|
||
Articles |




Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287;
Laboratory of Immunopathology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and || Flow Cytometry Section, Laboratory of Molecular Structure, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Can a retroviral infection be controlled or eradicated by the presence of immune cells that resist infection? Current thought on therapies for human retroviral disease considers the possibility that rendering at least part of a patient's immune system resistant to infection will prove beneficial (1, 2). To gain insight into the ability of resistant cells to alter the outcome of retroviral disease, allophenic mice were constructed from inbred strains of mice susceptible and resistant to the syndrome of lymphoproliferation and immunodeficiency induced by LP-BM5 murine leukemia viruses (MuLV)1 termed murine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (MAIDS) (3–5). Induction of MAIDS is dependent on expression of a replication defective virus, BM5def, that encodes a unique Gag polyprotein (4, 6).
Allophenic mice (designated strain A
These studies establish that MAIDS can be controlled by the presence of immune system cells that resist disease, and suggest thresholds for the percentage of cells of resistant genotype required to prevent progressive disease. Critically, assessment of retroviral burden over the course of disease reveals that although infection is initially established in allophenics with significant numbers of cells of susceptible genotype, those mice with a preponderance of cells of resistant genotype are able to contain the viral burden and remain healthy.
Percent chimerism of B6
Percent chimerism of B6
To assess the stability of chimerism, four allophenics were left uninfected. Chimerism was assessed at weeks 0 and 24 in three mice and at weeks 0, 8, 15, and 24 in a fourth. Chimerism was remarkably stable, varying by at most 6% from the initial evaluation.
To assess whether chimerism in PBL reflected that of other lymphoid compartments, we compared chimerism in PBL with that in spleen. We found <10% variation between the two. Indeed, a close correlation in chimerism between spleen and peripheral blood of allophenics has been previously described (12). We therefore used peripheral blood to assess chimerism because it minimized both trauma to the mice and the possibility that the course of disease would be altered by experimental manipulation.
Studies of Infected Mice.
Virus recovery was determined by infectious center assays (14– 16) using XC cell plaque assays in SC-1 cells for ecotropic MuLV, and immunofluorescent focus induction using monoclonal antibody 514 (17) in Mus dunni cells (18) for mink cell focus-forming (MCF) MuLV.
mRNA for BM5 defective (BM5def) was detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR using primers and the probe described previously (19, 20). PCR products were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization with fluorescein-labeled probes. To control for quantitative and qualitative variability of cDNAs, the housekeeping gene hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) was transcribed and amplified for all samples. To determine the relative expression of BM5def in different samples, we established standard curves for HPRT and BM5def by titration of cDNA samples prepared from spleens of mice infected with LP-BM5 virus that had the highest signals for BM5def or HPRT expression in initial screening. Amplification of HPRT for 24 cycles and of BM5def for 23 cycles gave linear correlations between the amounts of template cDNAs and PCR products (Fig.1). The intensity of hybridizing bands was determined by densitometric scanning (Hewlett-Packard Scanner; Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA) (21). Data represent differences in transcript levels normalized to HPRT expression and compared to a positive control (cDNA prepared from RNA of B6 spleen 4 wk after inoculation with LP-BM5 MuLV). Relative values are presented as follows: ++++ = 100% of control; +++ = 70–90%; ++ = 40–60%; + = 10–30%; trace = <10%; – = undetectable.
For mice studied at more than one time point, the first sample was from a hemisplenectomy, the second sample was from the residual spleen, and the third sample was from lymph node.
Statistical Analysis.
The initial study determined time to lymphadenopathy and time to death following infection of unmanipulated B6
Four mice with <50% PBL of 129 origin developed lymphadenopathy and died in a time course similar to that of fully susceptible B6 mice. Only the allophenic harboring 68% PBL of 129 origin failed to develop disease (Fig. 2, A and B). 10 additional B6
strain B) bear cells of two different genotypes, with individual cells deriving from and expressing the characteristics of one donor strain or the other, but not of both, as in an F1 animal. We used as the susceptible donor the prototypic MAIDS-sensitive strain, C57BL/6 (B6). The 129/SvJ (129) and A/J strains were selected as resistant donors because they failed to exhibit any signs of disease for
38 wk after infection.
![]()
Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Generation of Allophenic Mice and Determination of Lymphoid Chimerism.
The allophenic mice were constructed either by embryo fusion at the four to eight cell stage of development in the case of B6
A/J allophenics, or by injection of embryonic stem cells into a blastocyst in the case of the B6
129 allophenics (7–9).
129 allophenics was determined from tail blood samples obtained before infection. PBL were obtained from heparinized blood, and isolated on Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane Labs. Ltd., Hornby, Ontario, Canada) cushions, stained with fluorescent antibodies to the cell surface antigen Ly-9.1 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and analyzed on a cell sorter (FACS® 440; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). B6 mice do not express Ly-9.1 (10, 11).
A/J allophenics was determined from tail blood samples by subtracting the percent of H-2Db- expressing cells from total cells. H2-Db, expressed on cells of B6 but not A/J origin, was detected with a biotin-labeled mAb (PharMingen) and APC-avidin (Southern Biotechnology Assoc., Birmingham, AL) by flow cytometry.
Mice were judged to have MAIDS on the basis of progressive lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly and changes in cellular populations and cell surface antigens characteristic of MAIDS: the development of a B220 dull population of cells, excessive numbers of CD11b (Mac-1)+ cells, and the emergence of a CD4+, Thy 1.2– population of cells (13). Because spleen biopsies were performed, spleen weights at death are not presented, as they would not provide an accurate measure of lymphoproliferation.
The statistical significance of the association between
50% lymphocytes of resistant strain origin and development of disease, and >50% lymphocytes of resistant strain origin and resistance to disease was assessed by Fisher's Exact Test (StactXact3 software; CYTEL Software Corporation, Cambridge, MA).
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Studies of Time to Disease or Death in Unmanipulated B6
29 Mice Infected with LP-BM5 MuLV.
We first asked whether induction of MAIDS could be controlled by the presence of cells from the 129 strain of inbred mice. 129 mice are of the Fv-1nr (22) genotype and therefore restrict replication of the B-tropic helper viruses in LP-BM5 MuLV. Furthermore, they are also resistant to MAIDS development following infection with BM5def pseudotyped with a N-tropic helper virus (23); the mechanism of this resistance is not known.
129 allophenics. To meaningfully assess these two clinical endpoints of infection, mice were not subjected to procedures such as splenic biopsy which have an impact on the course of viral disease (Sechler, J.M.G., and A.S. Rosenberg, unpublished observation). Instead, the mice were bled only after development of lymphadenopathy for assessment of cellular populations indicative of MAIDS.
129 mice with primarily B6 PBL also developed lymphadenopathy secondary to MAIDS in the same time frame as B6 mice, whereas 6 mice with 57–82% 129 PBL never developed lymphadenopathy and remained healthy (Fig. 2 C). Association between development of disease and having
50% of lymphocytes of resistant strain origin, and resisting disease and having >50% of lymphocytes of resistant strain origin, was highly significant (P = 0.0002 by Fisher's Exact Test).
|
60%, as suggested by the susceptible mouse with 62% 129 cells and three resistant mice with 57–59% of PBL from strain 129.
Serial Studies of B6
129 Mice Infected with LP-BM5 MuLV.
To develop an understanding of the relationships among percent chimerism, virus expression, and development of MAIDS, we studied a series of B6
129 mice by examining splenic biopsies taken soon after infection for the presence of the three viruses that make up the LP-BM5 virus mixture and then observing the mice for development of disease; some mice were biopsied serially (Table 1). Mice were identified at autopsy as having MAIDS or not by gross observations and FACS® analysis of lymphoid tissues. While all allophenics tested 4 wk after inoculation expressed infectious ecotropic MuLV indicating successful infection of all animals, recovery of infectious MCF MuLV was less common and generally correlated with high expression of BM5def.
|
The B6
129 mouse with 59% 129 cells studied at three timepoints after infection is of special interest. Tests showed that a moderate proportion of spleen cells obtained at 4 wk after infection produced infectious ecotropic virus, whereas cells recovered at 19 wk from spleen and 35 wk from lymph node produced no detectable virus. In addition, transcripts for BM5def were detected in spleen at 4 and 19 wk but were present in lymph node at only trace levels at 35 wk. Thus, despite initial infection, the burden of both ecotropic and defective viruses was reduced, and the mouse remained healthy until killed.
Long-term disease-free survival was also associated with undetectable ecotropic virus in the mouse with 68% 129 cells which was sacrificed at 24 wk after inoculation without lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. This contrasts with the high level expression of helper virus in the mouse with 49% 129 cells which had MAIDS and was moribund when tested at the same time after infection. Prolonged resistance to MAIDS was thus associated with control of ecotropic virus spread and limited expression of BM5def.
Studies of Time to Disease in B6
A/J Mice Infected with LP-BM5 MuLV.
To examine whether similar levels of genotypically resistant cells are required for disease protection if resistance is predicated on an immunologic mechanism, B6
A/J chimeras were assessed. The disease resistance of A/J mice requires the presence of CD8+ T cells and is presumably immunologically mediated (25). In addition, A/J mice restrict replication of both the ecotropic and BM5def components of the LP-BM5 virus mixture (26, 27).
PBL of B6
A/J mice ranged in chimerism from 3 to 97% A/J with 14 of 17 mice bearing predominantly B6 PBL (Fig. 3 B). Of eight unmanipulated chimeras (Fig. 3 A), seven with cells of predominantly B6 origin developed lymphadenopathy within the same time frame as infected B6 and B6AF1 control animals. In contrast, the allophenic with 54% PBL of A/J origin exhibited resistance to MAIDS until sacrifice at 63 wk after infection.
|
129 allophenics, an understanding of the relationships among percent chimerism, virus expression, and development of MAIDS was sought. All 14 B6
A/J mice with <51% A/J PBL developed MAIDS, whereas three mice with >50% A/J cells did not (Fig. 3 B). The mouse with 51% A/J cells had splenomegaly at the time of biopsy 4 wk after infection, but did not progress to peripheral lymphadenopathy by the time of a second biopsy 19 wk later, although the spleen was still slightly enlarged and had nodules. Together, these findings suggest that about 50% PB cells of A/J origin are essential to mediate disease resistance. Again, there was a highly significant association between development of disease and having
50% of lymphocytes of resistant strain origin, and resisting disease and having >50% of lymphocytes of resistant strain origin (P = 0.0015 by Fisher's Exact Test).
The relationship between virus expression and percent chimerism in B6
A/J mice was generally consistent with results in the B6
129 allophenics. In particular, the two MAIDS-resistant mice showed a reduction in the frequency of ecotropic-virus-producing cells between the spleen samples obtained earlier and later in infection. In contrast, the mice with 40 and 44% PBL of A/J origin showed little or no ability to control expression of either helper virus or BM5def (Table 2). Thus, as with resistant B6
129 chimeras, resistant B6
A/J chimeras were clearly infected, had an initial burst of virus replication, but were able to contain retroviral burden.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results suggest that a critical balance in the proportion of lymphoid cells from the MAIDS-resistant and -sensitive strains determines whether mice infected with LPBM5 MuLV develop MAIDS or exhibit long-term resistance to disease. Indeed, MAIDS was prevented or controlled only in the chimeras that had a predominance of cells of the resistant genotype at the time of infection; no significant benefit with regard to disease progression or survival was conferred on animals in which lymphoid cells of the resistant genotype were in the minority.
It thus seems possible that a race between the rate of virus spread among cells of susceptible genotype and the rate at which virus-specific effector cells and mechanisms are activated determines the outcome of infection with LPBM5 MuLV. When the proliferation of virus-infected cells outpaces the activation and expansion of effector mechanisms, the animal develops lymphoproliferation and immunodeficiency. This model predicts that disease develops in chimeras with a large pool of genetically susceptible B cells, shown to be the principal early targets of infection (28, 29), coupled with a smaller pool of genotypically resistant effector cells. In these mice the frequency of virus-specific precursors would be limited, lessening the chance that sufficient virus-specific effectors could be generated to prevent disease. In allophenics with a predominance of cells of resistant genotype, there would be a sufficient level of virusspecific effectors and/or effector mechanisms to contain virus spread and prevent development of disease.
An alternative view of the requirement for a majority of resistant genotype cells to mediate resistance is based on the suggestion that B6 mice may provide a factor such as a cytokine necessary for disease induction (24, 30). Thus, resistant allophenics may not have this factor in an amount sufficient to facilitate disease progression, or the resistant strain may provide a factor such as IL-12 (31) that inhibits disease induction. Indeed, a genetically controlled negative regulatory factor has been implicated in resistance to induction of erythroleukemia by Friend virus complex (32).
We can conclude that the presence of genetically resistant immune system cells in sufficient numbers can confer long-term resistance to retroviral disease, even though viral integration and replication has occurred. This may have important implications for novel approaches to therapy of human retroviral disease.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 1 May 1996
Revised: 18 September 1996
1Abbreviations used in this paper: BM5def, BM5 defective; HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; MAIDS, murine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; MCF, mink cell focus-forming; MuLV, murine leukemia virus.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Friedman, A., S. Triezenberg, and S. McKnight. 1988. Expression of a truncated viral trans-activator selectively impedes lytic infection by its cognate virus. Nature (Lond.). 335: 452–454.
2 Baltimore D. Gene therapy. Intracellular immunization, Nature (Lond), 1988, 335, 395–396.[Medline]
3 Chattopadhyay SK, Morse HC III, Makino M, Ruscetti SK & Hartley JW. Defective virus is associated with induction of murine retrovirus-induced immunodeficiency syndrome, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1989, 86, 3862–3866.
4 Aziz D, Hanna Z & Jolicoeur P. Severe immunodeficiency disease induced by a defective murine leukaemia virus, Nature (Lond), 1989, 338, 505–508.[Medline]
5 Hartley J, Fredrickson T, Yetter R, Makino M & Morse HC III. Retrovirus-induced murine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: natural history of infection and differing susceptibility of inbred mouse strains, J Virol, 1989, 63, 1223–1231.
6 Chattopadhyay SK, Sengupta DN, Fredrickson TN, Morse HC III & Hartley JW. Characteristics and contributions of defective, ecotropic, and mink cell focus- inducing viruses involved in a retrovirus-induced immunodeficiency syndrome of mice, J Virol, 1991, 65, 4232–4241.
7 Tarkowski AK. Mouse chimeras developed from fused eggs, Nature (Lond), 1961, 190, 857–860.[Medline]
8 Hogan, B., F. Constantini, and E. Lacy. 1986. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 89–197.
9 Bradley, A., editor. 1987. Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford. 71–151.
10 Ledbetter JA, Goding JW, Tsu TT & Herzenberg LA. A new mouse lymphoid alloantigen (Lgp100) recognized by a monoclonal rat antibody, Immunogenetics, 1979, 8, 347–360.
11 Mathieson BJ, Sharrow SO, Bottomly K & Fowlkes BJ. Ly 9, an alloantigenic marker of lymphocyte differentiation, J Immunol, 1980, 125, 2127–2136.[Abstract]
12 Warner CM, Stephens TJ & McIvor JL. Composition of the immune system of allophenic mice, Cell Immunol, 1977, 30, 216–224.[Medline]
13 Holmes KL, Morse HC III, Makino M, Hardy RR & Hayakawa K. A unique subset of normal murine CD4+ T cells lacking Thy-1 is expanded in a murine retrovirus-induced immunodeficiency syndrome, MAIDS, Eur J Immunol, 1990, 20, 2783–2787.[Medline]
14 Rowe WP, Pugh WE & Hartley JW. Plaque assay techniques for murine leukemia viruses, Virology, 1970, 42, 1136–1139.[Medline]
15 Cloyd MW, Hartley JW & Rowe WP. Genetic study of lymphoma induction by AKR mink cell focus- inducing virus in AKR x NFS crosses, J Exp Med, 1981, 154, 450–457.
16 Hartley JW, Wolford NK, Old LJ & Rowe WP. A new class of murine leukemia virus associated with development of spontaneous lymphomas, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1977, 74, 789–792.
17 Chesebro B, Britt W, Evans L, Wehrly K, Nishio J & Cloyd M. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive with murine leukemia viruses: use in analysis of strains of Friend MCF and Friend ecotropic murine leukemia virus, Virology, 1983, 127, 134–148.[Medline]
18 Lander MR & Chattopadhyay SK. A Mus dunni cell line that lacks sequences closely related to endogenous murine leukemia viruses and can be infected by ecotropic, amphotropic, xenotropic, and mink cell focus-forming viruses, J Virol, 1984, 52, 695–698.
19 Giese NA, Giese T & Morse HC III. Murine AIDS is an antigen-driven disease: requirements for major histocompatibility complex class II expression and CD4+ T cells, J Virol, 1994, 68, 5819–5824.
20 Giese NA, Gazzinelli RT, Actor JK, Morawetz RA, Sarzotti M & Morse HC III. Retrovirus-elicited interleukin-12 and tumour necrosis factor–alpha as inducers of interferon-gamma–mediated pathology in mouse AIDS, Immunology, 1996, 87, 467–474.[Medline]
21 Svetic A, Finkelman FD, Jian YC, Dieffenbach CW, Scott DE, McCarthy KF, Steinberg AD & Gause WC. Cytokine gene expression after in vivo primary immunization with goat antibody to mouse IgD antibody, J Immunol, 1991, 147, 2391–2397.[Abstract]
22 Pincus T, Hartley J & Rowe W. A major genetic locus affecting resistance to infection with murine leukemia viruses. I. Tissue culture studies of naturally occurring viruses, J Exp Med, 1971, 133, 1219–1233.[Abstract]
23 Morawetz RA, Doherty TM, Giese NA, Hartley JW, Muller W, Kuhn R, Rajewsky K, Coffman R & Morse HC III. Resistance to murine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (MAIDS), Science (Wash DC), 1994, 265, 264–266.
24 Huang M, Simard C & Jolicoeur P. Susceptibility of inbred strains of mice to murine AIDS (MAIDS) correlates with target cell expansion and high expression of defective MAIDS virus, J Virol, 1992, 66, 2398–2406.
25 Makino M, Chattopadhyay SK, Hartley JW & Morse HC III. Analysis of role of CD8+ T cells in resistance to murine AIDS in A/J mice, J Immunol, 1992, 149(5), 1702–1706.[Medline]
26 Makino M, Morse HC III, Fredrickson TN & Hartley JW. H-2–associated and background genes influence the development of a murine retrovirus–induced immunodeficiency syndrome, J Immunol, 1990, 144, 4347–4355.[Abstract]
27 Morelli L, Skamene E & Gervais F. Host resistance and susceptibility to MAIDS virus: a case of Th cell dichotomy, Folia Biol (Praha), 1994, 40, 249–262.[Medline]
28 Huang M, Simard C, Kay DG & Jolicoeur P. The majority of cells infected with the defective murine AIDS virus belong to the B-cell lineage, J Virol, 1991, 65, 6562–6571.
29 Kim WK, Tang Y, Kenny JJ, Longo DL & Morse HC III. In murine AIDS, B cells are early targets of defective virus and are required for efficient infection and expression of defective virus in T cells and macrophages, J Virol, 1994, 68, 6767–6769.
30 Gazzinelli RT, Makino M, Chattopadhyay SK, Snapper CM, Sher A, Hugin A & Morse HC III. CD4+ subset regulation in viral infection. Preferential activation of Th2 cells during progression of retrovirus-induced immunodeficiency in mice, J Immunol, 1992, 148, 182–188.[Abstract]
31 Gazzinelli RT, Giese NA & Morse HC III. In vivo treatment with interleukin 12 protects mice from immune abnormalities observed during murine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (MAIDS), J Exp Med, 1994, 180, 2199–2208.
32 Axelrad AA, Croizat H & Eskinazi D. A washable macromolecule from Fv2rr marrow negatively regulates DNA synthesis in erythropoietic progenitor cells BFU-E, Cell, 1981, 26, 233–44.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|