The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Torrey Pines Biolabs
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1002K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zubler, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glasebrook, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zubler, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glasebrook, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 155, 666-680, Copyright © 1982 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Requirement for three signals in "T-independent" (lipopolysaccharide- induced) as well as in T-dependent B cell responses

RH Zubler and AL Glasebrook

The requirements for different activation signals in the generation of plaque-forming cell (PFC) responses by positively selected B (surface immunoglobulin-positive) cells were analyzed in low-density cultures to minimize the possible effects of contaminating T cells. Using this system, it is demonstrated that not only in T helper cell (TH)- dependent but also in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-dependent (i.e., so- called T-independent) PFC responses, the resting B cells have to receive at least three different signals: (a) a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-specific TH signal that can be bypassed by LPS, (b) an antigen signal, and (c) a second TH signal medicated by MHC- and antigen-unspecific helper factor(s) for B cell responses (BHF) that cannot by bypassed by LPS. Specifically, contact of surface immunoglobulin-positive cells with cloned allo-I-A-specific TH or LPS induced a polyclonal PFC response without significant proliferation, whereas contact with BHF alone (obtained as supernatants from different cloned TH, EL-4 thymoma cells, or secondary mixed leukocyte culture cells) had no effect. Only when LPS, antigen, and BHF, or, alternatively, allo-TH (producing themselves BHF) and antigen were present did clonally expanded PFC responses occur. Thus, the data indicate that both an LPS (or specific TH) signal and an antigen signal are required to render the B cells responsive to BHF. BHF seems to act essentially as a nonspecific growth factor, whereas differentiation into antibody-secreting cells appears to be a preprogrammed consequence of B cell activation by an LPS or specific TH signal.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS