuromediators. Blood
104: 81-88
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hwang, C. K., Kim, C. S., Choi, H. S., McKercher, S. R., Loh, H. H.
(2004). Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse {micro} Opioid Receptor Gene by PU.1. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 19764-19774
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, P.-W., Lee, Y.-M.
(2003). Transcriptional Regulation of {micro} Opioid Receptor Gene by cAMP Pathway. Mol. Pharmacol.
64: 1410-1418
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nayernia, K., Adham, I. M., Burkhardt-Gottges, E., Neesen, J., Rieche, M., Wolf, S., Sancken, U., Kleene, K., Engel, W.
(2002). Asthenozoospermia in Mice with Targeted Deletion of the Sperm Mitochondrion-Associated Cysteine-Rich Protein (Smcp) Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 3046-3052
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bi, J., Hu, X., Loh, H. H., Wei, L.-N.
(2001). Regulation of Mouse {kappa} Opioid Receptor Gene Expression by Retinoids. J. Neurosci.
21: 1590-1599
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ikeda, K., Kobayashi, T., Ichikawa, T., Kumanishi, T., Niki, H., Yano, R.
(2001). The Untranslated Region of {micro}-Opioid Receptor mRNA Contributes to Reduced Opioid Sensitivity in CXBK Mice. J. Neurosci.
21: 1334-1339
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zaki, P. A., Keith, D. E. Jr., Brine, G. A., Carroll, F. I., Evans, C. J.
(2000). Ligand-Induced Changes in Surface {micro}-Opioid Receptor Number: Relationship to G Protein Activation?. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
292: 1127-1134
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wei, L.-N., Hu, X., Bi, J., Loh, H.
(2000). Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse kappa -Opioid Receptor Expression. Mol. Pharmacol.
57: 401-408
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Law, P.-Y., Loh, H. H.
(1999). Regulation of Opioid Receptor Activities. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
289: 607-624
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
PICCIOTTO, M. R., WICKMAN, K.
(1998). Using Knockout and Transgenic Mice to Study Neurophysiology and Behavior. Physiol. Rev.
78: 1131-1163
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Polakiewicz, R. D., Schieferl, S. M., Gingras, A.-C., Sonenberg, N., Comb, M. J.
(1998). µ-Opioid Receptor Activates Signaling Pathways Implicated in Cell Survival and Translational Control. J. Biol. Chem.
273: 23534-23541
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ko, J. L., Loh, H. H.
(2001). Single-stranded DNA-binding Complex Involved in Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 788-795
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hu, X., Bi, J., Loh, H. H., Wei, L.-N.
(2001). An Intronic Ikaros-binding Element Mediates Retinoic Acid Suppression of the Kappa Opioid Receptor Gene, Accompanied by Histone Deacetylation on the Promoters. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 4597-4603
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Befort, K., Filliol, D., Decaillot, F. M., Gaveriaux-Ruff, C., Hoehe, M. R., Kieffer, B. L.
(2001). A Single Nucleotide Polymorphic Mutation in the Human {micro}-Opioid Receptor Severely Impairs Receptor Signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 3130-3137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chaturvedi, K., Bandari, P., Chinen, N., Howells, R. D.
(2001). Proteasome Involvement in Agonist-induced Down-regulation of {micro} and delta Opioid Receptors. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 12345-12355
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
