The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 978K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mills, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by North, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mills, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by North, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 157, 1448-1460, Copyright © 1983 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Expression of passively transferred immunity against an established tumor depends on generation of cytolytic T cells in recipient. Inhibition by suppressor T cells

CD Mills and RJ North

The results of this study with the P815 mastocytoma confirm the results of previous studies that showed that the passive transfer of tumor- sensitized T cells from immunized donors can cause the regression of tumors growing in T cell-deficient (TXB) recipients, but not in normal recipients. The key additional finding was that the expression of adoptive immunity against tumors growing in TXB recipients is immediately preceded by a substantial production of cytolytic T cells in the recipients' draining lymph node. On the other hand, failure of adoptive immunity to be expressed against tumors growing in normal recipients was associated with a cytolytic T cell response of much lower magnitude, and a similar low magnitude response was generated in TXB recipients infused with normal spleen cells and in tumor-bearing control mice. Because the passively transferred sensitized T cells possessed no cytolytic activity of their own, the results indicate that the 6-8-d delay before adoptive immunity is expressed represents the time needed for passively transferred helper or memory T cells to give rise to a cytolytic T cell response of sufficient magnitude to destroy the recipient's tumor. In support of this interpretation was the additional finding that inhibition of the expression of adoptive immunity by the passive transfer of suppressor T cells from tumor- bearing donors was associated with a substantially reduced cytolytic T cell response in the recipient's draining lymph node. The results serve to illustrate that interpretation of the results of adoptive immunization experiments requires a knowledge of the events that take place in the adoptively immunized recipient. They support the interpretation that suppressor T cells function in this model to "down- regulate" the production of cytolytic effector T cells.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS