The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Rockland Immunochemicals for Research
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 March 2005 doi:10.1084/jem.20041852
Rockefeller University Press, 0022-1007 $8.00
JEM, Volume 201, Number 7, 1101-1112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 2525K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jelley-Gibbs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swain, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jelley-Gibbs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swain, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Repeated stimulation of CD4 effector T cells can limit their protective function

Dawn M. Jelley-Gibbs, John P. Dibble, Svetlana Filipson, Laura Haynes, Roslyn A. Kemp, and Susan L. Swain

Trudeau Institute Inc., Saranac Lake, NY 12983

CORRESPONDENCE Dawn M. Jelley-Gibbs: djgibbs{at}trudeauinstitute.org

Chronic infections often result in CD8 T-cell deletion or functional nonresponsiveness. However, to date no definitive studies have attempted to determine the impact of repeated T cell receptor stimulation on CD4 effector T cell generation. We have determined that when antigen presentation is limited to 2 d, optimum in vitro CD4 effector generation is achieved. Alternatively, repeated stimulation results in decreased CD4 effector expansion, decreased cytokine production, and altered migration. Similarly, functionally impaired effectors develop in vivo when antigen-pulsed antigen-presenting cells are replenished every 24 h during a primary immune response. CD4 effectors that are generated with repeated stimulation provide no protection during influenza infection, and have an impaired ability to provide cognate help to B cells. These results suggest that duration of antigen presentation dictates CD4 effector function, and repeated T cell receptor stimulation in vitro and in vivo that exceeds an optimal threshold results in effectors with impaired function.


Abbreviations used: Ag, antigen; ATxBM, adult thymectomized, lethally irradiated, bone marrow reconstituted; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; ICCS, intracellular cytokine staining; NP, 4-hydroxy- 3-nitrophenyl acetate; PCCF, pigeon cytochrome c peptide fragment; RS, repeated stimulation; Tg, TCR transgenic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Overstimulated and ineffective
Heather L. Van Epps
J. Exp. Med. 2005 201: 1023. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS