The Journal of Experimental Medicine
VeriKine-HS Human IFN-Beta
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 2219K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravdin, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Guerrant, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravdin, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Guerrant, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 152, 377-390, Copyright © 1980 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Cytopathogenic mechanisms of Entamoeba histolytica

JI Ravdin, BY Croft and RL Guerrant

Cinemicrography of Entamoeba histolytica destruction of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells shows that ameba cytopathogenicity consists of separate components: a contact-dependent cytolethal effect, and phagocytosis. Cells not in contact with amebae remain intact. Quantitation of ameba destruction of CHO cells by applying the one-hit hypothesis confirms that the cytoethal effect of amebae is contact dependent. Studies with 111Indium oxine-labeled cells provide further evidence of extracellular killing by E. histolytica and indicate that > 94% of the target cells are killed before phagocytosis. When we examined for a cytotoxin release by E. histolytica, we found no effect on CHO cells with filtrates of amebae, and a nonspecific effect of cell rounding and release with sonicates of amebae. The ameba sonicate effect was time-dose dependent, was not cytolethal, was reversible, and was inhibited by alpha II macroglobulin. Cytochalasin B altered ameba motility and morphology, and monolayer experiments confirmed that cytochalasins A, B, or D inhibited CHO cell destruction by E. histolytica. Cytochalasin D also inhibited extracellular killing of CHO cells by amebae in pellets, apparently independent of effects on ameba motility or phagocytosis. Colchicine and vinblastine, alone or in combination with cytochalasin D, did not inhibit E. histolytica cytopathogenicity, which indicates that microtubule function is not required for target cell killing by amebae.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS