|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 168, 33-45, Copyright © 1988 by Rockefeller University Press
ARTICLES |
AS Rosenberg, T Mizuochi and A Singer
Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
The present study further characterizes the cellular mechanisms involved in the in vivo rejection of MHC class I-disparate skin allografts. Previously, we demonstrated that class I-specific rejection responses could result from collaborations between distinct populations of lymphokine-secreting T helper (Th) and lymphokine-responsive T effector (Teff) cells. In the present study, we have assessed the possibility that class I-specific rejection responses could also result from a second cellular mechanism involving a single population of dual- function Th/Teff cells that would not have any further requirement for cell-cell collaboration. Our experimental strategy was to determine the ability of MHC class I-allospecific T cells, in response to class I allodeterminants expressed on skin grafts, to provide help in vivo for activation of helper-dependent Teff cells. We found that class I anti- Kbm1-allospecific T cells would reject bm1 skin allografts, but would not generate help for the activation of helper-dependent effector cells that were specific for third-party skin allografts (e.g., grafts expressing Kbm6, Qa1a, or H-Y allodeterminants). This failure of anti- Kbm1 T cells to provide help in response to bm1 skin allografts was not due to an inability of lymphokine-secreting anti-Kbm1 Th cells to recognize and respond in vivo to Kbm1 allodeterminants expressed on skin, since lymphokine-secreting anti-Kbm1 Th cells were specifically primed in animals engrafted with bm1 skin allografts. Nor was any evidence found that this failure was due to active suppression of anti- Kbm1 helper activity. Rather, we found that anti-Kbm1 T cells consumed nearly all of the helper factors they secreted. Taken together, these results are most consistent with the in vivo activity of dual-function Th/Teff cells that consume the lymphokines they secrete. Thus, this study demonstrates that MHC class I-disparate skin allografts can be rejected by two mechanisms, depending on the ability of the allospecific Teff cell to secrete helper lymphokines. MHC class I- disparate grafts can be rejected by (a) class I-allospecific Teff cells that are unable to produce lymphokine but are responsive to exogenous T cell help; and (b) class I-allospecific dual-function Th/Teff cells that are able to both produce and consume soluble lymphokine.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
