The Journal of Experimental Medicine
VeriKine-HS Human IFN-Beta
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1016K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pilarski, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vergidis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pilarski, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vergidis, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 156, 217-229, Copyright © 1982 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Cytotoxic T cell response to minor histocompatibility antigens: apparent lack of H-2 restriction in killers stimulated by membrane fragments

LM Pilarski and D Vergidis

The secondary cytotoxic T cell response of BALB/c to B10.D2 or DBA/2 minor histocompatibility antigens in vitro requires the participation of an adherent cell. Nylon wool-passed spleen cells were only able to respond to nonadherent intact stimulator cells, or to membrane fragments derived from those cells, if a syngeneic adherent cell were present in the cultures. When the H-2 restriction properties of cytotoxic cells generated in response to various types of stimulation were analyzed, it was found that responses to B10.D2 or DBA/2 intact cells were always H-2 restricted. Responses to syngeneic adherent cells presenting B10.D2 or DBA.2 freeze-thaw antigen were either entirely or predominantly lacking in H-2 restriction as defined by efficient competition by B10 (H-2b) cold target cells. These unrestricted killers appeared to recognize minor histocompatibility as an independent determinant rather than as an H-2d/minors moiety cross-reaction with H- 2b, because they were not absorbed by BALB.B (H-2b) macrophage monolayers, but were absorbed by B10 monolayers. Similarly, B10 but not BALB.B cold targets were able to compete for the anti-B10.D2 killers. These experiments eliminate the possibility that the lack of restriction was due to an H-2b restricted receptor cross-reactive with H-2b. Possible models to explain these findings are discussed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS